To pull back my stat curtain a bit here on Run Lines, you need to break it down even further than just overall teams run line wins. You're missing a key stat on the run line selections which is that when a team total sits at 5.5 and the ML is -200 or more that favored team in that situation has won 77% of the time by 2 or more runs for the entire season to date. Don't overthink the teams.
ALL my situational plays have reasoning and merit and this is a year long thing. If these YTD 's I post and update daily can remain at 63-70% win percentage at the end of the season, THEN THAT IS MY KIND OF SUCCESS.
Bill Bob Sink - If your going to post my records every day be sure to go back to my first thread so you are accurate. It's a yearlong tracking thing, not just daily. If my goal is 63-70% correct on each situational matchup trend then I will be wrong 30-37% of the time. Sometimes comes in bunches, sometimes not. Be sure to post apologizes in October.
0
To pull back my stat curtain a bit here on Run Lines, you need to break it down even further than just overall teams run line wins. You're missing a key stat on the run line selections which is that when a team total sits at 5.5 and the ML is -200 or more that favored team in that situation has won 77% of the time by 2 or more runs for the entire season to date. Don't overthink the teams.
ALL my situational plays have reasoning and merit and this is a year long thing. If these YTD 's I post and update daily can remain at 63-70% win percentage at the end of the season, THEN THAT IS MY KIND OF SUCCESS.
Bill Bob Sink - If your going to post my records every day be sure to go back to my first thread so you are accurate. It's a yearlong tracking thing, not just daily. If my goal is 63-70% correct on each situational matchup trend then I will be wrong 30-37% of the time. Sometimes comes in bunches, sometimes not. Be sure to post apologizes in October.
The fact that you would never lay the 1.5 run line is insane. Its gives you so much value because games arent won by 1 run enough to justify taking the ML.
You are banking on something that happens 28-30% of the time, I will bet on something that happens 70-72% of the time.
Most people hate being enlightened to this, so I dont expect much of a positive response.
I wouldn't even try and educate people here because less than 1% want to learn something new. Everyone here is an expert on everything.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:
Roughly 28-30% of games end on one run.
The fact that you would never lay the 1.5 run line is insane. Its gives you so much value because games arent won by 1 run enough to justify taking the ML.
You are banking on something that happens 28-30% of the time, I will bet on something that happens 70-72% of the time.
Most people hate being enlightened to this, so I dont expect much of a positive response.
I wouldn't even try and educate people here because less than 1% want to learn something new. Everyone here is an expert on everything.
Not looking for any response Grease just want the rest of the folks to know that your alleged "situations" are nothing but chalk without any statistical proof that they are situational plays at all.
And because you seemed to have difficulty earlier posting an accurate record, I thought I'd help out.
There's no one here other than you and me anyway other than a few of your thread fluffing newbie aliases and your girlfriend collect anyway so no harm done.
Have a good day.
I agree with lot of what you said Billy, but to put those numbers isn't fair even a little. No one has been hotter the past 3 weeks and if you checked his record you would see that. Problem is 3 weeks isn't shit, 3 months would be a more accurate timetable but for now lets give him the benefit of the doubt. Sensei if your not going to keep track of a record than we will assume you lose a shit load of units, that's only fair as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by billysink:
Not looking for any response Grease just want the rest of the folks to know that your alleged "situations" are nothing but chalk without any statistical proof that they are situational plays at all.
And because you seemed to have difficulty earlier posting an accurate record, I thought I'd help out.
There's no one here other than you and me anyway other than a few of your thread fluffing newbie aliases and your girlfriend collect anyway so no harm done.
Have a good day.
I agree with lot of what you said Billy, but to put those numbers isn't fair even a little. No one has been hotter the past 3 weeks and if you checked his record you would see that. Problem is 3 weeks isn't shit, 3 months would be a more accurate timetable but for now lets give him the benefit of the doubt. Sensei if your not going to keep track of a record than we will assume you lose a shit load of units, that's only fair as well.
hey bro, do these two plays fall under the same situation? since they are both 26-14.. might u explain what this situation is
PinkNRole you might have the most fucked up avatar in Covers history. How you can have Satans Eye as your avatar is very fucked up. Are you a member of the Illuminati? Satan followers and worshipers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PicKnRole:
MIL -115 (26-14 Ytd in situational matchup)
W.SOX - 125 (26-14 Ytd in situational matchup)
hey bro, do these two plays fall under the same situation? since they are both 26-14.. might u explain what this situation is
PinkNRole you might have the most fucked up avatar in Covers history. How you can have Satans Eye as your avatar is very fucked up. Are you a member of the Illuminati? Satan followers and worshipers.
you post that you have a 24-6 record. There are not 30 plays posted so how you got that I don't know. You made 6 picks that day all of which were losers.
You post again on the 13 of June a thread with no record and pick 2 winners
you post that you have a 24-6 record. There are not 30 plays posted so how you got that I don't know. You made 6 picks that day all of which were losers.
You post again on the 13 of June a thread with no record and pick 2 winners
BTW Billy Bob, Only joined covers in May and season started in April so my stats begin from April dunce. Also, if I'm going to be so shitty this season then fade every game and you should be loaded come October, right?
0
Todays Situational Matchups:
STL OVR 4.5 RUNS (21-11 Ytd Situational Matchup)
TEX RL -1.5 -105 (16-6 Ytd Situational Matchup)
TEX OVR 5.5 RUNS (7-2 Ytd Situational Matchup)
BTW Billy Bob, Only joined covers in May and season started in April so my stats begin from April dunce. Also, if I'm going to be so shitty this season then fade every game and you should be loaded come October, right?
BTW Billy Bob, Only joined covers in May and season started in April so my stats begin from April dunce. Also, if I'm going to be so shitty this season then fade every game and you should be loaded come October, right?
