Decline, take a knee, and win immediately. Zero chance of losing.
Accept the safety, and you allow Seattle to recover a possible onside kick. If they do, they might throw a bomb and score. If so, then they onside kick again, throw another bomb and score again. .001% chance of winning.
0% is better than .001%.
(You don't give the opposition a chance at the ball at all, if you don't have to.)
NICE call!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Re: Seattle / San Fran.
Decline, take a knee, and win immediately. Zero chance of losing.
Accept the safety, and you allow Seattle to recover a possible onside kick. If they do, they might throw a bomb and score. If so, then they onside kick again, throw another bomb and score again. .001% chance of winning.
0% is better than .001%.
(You don't give the opposition a chance at the ball at all, if you don't have to.)
I completely agree and had SF -8...I am so sick of the crying and pur lack of knowledge of anything around here...its pathetic and I just lost 220 on it.....but I know its the right decision...get over it people
0
I completely agree and had SF -8...I am so sick of the crying and pur lack of knowledge of anything around here...its pathetic and I just lost 220 on it.....but I know its the right decision...get over it people
you are an idiot...you can't onside kick after a safety. If you would of said "turn the ball over" or "get injured" you might of had a point.
Yes you can onside kick after a safety. It's a free kick, you have the option of punting or kicking off. I have seen an onside kick attempted after a safety. It's rare, but it has happened.
0
Quote Originally Posted by straitwreckn:
you are an idiot...you can't onside kick after a safety. If you would of said "turn the ball over" or "get injured" you might of had a point.
Yes you can onside kick after a safety. It's a free kick, you have the option of punting or kicking off. I have seen an onside kick attempted after a safety. It's rare, but it has happened.
Decline, take a knee, and win immediately. Zero chance of losing.
Accept the safety, and you allow Seattle to recover a possible onside kick. If they do, they might throw a bomb and score. If so, then they onside kick again, throw another bomb and score again. .001% chance of winning.
0% is better than .001%.
(You don't give the opposition a chance at the ball at all, if you don't have to.)
NICE call!
Are you serious? Smartest Call you've seen in a long time? Maybe the biggest exaggeration I have seen in a long time.
There is 0% chance that Seattle scores twice in 45 seconds with no time-outs. Smells bad to me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ed-Collins:
Re: Seattle / San Fran.
Decline, take a knee, and win immediately. Zero chance of losing.
Accept the safety, and you allow Seattle to recover a possible onside kick. If they do, they might throw a bomb and score. If so, then they onside kick again, throw another bomb and score again. .001% chance of winning.
0% is better than .001%.
(You don't give the opposition a chance at the ball at all, if you don't have to.)
NICE call!
Are you serious? Smartest Call you've seen in a long time? Maybe the biggest exaggeration I have seen in a long time.
There is 0% chance that Seattle scores twice in 45 seconds with no time-outs. Smells bad to me.
Decline, take a knee, and win immediately. Zero chance of losing.
Accept the safety, and you allow Seattle to recover a possible onside kick. If they do, they might throw a bomb and score. If so, then they onside kick again, throw another bomb and score again. .001% chance of winning.
0% is better than .001%.
(You don't give the opposition a chance at the ball at all, if you don't have to.)
NICE call!
BETTER CHANCE OF SMITH DROPPING THE SNAP ON A KNEEL DOWN PLAY.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ed-Collins:
Re: Seattle / San Fran.
Decline, take a knee, and win immediately. Zero chance of losing.
Accept the safety, and you allow Seattle to recover a possible onside kick. If they do, they might throw a bomb and score. If so, then they onside kick again, throw another bomb and score again. .001% chance of winning.
0% is better than .001%.
(You don't give the opposition a chance at the ball at all, if you don't have to.)
NICE call!
BETTER CHANCE OF SMITH DROPPING THE SNAP ON A KNEEL DOWN PLAY.
Cracks me up all these jokers gambling that dont know the rules of football. "Seattle could recover the onside kick" lol. Even if San Fran tried to fair catch the free kick and Kyle Williams fumbled it. It's a 2 possession game!
0
Cracks me up all these jokers gambling that dont know the rules of football. "Seattle could recover the onside kick" lol. Even if San Fran tried to fair catch the free kick and Kyle Williams fumbled it. It's a 2 possession game!
Decline, take a knee, and win immediately. Zero chance of losing.
Accept the safety, and you allow Seattle to recover a possible onside kick. If they do, they might throw a bomb and score. If so, then they onside kick again, throw another bomb and score again. .001% chance of winning.
0% is better than .001%.
(You don't give the opposition a chance at the ball at all, if you don't have to.)
NICE call!
What an idiot...haha...no clue what he's saying
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ed-Collins:
Re: Seattle / San Fran.
Decline, take a knee, and win immediately. Zero chance of losing.
Accept the safety, and you allow Seattle to recover a possible onside kick. If they do, they might throw a bomb and score. If so, then they onside kick again, throw another bomb and score again. .001% chance of winning.
0% is better than .001%.
(You don't give the opposition a chance at the ball at all, if you don't have to.)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.