Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify plus a few other popular members I was suggested to verify!
-- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
-- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers.
-- LIVE game action bets and pushes are not counted.
-- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
Net Units per Pick ratio: (calculated on one unit per pick)
This ratio is very indicative of handicapping skill
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks)
0.126 Kinger7650 (12.45 units from 99 picks) 0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks) 0.058 weeble5672 (68.35 units from 1163 picks) 0.052 Kingcapper77 (8.28 from 159 picks) 0.049 *Kaufee (3.08 from 63 picks; *far short of minimum 100) 0.046 Bettorific (16.22 units from 346 picks) 0.008 SteveA2009 (3.39 units from 386 picks) -0.123 *Brooklyncapper (-18.72 units from 151 picks since May 6)
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
2
Quote Originally Posted by zircon:
June 30 UPDATE
TOP MLB forum cappers of note to end of June:
Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify plus a few other popular members I was suggested to verify!
-- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
-- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers.
-- LIVE game action bets and pushes are not counted.
-- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
Net Units per Pick ratio: (calculated on one unit per pick)
This ratio is very indicative of handicapping skill
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks)
0.126 Kinger7650 (12.45 units from 99 picks) 0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks) 0.058 weeble5672 (68.35 units from 1163 picks) 0.052 Kingcapper77 (8.28 from 159 picks) 0.049 *Kaufee (3.08 from 63 picks; *far short of minimum 100) 0.046 Bettorific (16.22 units from 346 picks) 0.008 SteveA2009 (3.39 units from 386 picks) -0.123 *Brooklyncapper (-18.72 units from 151 picks since May 6)
Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify plus a few other popular members I was suggested to verify!
-- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime. -- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers. -- LIVE game action bets and pushes are not counted. -- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
This is neither intended to backpat anyone nor demean anyone. If you read it negatively then YOU are reading it wrong. I don't have the time nor inclination to score forum records for everybody, so no more requests, thank you.
Gross units: (scored as one unit every pick)
+68.35 weeble5672 over +27 units just since Wednesday
+3.39 SteveA2009 +3.08 Kaufee (does not have 100 pick minimum)
- 4.80 FunkyRufus -18.72 *Brooklyncapper (only from May 6 to date)
*Covers.search only goes back to May 6, and Google searches were futile
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
2
Repost: TOP MLB handicappers having good season!
Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify plus a few other popular members I was suggested to verify!
-- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime. -- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers. -- LIVE game action bets and pushes are not counted. -- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
This is neither intended to backpat anyone nor demean anyone. If you read it negatively then YOU are reading it wrong. I don't have the time nor inclination to score forum records for everybody, so no more requests, thank you.
Gross units: (scored as one unit every pick)
+68.35 weeble5672 over +27 units just since Wednesday
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: Multi-unit designations are stripped away since that is totally irrelevent to one's ability to pick more winners than losers.
This is so true and something people these days are just clueless about
I see guys saying "oh man im up 200 units" and it just completely undermines the term "units" when youre betting 5, 10, 25 units a game.
Units are SUPPOSED to be used to determine if your plays are profitable betting the same each game. Who cares if youre up 10 units if you had to bet 50 units on the last game to get there
I really cant take anyone serious if they dont first off track their record (everyone THINKS theyre up while very few are) and if they get crazy on unit size. To bump up to 1.5 or 2 occasionally is one thing but if youre going more than that with any regularity its just garbage. Its just low level chasing, unrealistic, and the approach of someone who wants to APPEAR up to a bunch of strangers
Nice work
@Carpinteria
You make some very good points.
Ironically the top 5 guys on the list all do the honorable thing and post their picks as one unit, but I am sure that like everyone else they also vary the amount of cash on their bets, sometimes by quite a bit, but continue to post their picks as one unit anyway.
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
4
Quote Originally Posted by Carpinteria:
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: Multi-unit designations are stripped away since that is totally irrelevent to one's ability to pick more winners than losers.
This is so true and something people these days are just clueless about
I see guys saying "oh man im up 200 units" and it just completely undermines the term "units" when youre betting 5, 10, 25 units a game.
Units are SUPPOSED to be used to determine if your plays are profitable betting the same each game. Who cares if youre up 10 units if you had to bet 50 units on the last game to get there
I really cant take anyone serious if they dont first off track their record (everyone THINKS theyre up while very few are) and if they get crazy on unit size. To bump up to 1.5 or 2 occasionally is one thing but if youre going more than that with any regularity its just garbage. Its just low level chasing, unrealistic, and the approach of someone who wants to APPEAR up to a bunch of strangers
Nice work
@Carpinteria
You make some very good points.
