@PapaGwop
Never heard of you…don’t talk to me unless you know.
This guy gets it! Way to go BETTORIFIC
It’s gotta be tough supporting the Orioles…I wish you best this second half MLB! Aloha
This guy gets it! Way to go BETTORIFIC
It’s gotta be tough supporting the Orioles…I wish you best this second half MLB! Aloha
Zirco - much more credible if your signature, and most important references by your name…
wasn’t hung up on another grown man… just saying and suggesting. It’s weak sauce, bad look.
Zirco - much more credible if your signature, and most important references by your name…
wasn’t hung up on another grown man… just saying and suggesting. It’s weak sauce, bad look.
agree
agree
Possibly a case can be made, although it's open to everyone, so it's a man's choice. Maybe the same can be said of those who pounce on cheap opening lines compared with the majority who take the lines afterr they have moved and settled. It would make zircon's efforts even more difficult than needed.
agree would be problematic to make separations by units based on which book they use
Possibly a case can be made, although it's open to everyone, so it's a man's choice. Maybe the same can be said of those who pounce on cheap opening lines compared with the majority who take the lines afterr they have moved and settled. It would make zircon's efforts even more difficult than needed.
agree would be problematic to make separations by units based on which book they use
Rough supporting the Orioles....
Rough supporting the Orioles....
or whitesox
or the awful rockies
or whitesox
or the awful rockies
or whitesox
or the awful rockies
or whitesox
or the awful rockies
UPDATE to end of Saturday July 6:
TOP MLB forum cappers of note
MLB is a tough slog for most. You're skills are doing fine if you can generate a positive unit record!
My handycapping skills teeter on the weak side so I try to watch the winning and/or popular handicappers to learn how they succeed and maybe pick up some tips to improve my game.
I do not tail these people, but I frequently check their picks to see if maybe I should re-examine my own when they oppose.
Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify, plus a few notable popular members I was suggested to verify.
-- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet only ONE UNIT on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
-- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers.
-- Also LIVE action bets and pushes are not counted.
-- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
This is neither intended to praise anyone nor embarrass anyone. If you read it that way then YOU are reading it wrong.
I don't have the time nor inclination to score forum records for everybody, so no more requests, thank you.
Unfortunately the limits of Covers.com search function (or profile posts, or Google) makes it exceedingly daunting to backtrack and verify records of some popular handicappers, especially their April picks/threads.
UPDATE to end of Saturday July 6:
TOP MLB forum cappers of note
MLB is a tough slog for most. You're skills are doing fine if you can generate a positive unit record!
My handycapping skills teeter on the weak side so I try to watch the winning and/or popular handicappers to learn how they succeed and maybe pick up some tips to improve my game.
I do not tail these people, but I frequently check their picks to see if maybe I should re-examine my own when they oppose.
Below are the results of the top records I was able to verify, plus a few notable popular members I was suggested to verify.
-- I analyzed their posted picks from the perspective of a lurker who would bet only ONE UNIT on each of their picks that were posted before gametime.
-- Multi-unit designations are disregarded, since how much money one claims to bet is irrelevent to his ability to pick more winners than losers.
-- Also LIVE action bets and pushes are not counted.
-- 100 picks minimum needed to qualify in TOP HANDICAPPER category.
This is neither intended to praise anyone nor embarrass anyone. If you read it that way then YOU are reading it wrong.
I don't have the time nor inclination to score forum records for everybody, so no more requests, thank you.
Unfortunately the limits of Covers.com search function (or profile posts, or Google) makes it exceedingly daunting to backtrack and verify records of some popular handicappers, especially their April picks/threads.
As of Saturday night, July 6:
(all picks scored by just one unit)
Gross units:
+44.60 fubah2
+42.69 weeble5672
+27.11 Bettorific
+25.34 Coloneljim
+10.62 SteveA2009
+10.33 Kingcapper77
+7.90 Kinger7650
+3.08 Kaufee (does not have 100 pick minimum)
- 4.80 FunkyRufus
-20.23 *Brooklyncapper (*only from May 6 to date)
*Covers.search only goes back to May 6, and Google searches were futile
As of Saturday night, July 6:
(all picks scored by just one unit)
Gross units:
+44.60 fubah2
+42.69 weeble5672
+27.11 Bettorific
+25.34 Coloneljim
+10.62 SteveA2009
+10.33 Kingcapper77
+7.90 Kinger7650
+3.08 Kaufee (does not have 100 pick minimum)
- 4.80 FunkyRufus
-20.23 *Brooklyncapper (*only from May 6 to date)
*Covers.search only goes back to May 6, and Google searches were futile
Net Units per Pick ratio:
This ratio is indicative of handicapping skill
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks)
0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks)
0.070 Kinger7650 (7.90 units from 113 picks)
0.069 Bettorific (27.11 units from 389 picks)
0.060 Kingcapper77 (10.33 from 171 picks)
0.033 weeble5672 (42.69 units from 1287 picks)
0.026 SteveA2009 (10.64 units from 409 picks)
0.049 *Kaufee (3.08 from 63 picks; *far short of minimum 100)
-0.60 *FunkyRufus (-4.80 units from 79 picks)
-0.13 *Brooklyncapper (-18.72 units from 155 picks since May 6)
Net Units per Pick ratio:
This ratio is indicative of handicapping skill
0.171 fubah2 (44.60 units from 260 picks)
0.111 Coloneljim (25.34 units from 227 picks)
0.070 Kinger7650 (7.90 units from 113 picks)
0.069 Bettorific (27.11 units from 389 picks)
0.060 Kingcapper77 (10.33 from 171 picks)
0.033 weeble5672 (42.69 units from 1287 picks)
0.026 SteveA2009 (10.64 units from 409 picks)
0.049 *Kaufee (3.08 from 63 picks; *far short of minimum 100)
-0.60 *FunkyRufus (-4.80 units from 79 picks)
-0.13 *Brooklyncapper (-18.72 units from 155 picks since May 6)
(all picks scored by just one unit)
Gross units:
+44.60 fubah2
+42.69 weeble5672
+27.11 Bettorific
+25.34 Coloneljim
Good work zircon
(all picks scored by just one unit)
Gross units:
+44.60 fubah2
+42.69 weeble5672
+27.11 Bettorific
+25.34 Coloneljim
Good work zircon
zircon Looks like a lot of work.
zircon Looks like a lot of work.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.