WHICH-of-the-2 quarterbacks, do you believe, will have more time-&-opportunity, by-being less-"hindered"-with, in order to "perform" more- "productively" for his team?
And-which, will be rushed-&-forced-into making costly mistakes?
The "trenches", will "dictate" a-LOT, with-respect of "the direction" that this game will take, and, it's "ultimate outcome".
I believe that, there is, A-HUGE, advatage here for the Rams!!!
WHICH-of-the-2 quarterbacks, do you believe, will have more time-&-opportunity, by-being less-"hindered"-with, in order to "perform" more- "productively" for his team?
And-which, will be rushed-&-forced-into making costly mistakes?
The "trenches", will "dictate" a-LOT, with-respect of "the direction" that this game will take, and, it's "ultimate outcome".
I believe that, there is, A-HUGE, advatage here for the Rams!!!
Is Stafford mobile? The Bengals' D had 42 sacks compared to 50 for the Rams...Perhaps the Bengals will have success running the ball with Mixon which would negate the pass rush.
Do you think that the NFC is superior to the AFC this year overall???
0
@lajohn
Is Stafford mobile? The Bengals' D had 42 sacks compared to 50 for the Rams...Perhaps the Bengals will have success running the ball with Mixon which would negate the pass rush.
Do you think that the NFC is superior to the AFC this year overall???
A "minor difference" between the two conferenses...
And, a "minor difference" between these two teams..
If you honestly "weigh-in" these two, you will conclude, that they are: ---pretty-much-"even"
...except for, one "glaring"-difference:
The superiority-of the Ram's defensive-line when facing the Bengal's offensive-line.
The pass rush will-NOT be halted-or-negated.
Thus, they will have "favourable field position", throughout most of the game, and will have, a MUCH-easier time, in moving the ball with consistency, creating more "scoring opportunities", both on the ground, and in the air.
0
A "minor difference" between the two conferenses...
And, a "minor difference" between these two teams..
If you honestly "weigh-in" these two, you will conclude, that they are: ---pretty-much-"even"
...except for, one "glaring"-difference:
The superiority-of the Ram's defensive-line when facing the Bengal's offensive-line.
The pass rush will-NOT be halted-or-negated.
Thus, they will have "favourable field position", throughout most of the game, and will have, a MUCH-easier time, in moving the ball with consistency, creating more "scoring opportunities", both on the ground, and in the air.
@lajohn Is Stafford mobile? The Bengals' D had 42 sacks compared to 50 for the Rams...Perhaps the Bengals will have success running the ball with Mixon which would negate the pass rush. Do you think that the NFC is superior to the AFC this year overall???
I think the AFC is superior ..Oddsmakers tend to agree as the hypothetical look a head lines had the CHIEFS and BILLS as the 3-8.5 point chalks vs anyone from the NFC ( from what I remember)
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
1
Quote Originally Posted by lancer89074:
@lajohn Is Stafford mobile? The Bengals' D had 42 sacks compared to 50 for the Rams...Perhaps the Bengals will have success running the ball with Mixon which would negate the pass rush. Do you think that the NFC is superior to the AFC this year overall???
I think the AFC is superior ..Oddsmakers tend to agree as the hypothetical look a head lines had the CHIEFS and BILLS as the 3-8.5 point chalks vs anyone from the NFC ( from what I remember)
Any pass rush can be halted and negated. Screen passes, check-downs to Mixon, and running the ball directly at Donald and Miller... how about Burrow designed run plays? I would love to see the Bengals counter with center screens that Warren Moon used to burn D pass rushes.
What you saw in Tampa in the last Superbowl with Mahomes running for his life isn't what you will witness on Sunday.
0
@lajohn
Any pass rush can be halted and negated. Screen passes, check-downs to Mixon, and running the ball directly at Donald and Miller... how about Burrow designed run plays? I would love to see the Bengals counter with center screens that Warren Moon used to burn D pass rushes.
What you saw in Tampa in the last Superbowl with Mahomes running for his life isn't what you will witness on Sunday.
I think the AFC is superior ..Oddsmakers tend to agree as the hypothetical look a head lines had the CHIEFS and BILLS as the 3-8.5 point chalks vs anyone from the NFC ( from what I remember)
Totally agree... What is more of an achievement the Rams beating the 49ers @ home or the Bengals beating KC on the road in Arrowhead?
Now the Rams face a team that has more offensive weapons than they do...and are more balanced than the 49ers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
I think the AFC is superior ..Oddsmakers tend to agree as the hypothetical look a head lines had the CHIEFS and BILLS as the 3-8.5 point chalks vs anyone from the NFC ( from what I remember)
Totally agree... What is more of an achievement the Rams beating the 49ers @ home or the Bengals beating KC on the road in Arrowhead?
Now the Rams face a team that has more offensive weapons than they do...and are more balanced than the 49ers.
Quote Originally Posted by Europa: @lajohn i got Rams +9, Hawks +17, Minn. Over 228.5, and Over 35.5 for the Super Bowl. ...You're 1-0 ..ALREADY..."Europa" The other 3 look... QUITE-good!!! GL-2-US
MINN's game has 248 points as of now.
1
Quote Originally Posted by lajohn:
Quote Originally Posted by Europa: @lajohn i got Rams +9, Hawks +17, Minn. Over 228.5, and Over 35.5 for the Super Bowl. ...You're 1-0 ..ALREADY..."Europa" The other 3 look... QUITE-good!!! GL-2-US
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.