All Forums | NBA Betting

Here's a writer who had enough courage to write SOMETHING about the Utah/Denver over 209 fix

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10764
Posts: 202
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #76
Quote Originally Posted by robertgould79:

It's funny Bator....I didn't have a penny on the game and was leaning hard on the Under myself...and I posted about how weird the fouls were and how fast they were coming at around the 3:00 mark in the 4th quarter. I hate to use the word "fix" as I've taken so many bad beats and tried to blame it on this out of frustration...but that game was crazy. The worst part was that half the fouls in the final minutes weren't even contact fouls to the ball handler....they were away from the ball fouls and we couldn't even see what the hell was going on. It was hilarious...the whistle blew every 20 seconds and even the players were like "What the Fuck"....kinda looking around to see who the foul was on.


 

Good description of the bullshit that was going on.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3088
Posted: #77
Quote Originally Posted by robertgould79:



And lastly brother...what the hell are you doing betting 8K on an NBA game. That's just insanity. Don't get me wrong...you may be some very rich stock-broker who pisses 8K away like nothing....then that's cool.




Hey buddy...you left the important sentence out after my comment about betting 8K being insane. I'm sorry bro...that's your business and if you can afford it...more power to you. Wish I had that kind of money....lol. 1st baby is due in June and I'm trying to get some extra cash from the books to contribute to his savings account...lol.

Sorry if I came off as insulting...didn't mean that at all. Your business is your business...my point was people that wager serious cash on NBA or NCAA that don't have a big bankroll are crazy. I'm sorry bud.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #78
Quote Originally Posted by robertgould79:

Hey Bator...I see people say you do this for a full-time living. Pretty crazy...how come you don't post plays ever? I see once and awhile you'll mention you're on a side during a game conversation..but rarely post a pre-game pick. I'd be very interested to see your handicapping style and picks someday.

 

 

I've tried starting my own thread a few times, but unfortunately they often turned out to look like THIS thread, going on and on with both followers and haters whipping up a shitstorm.  It ate into my time tremendously, much like this thread is doing tonight.  I was supposed to meet someone for dinner 90 minutes ago!

 

D'oh!!

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #79
Quote Originally Posted by ihaveherpeez23:

green machine...i ve broken 3 $300 cell phones watching some fucked up games this year including my laptop and ps3...you wouldnt believe how costly these games are on one's physical and mental health...unreal...but can resist the euphoria that comes with winning a large wager...

 

 

Geez, try holding onto a Nerf football during the tense moments and stop breaking the good stuff.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by Kaufee:

I have to side with MrBator on this one. I really do not understand how the cheating, lying, scamming referees don't infuriate more people. The game is suppose to "naturally" play itself out. There is nothing natural about an outcome that has already been decided for us. How is that okay with some of you? What ever happened to honesty and integrity?

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 4506
Posted: #81
Bator I am sure you had Golden State to get your money back on the ML tonight.  Just seems like you type of bet
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #82
Quote Originally Posted by mamatheregoes:

 

I thnk I know how you bet Bator, were you on Clips ML wednesday and Golden State ML tonight?

 

 

The Clippers?  The fucking Clippers?  FUCK NO!!!!!

 

Warriors +6.5, yes.  I also had the lame Rockets, though.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3088
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

I've tried starting my own thread a few times, but unfortunately they often turned out to look like THIS thread, going on and on with both followers and haters whipping up a shitstorm.  It ate into my time tremendously, much like this thread is doing tonight.  I was supposed to meet someone for dinner 90 minutes ago!

 

D'oh!!



LOL...I hear you brother...I've been spending way too much time on this forum as well. It's all fun though.

And I also hear you in regards to people loving/bashing you. I've been on a red-hot streak the last few weeks and as soon as I lose 2 in a row I'll be hearing it...lol. Some people don't understand this business and how picking 2 out of 3 is excellent.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #84

Quote Originally Posted by robertgould79:



Hey buddy...you left the important sentence out after my comment about betting 8K being insane. I'm sorry bro...that's your business and if you can afford it...more power to you. Wish I had that kind of money....lol. 1st baby is due in June and I'm trying to get some extra cash from the books to contribute to his savings account...lol.

Sorry if I came off as insulting...didn't mean that at all. Your business is your business...my point was people that wager serious cash on NBA or NCAA that don't have a big bankroll are crazy. I'm sorry bud.

 

 

No, absolutely no offense taken.  I knew what you meant.

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 21183
Posted: #85
I agree there were moments of that game that were highly
suspect, however, there was also an offensive interference goaltending call against Carlos Boozer, that could have easily been ignored.
 
And would have been ignored if there was a collective effort to get the game over the posted total.  So you would think, yes?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by mamatheregoes:

Bator I am sure you had Golden State to get your money back on the ML tonight.  Just seems like you type of bet

 

No moneyline, but I had Golden State +6.5 and Golden State again at halftime +6.5.  You know who I took on the moneyline?  The Rockets!  Dumb bet!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 243
Posted: #87
MrBator,

What I don't understand is why this particular game would be a fix.  I believe that you even mentioned in a different thread that the over was one of the most public plays of the week.  It was a late, standalone, national TV game and it appeared that everyone was on the over.  Could there really have been that much sharp money on the under that would have countered the huge percentages on the over and made it worth fixing the game?  I realize its not a conspiracy with the entire city of Las Vegas to fix a game, but generally wouldn't a person taking rather than making bets be the one fixing it?  If so, why would they choose this game?  Please don't take this as me attacking you or the idea that the game could have been fixed, I am just curious as someone who is a more casual (probably semi-square) gambler. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #88

Quote Originally Posted by robertgould79:



LOL...I hear you brother...I've been spending way too much time on this forum as well. It's all fun though.