Ironically the top 5 guys on the list all do the honorable thing and post their picks as one unit, but I am sure that like everyone else they also vary the amount of cash on their bets, sometimes by quite a bit, but continue to post their picks as one unit anyway.
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: June 30 UPDATE TOP MLB forum cappers of note to end of June: Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify plus a few other popular members I was suggested to verify! -- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime. -- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers. -- LIVE game action bets and pushes are not counted. -- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
Net Units per Pick ratio: (calculated on one unit per pick)
This ratio is very indicative of handicapping skill
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks)
0.126 Kinger7650 (12.45 units from 99 picks) 0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks) 0.058 weeble5672 (68.35 units from 1163 picks) 0.052 Kingcapper77 (8.28 from 159 picks) 0.049 *Kaufee (3.08 from 63 picks; *far short of minimum 100) 0.046 Bettorific (16.22 units from 346 picks)
@zircon
That's a lotta work.
1
Quote Originally Posted by zircon:
Quote Originally Posted by zircon: June 30 UPDATE TOP MLB forum cappers of note to end of June: Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify plus a few other popular members I was suggested to verify! -- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime. -- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers. -- LIVE game action bets and pushes are not counted. -- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
Net Units per Pick ratio: (calculated on one unit per pick)
This ratio is very indicative of handicapping skill
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks)
0.126 Kinger7650 (12.45 units from 99 picks) 0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks) 0.058 weeble5672 (68.35 units from 1163 picks) 0.052 Kingcapper77 (8.28 from 159 picks) 0.049 *Kaufee (3.08 from 63 picks; *far short of minimum 100) 0.046 Bettorific (16.22 units from 346 picks)
One more parameter worth considering is the vig or juice Weebs is with pinnacle so gets -105 lines Are the other cappers getting similar? This is a big factor to include
Possibly a case can be made, although it's open to everyone, so it's a man's choice. Maybe the same can be said of those who pounce on cheap opening lines compared with the majority who take the lines afterr they have moved and settled. It would make zircon's efforts even more difficult than needed.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Ramanujan:
One more parameter worth considering is the vig or juice Weebs is with pinnacle so gets -105 lines Are the other cappers getting similar? This is a big factor to include
Possibly a case can be made, although it's open to everyone, so it's a man's choice. Maybe the same can be said of those who pounce on cheap opening lines compared with the majority who take the lines afterr they have moved and settled. It would make zircon's efforts even more difficult than needed.
Weeble deserves the #1 spot this season ! Great man.
Col Jim well done!
What’s great is it exposes the Posters pretending to be cappers. It’s all performance Brooklyn Capper. So with these numbers I will auto fade BKC quite often in his second half of MLB ???? straight $100 per fade and I will list these wagers in the MLB forum.
And I plan to donate 25% to the Maui Humane Society. Stay tuned…
The impossible only takes longer….
1
This sorry list is missing the absolute best…
Thanks Funky Rufus, and Damon!!
well done as always every year PHO20
Estes cmon baaaaack.
Weeble deserves the #1 spot this season ! Great man.
Col Jim well done!
What’s great is it exposes the Posters pretending to be cappers. It’s all performance Brooklyn Capper. So with these numbers I will auto fade BKC quite often in his second half of MLB ???? straight $100 per fade and I will list these wagers in the MLB forum.
And I plan to donate 25% to the Maui Humane Society. Stay tuned…
Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify plus a few other popular members I was suggested to verify!
-- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
-- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers.
-- LIVE game action bets and pushes are not counted.
-- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
Net Units per Pick ratio: (calculated on one unit per pick)
This ratio is very indicative of handicapping skill
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks)
0.126 Kinger7650 (12.45 units from 99 picks) 0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks) 0.058 weeble5672 (68.35 units from 1163 picks) 0.052 Kingcapper77 (8.28 from 159 picks) 0.049 *Kaufee (3.08 from 63 picks; *far short of minimum 100) 0.046 Bettorific (16.22 units from 346 picks)
@zircon
That's a lotta work.
good work zircon
gl to all after the first half season behind us
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by zircon:
June 30 UPDATE
TOP MLB forum cappers of note to end of June:
Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify plus a few other popular members I was suggested to verify!
-- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet just one unit on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
-- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers.
-- LIVE game action bets and pushes are not counted.
-- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
Net Units per Pick ratio: (calculated on one unit per pick)
This ratio is very indicative of handicapping skill
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks)
0.126 Kinger7650 (12.45 units from 99 picks) 0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks) 0.058 weeble5672 (68.35 units from 1163 picks) 0.052 Kingcapper77 (8.28 from 159 picks) 0.049 *Kaufee (3.08 from 63 picks; *far short of minimum 100) 0.046 Bettorific (16.22 units from 346 picks)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.