


But, if Timmy can get them ALL to go to church together too

Crusher don't even get me started on the Mavs vs Heat.
This isnt the time or place but if the Heat can close out game 2 that picture in your avatar never would have taken place
Crusher don't even get me started on the Mavs vs Heat.
This isnt the time or place but if the Heat can close out game 2 that picture in your avatar never would have taken place
Nice to see a Tebow doubter have the balls to admit they were wrong about the kid.
Tebow could win 3 super bowls over the next 5 years and sparky would still be claiming he was right about him sucking.
Nice to see a Tebow doubter have the balls to admit they were wrong about the kid.
Tebow could win 3 super bowls over the next 5 years and sparky would still be claiming he was right about him sucking.
Sparky (along with all the other Tebow haters) are already eating crow.
The kid took over a shitty 1-4 team that had thrown in the towel and went 6-1 as starter and got them to 1st place. Anyone who thinks a player that can do that “sucks” is beyond ignorant.
Oh, and Tebow had a passer rating of 149.3 yesterday. Not bad for “a fullback playing QB.”
Trent Dilfer had one of the greatest defenses of all time.
Tim Tebow has a defense that ranks 24th this season.
To compare the two is asinine.
That great defense gave up 32 points yesterday. Tebow was the reason they still won. It’s sad when people refuse to admit when they were wrong and give credit where credit is due.
Sparky (along with all the other Tebow haters) are already eating crow.
The kid took over a shitty 1-4 team that had thrown in the towel and went 6-1 as starter and got them to 1st place. Anyone who thinks a player that can do that “sucks” is beyond ignorant.
Oh, and Tebow had a passer rating of 149.3 yesterday. Not bad for “a fullback playing QB.”
Trent Dilfer had one of the greatest defenses of all time.
Tim Tebow has a defense that ranks 24th this season.
To compare the two is asinine.
That great defense gave up 32 points yesterday. Tebow was the reason they still won. It’s sad when people refuse to admit when they were wrong and give credit where credit is due.
Sparky (along with all the other Tebow haters) are already eating crow.
The kid took over a shitty 1-4 team that had thrown in the towel and went 6-1 as starter and got them to 1st place. Anyone who thinks a player that can do that “sucks” is beyond ignorant.
Oh, and Tebow had a passer rating of 149.3 yesterday. Not bad for “a fullback playing QB.”
Trent Dilfer had one of the greatest defenses of all time.
Tim Tebow has a defense that ranks 24th this season.
To compare the two is asinine.
That great defense gave up 32 points yesterday. Tebow was the reason they still won. It’s sad when people refuse to admit when they were wrong and give credit where credit is due.
Me, you and Matt4000 have been killing this thread.
We hit people with facts, others come back with weak opinions.
" Yeah, uhh the Defense is the only reason the broncos are winning. Even when they allow 32 points to a team missing its best player. The defense is why the Broncos are winning."
I love how these people can't come up with a comptetant theory of why the Broncos D couldnt win with Orton, but they can with Tebow.
......Still waiting
Sparky (along with all the other Tebow haters) are already eating crow.
The kid took over a shitty 1-4 team that had thrown in the towel and went 6-1 as starter and got them to 1st place. Anyone who thinks a player that can do that “sucks” is beyond ignorant.
Oh, and Tebow had a passer rating of 149.3 yesterday. Not bad for “a fullback playing QB.”
Trent Dilfer had one of the greatest defenses of all time.
Tim Tebow has a defense that ranks 24th this season.
To compare the two is asinine.
That great defense gave up 32 points yesterday. Tebow was the reason they still won. It’s sad when people refuse to admit when they were wrong and give credit where credit is due.
Me, you and Matt4000 have been killing this thread.
We hit people with facts, others come back with weak opinions.
" Yeah, uhh the Defense is the only reason the broncos are winning. Even when they allow 32 points to a team missing its best player. The defense is why the Broncos are winning."
I love how these people can't come up with a comptetant theory of why the Broncos D couldnt win with Orton, but they can with Tebow.
