165yds please go read what these " sharp" guys were calling me in the first page of this thread when i said the same thing you just did.
i am calling you a douchebag right now..........you are going into peoples threads after the previous game lost and mocking them........that is classless.......and if you have truly been betting 20 years, then you are a real loser dude.......cmon man......
0
Quote Originally Posted by jabaro:
165yds please go read what these " sharp" guys were calling me in the first page of this thread when i said the same thing you just did.
i am calling you a douchebag right now..........you are going into peoples threads after the previous game lost and mocking them........that is classless.......and if you have truly been betting 20 years, then you are a real loser dude.......cmon man......
i am calling you a douchebag right now..........you are going into peoples threads after the previous game lost and mocking them........that is classless.......and if you have truly been betting 20 years, then you are a real loser dude.......cmon man......
i have not mocked one person. show me where?
now go eat your popsicle and watch the game. thank you in advance.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HIIT:
i am calling you a douchebag right now..........you are going into peoples threads after the previous game lost and mocking them........that is classless.......and if you have truly been betting 20 years, then you are a real loser dude.......cmon man......
i have not mocked one person. show me where?
now go eat your popsicle and watch the game. thank you in advance.
people who bet on the under and reds........you mocked them........and then you proclaim your prophecy on this late game with the line move shit......you have no credibility dude......good night
0
people who bet on the under and reds........you mocked them........and then you proclaim your prophecy on this late game with the line move shit......you have no credibility dude......good night
people who bet on the under and reds........you mocked them........and then you proclaim your prophecy on this late game with the line move shit......you have no credibility dude......good night
show me the thread.
send me your address and i will send you a coupon for some free popsicles so you can calm down a bit.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HIIT:
people who bet on the under and reds........you mocked them........and then you proclaim your prophecy on this late game with the line move shit......you have no credibility dude......good night
show me the thread.
send me your address and i will send you a coupon for some free popsicles so you can calm down a bit.
So the general consensus is that the line moved 50 cents because nobody was betting the braves, and the books knew that a worse price would make everyone bet them?
This is seriously what is being agreed upon here?
Have I entered the twilight zone?
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
So the general consensus is that the line moved 50 cents because nobody was betting the braves, and the books knew that a worse price would make everyone bet them?
So the general consensus is that the line moved 50 cents because nobody was betting the braves, and the books knew that a worse price would make everyone bet them?
This is seriously what is being agreed upon here?
Have I entered the twilight zone?
vanzack, not that nobody was betting the braves but......
well let me try and explain and im not saying im right but this is what I THINK and have seen many many times.
i dont know if you follow boxing but i will use this example on an up coming fight.
marcos maidana +250
amir khan -300
Now I THINK this line is way off I THINK maidana is a much better fighter than +250 to amir khan and I would have put the line at
khan -120
maidana +100
but when i see +250 on maidana now I start to think why is he such an underdog and think wow the oddsmakers know something i dont and get get scared and only bet 50 on maidana but had he been +100 i would have thought " hey even the oddsmakers think he has a good chance" and i would have laid 500 on maidana.
this is WHAT I THINK ONLY. IM NOT SAYING IM RIGHT.JUST MY OPINION AND IT WAS THE BEST WAY I COULD EXPLAIN IT.
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
So the general consensus is that the line moved 50 cents because nobody was betting the braves, and the books knew that a worse price would make everyone bet them?
This is seriously what is being agreed upon here?
Have I entered the twilight zone?
vanzack, not that nobody was betting the braves but......
well let me try and explain and im not saying im right but this is what I THINK and have seen many many times.
i dont know if you follow boxing but i will use this example on an up coming fight.
marcos maidana +250
amir khan -300
Now I THINK this line is way off I THINK maidana is a much better fighter than +250 to amir khan and I would have put the line at
khan -120
maidana +100
but when i see +250 on maidana now I start to think why is he such an underdog and think wow the oddsmakers know something i dont and get get scared and only bet 50 on maidana but had he been +100 i would have thought " hey even the oddsmakers think he has a good chance" and i would have laid 500 on maidana.
this is WHAT I THINK ONLY. IM NOT SAYING IM RIGHT.JUST MY OPINION AND IT WAS THE BEST WAY I COULD EXPLAIN IT.
vanzack, not that nobody was betting the braves but......
well let me try and explain and im not saying im right but this is what I THINK and have seen many many times.
i dont know if you follow boxing but i will use this example on an up coming fight.
marcos maidana +250
amir khan -300
Now I THINK this line is way off I THINK maidana is a much better fighter than +250 to amir khan and I would have put the line at
khan -120
maidana +100
but when i see +250 on maidana now I start to think why is he such an underdog and think wow the oddsmakers know something i dont and get get scared and only bet 50 on maidana but had he been +100 i would have thought " hey even the oddsmakers think he has a good chance" and i would have laid 500 on maidana.
this is WHAT I THINK ONLY. IM NOT SAYING IM RIGHT.JUST MY OPINION AND IT WAS THE BEST WAY I COULD EXPLAIN IT.
