PR II has a very unquie way to measure things, I use ratio, what ratio does....... a team out-play it's opp in key stat battles and uses ratio automatically credits better defense and gives extra reward for winning each stat battle even if by a small amount.
One could not look at year end stats and see Panthers as comparable to best teams in history.
Here's why, let say team A wins ave per pass battle in a particular game 10 yds to 7 a 3 yd diff.
Team B wins 6-4, only a 2 yd diff.
Using ration team B is the better team because their defense played much better.
10 divided by 7 = 1.43 to 1
6 divided by 4 + 1.5 to 1
Team B recieves more points in their PRing even though they only out-gained opp by 2 yds to team A 3 yds.
This penalizes better offenses and rewards better defenses.
For team A to get 1.5 points they need to ave 10.5 yds and out-gain opp by 3.5 yds to be equal to a team out-gaining an opp by only 2 yds.
This is why year end stats will never see what PR II sees.
PR II also contradicts what many web sites say that the running game has little value, it weighs the running game quite a bit using ratio.
Here's the best teams in PRII , teams over 15
91 Skins, 85 Bears, 92 Dallas, 98 Denver, 2000 Ravens and 2013 Seahawks were a tad under 15.
If we look at how these teams dominated the postseason.................
91 Skins won by ave of 20.33 pts
85 Bears 27 pts
92 Dallas 23 pts
98 Denver 21 pts
2000 Ravens 18 pts
2013 Seahawks 16.33 pts
Each team won at least 1 game by 30 pts or more except 2000 Ravens best win 27 pts.
Panthers won by 34
Each team won a 2cd game by at least 14 pts except 2013 Seahawks who were up 16 when Saints scored on 4th down with 28 secs left.
Of coarse Panthers up by 31 and gave up many a score.
Those teams combined to go 18-1 ATS in all postseason games.
Panthers 2-0 ATS thus far.
Wow, I sure missed the boat with the Panthers this season, and that is as aggravating as it gets !!!...............................
......
.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