......Still waiting
Me, you and Matt4000 have been killing this thread.
We hit people with facts, others come back with weak opinions.
" Yeah, uhh the Defense is the only reason the broncos are winning. Even when they allow 32 points to a team missing its best player. The defense is why the Broncos are winning."
I love how these people can't come up with a comptetant theory of why the Broncos D couldnt win with Orton, but they can with Tebow.
......Still waiting
Me, you and Matt4000 have been killing this thread.
We hit people with facts, others come back with weak opinions.
" Yeah, uhh the Defense is the only reason the broncos are winning. Even when they allow 32 points to a team missing its best player. The defense is why the Broncos are winning."
I love how these people can't come up with a comptetant theory of why the Broncos D couldnt win with Orton, but they can with Tebow.
......Still waiting
Sparky isn't that bad.
Its more of JetJeff12 or whatever his name is.
He actually said, it doesnt matter if the defense allowed 32 pts, if they dont stop the Vikings on their last possesion, the Broncos don't win. therefore, the Broncos D won that game.
I shit you not
Sparky isn't that bad.
Its more of JetJeff12 or whatever his name is.
He actually said, it doesnt matter if the defense allowed 32 pts, if they dont stop the Vikings on their last possesion, the Broncos don't win. therefore, the Broncos D won that game.
I shit you not
Come on guys. You can't call me a stubborn moron and expect me to read really long posts do you?
Like dgenerate said...I can't comprehend things. Gotta dumb it down for me.
Come on guys. You can't call me a stubborn moron and expect me to read really long posts do you?
Like dgenerate said...I can't comprehend things. Gotta dumb it down for me.
Sparky (along with all the other Tebow haters) are already eating crow.
The kid took over a shitty 1-4 team that had thrown in the towel and went 6-1 as starter and got them to 1st place. Anyone who thinks a player that can do that “sucks” is beyond ignorant.
Oh, and Tebow had a passer rating of 149.3 yesterday. Not bad for “a fullback playing QB.”
Trent Dilfer had one of the greatest defenses of all time.
Tim Tebow has a defense that ranks 24th this season.
To compare the two is asinine.
That great defense gave up 32 points yesterday. Tebow was the reason they still won. It’s sad when people refuse to admit when they were wrong and give credit where credit is due.
Do you just copy and paste your posts now because I don't respond to them? I've responded once and you just keep talking about how he's 6-1 and how I eat crow and how Tebow is winning.
Tebow isn't a good quarterback and, in time, you will be the one eating crow. I like you...but it seems that ALL you have is that he's 6-1 and took a losing team and made them a winning team. That doesn't mean anything to my assessment of how he'll be in the future.
What good is making a thread, after the fact that he's fallen off the wagon, to say that he's bad? All I did was say it before hand. I'm pretty much predicting his future. Plain and simple. And can't eat crow after a half season sample size. Ala Orton's 6-0 Denver start when he first came over.
Sparky (along with all the other Tebow haters) are already eating crow.
The kid took over a shitty 1-4 team that had thrown in the towel and went 6-1 as starter and got them to 1st place. Anyone who thinks a player that can do that “sucks” is beyond ignorant.
Oh, and Tebow had a passer rating of 149.3 yesterday. Not bad for “a fullback playing QB.”
Trent Dilfer had one of the greatest defenses of all time.
Tim Tebow has a defense that ranks 24th this season.
To compare the two is asinine.
That great defense gave up 32 points yesterday. Tebow was the reason they still won. It’s sad when people refuse to admit when they were wrong and give credit where credit is due.
Do you just copy and paste your posts now because I don't respond to them? I've responded once and you just keep talking about how he's 6-1 and how I eat crow and how Tebow is winning.
Tebow isn't a good quarterback and, in time, you will be the one eating crow. I like you...but it seems that ALL you have is that he's 6-1 and took a losing team and made them a winning team. That doesn't mean anything to my assessment of how he'll be in the future.
What good is making a thread, after the fact that he's fallen off the wagon, to say that he's bad? All I did was say it before hand. I'm pretty much predicting his future. Plain and simple. And can't eat crow after a half season sample size. Ala Orton's 6-0 Denver start when he first came over.
