My capping skills teeter on the weak side so I try to watch the winning and/or popular handicappers to learn how they succeed and maybe pick up some tips to improve my game. I do not tail these people, but I frequently check their picks to see if maybe I should re-examine my own when they oppose.
Here are the results of the 5 top records that I could verify plus a couple other very popular members!
I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
Multi-unit designations are stripped away since that is totally irrelevent to one's ability to pick more winners than losers.
Also LIVE game action bets are not counted.
100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
This is neither intended to backpat anyone nor demean anyone. If you read it negatively then YOU are reading it wrong.
I don't have the time nor inclination to score forum records for everybody. But if I mistakenly missed a TOP HANDICAPPER (when all his picks scored only by one unit!) then please advise and I can take a look and update if he qualifies.
Gross units(after stripping down to one unit each pick): (Always the bottom line to a good season!)
+ 5.93 Kaufee - 7.97 Brooklyncapper* (only from May 6 to date) *Covers.search only goes back to May 6, and Google searches were futile
Net Units per pick ratio: This ratio is indicative of handicapping skill to this part of the season
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks) 0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks) 0.107 Kingcapper77 (14.88 from 138 picks) 0.097 Kaufee (5.93 from 61 picks; but well short of minimum 100) 0.058 SteveA2009 (19.54 units from 336 picks) 0.045 weeble5672 (42.34 units from 940 picks) -0.07 Brooklyncapper* (-7.47 units from 112 picks only since May 6)
Congrats gentlemen on a good start to the season!
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
7
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
TOP MLB forum handicappers of note
My capping skills teeter on the weak side so I try to watch the winning and/or popular handicappers to learn how they succeed and maybe pick up some tips to improve my game. I do not tail these people, but I frequently check their picks to see if maybe I should re-examine my own when they oppose.
Here are the results of the 5 top records that I could verify plus a couple other very popular members!
I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
Multi-unit designations are stripped away since that is totally irrelevent to one's ability to pick more winners than losers.
Also LIVE game action bets are not counted.
100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
This is neither intended to backpat anyone nor demean anyone. If you read it negatively then YOU are reading it wrong.
I don't have the time nor inclination to score forum records for everybody. But if I mistakenly missed a TOP HANDICAPPER (when all his picks scored only by one unit!) then please advise and I can take a look and update if he qualifies.
Gross units(after stripping down to one unit each pick): (Always the bottom line to a good season!)
+ 5.93 Kaufee - 7.97 Brooklyncapper* (only from May 6 to date) *Covers.search only goes back to May 6, and Google searches were futile
Net Units per pick ratio: This ratio is indicative of handicapping skill to this part of the season
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks) 0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks) 0.107 Kingcapper77 (14.88 from 138 picks) 0.097 Kaufee (5.93 from 61 picks; but well short of minimum 100) 0.058 SteveA2009 (19.54 units from 336 picks) 0.045 weeble5672 (42.34 units from 940 picks) -0.07 Brooklyncapper* (-7.47 units from 112 picks only since May 6)
Good info, I look everyday to see what the "top" cappers (mentioned above, plus a couple you missed) like, for personal reaffirmation. It gets frustrating and irritating to open threads of cappers who aren't even doing better than a coin flip. I used to post my plays everyday and I did well (close or above 60%). If I was a "coinflipper picker"...lol... or worse, personally, I would stop posting my plays. Anyway, all info is appreciated and we are all here to help each other make money and win...Peace!
5
Good info, I look everyday to see what the "top" cappers (mentioned above, plus a couple you missed) like, for personal reaffirmation. It gets frustrating and irritating to open threads of cappers who aren't even doing better than a coin flip. I used to post my plays everyday and I did well (close or above 60%). If I was a "coinflipper picker"...lol... or worse, personally, I would stop posting my plays. Anyway, all info is appreciated and we are all here to help each other make money and win...Peace!