Your posted pick record on covers for MLB only is:
39-47
I am not interested in what your alleged record was before you joined. Mine was 113-1 BTW.
I will be keeping track daily from here on in.
Grease is
39-47 YTD
10-20 last 5
I will limit my posts in your MLB thread to just your record moving forward. Good days or bad days. Chalk or not. I will not post in your other sports threads. I will not post or reply to your kiddy club. When it appears you have learned to not mislead, pump up only your winning days or any other bullshit tactic I will leave.
I have no problem with a good solid honest winning capper. I sincerely hope you become one.
Fair enough?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SenseiKreese:
Todays Situational Matchups:
STL OVR 4.5 RUNS (21-11 Ytd Situational Matchup)
TEX RL -1.5 -105 (16-6 Ytd Situational Matchup)
TEX OVR 5.5 RUNS (7-2 Ytd Situational Matchup)
BTW Billy Bob, Only joined covers in May and season started in April so my stats begin from April dunce. Also, if I'm going to be so shitty this season then fade every game and you should be loaded come October, right?
Your posted pick record on covers for MLB only is:
39-47
I am not interested in what your alleged record was before you joined. Mine was 113-1 BTW.
I will be keeping track daily from here on in.
Grease is
39-47 YTD
10-20 last 5
I will limit my posts in your MLB thread to just your record moving forward. Good days or bad days. Chalk or not. I will not post in your other sports threads. I will not post or reply to your kiddy club. When it appears you have learned to not mislead, pump up only your winning days or any other bullshit tactic I will leave.
I have no problem with a good solid honest winning capper. I sincerely hope you become one.
BTW Billy Bob, Only joined covers in May and season started in April so my stats begin from April dunce. Also, if I'm going to be so shitty this season then fade every game and you should be loaded come October, right?
Yes it would appear that way. It is a shame I don't play or fade cappers especially ones who play only square plays and chalk. You haven't bet an underdog in baseball all year.
I follow one capper on this whole site as I am quite capable of making my own picks. Thanks for the offer though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SenseiKreese:
Todays Situational Matchups:
STL OVR 4.5 RUNS (21-11 Ytd Situational Matchup)
TEX RL -1.5 -105 (16-6 Ytd Situational Matchup)
TEX OVR 5.5 RUNS (7-2 Ytd Situational Matchup)
BTW Billy Bob, Only joined covers in May and season started in April so my stats begin from April dunce. Also, if I'm going to be so shitty this season then fade every game and you should be loaded come October, right?
Yes it would appear that way. It is a shame I don't play or fade cappers especially ones who play only square plays and chalk. You haven't bet an underdog in baseball all year.
I follow one capper on this whole site as I am quite capable of making my own picks. Thanks for the offer though.
Your posted pick record on covers for MLB only is:
39-47
I am not interested in what your alleged record was before you joined. Mine was 113-1 BTW.
I will be keeping track daily from here on in.
Grease is
39-47 YTD
10-20 last 5
I will limit my posts in your MLB thread to just your record moving forward. Good days or bad days. Chalk or not. I will not post in your other sports threads. I will not post or reply to your kiddy club. When it appears you have learned to not mislead, pump up only your winning days or any other bullshit tactic I will leave.
I have no problem with a good solid honest winning capper. I sincerely hope you become one.
Fair enough?
Great stuff Billy, you should really be a Mod. You have a great eye for SAF's. SenseiKreese .
0
Quote Originally Posted by billysink:
Your posted pick record on covers for MLB only is:
39-47
I am not interested in what your alleged record was before you joined. Mine was 113-1 BTW.
I will be keeping track daily from here on in.
Grease is
39-47 YTD
10-20 last 5
I will limit my posts in your MLB thread to just your record moving forward. Good days or bad days. Chalk or not. I will not post in your other sports threads. I will not post or reply to your kiddy club. When it appears you have learned to not mislead, pump up only your winning days or any other bullshit tactic I will leave.
I have no problem with a good solid honest winning capper. I sincerely hope you become one.
Fair enough?
Great stuff Billy, you should really be a Mod. You have a great eye for SAF's. SenseiKreese .
Just keep tracking thru October Billy Bob. You should track my WNBA as well. If you want to start since I joined in May that's fine (inaccurate, but fine). Record at the end of the year will speak for itself. Gonna keep posting YTD the same way I have since start of the season though to give readers the knowledge of how that particular situation is playing out. You can track overall any way you want way to help guide everyone if need be.
Remember dunce, posting these to help others win and let them analyze those plays on their own as well, nothing gained on my end.
0
Just keep tracking thru October Billy Bob. You should track my WNBA as well. If you want to start since I joined in May that's fine (inaccurate, but fine). Record at the end of the year will speak for itself. Gonna keep posting YTD the same way I have since start of the season though to give readers the knowledge of how that particular situation is playing out. You can track overall any way you want way to help guide everyone if need be.
Remember dunce, posting these to help others win and let them analyze those plays on their own as well, nothing gained on my end.
The fact that you would never lay the 1.5 run line is insane. Its gives you so much value because games arent won by 1 run enough to justify taking the ML.
You are banking on something that happens 28-30% of the time, I will bet on something that happens 70-72% of the time.
Most people hate being enlightened to this, so I dont expect much of a positive response.
You are corrrrrect SIR
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:
Roughly 28-30% of games end on one run.
The fact that you would never lay the 1.5 run line is insane. Its gives you so much value because games arent won by 1 run enough to justify taking the ML.
You are banking on something that happens 28-30% of the time, I will bet on something that happens 70-72% of the time.
Most people hate being enlightened to this, so I dont expect much of a positive response.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.