Insider, so far good money on Bos sp and ml. Line moving Bos way. How does that normally end from your experiences?
What are you fishing for here? Yes the majority of the money is on Boston so they went from Philly -1 to Boston -1. That's the correct movement
Yeah, slight movement towards Boston. Nothing crazy or out of the ordinary from what I see. Boston seems to be the public play tonight, although I definitely think you have to take any reporting of betting %s with a large grain of salt....
0
Quote Originally Posted by GBpack12:
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34:
Insider, so far good money on Bos sp and ml. Line moving Bos way. How does that normally end from your experiences?
What are you fishing for here? Yes the majority of the money is on Boston so they went from Philly -1 to Boston -1. That's the correct movement
Yeah, slight movement towards Boston. Nothing crazy or out of the ordinary from what I see. Boston seems to be the public play tonight, although I definitely think you have to take any reporting of betting %s with a large grain of salt....
It could go either way. I actually think the public is very very much on Boston with only slight line movement (PK to -1 Boston). And so based on that I would put some weight towards Philly. Vegas will take a pretty big hit if Boston covers. But they take big hits all the time, and rake it in all the time from game to game. Despite the public betting on Boston, I still give them the slight edge. But like I said, would not be surprised at all if Philly wins.
Here's what has me thinking twice about laying quid on Philly. If my paid service is correct. Seems as though they are fairly solid with getting $ %'s over the years. The last 6 teams (games) that had the $ %'s on them have not covered the spread. I don't know if it goes 7 straight, or 6 out of 7 after tonight? This may sound worthless, but using these numbers has treat me pretty good over the decades.
Fair enough, the trend of $% teams losing will be broken sooner or later. But I thought you said you have never paid for a service, never will, and win and lose on your own terms? I have the memory of an elephant.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34:
Quote Originally Posted by NBA_Insider:
It could go either way. I actually think the public is very very much on Boston with only slight line movement (PK to -1 Boston). And so based on that I would put some weight towards Philly. Vegas will take a pretty big hit if Boston covers. But they take big hits all the time, and rake it in all the time from game to game. Despite the public betting on Boston, I still give them the slight edge. But like I said, would not be surprised at all if Philly wins.
Here's what has me thinking twice about laying quid on Philly. If my paid service is correct. Seems as though they are fairly solid with getting $ %'s over the years. The last 6 teams (games) that had the $ %'s on them have not covered the spread. I don't know if it goes 7 straight, or 6 out of 7 after tonight? This may sound worthless, but using these numbers has treat me pretty good over the decades.
Fair enough, the trend of $% teams losing will be broken sooner or later. But I thought you said you have never paid for a service, never will, and win and lose on your own terms? I have the memory of an elephant.
What are you fishing for here? Yes the majority of the money is on Boston so they went from Philly -1 to Boston -1. That's the correct movement
Not fishing here, even though I do enjoy that sport. Sure it's correct line movement - how does that equate to teams covering or not covering the spread? I'm a retired researcher, these things attract my attention.
FIND JESUS / GO DAWGS / NOTHING IS WHAT IT APPEARS
0
Quote Originally Posted by GBpack12:
What are you fishing for here? Yes the majority of the money is on Boston so they went from Philly -1 to Boston -1. That's the correct movement
Not fishing here, even though I do enjoy that sport. Sure it's correct line movement - how does that equate to teams covering or not covering the spread? I'm a retired researcher, these things attract my attention.
What are you fishing for here? Yes the majority of the money is on Boston so they went from Philly -1 to Boston -1. That's the correct movement
Not fishing here, even though I do enjoy that sport. Sure it's correct line movement - how does that equate to teams covering or not covering the spread? I'm a retired researcher, these things attract my attention.
I think line movement is one factor in making a pick and one factor only. Line movement can be caused by many different things (overwhelming public money, sharp money, injuries, books messing with your head, etc.). I think the key is determine why the line is moving and using it as one factor in your decision-making.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34:
Quote Originally Posted by GBpack12:
What are you fishing for here? Yes the majority of the money is on Boston so they went from Philly -1 to Boston -1. That's the correct movement
Not fishing here, even though I do enjoy that sport. Sure it's correct line movement - how does that equate to teams covering or not covering the spread? I'm a retired researcher, these things attract my attention.