And I also hear you in regards to people loving/bashing you. I've been on a red-hot streak the last few weeks and as soon as I lose 2 in a row I'll be hearing it...lol. Some people don't understand this business and how picking 2 out of 3 is excellent.

 

 

Yeah, getting that love is a double-edged sword because some of those people will hate you if you don't keep it going in the right direction.  But there's a lot of cool people, too.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #89
Quote Originally Posted by The Giant:

I agree there were moments of that game that were highly
suspect, however, there was also an offensive interference goaltending call against Carlos Boozer, that could have easily been ignored.
 

And would have been ignored if there was a collective effort to get the game over the posted total.  So you would think, yes?

 

 

One offensive goaltending call is no defense against what those three men did to slash-n-trash the integrity of that basketball game.  Uh uh.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 10769
Posted: #90
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

pucku, fuck you.    Go buy yourself a couple points and go back to sleep.

 




 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 4506
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

No moneyline, but I had Golden State +6.5 and Golden State again at halftime +6.5.  You know who I took on the moneyline?  The Rockets!  Dumb bet!

Yea seemed like a good spot for the Rockets, but they looked a step slow tonight.  I just hope you bet everything you have on UNC.  Sink Las Vegas.  It is the easiest bet in the history of gambling. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3088
Posted: #92
Aeternus2006W....that comment to Puck was classic....go buy a couple points and fuck yourself...lol.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 10769
Posted: #93
Quote Originally Posted by ihaveherpeez23:

mr bator....i do pretty well doing some day-trading as well as short-term long term holdings....these 5 companies will at least be 5 times what they are trading at now in one years time....RFMD(has nearly doubled up in month),, MU( has amost tripled since jan 09)....HIMX( another solid stock)...CRYP(solid company involved in online gaming) and last but not least...AMD(semi-conductor company poised to get back in the black.....now is the time if you have extra liquidity laying around to pump into these stocks....i gaurantee you that these companies have bottommed out and will only continue to go higher and higher...these are buy and hold opportunities....well worth investing your hard-earned winnings good luck whatever you decide to do...etrade is a great online brokerage to start out if your a beginner


E-Turd is the worst broker you could possibly use. If you knew anything about trading, you would steer people clear of e-trade and recommend a real broker with A real trading platform like think or swim.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #94
That comment wasn't from Aeternus2006
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #95
Quote Originally Posted by DrRosenrosen:

MrBator,

What I don't understand is why this particular game would be a fix.  I believe that you even mentioned in a different thread that the over was one of the most public plays of the week.  It was a late, standalone, national TV game and it appeared that everyone was on the over.  Could there really have been that much sharp money on the under that would have countered the huge percentages on the over and made it worth fixing the game?  I realize its not a conspiracy with the entire city of Las Vegas to fix a game, but generally wouldn't a person taking rather than making bets be the one fixing it?  If so, why would they choose this game?  Please don't take this as me attacking you or the idea that the game could have been fixed, I am just curious as someone who is a more casual (probably semi-square) gambler. 

 

 

The thing is, DrRosenrosen, we don't know anything.  We don't know how this was arranged, or by whom, or on behalf of whom, or how, exactly, a profit was turned by having the referees make this game go over 209.  One thing I do feel strongly about is that the public's wagering on this game (which was decidedly towards the over) was no factor in hatching this plan.  This was a great game to pick, though, because these two teams had already played two foul-filled games this season.  This one should have blended in as simply another, but the poor shooting throughout forced the three refs to call more and more fouls, which wound up looking suspicious and weird, even to casual viewers.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 21183
Posted: #96
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

One offensive goaltending call is no defense against what those three men did to slash-n-trash the integrity of that basketball game.  Uh uh.

 

It happened late in the game, with the total still hanging in the balance.

I don't really have a dog in this race, I was just playing devil's advocate.

Carry on.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3088
Posted: #97
Quote Originally Posted by Crowkillers:

That comment wasn't from Aeternus2006


I know guy...was laughing along with Aeternus2006's laughing icon.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #98
Quote Originally Posted by The Giant:

 

It happened late in the game, with the total still hanging in the balance.

I don't really have a dog in this race, I was just playing devil's advocate.

Carry on.

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17651
Posted: #99
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

The thing is, DrRosenrosen, we don't know anything.  We don't know how this was arranged, or by whom, or on behalf of whom, or how, exactly, a profit was turned by having the referees make this game go over 209.  One thing I do feel strongly about is that the public's wagering on this game (which was decidedly towards the over) was no factor in hatching this plan.  This was a great game to pick, though, because these two teams had already played two foul-filled games this season.  This one should have blended in as simply another, but the poor shooting throughout forced the three refs to call more and more fouls, which wound up looking suspicious and weird, even to casual viewers.



The Giant, i'm in love with another poster,
 thx for 7 and a weeks worth of 


THE REFS ARE IN ON THE FUCKING TOTALS

Paulsy
4/4/9
Covers Mod
Retired

 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 41530
Posted: #100
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

pucku, fuck you.    Go buy yourself a couple points and go back to sleep.

 

    WOW          YOU ARE A ASS   WHY WOULD YOU EVER BET ON SOMETHING THAT YOU THOUGHT WAS FIX ?????
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.