956 Pittsburgh Pirates (F. Liriano) -1 RL, +109 --- Risk 1.50% of Bankroll
for those waiting for the actual -1 line, you can manufacture it as following:
1.38 Units Pirates ML (-138)
1 Units Pirates -1.5 (+160)
You lose 2.38 units if they lose. You make 0 if they win. You make. 2.60 units if they win by 2 or more.
This is what I did. I would be very surprised to see the -1 RL at plus money tomorrow. According to my calculations (estimates), it should be about -120.
0
POD for tomorrow:
956 Pittsburgh Pirates (F. Liriano) -1 RL, +109 --- Risk 1.50% of Bankroll
for those waiting for the actual -1 line, you can manufacture it as following:
1.38 Units Pirates ML (-138)
1 Units Pirates -1.5 (+160)
You lose 2.38 units if they lose. You make 0 if they win. You make. 2.60 units if they win by 2 or more.
This is what I did. I would be very surprised to see the -1 RL at plus money tomorrow. According to my calculations (estimates), it should be about -120.
Playing so many games a day,you're bound to run into these uncapable results
I play the games that make sense according to my system. Really, the more plays the better as the results will be more statistically significant.
I average 3-5 plays per day. Once you account for sides vs. run totals… that equates to about 15% of the card each day. That is not very much at all in the grand scheme of things.
And… on a side note… find me the number of times that a team has come back from a 3 run deficit with 1 out in the 9th and nobody on.
hint: it has absolutely ZERO to do with how many games I bet on a daily basis.
If you are going to be critical, then post your own plays and compare your performance to mine come October. The goal is to win over the long run, and you don't do that by arbitrarily capping the number of plays you can wager on per day.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:
Playing so many games a day,you're bound to run into these uncapable results
I play the games that make sense according to my system. Really, the more plays the better as the results will be more statistically significant.
I average 3-5 plays per day. Once you account for sides vs. run totals… that equates to about 15% of the card each day. That is not very much at all in the grand scheme of things.
And… on a side note… find me the number of times that a team has come back from a 3 run deficit with 1 out in the 9th and nobody on.
hint: it has absolutely ZERO to do with how many games I bet on a daily basis.
If you are going to be critical, then post your own plays and compare your performance to mine come October. The goal is to win over the long run, and you don't do that by arbitrarily capping the number of plays you can wager on per day.
The more game you bet the odds increase of something going wrong.That's why the casino offers parlays.You must learn to accept the good with the bad when gambling.
0
The more game you bet the odds increase of something going wrong.That's why the casino offers parlays.You must learn to accept the good with the bad when gambling.
The more game you bet the odds increase of something going wrong.That's why the casino offers parlays.You must learn to accept the good with the bad when gambling.
hmmm. well show me where I rely on parlays for my payouts.
Also, you are completely incorrect with your first statement. In fact, the more games you bet, the more the "luck" or extreme events average out.
Try again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:
The more game you bet the odds increase of something going wrong.That's why the casino offers parlays.You must learn to accept the good with the bad when gambling.
hmmm. well show me where I rely on parlays for my payouts.
Also, you are completely incorrect with your first statement. In fact, the more games you bet, the more the "luck" or extreme events average out.
moreover, i track the "good" with the "bad". It guides my capping decisions. You cannot place wagers and not track your results. There is valuable learning material embedded in every wager you place, as well as the wagers you do not place.
I feel you have me mistaken for something that I am not. I am about as diligent as they come.
All I know is I post my picks every day. You do not. I respect anyone who posts daily and keeps a REAL record with return on risk. It's hard to take someone seriously when they have zero track record… no documentation of expressing a view on a daily basis.
0
moreover, i track the "good" with the "bad". It guides my capping decisions. You cannot place wagers and not track your results. There is valuable learning material embedded in every wager you place, as well as the wagers you do not place.
I feel you have me mistaken for something that I am not. I am about as diligent as they come.
All I know is I post my picks every day. You do not. I respect anyone who posts daily and keeps a REAL record with return on risk. It's hard to take someone seriously when they have zero track record… no documentation of expressing a view on a daily basis.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.