I think line movement is one factor in making a pick and one factor only. Line movement can be caused by many different things (overwhelming public money, sharp money, injuries, books messing with your head, etc.). I think the key is determine why the line is moving and using it as one factor in your decision-making.
Here's what has me thinking twice about laying quid on Philly. If my paid service is correct. Seems as though they are fairly solid with getting $ %'s over the years. The last 6 teams (games) that had the $ %'s on them have not covered the spread. I don't know if it goes 7 straight, or 6 out of 7 after tonight? This may sound worthless, but using these numbers has treat me pretty good over the decades.Fair enough, the trend of $% teams losing will be broken sooner or later. But I thought you said you have never paid for a service, never will, and win and lose on your own terms? I have the memory of an elephant.
I have never paid a tout. This is strictly an information service. I will continue to use them until they lead me astray. Hasn't happened yet.
FIND JESUS / GO DAWGS / NOTHING IS WHAT IT APPEARS
0
Quote Originally Posted by NBA_Insider:
Here's what has me thinking twice about laying quid on Philly. If my paid service is correct. Seems as though they are fairly solid with getting $ %'s over the years. The last 6 teams (games) that had the $ %'s on them have not covered the spread. I don't know if it goes 7 straight, or 6 out of 7 after tonight? This may sound worthless, but using these numbers has treat me pretty good over the decades.Fair enough, the trend of $% teams losing will be broken sooner or later. But I thought you said you have never paid for a service, never will, and win and lose on your own terms? I have the memory of an elephant.
I have never paid a tout. This is strictly an information service. I will continue to use them until they lead me astray. Hasn't happened yet.
Here's what has me thinking twice about laying quid on Philly. If my paid service is correct. Seems as though they are fairly solid with getting $ %'s over the years. The last 6 teams (games) that had the $ %'s on them have not covered the spread. I don't know if it goes 7 straight, or 6 out of 7 after tonight? This may sound worthless, but using these numbers has treat me pretty good over the decades.Fair enough, the trend of $% teams losing will be broken sooner or later. But I thought you said you have never paid for a service, never will, and win and lose on your own terms? I have the memory of an elephant.
I have never paid a tout. This is strictly an information service. I will continue to use them until they lead me astray. Hasn't happened yet.
oh ok. sportinsights or something, gotcha
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34:
Quote Originally Posted by NBA_Insider:
Here's what has me thinking twice about laying quid on Philly. If my paid service is correct. Seems as though they are fairly solid with getting $ %'s over the years. The last 6 teams (games) that had the $ %'s on them have not covered the spread. I don't know if it goes 7 straight, or 6 out of 7 after tonight? This may sound worthless, but using these numbers has treat me pretty good over the decades.Fair enough, the trend of $% teams losing will be broken sooner or later. But I thought you said you have never paid for a service, never will, and win and lose on your own terms? I have the memory of an elephant.
I have never paid a tout. This is strictly an information service. I will continue to use them until they lead me astray. Hasn't happened yet.
Insider, I agree. It's one integral part of a system I've devised. I've done really well with it winning % wise, but have struggled with money mgt/tilting from time to time.
FIND JESUS / GO DAWGS / NOTHING IS WHAT IT APPEARS
0
Insider, I agree. It's one integral part of a system I've devised. I've done really well with it winning % wise, but have struggled with money mgt/tilting from time to time.
I have never paid a tout. This is strictly an information service. I will continue to use them until they lead me astray. Hasn't happened yet.oh ok. sportinsights or something, gotcha
Yep.
FIND JESUS / GO DAWGS / NOTHING IS WHAT IT APPEARS
0
Quote Originally Posted by NBA_Insider:
I have never paid a tout. This is strictly an information service. I will continue to use them until they lead me astray. Hasn't happened yet.oh ok. sportinsights or something, gotcha
Insider, I agree. It's one integral part of a system I've devised. I've done really well with it winning % wise, but have struggled with money mgt/tilting from time to time.
cool, good for you man. And haven't we all re: tilting / money mgmt? haha. Thanks for the convo. I'm going offline for a while.... enjoy the game and good luck!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34:
Insider, I agree. It's one integral part of a system I've devised. I've done really well with it winning % wise, but have struggled with money mgt/tilting from time to time.
cool, good for you man. And haven't we all re: tilting / money mgmt? haha. Thanks for the convo. I'm going offline for a while.... enjoy the game and good luck!
cool, good for you man. And haven't we all re: tilting / money mgmt? haha. Thanks for the convo. I'm going offline for a while.... enjoy the game and good luck!
