2 "parter"...
1. At what age did you lose your "innocence"?
2. Do you think cgy at bos nhl goes over 5.5 tonight?
1) Age 15
2) Sorry but please understand I am going to be late on many of these, so close to game time, but my go-to hockey guy is Biff at armadillo.com Hope you had the OVER!!! Boston is rockn' and rolln'
, and Plenty of NCAA BB action concurrently...
Let me ask you a question Goose.... Based on your 2nd ammendment post above....
Where does the right to bear arms end? Is a nuclear submarine OK for an individual to own?
What I am getting at is this - and I really have never received a good explanation....
If you were to make a list from 1 - 50 of all known weapons - a 1 being a rock and a 50 being a ICBM - where does the 2nd ammendment draw the line? At #22 but not #23? Why?
Why are guns included in the 2nd ammendment, but not a nuclear weapon?
Let me ask you a question Goose.... Based on your 2nd amendment post above....
Where does the right to bear arms end? Is a nuclear submarine OK for an individual to own?
What I am getting at is this - and I really have never received a good explanation....
If you were to make a list from 1 - 50 of all known weapons - a 1 being a rock and a 50 being a ICBM - where does the 2nd amendment draw the line? At #22 but not #23? Why?
Why are guns included in the 2nd amendment, but not a nuclear weapon?
The reason why we have never received a "good explanation" on what constitutes a valid 2nd Amendment weapon is because the Supreme Court continues to be constantly tested on these questions.
While it has generally been conceded by the Supreme Court that most weapons for "personal home defense" are acceptable there still remains arguments as to what weapons a "State Militia" can legally possess.
It continues to be an ongoing process where some individuals in certain States have, for instance, actually legally argued and been granted the right to maintain a battle tank.
Although it sounds ludicrous today it might very well be possible in the not too distant future for a State Militia to legally argue for even more possession of advanced weaponry.
Nuclear weaponry is clearly unattainable for Personal and State possession and your question as such is obviously laughable.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
