The most HILARIOUS thing to me is how guys like Celtics have figured it out. They know what's going on: "The line tells the story."
But they never can parlay that knowledge into winning consistently.
You can just "hear" it in his posts. He is so completely flummoxed....so completely confused....so completely turned upside down by his paranoia......that this is what he comes up with.
He's not the first and yes, corruption exists in sports. But seriously, line this guy up with the folks who said a plane never crashed into the pentagon.
0
The most HILARIOUS thing to me is how guys like Celtics have figured it out. They know what's going on: "The line tells the story."
But they never can parlay that knowledge into winning consistently.
You can just "hear" it in his posts. He is so completely flummoxed....so completely confused....so completely turned upside down by his paranoia......that this is what he comes up with.
He's not the first and yes, corruption exists in sports. But seriously, line this guy up with the folks who said a plane never crashed into the pentagon.
The fact that someone thinks the NFL is rigged, yet CONTINUES TO WAGER ON NFL GAMES tells me they are completely insane, and their opinion has basis of credibility.
The old bookie guy is just a moron.
Fishy lines = Bookmakers know more about sports than you
People that cry "Fix" = Morons. All of them.
0
The fact that someone thinks the NFL is rigged, yet CONTINUES TO WAGER ON NFL GAMES tells me they are completely insane, and their opinion has basis of credibility.
The old bookie guy is just a moron.
Fishy lines = Bookmakers know more about sports than you
The fact that someone thinks the NFL is rigged, yet CONTINUES TO WAGER ON NFL GAMES tells me they are completely insane, and their opinion has NO basis of credibility.
The old bookie guy is just a moron.
Fishy lines = Bookmakers know more about sports than you
People that cry "Fix" = Morons. All of them.
Edit my missed word!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:
The fact that someone thinks the NFL is rigged, yet CONTINUES TO WAGER ON NFL GAMES tells me they are completely insane, and their opinion has NO basis of credibility.
The old bookie guy is just a moron.
Fishy lines = Bookmakers know more about sports than you
The most HILARIOUS thing to me is how guys like Celtics have figured it out. They know what's going on: "The line tells the story."
But they never can parlay that knowledge into winning consistently.
You can just "hear" it in his posts. He is so completely flummoxed....so completely confused....so completely turned upside down by his paranoia......that this is what he comes up with.
He's not the first and yes, corruption exists in sports. But seriously, line this guy up with the folks who said a plane never crashed into the pentagon.
Because how would i know? Do you think i know exactly what is going on? I can come up with arguments why NFL wants this or that team to win like it was obv. Reid wanna gonna beat his old team after being squished by them, that is a pretty obvious thing.
But i knew NOTHING about Chicago - Pittsburgh that could give me an edge, and therefore i didnt place a bet. But when i watched the game it was clearly evident to me what was going on. Chicago get their lead, now at this point, EVERYONE go: "Roethlisberger worst QB ever. Steelers in totally disarray" and since Pittsburgh are at home, they just let the Steelers come back a little bit in the game to give something for the home crowd and the fans before they let the game slide completely away again. This fact has not been useful in a capping situation anyways, unless u took the bears when the lead was down to 4 @ 27-23.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
The most HILARIOUS thing to me is how guys like Celtics have figured it out. They know what's going on: "The line tells the story."
But they never can parlay that knowledge into winning consistently.
You can just "hear" it in his posts. He is so completely flummoxed....so completely confused....so completely turned upside down by his paranoia......that this is what he comes up with.
He's not the first and yes, corruption exists in sports. But seriously, line this guy up with the folks who said a plane never crashed into the pentagon.
Because how would i know? Do you think i know exactly what is going on? I can come up with arguments why NFL wants this or that team to win like it was obv. Reid wanna gonna beat his old team after being squished by them, that is a pretty obvious thing.
But i knew NOTHING about Chicago - Pittsburgh that could give me an edge, and therefore i didnt place a bet. But when i watched the game it was clearly evident to me what was going on. Chicago get their lead, now at this point, EVERYONE go: "Roethlisberger worst QB ever. Steelers in totally disarray" and since Pittsburgh are at home, they just let the Steelers come back a little bit in the game to give something for the home crowd and the fans before they let the game slide completely away again. This fact has not been useful in a capping situation anyways, unless u took the bears when the lead was down to 4 @ 27-23.
Tonight, if there's a "total, absolute "blowout," fand will go to bed by the half....TV COMMERCIALS GO TO HELL, SOME MNF RATINGS ETC....They always leave a bit of doubt with the bettors, just like last night....Chicago up big, Steelers , like a miracle, come back to make it interesting, then late in game BIG BEN tosses out, yes tosses out backwards, his second giveaway, and it's done.....But viewers still stay, and got their pathetic entertainment!!....For some reason, I like the "under" tonight!....Thoughts??....
This is exactly spot on. You see, Denver lead by halftime, then up 30-7 and should have been 37-7. But what would happen if the score was 37-7... People would leave the field, betters would call it a game. So they just give Oakland betters a bit more faith in this pick before it will eventually get killed.