Nice chattin with ya! Be good, and GL!
FIND JESUS / GO DAWGS / NOTHING IS WHAT IT APPEARS
0
Quote Originally Posted by NBA_Insider:
cool, good for you man. And haven't we all re: tilting / money mgmt? haha. Thanks for the convo. I'm going offline for a while.... enjoy the game and good luck!
people love boston.... they believe as well as I do that they have a huge advantage with the coaching.... boston at home plays better.... and its virtually a pick em...
would love to have seen kyrie and haywood with this team... i like the over..and boston...
0
people love boston.... they believe as well as I do that they have a huge advantage with the coaching.... boston at home plays better.... and its virtually a pick em...
would love to have seen kyrie and haywood with this team... i like the over..and boston...
Tough game so NO BET Celtics havent lost at home YET and the 76ers coach sucks in the playoffs from what I can see, they just shoot stupid 3s far too much and that plays right into Bostons hands. Philly blew at least one game in Boston and I can see them winning and I can sure see them losing
Golden State takes the first game
0
Tough game so NO BET Celtics havent lost at home YET and the 76ers coach sucks in the playoffs from what I can see, they just shoot stupid 3s far too much and that plays right into Bostons hands. Philly blew at least one game in Boston and I can see them winning and I can sure see them losing
That’s right. If the Sixers win it’s because it was part of the script and ESPN told the Celtics to lose the game. Sucks for them to have to go out and act and lose a game.
0
That’s right. If the Sixers win it’s because it was part of the script and ESPN told the Celtics to lose the game. Sucks for them to have to go out and act and lose a game.
if sports wagering becomes legal across the board, commissioner Silver already stated it wants it to be known the NBA wants its share of % of all money wagered on anything related to and with the NBA...it is no longer as I quote a Kevin Costner movie "For the Love of the Game".... it is for the love of the money..... and money dictates everything... in the sports world among others....
Uh, the NBA already gets a huge cut. How do you think they pay those salaries? Just home ticket, beer, food sales? :>)) I can't prove it, but I feel it in my bones.
TV contracts. That's where the majority of any of the major sports' revenue comes from, college or pro. How does the women's field hockey team pay for their girl's uniforms, trips, scholarships, ect.? They're paid for by the lucrative TV contracts for football and men's basketball.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34:
Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:
if sports wagering becomes legal across the board, commissioner Silver already stated it wants it to be known the NBA wants its share of % of all money wagered on anything related to and with the NBA...it is no longer as I quote a Kevin Costner movie "For the Love of the Game".... it is for the love of the money..... and money dictates everything... in the sports world among others....
Uh, the NBA already gets a huge cut. How do you think they pay those salaries? Just home ticket, beer, food sales? :>)) I can't prove it, but I feel it in my bones.
TV contracts. That's where the majority of any of the major sports' revenue comes from, college or pro. How does the women's field hockey team pay for their girl's uniforms, trips, scholarships, ect.? They're paid for by the lucrative TV contracts for football and men's basketball.
Posted: May. 9, 2018 - 8:19 PM ET "Quote" 3 pages of nonsenseCeltics win tonight series ends and there's no basketball until SundayThat's no game Friday on ESPN which btw have been airing commercial on their radio station the last 2 daysAnd NOT ONCE mentioning if necessaryC'mon man open your eyesSixers win tonightThere will be a game 6 Friday at 8 on ESPN just like the commercial has said the last 2 days.
open your eyes and seek help
0
Quote Originally Posted by FeltonsFollies:
Posted: May. 9, 2018 - 8:19 PM ET "Quote" 3 pages of nonsenseCeltics win tonight series ends and there's no basketball until SundayThat's no game Friday on ESPN which btw have been airing commercial on their radio station the last 2 daysAnd NOT ONCE mentioning if necessaryC'mon man open your eyesSixers win tonightThere will be a game 6 Friday at 8 on ESPN just like the commercial has said the last 2 days.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
