you know the drill. bet AGAINST the most selected teams and/or bet ON the least selected teams. in 2013 the Fade" went 38-15-2 (71.7%) thru Week 11 & 47-36-2 (56.6%) thru Week 17 (end of season). went 5-0 week 3 and 4-1 weeks 1, 6, 7, 9 & 11 in 2013. "Contra" was 12-6-2 thru Week 13 and 13-11-2 thru Week 17
point spreads from Hilton contest. number of times team selected in ( ). current (Saturday) LVS Superbook (former Hilton) point spread in [ ]. "Contra" = least selected team vs most selected team.
you know the drill. bet AGAINST the most selected teams and/or bet ON the least selected teams. in 2013 the Fade" went 38-15-2 (71.7%) thru Week 11 & 47-36-2 (56.6%) thru Week 17 (end of season). went 5-0 week 3 and 4-1 weeks 1, 6, 7, 9 & 11 in 2013. "Contra" was 12-6-2 thru Week 13 and 13-11-2 thru Week 17
point spreads from Hilton contest. number of times team selected in ( ). current (Saturday) LVS Superbook (former Hilton) point spread in [ ]. "Contra" = least selected team vs most selected team.
and PLEASE keep personal picks (and any snotty remarks) OUT of the thread. will try to have just one thread this season for ALL the weekly information and would like to keep it free of useless BS
0
and PLEASE keep personal picks (and any snotty remarks) OUT of the thread. will try to have just one thread this season for ALL the weekly information and would like to keep it free of useless BS
I'm in the contest for the first time this year. Of my five contest picks in Week 1, I have one of the most popular (New Orleans -3) and one of the least popular (Indy +7.5). I would hate to have all 5 of the most popular in light of history.
Over 1400 in the contest this year, a new record.
0
Greetings, hockey-playing rodent.
I'm in the contest for the first time this year. Of my five contest picks in Week 1, I have one of the most popular (New Orleans -3) and one of the least popular (Indy +7.5). I would hate to have all 5 of the most popular in light of history.
Would you consider Oak a "contra pick" since it is a least picked team and the NYJ were picked by the widest margin?
Picked by the Widest Margin LVH SuperContest
TB 424, Pit 236, Det 202, Ten 163, NYJ 155
not really. as the numbers after the contest spread in ( ) indicate, although the Raiders are the 2nd least selected @ only 98 plays, the Jets were only the 13th most selected team @ 253 plays
in my "matrix" a "Contra" must be a "bottom 5" least selected vs a "top 5" most selected
0
Quote Originally Posted by notsoeasymoney:
Would you consider Oak a "contra pick" since it is a least picked team and the NYJ were picked by the widest margin?
Picked by the Widest Margin LVH SuperContest
TB 424, Pit 236, Det 202, Ten 163, NYJ 155
not really. as the numbers after the contest spread in ( ) indicate, although the Raiders are the 2nd least selected @ only 98 plays, the Jets were only the 13th most selected team @ 253 plays
in my "matrix" a "Contra" must be a "bottom 5" least selected vs a "top 5" most selected
What about bring back the super contra and include the cowflop flaming five!
you mean the "Triple Dog Dare Ya" bet against a top 5 selection that is also picked by Colin Cowherd and playing a bottom 5?
this week that would be bet the Panthers +3 -120
the "Hybred Contra" of betting agains a Top 5 selection also picked by Cowheard did pretty good BUT "Triple Dog Dare Ya" only came into play three times and was 0-3
only two that are both Top 5 selected + Cowherd this week are Titans and Buccs which would indicate Panther +3 -120 and @ Chiefs -3 -120
0
Quote Originally Posted by wynston731:
What about bring back the super contra and include the cowflop flaming five!
you mean the "Triple Dog Dare Ya" bet against a top 5 selection that is also picked by Colin Cowherd and playing a bottom 5?
this week that would be bet the Panthers +3 -120
the "Hybred Contra" of betting agains a Top 5 selection also picked by Cowheard did pretty good BUT "Triple Dog Dare Ya" only came into play three times and was 0-3
only two that are both Top 5 selected + Cowherd this week are Titans and Buccs which would indicate Panther +3 -120 and @ Chiefs -3 -120
not really. as the numbers after the contest spread in ( ) indicate, although the Raiders are the 2nd least selected @ only 98 plays, the Jets were only the 13th most selected team @ 253 plays
in my "matrix" a "Contra" must be a "bottom 5" least selected vs a "top 5" most selected
Do you think that has the same weight? Oak being one of the least selected teams and NYJ being picked by a "top 5 margin". Maybe only the 13th most selected team but still picked more times than Oak to make it to the top 5 margin of picks...does that make since? Have you tracked something like that?
0
Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat:
not really. as the numbers after the contest spread in ( ) indicate, although the Raiders are the 2nd least selected @ only 98 plays, the Jets were only the 13th most selected team @ 253 plays
in my "matrix" a "Contra" must be a "bottom 5" least selected vs a "top 5" most selected
Do you think that has the same weight? Oak being one of the least selected teams and NYJ being picked by a "top 5 margin". Maybe only the 13th most selected team but still picked more times than Oak to make it to the top 5 margin of picks...does that make since? Have you tracked something like that?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.