System is looking crazy, I'm just really angry with myself that I didn't follow more of these U/O picks on this spreadsheet, i chose LAL/GSW under and SAC/OKC Under
Looks like SAC/OKC Will be ok with the under
LAL/GSW on the other hand... LOL
0
System is looking crazy, I'm just really angry with myself that I didn't follow more of these U/O picks on this spreadsheet, i chose LAL/GSW under and SAC/OKC Under
NBA_nate My head is starting to spin! Did you check the spread sheet?
TKWSNx93 As the nerd of this thread, (and that's o.k. I learned from the movie 21 Jump Street, that nerds are cool now...) Is anything NBA_nate saying making sense?
Yes, and I am going to see if I can make a spreadsheet/calculator that his idea too
We have to be nice to nerds! We all work for them
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vapster:
NBA_nate My head is starting to spin! Did you check the spread sheet?
TKWSNx93 As the nerd of this thread, (and that's o.k. I learned from the movie 21 Jump Street, that nerds are cool now...) Is anything NBA_nate saying making sense?
Yes, and I am going to see if I can make a spreadsheet/calculator that his idea too
@NBA Nate...was following along with your efforts last night and was hoping you'd pop up here...good stuff.
Do you run those calculations through a spread sheet you've built (I hope)?
Sending a PM request through Nate.
Also, the biggest divergence tonight was the LAL/GS game, which I noted earlier in the day, as possible red flag. That game is absolutely going nuts with the over, even though we suggest it should be in the 220 range.
I'm curious if we see this as a pattern going forward.
0
@NBA Nate...was following along with your efforts last night and was hoping you'd pop up here...good stuff.
Do you run those calculations through a spread sheet you've built (I hope)?
Sending a PM request through Nate.
Also, the biggest divergence tonight was the LAL/GS game, which I noted earlier in the day, as possible red flag. That game is absolutely going nuts with the over, even though we suggest it should be in the 220 range.
I'm curious if we see this as a pattern going forward.
System is looking crazy, I'm just really angry with myself that I didn't follow more of these U/O picks on this spreadsheet, i chose LAL/GSW under and SAC/OKC Under
Looks like SAC/OKC Will be ok with the under
LAL/GSW on the other hand... LOL
yeah, the LAL injuries are too much..this one was definitely an over pick. Unfortunately I took the under, but from now on the system will take injuries into further consideration
We need to hope that GSW rests their starters or something, otherwise this is going WAYY over
0
Quote Originally Posted by HaroldG:
System is looking crazy, I'm just really angry with myself that I didn't follow more of these U/O picks on this spreadsheet, i chose LAL/GSW under and SAC/OKC Under
Looks like SAC/OKC Will be ok with the under
LAL/GSW on the other hand... LOL
yeah, the LAL injuries are too much..this one was definitely an over pick. Unfortunately I took the under, but from now on the system will take injuries into further consideration
We need to hope that GSW rests their starters or something, otherwise this is going WAYY over
System is looking crazy, I'm just really angry with myself that I didn't follow more of these U/O picks on this spreadsheet, i chose LAL/GSW under and SAC/OKC Under
Looks like SAC/OKC Will be ok with the under
LAL/GSW on the other hand... LOL
If you feel like it, you can always "in-game" some of the stats. OKC, for instance. Check the half totals, or quarter totals. They tell a similar tale.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HaroldG:
System is looking crazy, I'm just really angry with myself that I didn't follow more of these U/O picks on this spreadsheet, i chose LAL/GSW under and SAC/OKC Under
Looks like SAC/OKC Will be ok with the under
LAL/GSW on the other hand... LOL
If you feel like it, you can always "in-game" some of the stats. OKC, for instance. Check the half totals, or quarter totals. They tell a similar tale.
NBA_nate My head is starting to spin! Did you check the spread sheet?
TKWSNx93 As the nerd of this thread, (and that's o.k. I learned from the movie 21 Jump Street, that nerds are cool now...) Is anything NBA_nate saying making sense?
I just posted a detailed response but the Comp. had a fit so I'm not going to re-type it all......
basically, I put more emphasis on the last five games than than the whole year (offense + defense)
Then I simply add (last 5 game) offense numbers for both teams together, sometimes the results are a few points different.
Example:
Team 1 just played, OKC, GS, POR, TOR, LAC, and lost all 5 games. Their own teams scoring will be less than half of the total.