Yep!! I had this nagging feeling I was missing somebody good but drew blanks, until you posted! Thanks!
Kinger7650 is doing quite well! He accidentally messed up his season total count on May 13-14 by one tally each but not a big deal.
I have him scored at 60-33 (not 59-32) for a nice +17.95 units!
Technically doesn't qualify enough picks yet but he will by the weekend, and check this out: he moves into TOP SPOT ahead of fubah2 with the highest "Net units/pick" ratio at 0.193 entering today!
I will repost an updated chart soon but am checking on a couple others first....
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
9
Quote Originally Posted by JoseAlonso787:
Kinger7650
@JoseAlonso787
Yep!! I had this nagging feeling I was missing somebody good but drew blanks, until you posted! Thanks!
Kinger7650 is doing quite well! He accidentally messed up his season total count on May 13-14 by one tally each but not a big deal.
I have him scored at 60-33 (not 59-32) for a nice +17.95 units!
Technically doesn't qualify enough picks yet but he will by the weekend, and check this out: he moves into TOP SPOT ahead of fubah2 with the highest "Net units/pick" ratio at 0.193 entering today!
I will repost an updated chart soon but am checking on a couple others first....
@KC_4_LIFE Agreed on funky. He is in a league of his own.
Maybe, but I don't see a YTD record posted, nor YTD units posted (when all scored at one unit only), nor daily or weekly recaps of records so I skipped it.....
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
4
Quote Originally Posted by tomboy23:
@KC_4_LIFE Agreed on funky. He is in a league of his own.
Maybe, but I don't see a YTD record posted, nor YTD units posted (when all scored at one unit only), nor daily or weekly recaps of records so I skipped it.....
Lots of work but certainly good to know for anyone following cappers.
Yep, for sure it was.
I am still baffled as to why I can't find Brooklyncappers posts on the internet for April. I can for the other guys but not his. It seems Covers.com limits their search results to a set number of threads so I had to Google and that got way frustrating.
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
2
Quote Originally Posted by ShortAsssSam:
Lots of work but certainly good to know for anyone following cappers.
Yep, for sure it was.
I am still baffled as to why I can't find Brooklyncappers posts on the internet for April. I can for the other guys but not his. It seems Covers.com limits their search results to a set number of threads so I had to Google and that got way frustrating.
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: Multi-unit designations are stripped away Deal breaker right here. Many punters don't "flat bet" and have great success.
Exactly, and me included, except for the great success part.
However we can't properly COMPARE that way. For that reason, all must be judged as if a lurker was only willing to bet one unit on each pick, which is fair.
What a person chooses to bet in terms of $$$ is only relevent to him.
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
6
Quote Originally Posted by IntenseOperator:
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: Multi-unit designations are stripped away Deal breaker right here. Many punters don't "flat bet" and have great success.
Exactly, and me included, except for the great success part.
However we can't properly COMPARE that way. For that reason, all must be judged as if a lurker was only willing to bet one unit on each pick, which is fair.
What a person chooses to bet in terms of $$$ is only relevent to him.
Quote Originally Posted by JoseAlonso787: Kinger7650 @JoseAlonso787 Yep!! I had this nagging feeling I was missing somebody good but drew blanks, until you posted! Thanks! Kinger7650 is doing quite well! He accidentally messed up his season total count on May 13-14 by one tally each but not a big deal. I have him scored at 60-33 (not 59-32) for a nice +17.95 units! Technically doesn't qualify enough picks yet but he will by the weekend, and check this out: he moves into TOP SPOT ahead of fubah2 with the highest "Net units/pick" ratio at 0.193 entering today! I will repost an updated chart soon but am checking on a couple others first....
