Continued....Click on show more....Denvedder #52 on King of Covers.....he doesn't play every day...he doesn't play many games....usually 1 at best....today 2...picks are Milwaukee ML and Under 10.5 in Pittsburgh vs Colorado game....his record very impressive....actually unbelievable....he went 2 for 2 yesterday with Philadelphia ML and Dodgers ML yesterday...cheers
This is the last time I’ll visit this prick’s thread.
There’s a reason he has a nearly 500 record. He literally flips coins. The Reds have a 56.6% chance of losing or pushing this bet. And nobody playing for $100 has built their own computer programs and secret spreadsheets. Somebody has to throw the flag on this scrub. Don’t fall for his b.s. He’s a 500 coin flipper
You're most welcome hunnid...boy oh boy....just trying to help....gambling is tough at the best of days....very hard hobby to stay in the green....all I'm trying to point out that he's a great capper with a an amazing documented record which stands at 37-4....I will repeat that he plays sparingly...not every day....usually 1 pick....the key here is that he is very disciplined....most of like to play daily and play multiple picks....sometimes he doesn't post for days.....very selective and disciplined....definitely the ultimate strength to this game of gambling...best of luck ...cheers
All due respect Kaufee....who a guy chooses to follow is kinda their business. I looked and I didn't see anyone deliberately disrespecting you. I really do respect your willingness to post your plays and 'put yourself out there' so to speak but......I highly doubt Key is going to engage in a childish back and forth. Many have tried...believe me. I do have a simple yes or no question, and this isn't defending key. In fact he would probably tell me to please stay off his side. Yes or No....you recently posted a bunch of -130 and -140 favorites that lost. Correct?
rutro George
@Natty68
He completely disrespected me in his thread yesterday, calling me out for laying -1.
He gave some BS breakdown that sounded like there were only 3 possible outcomes at -1 and implied that all have a 33.3% chance. That is ludicrous. The implied probability that I would’ve won that bet was 57% and I had a 65% of at least pushing.
It did lose, but his math and explanation were complete b.s. He’s misleading people and personally singled me out.
He provided stupid 5th grade math to sound intelligent and and I don’t know why he chose me of all people. I’ve never disrespected him and I would never call someone out like this. But he asked for it.
Cinci is an AUTOMATIC scratch. Don't ever get lied to about that. In 5 inning games listed pitchers MUST GO.
Now and then you read some B.S. like "well, my guy took it and I lost". If that happens you need a new book because if it won he would have invoked that universal rule.
Looking at 2 others I was considering anyway and will be back shortly if I pull the trigger on one or both.
Established in 1995,
I am just kidding of course 
Hot Forum Topics
