Kawhi's player efficiency rating in playoffs is 28.5, pretty damn strong.
Kawhi will really add to his legacy with a big performance tonight and the win.
After 9 games Kawhi had PER of 32.8 and there were reports around how Kawhi had done things MJ never did. So many points, rebs, assists, steals or whatever it was.
And his 32.8 PER was better then any PER MJ had in playoffs.
HOWEVER, that was after just 9 games, MJ had 4 seasons with over 15 games played and PER ratings 29.9 or better..
MJ ave 28.6 PER in career in playoffs.
Game 3 when Klay was out Curry had a game that no player in league history ever had in a NBA Finals game, with 45 points or better and so many rebs, assists and steals or whatever it was.
Funny how the media always wants to say , for example Kawhi did what MJ never did. Always comparing players to MJ as though those players are better or playing better then MJ ever did.
And that be false, what those type situations show is the uniqueness of an individual player, they don't always tell you the player is better overall, just unique in what they bring to the court.
Different players bring different talents and skills, but over all play on the court MJ is still the KING, HE DID IT AFTER OVER 15 GAMES PLAYED , Kawhi did it for 9 games with a 32.8 PER but after many more games he drops well below MJ's best performances.
0
Kawhi's player efficiency rating in playoffs is 28.5, pretty damn strong.
Kawhi will really add to his legacy with a big performance tonight and the win.
After 9 games Kawhi had PER of 32.8 and there were reports around how Kawhi had done things MJ never did. So many points, rebs, assists, steals or whatever it was.
And his 32.8 PER was better then any PER MJ had in playoffs.
HOWEVER, that was after just 9 games, MJ had 4 seasons with over 15 games played and PER ratings 29.9 or better..
MJ ave 28.6 PER in career in playoffs.
Game 3 when Klay was out Curry had a game that no player in league history ever had in a NBA Finals game, with 45 points or better and so many rebs, assists and steals or whatever it was.
Funny how the media always wants to say , for example Kawhi did what MJ never did. Always comparing players to MJ as though those players are better or playing better then MJ ever did.
And that be false, what those type situations show is the uniqueness of an individual player, they don't always tell you the player is better overall, just unique in what they bring to the court.
Different players bring different talents and skills, but over all play on the court MJ is still the KING, HE DID IT AFTER OVER 15 GAMES PLAYED , Kawhi did it for 9 games with a 32.8 PER but after many more games he drops well below MJ's best performances.
Was not very likely Warriors would come back to win series
down 3-1, the odds were stacked heavily against it.
Just because they did it before VS OKC and Cavs did it VS them did not increase their odds.
Kawhi didn't have an overly great game, you can see the big difference between him and MJ when he gets doubled.
And he's not a great passer , if he became a much better passer would help him when doubled.
He is still a great, great player, no shame in not being as good as MJ for sure.
That could of been our Bucks out there taking down the mighty Warriors as we thought it would be had they gotten past these Raptors , but they could not get it done.
0
Was not very likely Warriors would come back to win series
down 3-1, the odds were stacked heavily against it.
Just because they did it before VS OKC and Cavs did it VS them did not increase their odds.
Kawhi didn't have an overly great game, you can see the big difference between him and MJ when he gets doubled.
And he's not a great passer , if he became a much better passer would help him when doubled.
He is still a great, great player, no shame in not being as good as MJ for sure.
That could of been our Bucks out there taking down the mighty Warriors as we thought it would be had they gotten past these Raptors , but they could not get it done.
NBA Finals................................................
Leans --- 2-0
our leans in round 1 were 5-6
all leans were ---- 12-7
now's the time to grade-out our futures on Bucks............................
to win east --- lost 6 units
to win title --- lost 6 units
son of a gun, our Bucks got so close up 2-0 on Raptors.
I didn't think about it but we could of made a small play on Raps at that point and got some great odds as we had come so far with such very good odds on the Bucks that we could of afforded to do it.