Sir -
Let me tell you what I think.....
I THINK that if you set a bad line on an event like MLB (not boxing), you would get HAMMERED on the side that is bad. Period.
So tonight for example, the line must have been bad at -167. The line was probably bad at -145. The line might have been bad at -135. But at -110? Maybe that was an overreaction. So the line was hammered tonight on the Braves side.
If - we assume your thought could be true - and they moved the line "on air" from -167 to -110, surely they would have taken so much SF money that it would have been ridiculous. If the true good line was indeed -167, and they just decided to move it to -110 to confuse people in to betting the Braves, I guess this might have worked with a VERY small percentage of gamblers, but every big gambler in the universe would hammer the Giants.
Sorry - but that is reality. Not the imaginary world of pump fakes by bookmakers made up by people who dont understand money moves. Im sure (because of the lack of obvious info) that this was indeed a money move - that there was enough money to move the line down - and that the books are thrilled at this apparant result.
I dont believe in ghosts, I dont believe in god, and I certainly dont believe in bookie double reverse pump fakes.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jabaro:
vanzack, not that nobody was betting the braves but......
well let me try and explain and im not saying im right but this is what I THINK and have seen many many times.
i dont know if you follow boxing but i will use this example on an up coming fight.
marcos maidana +250
amir khan -300
Now I THINK this line is way off I THINK maidana is a much better fighter than +250 to amir khan and I would have put the line at
khan -120
maidana +100
but when i see +250 on maidana now I start to think why is he such an underdog and think wow the oddsmakers know something i dont and get get scared and only bet 50 on maidana but had he been +100 i would have thought " hey even the oddsmakers think he has a good chance" and i would have laid 500 on maidana.
this is WHAT I THINK ONLY. IM NOT SAYING IM RIGHT.JUST MY OPINION AND IT WAS THE BEST WAY I COULD EXPLAIN IT.
Sir -
Let me tell you what I think.....
I THINK that if you set a bad line on an event like MLB (not boxing), you would get HAMMERED on the side that is bad. Period.
So tonight for example, the line must have been bad at -167. The line was probably bad at -145. The line might have been bad at -135. But at -110? Maybe that was an overreaction. So the line was hammered tonight on the Braves side.
If - we assume your thought could be true - and they moved the line "on air" from -167 to -110, surely they would have taken so much SF money that it would have been ridiculous. If the true good line was indeed -167, and they just decided to move it to -110 to confuse people in to betting the Braves, I guess this might have worked with a VERY small percentage of gamblers, but every big gambler in the universe would hammer the Giants.
Sorry - but that is reality. Not the imaginary world of pump fakes by bookmakers made up by people who dont understand money moves. Im sure (because of the lack of obvious info) that this was indeed a money move - that there was enough money to move the line down - and that the books are thrilled at this apparant result.
I dont believe in ghosts, I dont believe in god, and I certainly dont believe in bookie double reverse pump fakes.
I THINK that if you set a bad line on an event like MLB (not boxing), you would get HAMMERED on the side that is bad. Period.
So tonight for example, the line must have been bad at -167. The line was probably bad at -145. The line might have been bad at -135. But at -110? Maybe that was an overreaction. So the line was hammered tonight on the Braves side.
If - we assume your thought could be true - and they moved the line "on air" from -167 to -110, surely they would have taken so much SF money that it would have been ridiculous. If the true good line was indeed -167, and they just decided to move it to -110 to confuse people in to betting the Braves, I guess this might have worked with a VERY small percentage of gamblers, but every big gambler in the universe would hammer the Giants.
Sorry - but that is reality. Not the imaginary world of pump fakes by bookmakers made up by people who dont understand money moves. Im sure (because of the lack of obvious info) that this was indeed a money move - that there was enough money to move the line down - and that the books are thrilled at this apparant result.
I dont believe in ghosts, I dont believe in god, and I certainly dont believe in bookie double reverse pump fakes.
vanzack dont compare yourself with the general public
YOU I THINK ARE MUCH SMARTER THAN THAT
please look around most people that bet ARE really that gulible.
i used to think like you and say i dont think theres that many dumb people out there. but THERE IS.
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Sir -
Let me tell you what I think.....
