Yes he is funny, and he is the man. Take that record and "Smack" it up (pun intended), don't flip it, but keep putting it down.
Keep it going buddy and whenever youre ready.... (I predict that you are going to be upset that you didnt get to it sooner, you know what Im talking about)
Yes he is funny, and he is the man. Take that record and "Smack" it up (pun intended), don't flip it, but keep putting it down.
Keep it going buddy and whenever youre ready.... (I predict that you are going to be upset that you didnt get to it sooner, you know what Im talking about)
IF you are 114-68 over last 26 days(pod) I believe your in the RED making money!!!
and 261-164 overall that's 61%..... break even 52.9%
IF you are 114-68 over last 26 days(pod) I believe your in the RED making money!!!
and 261-164 overall that's 61%..... break even 52.9%
A textbook example of why so many systems and people can not possibly make money at at odds wagering on baseball. Even 52.9% is incorrect in 11/10 foots and buckets, it is 53.28%. But, that is not the problem because baseball wagering on odds is more akin to odds games. Roulettte, craps, even horse racing are better examples than foots and buckets. At 261-164, as you quote, -157 would be the break even point. High odds favorites with a return on risk of 63.69% have a very hard time keeping up with high juice losers.
To quote an ancient source, "Bad wagering and bad money management have killed more gamblers than bad picks ever did."
Sorry to burst your bubble, but supposedly the idea here is to help one another win, not lead lambs to the slaughter.
A textbook example of why so many systems and people can not possibly make money at at odds wagering on baseball. Even 52.9% is incorrect in 11/10 foots and buckets, it is 53.28%. But, that is not the problem because baseball wagering on odds is more akin to odds games. Roulettte, craps, even horse racing are better examples than foots and buckets. At 261-164, as you quote, -157 would be the break even point. High odds favorites with a return on risk of 63.69% have a very hard time keeping up with high juice losers.
To quote an ancient source, "Bad wagering and bad money management have killed more gamblers than bad picks ever did."
Sorry to burst your bubble, but supposedly the idea here is to help one another win, not lead lambs to the slaughter.
Smack stated earlier in the thread that the average line for the PODS was -175. Playing everything straight up doesn't look like a winning proposition. I'll play -1 or -1.5 at times but really haven't calculated how that has. affected my return
Smack stated earlier in the thread that the average line for the PODS was -175. Playing everything straight up doesn't look like a winning proposition. I'll play -1 or -1.5 at times but really haven't calculated how that has. affected my return
then dont follow his picks then!! simple math
then dont follow his picks then!! simple math
EVERYTONE WANTS TO NIT PICK THE TRACKING NOT GOING TO lead lambs to the SLAUGHTER WITH PICKING WINNERS TAKE THE PICKS DONT TAKE THE PICKS JUST PEOPLE NEED TO STOP RUINING THIS SITE WITH NEGATIVE CRAP!! IF YOUR BETTING HIS PICKS AND IT IS 261-164 I GUARNTEE HE IS ON THE POSITIVE SIDE OF THE MONEY OR ROI WHICH NOBODY KNEW ABOUT EXECPT READING IN BOOKS EX:SHARP SPORTS BETTING OR CONQUERING RISK SPORTS GAMBLING BOOKS GIVE IT A REST YOU PEOPLE THAT ARE NEGATIVE KNOW WHATS IN THIS THREAD SO DONT READ IT IF YOU DONT LIKE WHAT THE THREAD IS OR AUTHOR IS SAYING
EVERYTONE WANTS TO NIT PICK THE TRACKING NOT GOING TO lead lambs to the SLAUGHTER WITH PICKING WINNERS TAKE THE PICKS DONT TAKE THE PICKS JUST PEOPLE NEED TO STOP RUINING THIS SITE WITH NEGATIVE CRAP!! IF YOUR BETTING HIS PICKS AND IT IS 261-164 I GUARNTEE HE IS ON THE POSITIVE SIDE OF THE MONEY OR ROI WHICH NOBODY KNEW ABOUT EXECPT READING IN BOOKS EX:SHARP SPORTS BETTING OR CONQUERING RISK SPORTS GAMBLING BOOKS GIVE IT A REST YOU PEOPLE THAT ARE NEGATIVE KNOW WHATS IN THIS THREAD SO DONT READ IT IF YOU DONT LIKE WHAT THE THREAD IS OR AUTHOR IS SAYING
ibacku-you are totally confusing me. First off-I think we should all try to help each other make money. Key is a numbers guy and agreed with you that you would be in the RED if you bet these picks straight up.I'm guessing that you don't realize that being in the BLACK is positive and being in the RED is negative. Otherwise it makes no sense with the attitude you have.I appreciate everthing smack has done and have followed along.I am always looking to refine my betting methods.
ibacku-you are totally confusing me. First off-I think we should all try to help each other make money. Key is a numbers guy and agreed with you that you would be in the RED if you bet these picks straight up.I'm guessing that you don't realize that being in the BLACK is positive and being in the RED is negative. Otherwise it makes no sense with the attitude you have.I appreciate everthing smack has done and have followed along.I am always looking to refine my betting methods.
SIMPLE MATH 261-164 RECORD FOR HIM NOT MY THREAD JUST DEFENDING AGAINST HATERS
SIMPLE MATH 261-164 RECORD FOR HIM NOT MY THREAD JUST DEFENDING AGAINST HATERS
ibacku-look at the hard numbers. Smack stated that the average line for PODS was -175. At the percentage that he's hitting Key stated that -157 is the break even point. What don't you understand ? Key has probably been gambling for longer than most of you have been alive (except me ).I don't think he's being negative-just realistic.As I said before the purpose of any forum should be to help people make some money
ibacku-look at the hard numbers. Smack stated that the average line for PODS was -175. At the percentage that he's hitting Key stated that -157 is the break even point. What don't you understand ? Key has probably been gambling for longer than most of you have been alive (except me ).I don't think he's being negative-just realistic.As I said before the purpose of any forum should be to help people make some money
and he is negative- 2100 dollars or -7 units his record what does that tell you!!
and he is negative- 2100 dollars or -7 units his record what does that tell you!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.