Thomas, the guy Denver took with their first pick in that draft before Tebow, isn't bad either.
Thomas, the guy Denver took with their first pick in that draft before Tebow, isn't bad either.
Come on guys. You can't call me a stubborn moron and expect me to read really long posts do you?
Like dgenerate said...I can't comprehend things. Gotta dumb it down for me.
Come on guys. You can't call me a stubborn moron and expect me to read really long posts do you?
Like dgenerate said...I can't comprehend things. Gotta dumb it down for me.
Nice to see a Tebow doubter have the balls to admit they were wrong about the kid.
Tebow could win 3 super bowls over the next 5 years and sparky would still be claiming he was right about him sucking.
Are you sure you're intentionally doing this or are you so caught up in Tebow?
Correcting...The BRONCOS could win 3 super bowls in the next 5 years..........
And how can you even believe that guy? He just said he agreed with me at first and than calls me stupid. Anybody can say that. I can go into one of your Braves threads and say something about how I agreed with you at first but after losing I don't agree anymore.
That post has no credibility whatsoever.
Nice to see a Tebow doubter have the balls to admit they were wrong about the kid.
Tebow could win 3 super bowls over the next 5 years and sparky would still be claiming he was right about him sucking.
Are you sure you're intentionally doing this or are you so caught up in Tebow?
Correcting...The BRONCOS could win 3 super bowls in the next 5 years..........
And how can you even believe that guy? He just said he agreed with me at first and than calls me stupid. Anybody can say that. I can go into one of your Braves threads and say something about how I agreed with you at first but after losing I don't agree anymore.
That post has no credibility whatsoever.
You think I care what "experts" say?
If you're so high on "experts" than you should be on my side because Mel Kiper is an "expert".
You think I care what "experts" say?
If you're so high on "experts" than you should be on my side because Mel Kiper is an "expert".
You think I care what "experts" say?
If you're so high on "experts" than you should be on my side because Mel Kiper is an "expert".
You think I care what "experts" say?
If you're so high on "experts" than you should be on my side because Mel Kiper is an "expert".
And how would you like for me to respond to his article? Do you want me to find an article on why Tebow will fail as a rebuttle? How do you respond to an article?
I have a question that nobody seems to ever answer. Why, if he's such a winner, should losing to a good team like the Patriots mean nothing and only beating average to below average team give him the title of a great, winning, quarterback?
I'm not saying that ONLY beating good teams would make the case that he's good. But lets see what happens when the competition gets tougher. He faces a solid defense this week and a great team the week after. What if he loses 2 in a row? Will he be shook? Can he bounce back? He's never been put in that spot before. Who's to say he'll come out of that fine? And who am I to say he won't?
There are so many questions that have no answers because it's all speculation. And that is where I stand in my arguement. I'm speculating that Tebow will fall off the wagon the more he plays and the tougher his competition gets and the more defenses adapt to his style of offense. Lets not forget that he's changing the game of football with this offense. He's playing his Florida type of offense while most other teams are playing more conventional.
And how would you like for me to respond to his article? Do you want me to find an article on why Tebow will fail as a rebuttle? How do you respond to an article?
I have a question that nobody seems to ever answer. Why, if he's such a winner, should losing to a good team like the Patriots mean nothing and only beating average to below average team give him the title of a great, winning, quarterback?
I'm not saying that ONLY beating good teams would make the case that he's good. But lets see what happens when the competition gets tougher. He faces a solid defense this week and a great team the week after. What if he loses 2 in a row? Will he be shook? Can he bounce back? He's never been put in that spot before. Who's to say he'll come out of that fine? And who am I to say he won't?
There are so many questions that have no answers because it's all speculation. And that is where I stand in my arguement. I'm speculating that Tebow will fall off the wagon the more he plays and the tougher his competition gets and the more defenses adapt to his style of offense. Lets not forget that he's changing the game of football with this offense. He's playing his Florida type of offense while most other teams are playing more conventional.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.