How are the Rams better than Bengals?

@theclaw

 You make sum good points but yds rushing to AZ and TB are grossly misleading as both teams were behind early and had to throw. Rams defense is the best defense CIN will face but they're not infallible, they're good but not great. Mixon is the best RB they will have faced and he's a load.CIN is going to run the ball, for better or worse, the line does block for him, they struggle with pass protection. He rushed for over 1200 yds, 4.1 ypc and 13 TDs, you don't do that without your big boys blocking. The 2 weeks is all about coaching IMO, exploiting weaknesses, throwing out sum surprises. On paper the Rams should win but as we know, game is played on the field. I think we have a close game decided in the 4th quarter, as all these games the past 2 weeks have been. GL to you!

When does Don Juan usually release his pick. I’m a huge bengals fan but i really like the rams because of all the veterans 

He usually released his play on the Fridays before Super Bowl. But this time , according to his post, he may release it on this Wednesday. 

@brn2loslive2win

  Rams need a QB. Stafford a veteran? Hahaha at what? INTS? 323 career TDS and 161 INTS. 49% INT to TD ratio. Flip a coin as that’s the guess on if he throws for a TD or an INT. LMAO

SBNATION-However, Stafford has had some ugly outings this year. He threw thirteen interceptions over his last nine regular season games. That includes back-to-back interceptions—one a pick-six, the other down to the Los Angeles Rams’ two yard line—in an ugly loss to the Tennessee Titans in early November.

In fact, Stafford led the league in pick-sixes this year with four, which is one more than he had last year with the Lions, when he also led the NFL in that category.

49 Cincy 23 8 8 26 9 21
-4 LAR 25 5 5 21 3 11

Cincy is better in in Off. Rushing rank at 23 vs 25. The Rams are better in Passing rank at 5 vs 8; Def. rushing rank at 5 vs 8; Def Passing rank at 21 vs 26; Sagarin rank at 3 vs 9 and schedule strength at 11 vs 21.    You could make a case that the Rams are better.    

Here's a stat no one has mentioned, Bengals 7-0 ATS last 7 games. Meaningless, maybe, maybe not. They're beating the books though, no disputing that.

Rams need a QB. Stafford a veteran? Hahaha at what? INTS? 323 career TDS and 161 INTS. 49% INT to TD ratio. Flip a coin as that’s the guess on if he throws for a TD or an INT. LMAO 

####################### 

Oh, 49, eh? 

And yet I picked Bengals as well. 

I'm not a handicapper. I'm a truth seeker.

Besides, handicapper is kind of a negative term lol

@mrusso

 Interesting stat with the number 7 …. From observation only …. Many streaks seem to end on 7 ….. win or losing streaks ….once again just observation . 

@TheBuddah

 Talking strictly streaks, I generally won't bet against a current substantial winning streak or on a team to win with a substantial losing streak. At least 5 games either way. But the Superbowl and any playoffs in general do offset those streaks for me. Still, if you've been betting the Bengals every game, why wouldn't you take them again. I'm 2-2 on them so doesn't really apply to me. GL in your plays!

@chic-cardinals

 .498% basically 50% if you round up? Lol 

this yr is 41% INT to TD ratio. 41TDs 17INTS. 2 INTS thrown in SB this yr. Possibly 1 pick 6 

Wait , weren’t you leaning Bengals ? Who h got VZ 

@EatTheRich

  Hit the nail on the head. This guy is beyond clueless, all 49ers can’t, won’t, script is written, numerology says so, non stop all last week and fanboy never owned up that he was wrong. Just more gibberish spewing from his mouth. Mush is strong with this one. 

Check out NFL.com.  Go to the team stats and check DEF passing and sort the teams by "Rate."  LAR is ranked #5 while CIN is only #18, so that is one way they're better.

Those stats are for the regular season.  CIN has won 3 playoff games, including 2 as a road dog, so CIN's passing DEF might be good enough to win one more game.

Are you a special kid? Never owned up to? 

It's right here. What am I denying? Complain all you want. The game is decided before it starts, whether I'm right or wrong about outcome. Can you grasp that basic truth?  

Adulthood is the new immaturity. You act like children over tv sports. You live vicariously through jocks that don't care you exist. Get a grip. 

 Stop worshipping your tv

Nice catch... 

Bengals probably should have lost to the Raiders but didn't, they should have lost to Titans but didn't,  should have lost to the Chiefsadter the Chiefs should have lost to the Bills, but didn't and probably should lose to the Rams. Rams almost losing to a dead in the water Buccaneers teams well...They hit one big pass when Bucs played an extremely strange coverage scheme.  Anyone can win or lose. Being a Rams fan I don't see them as a good situational team but the Bengals seem to be an excellent situational team. Did the 49ers deserve to beat the Packers and the Rams were generally outplayed by the 49ers but lost, even the Dallas game was almost given away by the 9ers. Anything can happen Bengals winning by 3 or losing by 13. Nothing would be surprising this year.

hOW many Sacks Mr. Donald have in his last Super Bowl ? 

He has as many as you and I do...but this time I think he will have at least one but that over/under sack total number is around 5 so...

I look for one of my favorite players on D for the Bengals to come up big in some way and maybe add a sack or two and an intercept...some guys come up big in big games and slot corner Mike Hilton is one of them. 

@vanzack

 No there isn't

@lancer89074

 Trey Hendrickson. Is this guy the most underrated defensive player in this Superbowl?

2021 regular season sacks, 14

Donald 12.5 sacks

Playoffs, Trey, 2.5 sacks, 1 FF

Miller 2 sacks, 1 FF.

Yet I have failed to see this guys name one time anywhere in this forum, my apologies if I missed him somewhere. If I'm Trey, I'm feeling somewhat disrespected because his name isn't even in any conversation, yet his numbers are good, he's productive. Don't sleep on Mr. Hendrickson, I'll promise you Matt Stafford and his O-line won't.

Donalds 12.5 > Hendricksons 14 imo since Donald isn’t an Edge rusher  line Hendrickson up inside and see if he reaches 14

i agree though Hendrickson had a great year, cincy probabky wouldn’t be here without him since they let Carl Lawson walk

Last 5 Superbowls,  favorite teams are 3-1-1

White jersey winning the Superbowl?  Look it up.  It might change your life.  Rams wearing white this weekend.  

@philschnaars

 I only used Donald because he has the most sacks on the Rams. I'm not saying Hendrickson is a better player, just that he's been very productive and again, he's almost anonymous to alot of people out there. This is the type of player to come out and make a statement on Sunday. I'll be watching him and Rams fans should too.

@nfl_brosuf

 Yea...I don't think so. Getting married, having kids, those are life changing events for me, not the color of a football jersey.