I THINK that if you set a bad line on an event like MLB (not boxing), you would get HAMMERED on the side that is bad. Period.
So tonight for example, the line must have been bad at -167. The line was probably bad at -145. The line might have been bad at -135. But at -110? Maybe that was an overreaction. So the line was hammered tonight on the Braves side.
If - we assume your thought could be true - and they moved the line "on air" from -167 to -110, surely they would have taken so much SF money that it would have been ridiculous. If the true good line was indeed -167, and they just decided to move it to -110 to confuse people in to betting the Braves, I guess this might have worked with a VERY small percentage of gamblers, but every big gambler in the universe would hammer the Giants.
Sorry - but that is reality. Not the imaginary world of pump fakes by bookmakers made up by people who dont understand money moves. Im sure (because of the lack of obvious info) that this was indeed a money move - that there was enough money to move the line down - and that the books are thrilled at this apparant result.
I dont believe in ghosts, I dont believe in god, and I certainly dont believe in bookie double reverse pump fakes.
vanzack dont compare yourself with the general public
YOU I THINK ARE MUCH SMARTER THAN THAT
please look around most people that bet ARE really that gulible.
i used to think like you and say i dont think theres that many dumb people out there. but THERE IS.
i dont think people were lined up to bet the braves that badly to drop the line 50 cents.
vanzack ,you of all people knows how much money it takes to move a line.
it would have to be millions and millions for pinny to move it. shit i think they move 3 cents for every 10 k if im right and most of the time they even move it right back.
0
Just one other thing.
i dont think people were lined up to bet the braves that badly to drop the line 50 cents.
vanzack ,you of all people knows how much money it takes to move a line.
it would have to be millions and millions for pinny to move it. shit i think they move 3 cents for every 10 k if im right and most of the time they even move it right back.
I THINK that if you set a bad line on an event like MLB (not boxing), you would get HAMMERED on the side that is bad. Period.
So tonight for example, the line must have been bad at -167. The line was probably bad at -145. The line might have been bad at -135. But at -110? Maybe that was an overreaction. So the line was hammered tonight on the Braves side.
If - we assume your thought could be true - and they moved the line "on air" from -167 to -110, surely they would have taken so much SF money that it would have been ridiculous. If the true good line was indeed -167, and they just decided to move it to -110 to confuse people in to betting the Braves, I guess this might have worked with a VERY small percentage of gamblers, but every big gambler in the universe would hammer the Giants.
Sorry - but that is reality. Not the imaginary world of pump fakes by bookmakers made up by people who dont understand money moves. Im sure (because of the lack of obvious info) that this was indeed a money move - that there was enough money to move the line down - and that the books are thrilled at this apparant result.
I dont believe in ghosts, I dont believe in god, and I certainly dont believe in bookie double reverse pump fakes.
ROFLMAO
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Sir -
Let me tell you what I think.....
I THINK that if you set a bad line on an event like MLB (not boxing), you would get HAMMERED on the side that is bad. Period.
So tonight for example, the line must have been bad at -167. The line was probably bad at -145. The line might have been bad at -135. But at -110? Maybe that was an overreaction. So the line was hammered tonight on the Braves side.
If - we assume your thought could be true - and they moved the line "on air" from -167 to -110, surely they would have taken so much SF money that it would have been ridiculous. If the true good line was indeed -167, and they just decided to move it to -110 to confuse people in to betting the Braves, I guess this might have worked with a VERY small percentage of gamblers, but every big gambler in the universe would hammer the Giants.
Sorry - but that is reality. Not the imaginary world of pump fakes by bookmakers made up by people who dont understand money moves. Im sure (because of the lack of obvious info) that this was indeed a money move - that there was enough money to move the line down - and that the books are thrilled at this apparant result.
I dont believe in ghosts, I dont believe in god, and I certainly dont believe in bookie double reverse pump fakes.
i dont think people were lined up to bet the braves that badly to drop the line 50 cents.
vanzack ,you of all people knows how much money it takes to move a line.
it would have to be millions and millions for pinny to move it. shit i think they move 3 cents for every 10 k if im right and most of the time they even move it right back.
Really? Am I reading this non-sense? Money moved the line, its that simple! There is no sports book conspiracy theory!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jabaro:
Just one other thing.
i dont think people were lined up to bet the braves that badly to drop the line 50 cents.
vanzack ,you of all people knows how much money it takes to move a line.
it would have to be millions and millions for pinny to move it. shit i think they move 3 cents for every 10 k if im right and most of the time they even move it right back.
Really? Am I reading this non-sense? Money moved the line, its that simple! There is no sports book conspiracy theory!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
