I don't understand how the Asian line is so far off than the ML. I know that the pk -249 will push if there is a tie but it's 139 points worse than the ML. Thought that was odd.
Sorry, needed to catch up. You've answered it; the -249 is correct if you're not laying the 1/2 (no draw bet). Might sound like a lot, but compare it to other games and you'll see that's normal...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Never_Say_Lock:
I don't understand how the Asian line is so far off than the ML. I know that the pk -249 will push if there is a tie but it's 139 points worse than the ML. Thought that was odd.
Sorry, needed to catch up. You've answered it; the -249 is correct if you're not laying the 1/2 (no draw bet). Might sound like a lot, but compare it to other games and you'll see that's normal...
I was leaning more towards Stl tt o3.5 instead. Why would u recommend the fg over?
Locked in FG O6,5 last night. It's already showing 7 in many books. Burnett is riddled with overs also these two teams average last 10 games (home and away respectively) above 4,3 runs per game. But PS is another beast. Be careful.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pablo2k1:
I was leaning more towards Stl tt o3.5 instead. Why would u recommend the fg over?
Locked in FG O6,5 last night. It's already showing 7 in many books. Burnett is riddled with overs also these two teams average last 10 games (home and away respectively) above 4,3 runs per game. But PS is another beast. Be careful.
Sorry, needed to catch up. You've answered it; the -249 is correct if you're not laying the 1/2 (no draw bet). Might sound like a lot, but compare it to other games and you'll see that's normal...
Yeah, it just seemed like they would rather put out a -1/2 -150 or something like that rather than a pk -249.
Initial lean on hockey (someone already mentioned it) would be a Penguins over or TT over. Might just write down my plays to see if they hit for the first week. I would also say Kings game under but the total is at 5, not sure I like that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Baby_BA:
Sorry, needed to catch up. You've answered it; the -249 is correct if you're not laying the 1/2 (no draw bet). Might sound like a lot, but compare it to other games and you'll see that's normal...
Yeah, it just seemed like they would rather put out a -1/2 -150 or something like that rather than a pk -249.
Initial lean on hockey (someone already mentioned it) would be a Penguins over or TT over. Might just write down my plays to see if they hit for the first week. I would also say Kings game under but the total is at 5, not sure I like that.
Caps hung with IMO the best hockey team in the NhL opening night, which has to be a huge confidence boost for this young team n young coach Adam Oates . I know I said the Caps get off to slow starts but they looked really good Tuesday night. All over the caps tonight. Good luck
0
Medium to Big Play for me
Hockey YTD
1-1-0
Capitals -1.5 +135 (home opener) over Calgary
Caps hung with IMO the best hockey team in the NhL opening night, which has to be a huge confidence boost for this young team n young coach Adam Oates . I know I said the Caps get off to slow starts but they looked really good Tuesday night. All over the caps tonight. Good luck
While I'm treading lightly for the 1st few weeks of the NHL season, I'm basing these plays on the eye test from Tuesday evening. Caps gave the Hawks all they could handle and actually outplayed them for a good portion of the game. Had it not been for a few outstanding saves by Corey Crawford, Caps could have easily prevailed. Caps are a fast, talented team with a young goaltender who flashed periodic brilliance. I further feel it quite beneficial for the Caps to have competed admirably against the reigning Champs in their season opener which only provides them further motivation for tonight's home opener. Not sure where the Flames offensive production will come from and with a starting goaltender who hasn't played in the NHL in 4 years, I'm confident that the Caps will win comfortably tonight. That said, TAIL AT YOUR OWN RISK as I was dead wrong on the Ducks' game last night which I felt just as good about.
0
Coccia read my mind and beat me to it...
Caps PL (+135) Caps -1/2 1P (+135)
While I'm treading lightly for the 1st few weeks of the NHL season, I'm basing these plays on the eye test from Tuesday evening. Caps gave the Hawks all they could handle and actually outplayed them for a good portion of the game. Had it not been for a few outstanding saves by Corey Crawford, Caps could have easily prevailed. Caps are a fast, talented team with a young goaltender who flashed periodic brilliance. I further feel it quite beneficial for the Caps to have competed admirably against the reigning Champs in their season opener which only provides them further motivation for tonight's home opener. Not sure where the Flames offensive production will come from and with a starting goaltender who hasn't played in the NHL in 4 years, I'm confident that the Caps will win comfortably tonight. That said, TAIL AT YOUR OWN RISK as I was dead wrong on the Ducks' game last night which I felt just as good about.
Caps hung with IMO the best hockey team in the NhL opening night, which has to be a huge confidence boost for this young team n young coach Adam Oates . I know I said the Caps get off to slow starts but they looked really good Tuesday night. All over the caps tonight. Good luck
Adam Oates is 51. He's like the 13th or 14th oldest coach in the NHL.
0
Quote Originally Posted by coccia99:
Medium to Big Play for me
Hockey YTD
1-1-0
Capitals -1.5 +135 (home opener) over Calgary
Caps hung with IMO the best hockey team in the NhL opening night, which has to be a huge confidence boost for this young team n young coach Adam Oates . I know I said the Caps get off to slow starts but they looked really good Tuesday night. All over the caps tonight. Good luck
Adam Oates is 51. He's like the 13th or 14th oldest coach in the NHL.
While I'm treading lightly for the 1st few weeks of the NHL season, I'm basing these plays on the eye test from Tuesday evening. Caps gave the Hawks all they could handle and actually outplayed them for a good portion of the game. Had it not been for a few outstanding saves by Corey Crawford, Caps could have easily prevailed. Caps are a fast, talented team with a young goaltender who flashed periodic brilliance. I further feel it quite beneficial for the Caps to have competed admirably against the reigning Champs in their season opener which only provides them further motivation for tonight's home opener. Not sure where the Flames offensive production will come from and with a starting goaltender who hasn't played in the NHL in 4 years, I'm confident that the Caps will win comfortably tonight. That said, TAIL AT YOUR OWN RISK as I was dead wrong on the Ducks' game last night which I felt just as good about.
GL to us!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Coach19:
Coccia read my mind and beat me to it...
Caps PL (+135) Caps -1/2 1P (+135)
While I'm treading lightly for the 1st few weeks of the NHL season, I'm basing these plays on the eye test from Tuesday evening. Caps gave the Hawks all they could handle and actually outplayed them for a good portion of the game. Had it not been for a few outstanding saves by Corey Crawford, Caps could have easily prevailed. Caps are a fast, talented team with a young goaltender who flashed periodic brilliance. I further feel it quite beneficial for the Caps to have competed admirably against the reigning Champs in their season opener which only provides them further motivation for tonight's home opener. Not sure where the Flames offensive production will come from and with a starting goaltender who hasn't played in the NHL in 4 years, I'm confident that the Caps will win comfortably tonight. That said, TAIL AT YOUR OWN RISK as I was dead wrong on the Ducks' game last night which I felt just as good about.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Way too many soccer plays in here for me to digest 
Hot Forum Topics
