All Forums | NFL Betting

DID VEGAS WIN OR LOSE ON THIS SUPERBOWL

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7159
Posts: 88
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 4481
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by Wizard41:

they win 2-8 million usually

people do parlays and teasers

the love that betting

they lost on giants

they have won the last 11 of 12 or something like that



Teasers won since it was between GB +4 and PITT +10, so Vegas got fucked on that one too.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 408
Posted: #27
very true
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 408
Posted: #28
agree, makes sense
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #29

I am talking about teasers and parlays too, not to mention future tickets and stuff like that.

I even put in some plays for my dad's friends. There was a lot of money lost here in Steeler Nation...

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #30

Quote Originally Posted by DumbWalrus:



Teasers won since it was between GB +4 and PITT +10, so Vegas got fucked on that one too.

Not with the under teased...

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 4481
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by Crowkillers:

I am talking about teasers and parlays too, not to mention future tickets and stuff like that.

I even put in some plays for my dad's friends. There was a lot of money lost here in Steeler Nation...



American public >>>>> Steeler Nation

I bet Steeler Nation accounted for like only 4% of all the money bet.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 408
Posted: #32

if you teased the total up and went under, you lost

so not every fucking tease won

there are a lot of ways for vegas to win

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #33

Quote Originally Posted by DumbWalrus:



American public >>>>> Steeler Nation

I bet Steeler Nation accounted for like only 4% of all the money bet.

Only 4%..?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 408
Posted: #34
way more than 4
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 408
Posted: #35

4....you mean 40??

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 4481
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by Wizard41:

if you teased the total up and went under, you lost

so not every fucking tease won

there are a lot of ways for vegas to win
Result: Wager Won
Packers(GreenBay) 31 02/06/11(18:40 ET)
Steelers(Pittsburgh) +9 (+105)
Packers(GreenBay) 31 02/06/11(18:40 ET)
Over 39

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 4481
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by Wizard41:

4....you mean 40??



No, I mean 4.  As in "Steeler Nation" or those in Pittsburgh or that are Steeler fans.  Steeler backers arent neccesarily fans of the team.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 1194
Posted: #38
they won on me with my Pitt ML
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2927
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by wonwiththehook:

and who care if they won........did you..........I did......
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 26899
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by drifter44:



Favs and the over are about two or three times more than the other dog and prop wagers. People who do not bet on sports come out of the closet for this one. Grandmas and next door neighbor types!!


Ever hear of a public underdog? They do exist.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 83
Posted: #41

They won.  won big ML and lost some under/over, making 46 to 45 sharp under $ came last, so they lost less. Favs/dogs were almost balanced, so they could kept most of their commissions.  If GB won but no cover and under won, they could make lots of $... 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 408
Posted: #42
right so packers by one....they would have had huge profit
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 520
Posted: #43

Most of the books lost a small amount of money. Check out the link from the LVRJ

https://www.lvrj.com/news/betting-public-cashes-in-on-packers-115455184.html

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 10503
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by Wizard41:

the whole world was on Gbay

some money they win on under and Pitt Ml

But did they profit?


iOdds, it gives u exact vegas lines and always shows u exactly where the money is at. 

This Super Bowl had the following public bets...

91,891 on Pittsburgh Spread
89,954 on GB Spread

2,017 on the Over
1,157 on the Under

87,566 Pitt ML
60,850 GB ML



 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 37003
Posted: #45
My local lost.........big
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 408
Posted: #46

oakster thanks, that is what I was looking for

VEGAS LOST they needed the under or gbay not to cover

Iodds....wtf do your numbers mean

we need  information like vegas took say $90,000,000 in wagers and lost 4 million or whatever it is

sounds like they may have lost more than on the Giants win over NE

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 40852
Posted: #47
The final tally will come up shortly in couple of days, i guess Vegas won as usual. Probably, it won $8-10 millions.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 37003
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

My local lost.........big


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 408
Posted: #49

vegas got beat, read the article in the link above

they wish they won 8-10 million

not this year.

reports are out of losses by vegas....perfect storm...over and gbay won they wanted neither

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2304
Posted: #50
Vegas Always Wins...yea, maybe they lost a little on GB spread and a bit on the Over but they made a ton on Pit ML, props/parlays/teasers and JUICE. Vegas ALWAYS wins.


All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.