Posted:
#51
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Stu coming embraces here I am calling your pathetic wanna as a out what is your bet.
Quote Originally Posted by gutinstinctus:
WHATTAPLAY, 1. I´m glad you are a "fix reader". I can see how accurate your read of those "fixes" is from the result of your over bet on the Super Bowl. 2. Solid cappers may end up picking the wrong side regardless of how good your reads are. That is the beauty of sportsbetting. Variance... just as poker. If the expected result happened all the time then we would have no books at all. Same with poker, if the best player won all the time, then why would the fish even sit at the table. It happened to me with my Saints bet... some complained about being robbed, games being fixed, whatever. It is part of it. I take the loss, know it was a good bet, and move on. 3. Scal, I appreciate his writeups. I was on the other side for this last matchup. He was the only poster on the Rams who actually brought reasonable arguments to back them. 4. I petition for input from others? I don´t. My threads tend to have an arrogant speech of thank me for this valuable free info Im feeding you. If you discuss with me I will gladly and respectfully respond. I appreciate responses to my threads. And if you prove any argument that I made to be wrong, I will humbly accept you are right. Deep down, I know there may be areas Im not looking at, and part of being an EV+ bettor is about recognizing that and reflecting it on your bets. Reason over ego. Of course, for someone like you who is a "rigged speech reader" there is nothing that anyone could say that can make you change your mind. As said, you read the rigged factor of the over quite well this past Sunday (I had under 1st H, Under full game, Pats ML (and I recommended waiting for the spot to bet Pats live all week, Over Gronk receptions, Over CJ Anderson longest reception, under Robert Woods receiving yards and Over Philip Dorsett receiving yards). I missed 1. And I am well aware I ran above EV. Being results oriented, reading tactical and technical scripts is more profitable than looking for the invisible corrupt hands. 5. I´m very good indeed. But I am not close to being perfect. Every bet I make I know has some side that I have not seen or I may not be appreciating correctly. Feedback is not only welcome but is what I expect when I give a lengthy writeup. 6. What a coincidence. 50k on the ML but just pennies on the over. And we find out about the sums you bet after the "rigged script" has been revealed. Try harder next time. 7. So you´re at the beach enjoying, yet spend your whole day on the phone. Makes sense only if you are 19 or you are simply full of manure. A 19yo would not be betting 50k. With love, Gut
They're are plenty of 19yo's capable of betting 50K but there is nobody wastng their day on a beach arguing on covers.comWHATTAPLAY, 1. I´m glad you are a "fix reader". I can see how accurate your read of those "fixes" is from the result of your over bet on the Super Bowl. 2. Solid cappers may end up picking the wrong side regardless of how good your reads are. That is the beauty of sportsbetting. Variance... just as poker. If the expected result happened all the time then we would have no books at all. Same with poker, if the best player won all the time, then why would the fish even sit at the table. It happened to me with my Saints bet... some complained about being robbed, games being fixed, whatever. It is part of it. I take the loss, know it was a good bet, and move on. 3. Scal, I appreciate his writeups. I was on the other side for this last matchup. He was the only poster on the Rams who actually brought reasonable arguments to back them. 4. I petition for input from others? I don´t. My threads tend to have an arrogant speech of thank me for this valuable free info Im feeding you. If you discuss with me I will gladly and respectfully respond. I appreciate responses to my threads. And if you prove any argument that I made to be wrong, I will humbly accept you are right. Deep down, I know there may be areas Im not looking at, and part of being an EV+ bettor is about recognizing that and reflecting it on your bets. Reason over ego. Of course, for someone like you who is a "rigged speech reader" there is nothing that anyone could say that can make you change your mind. As said, you read the rigged factor of the over quite well this past Sunday (I had under 1st H, Under full game, Pats ML (and I recommended waiting for the spot to bet Pats live all week, Over Gronk receptions, Over CJ Anderson longest reception, under Robert Woods receiving yards and Over Philip Dorsett receiving yards). I missed 1. And I am well aware I ran above EV. Being results oriented, reading tactical and technical scripts is more profitable than looking for the invisible corrupt hands. 5. I´m very good indeed. But I am not close to being perfect. Every bet I make I know has some side that I have not seen or I may not be appreciating correctly. Feedback is not only welcome but is what I expect when I give a lengthy writeup. 6. What a coincidence. 50k on the ML but just pennies on the over. And we find out about the sums you bet after the "rigged script" has been revealed. Try harder next time. 7. So you´re at the beach enjoying, yet spend your whole day on the phone. Makes sense only if you are 19 or you are simply full of manure. A 19yo would not be betting 50k. With love, Gut
0
Hot Forum Topics
