Taking a poll - new vs. old Covers MLB Matchup page format

Old format was MUCH better.

Why change something that was working just fine. I too liked to see inning by inning without having to hit boxscore

Covers gets it scoreboard feed from Grace Notes. Since Grace Notes changed their mlb scoreboard look then it was automatically going to happen here

Use Grace Slick instead...

Or Mark Grace 

Or Bmore suburbs  

Havre De Grace...

@BigDickHertzer

 So I think OddsShark is a better deal. At a glance their matchups page give more info. Not as much as the old Covers layout. But since both sites force you to click on the matchup, Oddsshark has better info once you click.

I prefer the old format as well. Thanks.

@ColinMac

 Old format was much better, change it back 

Old 100%

2016 stats and trends with modern format before this trash update is far better. Bring back the REAL trends and mix in with umpires/referees records with teams records during day/night in season game plays. Seems like each update this site gets less and less to be on!

Old!! Covers keep changing things that don't need to be changed...for the worse!!

"Old Ways"  Rustie

Covers is the king of giving you updates you didn't ask for, don't want, don't need and make the site worse.

Dear members and scoreboard users,

Thank you for your continued feedback on our scoreboard products, especially regarding the recent MLB update. I'm pleased to announce that we have implemented Search and Conference filters to make it easier to find matchups without excessive scrolling. Additionally, we've added a line movement feature that will display opening odds and line movement in a modal window without requiring you to leave the page. We also have some other changes in the pipeline.

Here's what's on our roadmap:
- Trending points total and team to cover
- Reinstating opening odds in the scoreboard data

Once again, we appreciate your ongoing support and valuable feedback and will continue to monitor it.

Thank you!

Old