If team #2 is in the same boat, then both teams scoring will be less than adding both teams offense and defense together and dividing by 2.
Hope this helps,
Nate
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vapster:
NBA_nate My head is starting to spin! Did you check the spread sheet?
TKWSNx93 As the nerd of this thread, (and that's o.k. I learned from the movie 21 Jump Street, that nerds are cool now...) Is anything NBA_nate saying making sense?
I just posted a detailed response but the Comp. had a fit so I'm not going to re-type it all......
basically, I put more emphasis on the last five games than than the whole year (offense + defense)
Then I simply add (last 5 game) offense numbers for both teams together, sometimes the results are a few points different.
Example:
Team 1 just played, OKC, GS, POR, TOR, LAC, and lost all 5 games. Their own teams scoring will be less than half of the total.
If team #2 is in the same boat, then both teams scoring will be less than adding both teams offense and defense together and dividing by 2.
Not tested, but a user a few pages back claimed it worked really well. He adds ppg for the 1st/2nd quarters (1st half) and ppg for 3rd/4th quarters (2nd half)
0
Quote Originally Posted by bostonguy919:
How does this work for halfs
Not tested, but a user a few pages back claimed it worked really well. He adds ppg for the 1st/2nd quarters (1st half) and ppg for 3rd/4th quarters (2nd half)
that error. TP1=under TP2=over great night 10-1 so far2 more but 1 phew
Technically the system is 10-1, but some users (myself included) are 11-0 as we were able to get a few extra points for TOR/HOU. The system was off by only half a point with a 216.5 total!
0
Quote Originally Posted by breakstuff:
that error. TP1=under TP2=over great night 10-1 so far2 more but 1 phew
Technically the system is 10-1, but some users (myself included) are 11-0 as we were able to get a few extra points for TOR/HOU. The system was off by only half a point with a 216.5 total!
@NBA Nate...was following along with your efforts last night and was hoping you'd pop up here...good stuff.
Do you run those calculations through a spread sheet you've built (I hope)?
Sending a PM request through Nate.
Also, the biggest divergence tonight was the LAL/GS game, which I noted earlier in the day, as possible red flag. That game is absolutely going nuts with the over, even though we suggest it should be in the 220 range.
I'm curious if we see this as a pattern going forward.
Spreadsheets are a work in process...
Also have another of interest I'm working on, but It'll take a while:
Started with Toronto:
14 total games
7 on the road, until tonight, all 7 were within 10 points
Using a 2-bet system of 3-way Any-Other-Result (Covers 5 point win either way) and also the 6-10 pt win (either way) on the 7-way, would have covered all 7 games (until tonight ... lol)
Those bets are usually 2.9 odds for the <5>, and 3.2 for the 6-10, with an average of 3.05 / 2 bets, would have gotten an average of 1.525 on all 7 games.
And before tonight, 7 of their 14 games were within 5 points. A 2.9 bet (<5>) on all 14 games would have paid out 1/2 the time with an overall avg. payout of 1.45 odds.
Not a perfect system, but it may work with some teams, not others.... for example: GS, MIN, IND which have combined for 19 blowouts (16+ points diff.) in the first 3 weeks of November.
Also, don't forget the insanity at Cleveland tonight.... K. Love w/ 34 pts in the 1st Qtr, NBA record for 1st Qtr, 2nd only to Klay T's 37 pts in the 3rd Qtr last year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JamieR44:
@NBA Nate...was following along with your efforts last night and was hoping you'd pop up here...good stuff.
Do you run those calculations through a spread sheet you've built (I hope)?
Sending a PM request through Nate.
Also, the biggest divergence tonight was the LAL/GS game, which I noted earlier in the day, as possible red flag. That game is absolutely going nuts with the over, even though we suggest it should be in the 220 range.
I'm curious if we see this as a pattern going forward.
Spreadsheets are a work in process...
Also have another of interest I'm working on, but It'll take a while:
Started with Toronto:
14 total games
7 on the road, until tonight, all 7 were within 10 points
Using a 2-bet system of 3-way Any-Other-Result (Covers 5 point win either way) and also the 6-10 pt win (either way) on the 7-way, would have covered all 7 games (until tonight ... lol)
Those bets are usually 2.9 odds for the <5>, and 3.2 for the 6-10, with an average of 3.05 / 2 bets, would have gotten an average of 1.525 on all 7 games.
