November Stock Talk II Greed is Good
next week we will rebound, but from what level is the real question.
next week we will rebound, but from what level is the real question.
I note C now at $8.42, CC's call way back when comes true in spades.
And of course GM should already be in bankruptcy, but the assclowns of Congress will try to "save" them...the circus continues...
I note C now at $8.42, CC's call way back when comes true in spades.
And of course GM should already be in bankruptcy, but the assclowns of Congress will try to "save" them...the circus continues...
I laughed last night on 5 Dimes where they had the DOW up at -130
The DOW up should never be juiced..not how the current market is trading.
I laughed last night on 5 Dimes where they had the DOW up at -130
The DOW up should never be juiced..not how the current market is trading.
wow roaring back now -40 only
big rally within 15 minutes
I mean seriously... what a joke. Anyone day trading must be just pushing buttons at this moment and hoping.
wow roaring back now -40 only
big rally within 15 minutes
I mean seriously... what a joke. Anyone day trading must be just pushing buttons at this moment and hoping.
From Roubini today:
For 2009, the consensus estimates for earnings are delusional: Current consensus estimates are that S&P 500 earnings per share (EPS) will be $90 in 2009, up 15% from 2008. Such estimates are outright silly. If EPS falls--as is most likely--to a level of $60, then with a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 12, the S&P 500 index could fall to 720 (i.e. about 20% below current levels).
If the P/E falls to 10--as is possible in a severe recession--the S&P could be down to 600, or 35% below current levels.
And in a very severe recession, one cannot exclude that EPS could fall as low as $50 in 2009, dragging the S&P 500 index to as low as 500. So, even based on fundamentals and valuations, there are significant downside risks to U.S. equities (20% to 40%).
From Roubini today:
For 2009, the consensus estimates for earnings are delusional: Current consensus estimates are that S&P 500 earnings per share (EPS) will be $90 in 2009, up 15% from 2008. Such estimates are outright silly. If EPS falls--as is most likely--to a level of $60, then with a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 12, the S&P 500 index could fall to 720 (i.e. about 20% below current levels).
If the P/E falls to 10--as is possible in a severe recession--the S&P could be down to 600, or 35% below current levels.
And in a very severe recession, one cannot exclude that EPS could fall as low as $50 in 2009, dragging the S&P 500 index to as low as 500. So, even based on fundamentals and valuations, there are significant downside risks to U.S. equities (20% to 40%).
Paulson made the following comments late in the day-
FED has stabilized the banking system
FED says new TARP plan will help banks keep lending
FED says buying illiquid assets not off the table.
THAT sent the market screaming higher IMO
Paulson made the following comments late in the day-
FED has stabilized the banking system
FED says new TARP plan will help banks keep lending
FED says buying illiquid assets not off the table.
THAT sent the market screaming higher IMO
Beware, therefore, of those who tell you that we have reached a
bottom for risky financial assets. The same optimists told you that we
reached a bottom and the worst was behind us after the rescue of the
creditors of Bear Stearns in March; after the announcement of the
possible bailout of Fannie and Freddie in July; after the actual
bailout of Fannie and Freddie in September; after the bailout of AIG
In each case, the optimists argued that the latest crisis and rescue policy response was the cathartic event that signaled the bottom of the crisis and the recovery of markets. They were wrong literally at least six times in a row as the crisis--as I have consistently predicted over the last year--became worse and worse. So enough of the excessive optimism that has been proved wrong at least six times in the last eight months alone.
Beware, therefore, of those who tell you that we have reached a
bottom for risky financial assets. The same optimists told you that we
reached a bottom and the worst was behind us after the rescue of the
creditors of Bear Stearns in March; after the announcement of the
possible bailout of Fannie and Freddie in July; after the actual
bailout of Fannie and Freddie in September; after the bailout of AIG
In each case, the optimists argued that the latest crisis and rescue policy response was the cathartic event that signaled the bottom of the crisis and the recovery of markets. They were wrong literally at least six times in a row as the crisis--as I have consistently predicted over the last year--became worse and worse. So enough of the excessive optimism that has been proved wrong at least six times in the last eight months alone.
I think I found why the move came in.
Paulson made the following comments late in the day-
FED has stabilized the banking system
FED says new TARP plan will help banks keep lending
FED says buying illiquid assets not off the table.
THAT sent the market screaming higher IMO
I believe now more than ever they are bailing out the auto's. 3-5 million jobs need confidence to spend money at christmas. that paulson is a slick cat. 1-2 punch, get money out to borrow and secure people will have jobs = X-MAS propped up. market can run off of those numbers. X-mas is the biggest indicator of consumer spending. if they dont do there both X-mas numbers will Look awful. It buys them time to figure out what will really fix our economy or better yet let hank leave treasury on a high note.
I think I found why the move came in.
Paulson made the following comments late in the day-
FED has stabilized the banking system
FED says new TARP plan will help banks keep lending
FED says buying illiquid assets not off the table.
THAT sent the market screaming higher IMO
I believe now more than ever they are bailing out the auto's. 3-5 million jobs need confidence to spend money at christmas. that paulson is a slick cat. 1-2 punch, get money out to borrow and secure people will have jobs = X-MAS propped up. market can run off of those numbers. X-mas is the biggest indicator of consumer spending. if they dont do there both X-mas numbers will Look awful. It buys them time to figure out what will really fix our economy or better yet let hank leave treasury on a high note.
I think we continue to rally more. not huge numbers like today. what was today an 800 pt reversal just another day in the markets lol
I think we continue to rally more. not huge numbers like today. what was today an 800 pt reversal just another day in the markets lol
Hot Forum Topics
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,047
- Saturday 09/26/2026 517
- PART DEUX 196
- All About streak Survivor! 5,911
- NFL LOCKED IN! 100,643
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,416
- Saturday Football 11,899
- **$$$ MD Saturday 9/26 $$$** 7,093
- ***Macwesties * Sat. Sept. 26, 2026 * Week #4 * NCAAF College Football Plays*** 5,717
- POY: Clemson +1 at Cal 6,380
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
