Usually some good threads around draft time. Then comes season win total talk.
Ninja...i wasnt trying to be rude earlier to you...sorry if it came across that way.
Whatta is a complete nutjob and soon he will go back to being irrelevant...anyways he will take more "time off" again once his mom catches him online without permission...its what parents call "a timeout"
Ninja...i wasnt trying to be rude earlier to you...sorry if it came across that way.
Whatta is a complete nutjob and soon he will go back to being irrelevant...anyways he will take more "time off" again once his mom catches him online without permission...its what parents call "a timeout"
WHATTAPLAY,
1. I´m glad you are a "fix reader". I can see how accurate your read of those "fixes" is from the result of your over bet on the Super Bowl.
2. Solid cappers may end up picking the wrong side regardless of how good your reads are. That is the beauty of sportsbetting. Variance... just as poker. If the expected result happened all the time then we would have no books at all. Same with poker, if the best player won all the time, then why would the fish even sit at the table. It happened to me with my Saints bet... some complained about being robbed, games being fixed, whatever. It is part of it. I take the loss, know it was a good bet, and move on.
3. Scal, I appreciate his writeups. I was on the other side for this last matchup. He was the only poster on the Rams who actually brought reasonable arguments to back them.
4. I petition for input from others? I don´t. My threads tend to have an arrogant speech of thank me for this valuable free info Im feeding you. If you discuss with me I will gladly and respectfully respond. I appreciate responses to my threads. And if you prove any argument that I made to be wrong, I will humbly accept you are right. Deep down, I know there may be areas Im not looking at, and part of being an EV+ bettor is about recognizing that and reflecting it on your bets. Reason over ego. Of course, for someone like you who is a "rigged speech reader" there is nothing that anyone could say that can make you change your mind. As said, you read the rigged factor of the over quite well this past Sunday (I had under 1st H, Under full game, Pats ML (and I recommended waiting for the spot to bet Pats live all week, Over Gronk receptions, Over CJ Anderson longest reception, under Robert Woods receiving yards and Over Philip Dorsett receiving yards). I missed 1. And I am well aware I ran above EV. Being results oriented, reading tactical and technical scripts is more profitable than looking for the invisible corrupt hands.
5. I´m very good indeed. But I am not close to being perfect. Every bet I make I know has some side that I have not seen or I may not be appreciating correctly. Feedback is not only welcome but is what I expect when I give a lengthy writeup.
6. What a coincidence. 50k on the ML but just pennies on the over. And we find out about the sums you bet after the "rigged script" has been revealed. Try harder next time.
7. So you´re at the beach enjoying, yet spend your whole day on the phone. Makes sense only if you are 19 or you are simply full of manure. A 19yo would not be betting 50k.
With love,
Gut
I know, right. When i'm with my friends we're drinking, and laughing.... doing entirely too much cocaine. Maybe some shrooms and/or acid. I can't even look at my phone, let alone type. You're on a Beach, and the most interesting thing to you and your friends, is covers.com? You're full of shit. Conspiracy guy never has friends because he's annoying as shyt. I know this because i'm a social butterfly. I'm engaging with you guys because i'm at my place in the PNW, chilling with the wife and hitting the vape pen. It's snowing out. When I get back to Cali, i'll barely post.
They're are plenty of 19yo's capable of betting 50K but there is nobody wastng their day on a beach arguing on covers.com
WHATTAPLAY,
1. I´m glad you are a "fix reader". I can see how accurate your read of those "fixes" is from the result of your over bet on the Super Bowl.
2. Solid cappers may end up picking the wrong side regardless of how good your reads are. That is the beauty of sportsbetting. Variance... just as poker. If the expected result happened all the time then we would have no books at all. Same with poker, if the best player won all the time, then why would the fish even sit at the table. It happened to me with my Saints bet... some complained about being robbed, games being fixed, whatever. It is part of it. I take the loss, know it was a good bet, and move on.
3. Scal, I appreciate his writeups. I was on the other side for this last matchup. He was the only poster on the Rams who actually brought reasonable arguments to back them.
4. I petition for input from others? I don´t. My threads tend to have an arrogant speech of thank me for this valuable free info Im feeding you. If you discuss with me I will gladly and respectfully respond. I appreciate responses to my threads. And if you prove any argument that I made to be wrong, I will humbly accept you are right. Deep down, I know there may be areas Im not looking at, and part of being an EV+ bettor is about recognizing that and reflecting it on your bets. Reason over ego. Of course, for someone like you who is a "rigged speech reader" there is nothing that anyone could say that can make you change your mind. As said, you read the rigged factor of the over quite well this past Sunday (I had under 1st H, Under full game, Pats ML (and I recommended waiting for the spot to bet Pats live all week, Over Gronk receptions, Over CJ Anderson longest reception, under Robert Woods receiving yards and Over Philip Dorsett receiving yards). I missed 1. And I am well aware I ran above EV. Being results oriented, reading tactical and technical scripts is more profitable than looking for the invisible corrupt hands.
5. I´m very good indeed. But I am not close to being perfect. Every bet I make I know has some side that I have not seen or I may not be appreciating correctly. Feedback is not only welcome but is what I expect when I give a lengthy writeup.
6. What a coincidence. 50k on the ML but just pennies on the over. And we find out about the sums you bet after the "rigged script" has been revealed. Try harder next time.
7. So you´re at the beach enjoying, yet spend your whole day on the phone. Makes sense only if you are 19 or you are simply full of manure. A 19yo would not be betting 50k.
With love,
Gut
I know, right. When i'm with my friends we're drinking, and laughing.... doing entirely too much cocaine. Maybe some shrooms and/or acid. I can't even look at my phone, let alone type. You're on a Beach, and the most interesting thing to you and your friends, is covers.com? You're full of garbage. Conspiracy guy never has friends because he's annoying as shyt. I know this because i'm a social butterfly. I'm engaging with you guys because i'm at my place in the PNW, chilling with the wife and hitting the vape pen. It's snowing out. When I get back to Cali, i'll barely post.
1. I envy no one. Especially not a kook on covers who admits to being old.
2. If anyone read my posts, then read your posts, it's be pretty clear whose posts are idiotic.
3. You live 50 feet from the shore of the Twilight Zone. Let's say for shitz and giggles you are on a beach, with friends, this is how you spend that time. You must be the life of the party. Maybe you are on a beach, in February, but you're not with friends. I'd bet 50K on it.
Established in 1995,
knows how to enhance and accelerate a snowflake's meltdown like Whatta
Hot Forum Topics