And before tonight, 7 of their 14 games were within 5 points. A 2.9 bet (<5>) on all 14 games would have paid out 1/2 the time with an overall avg. payout of 1.45 odds.
Not a perfect system, but it may work with some teams, not others.... for example: GS, MIN, IND which have combined for 19 blowouts (16+ points diff.) in the first 3 weeks of November.
Also, don't forget the insanity at Cleveland tonight.... K. Love w/ 34 pts in the 1st Qtr, NBA record for 1st Qtr, 2nd only to Klay T's 37 pts in the 3rd Qtr last year.
The record was what 10-3? And obviously i chose the two loses out all of those wins haha lucky me! Nevertheless tho 11-3 today! I'll try to follow this one and think of some ways how to improve it and understand it more! Much respect
0
The record was what 10-3? And obviously i chose the two loses out all of those wins haha lucky me! Nevertheless tho 11-3 today! I'll try to follow this one and think of some ways how to improve it and understand it more! Much respect
NBA_nate My head is starting to spin! Did you check the spread sheet?
TKWSNx93 As the nerd of this thread, (and that's o.k. I learned from the movie 21 Jump Street, that nerds are cool now...) Is anything NBA_nate saying making sense?
Ok, here's a better one, since the OKC / SAC game just finished...
I took a look at the google spreadsheet, nice, simple, works good I like it,
It showed a total of 202.5, and a O/U of 214, so a -11.5.
Not sure how many games this calculates, I actually had a 208.5 (Yearly), so a difference of -5.5.
But the last five games (my calculations) showed an increase from 208.5 up to 216.
Then when I used only the offense numbers for the 2 teams (5 games), I had 107.4 and 106.6 for a total of 214.
I figured OKC might be a little tired tonight on the back-to-back so I bet Under on them, but I chose to up my Under to 215.5 @ 1.74 (down from 1.90), but I still missed it by 1.5 pts.......
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vapster:
NBA_nate My head is starting to spin! Did you check the spread sheet?
TKWSNx93 As the nerd of this thread, (and that's o.k. I learned from the movie 21 Jump Street, that nerds are cool now...) Is anything NBA_nate saying making sense?
Ok, here's a better one, since the OKC / SAC game just finished...
I took a look at the google spreadsheet, nice, simple, works good I like it,
It showed a total of 202.5, and a O/U of 214, so a -11.5.
Not sure how many games this calculates, I actually had a 208.5 (Yearly), so a difference of -5.5.
But the last five games (my calculations) showed an increase from 208.5 up to 216.
Then when I used only the offense numbers for the 2 teams (5 games), I had 107.4 and 106.6 for a total of 214.
I figured OKC might be a little tired tonight on the back-to-back so I bet Under on them, but I chose to up my Under to 215.5 @ 1.74 (down from 1.90), but I still missed it by 1.5 pts.......
Ok, here's a better one, since the OKC / SAC game just finished...
I took a look at the google spreadsheet, nice, simple, works good I like it,
It showed a total of 202.5, and a O/U of 214, so a -11.5.
Not sure how many games this calculates, I actually had a 208.5 (Yearly), so a difference of -5.5.
But the last five games (my calculations) showed an increase from 208.5 up to 216.
Then when I used only the offense numbers for the 2 teams (5 games), I had 107.4 and 106.6 for a total of 214.
I figured OKC might be a little tired tonight on the back-to-back so I bet Under on them, but I chose to up my Under to 215.5 @ 1.74 (down from 1.90), but I still missed it by 1.5 pts.......
Interesting points
It may be better to find the average between home/away, and last 5. We can keep track of this next time!
0
Quote Originally Posted by NBA_nate:
Ok, here's a better one, since the OKC / SAC game just finished...
I took a look at the google spreadsheet, nice, simple, works good I like it,
It showed a total of 202.5, and a O/U of 214, so a -11.5.
Not sure how many games this calculates, I actually had a 208.5 (Yearly), so a difference of -5.5.
But the last five games (my calculations) showed an increase from 208.5 up to 216.
Then when I used only the offense numbers for the 2 teams (5 games), I had 107.4 and 106.6 for a total of 214.
I figured OKC might be a little tired tonight on the back-to-back so I bet Under on them, but I chose to up my Under to 215.5 @ 1.74 (down from 1.90), but I still missed it by 1.5 pts.......
Interesting points
It may be better to find the average between home/away, and last 5. We can keep track of this next time!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.