Agree Kinger is having a good run
3
Quote Originally Posted by zircon:
Quote Originally Posted by JoseAlonso787: Kinger7650 @JoseAlonso787 Yep!! I had this nagging feeling I was missing somebody good but drew blanks, until you posted! Thanks! Kinger7650 is doing quite well! He accidentally messed up his season total count on May 13-14 by one tally each but not a big deal. I have him scored at 60-33 (not 59-32) for a nice +17.95 units! Technically doesn't qualify enough picks yet but he will by the weekend, and check this out: he moves into TOP SPOT ahead of fubah2 with the highest "Net units/pick" ratio at 0.193 entering today! I will repost an updated chart soon but am checking on a couple others first....
Here are the results of the 5 top records that I could verify plus a couple other very popular members!
I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
Multi-unit designations are stripped away since that is totally irrelevent to one's ability to pick more winners than losers.
Also LIVE game action bets are not counted.
100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
This is neither intended to backpat anyone nor demean anyone. If you read it negatively then YOU are reading it wrong.
I don't have the time nor inclination to score forum records for everybody. But if I mistakenly missed a TOP HANDICAPPER (when all his picks scored only by one unit!) then please advise and I can take a look and update if he qualifies.
Gross units(after stripping down to one unit each pick): (Always the bottom line to a good season!)
+44.60 fubah2 +42.34 weeble5672
Although these two stand out well above the rest
4
Quote Originally Posted by zircon:
Here are the results of the 5 top records that I could verify plus a couple other very popular members!
I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
Multi-unit designations are stripped away since that is totally irrelevent to one's ability to pick more winners than losers.
Also LIVE game action bets are not counted.
100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
This is neither intended to backpat anyone nor demean anyone. If you read it negatively then YOU are reading it wrong.
I don't have the time nor inclination to score forum records for everybody. But if I mistakenly missed a TOP HANDICAPPER (when all his picks scored only by one unit!) then please advise and I can take a look and update if he qualifies.
Gross units(after stripping down to one unit each pick): (Always the bottom line to a good season!)
Quote Originally Posted by IntenseOperator: Quote Originally Posted by zircon: Multi-unit designations are stripped away Deal breaker right here. Many punters don't "flat bet" and have great success. Exactly, and me included, except for the great success part. However we can't properly COMPARE that way. For that reason, all must be judged as if a lurker was only willing to bet one unit on each pick, which is fair. What a person chooses to bet in terms of $$$ is only relevent to him.
in the middle of games but happened on this... i will try read more later...i don't agree with win loss percentage of games being the MEASURE... units IS what matters .... thanks for the thread and i hope to get back and read it all ....
goldfinger 1964
3
Quote Originally Posted by zircon:
Quote Originally Posted by IntenseOperator: Quote Originally Posted by zircon: Multi-unit designations are stripped away Deal breaker right here. Many punters don't "flat bet" and have great success. Exactly, and me included, except for the great success part. However we can't properly COMPARE that way. For that reason, all must be judged as if a lurker was only willing to bet one unit on each pick, which is fair. What a person chooses to bet in terms of $$$ is only relevent to him.
in the middle of games but happened on this... i will try read more later...i don't agree with win loss percentage of games being the MEASURE... units IS what matters .... thanks for the thread and i hope to get back and read it all ....
I run threw the forum each day about 11:00 am eastern. I really like the cappers who not only put their picks up but have a well written post to back up their reasoning. I am not great at MLB but I hold my own in NCAAB. I am new here and I find this site GREAT for information. BTW does anyone here remember BigGuys.com. Somewhat similar to this site. (don't Google it unless you put sports betting in there, it will be hard to unsee some of the results. LOL) That site is not around anymore but it was fun.
4
I run threw the forum each day about 11:00 am eastern. I really like the cappers who not only put their picks up but have a well written post to back up their reasoning. I am not great at MLB but I hold my own in NCAAB. I am new here and I find this site GREAT for information. BTW does anyone here remember BigGuys.com. Somewhat similar to this site. (don't Google it unless you put sports betting in there, it will be hard to unsee some of the results. LOL) That site is not around anymore but it was fun.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.