I still remember losing with +1000 on Mavs in 2006 to win title and they were up 2-0 on Heat , and Heat were +480 at that point.
I was looking at a big score on Mavs as we were here on Bucks with such great odds and did not take the Heat.
All it took was a small play and we could have done well either result and I did not take it.
What's very interesting is those Mavs were similar to Bucks in that they had no prior experience of being in or winning the title , I'm not sure if they even made a conference final and they rose-up to be our no. 1 ranked team just like the Bucks.
Here's what is incredible about those 2 teams , and why we say you get great value on teams with no experience winning anything.
In the 1st...2 rounds Bucks were 8-1 ATS, Mavs were if I remember correctly and I think I do 7-2 ATS .
Other teams produced similar results in similar spots but those type teams don't come around very often .
I was aware of this but with multiple games coming everyday it is tough to keep up with all the info let-alone look into and feel confident with other info does not come up very often, but we did miss the boat on that info.
0
NBA Finals................................................
Leans --- 2-0
our leans in round 1 were 5-6
all leans were ---- 12-7
now's the time to grade-out our futures on Bucks............................
to win east --- lost 6 units
to win title --- lost 6 units
son of a gun, our Bucks got so close up 2-0 on Raptors.
I didn't think about it but we could of made a small play on Raps at that point and got some great odds as we had come so far with such very good odds on the Bucks that we could of afforded to do it.
I still remember losing with +1000 on Mavs in 2006 to win title and they were up 2-0 on Heat , and Heat were +480 at that point.
I was looking at a big score on Mavs as we were here on Bucks with such great odds and did not take the Heat.
All it took was a small play and we could have done well either result and I did not take it.
What's very interesting is those Mavs were similar to Bucks in that they had no prior experience of being in or winning the title , I'm not sure if they even made a conference final and they rose-up to be our no. 1 ranked team just like the Bucks.
Here's what is incredible about those 2 teams , and why we say you get great value on teams with no experience winning anything.
In the 1st...2 rounds Bucks were 8-1 ATS, Mavs were if I remember correctly and I think I do 7-2 ATS .
Other teams produced similar results in similar spots but those type teams don't come around very often .
I was aware of this but with multiple games coming everyday it is tough to keep up with all the info let-alone look into and feel confident with other info does not come up very often, but we did miss the boat on that info.
all told we won 23.08 units in this years playoffs..........................not to shabby guys.
we had 1 really strong run another very good round and 1 pathetic round
adding in our 12 units of futures losses on Bucks.......................Won 11.08 units
Hey, not the best but we were very close to a big score on Bucks and anytime we can come-out ahead it's all good.
To put it all in perspective, nobody can win big all the time. If we compared ourselves to touts on sports monitor our 11.08 units at $100 a unit as they use would be $1108 and that'd easily be top 5 of roughly 30 touts.
They don't use ML, parlays and futures but even comparing just sides we were top 5 again.
Last season we finish 2cd in net wins using only full game and totals.
if you look close only 12 touts even finished winning units , far more lost units.
And those touts beat us one year don't beat us the next year very often.
If you want to use a tout service nothing wrong with that as some can have very good runs but you need to be realistic on what to expect .
all told we won 23.08 units in this years playoffs..........................not to shabby guys.
we had 1 really strong run another very good round and 1 pathetic round
adding in our 12 units of futures losses on Bucks.......................Won 11.08 units
Hey, not the best but we were very close to a big score on Bucks and anytime we can come-out ahead it's all good.
To put it all in perspective, nobody can win big all the time. If we compared ourselves to touts on sports monitor our 11.08 units at $100 a unit as they use would be $1108 and that'd easily be top 5 of roughly 30 touts.
They don't use ML, parlays and futures but even comparing just sides we were top 5 again.
Last season we finish 2cd in net wins using only full game and totals.
if you look close only 12 touts even finished winning units , far more lost units.
And those touts beat us one year don't beat us the next year very often.
If you want to use a tout service nothing wrong with that as some can have very good runs but you need to be realistic on what to expect .
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