It's important when theres only 1 game on the night that the spread is somewhat close atleast at some point in the game otherwise the betters will lose interest. It ok on Sunday that some slight totally away, but the night games must have a close period. That was the case with Chicago - Steelers, where Bears were up 27-23 and Steelers had the chance to get ahead. At a 27-23 its still pretty open whos gonna win atleast if u like score wise...
0
Quote Originally Posted by inthetank:
Tonight, if there's a "total, absolute "blowout," fand will go to bed by the half....TV COMMERCIALS GO TO HELL, SOME MNF RATINGS ETC....They always leave a bit of doubt with the bettors, just like last night....Chicago up big, Steelers , like a miracle, come back to make it interesting, then late in game BIG BEN tosses out, yes tosses out backwards, his second giveaway, and it's done.....But viewers still stay, and got their pathetic entertainment!!....For some reason, I like the "under" tonight!....Thoughts??....
This is exactly spot on. You see, Denver lead by halftime, then up 30-7 and should have been 37-7. But what would happen if the score was 37-7... People would leave the field, betters would call it a game. So they just give Oakland betters a bit more faith in this pick before it will eventually get killed.
It's important when theres only 1 game on the night that the spread is somewhat close atleast at some point in the game otherwise the betters will lose interest. It ok on Sunday that some slight totally away, but the night games must have a close period. That was the case with Chicago - Steelers, where Bears were up 27-23 and Steelers had the chance to get ahead. At a 27-23 its still pretty open whos gonna win atleast if u like score wise...
Because how would i know? Do you think i know exactly what is going on? I can come up with arguments why NFL wants this or that team to win like it was obv. Reid wanna gonna beat his old team after being squished by them, that is a pretty obvious thing.
But i knew NOTHING about Chicago - Pittsburgh that could give me an edge, and therefore i didnt place a bet. But when i watched the game it was clearly evident to me what was going on. Chicago get their lead, now at this point, EVERYONE go: "Roethlisberger worst QB ever. Steelers in totally disarray" and since Pittsburgh are at home, they just let the Steelers come back a little bit in the game to give something for the home crowd and the fans before they let the game slide completely away again. This fact has not been useful in a capping situation anyways, unless u took the bears when the lead was down to 4 @ 27-23.
Just a few questions:
If that was so obvious, there are things called "in-game" bets, 2nd half, 3Q and 4Q bets for you to choose from.
No disrespect, it's much easier to come up with reasons to fit your argument AFTER the game was over. For instance, there are numerous "fixed" threads AFTER tonight's game. For some reasons, people KNOW FOR A FACT that Den backers were taking -16 or above and Oak backers were taking +16 or less and that's absolute no possible way the other way around or at least somewhere in between.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BostonCelticFTW:
Because how would i know? Do you think i know exactly what is going on? I can come up with arguments why NFL wants this or that team to win like it was obv. Reid wanna gonna beat his old team after being squished by them, that is a pretty obvious thing.
But i knew NOTHING about Chicago - Pittsburgh that could give me an edge, and therefore i didnt place a bet. But when i watched the game it was clearly evident to me what was going on. Chicago get their lead, now at this point, EVERYONE go: "Roethlisberger worst QB ever. Steelers in totally disarray" and since Pittsburgh are at home, they just let the Steelers come back a little bit in the game to give something for the home crowd and the fans before they let the game slide completely away again. This fact has not been useful in a capping situation anyways, unless u took the bears when the lead was down to 4 @ 27-23.
Just a few questions:
If that was so obvious, there are things called "in-game" bets, 2nd half, 3Q and 4Q bets for you to choose from.
No disrespect, it's much easier to come up with reasons to fit your argument AFTER the game was over. For instance, there are numerous "fixed" threads AFTER tonight's game. For some reasons, people KNOW FOR A FACT that Den backers were taking -16 or above and Oak backers were taking +16 or less and that's absolute no possible way the other way around or at least somewhere in between.
I can count more than a hand full of baseball games where the public is pounding the RL and then a team blows the RL from some off the wall play.. Coincidence? Maybe.. When I think hmm fix? Then they lose the lead and the game I lmao.
0
I can count more than a hand full of baseball games where the public is pounding the RL and then a team blows the RL from some off the wall play.. Coincidence? Maybe.. When I think hmm fix? Then they lose the lead and the game I lmao.
The fact that someone thinks the NFL is rigged, yet CONTINUES TO WAGER ON NFL GAMES tells me they are completely insane, and their opinion has basis of credibility.
The old bookie guy is just a moron.
Fishy lines = Bookmakers know more about sports than you
People that cry "Fix" = Morons. All of them.
You're right.. If people had shopping choices and knew how to read lines.. You can tell a sharp from a fish..
0
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:
The fact that someone thinks the NFL is rigged, yet CONTINUES TO WAGER ON NFL GAMES tells me they are completely insane, and their opinion has basis of credibility.
The old bookie guy is just a moron.
Fishy lines = Bookmakers know more about sports than you
People that cry "Fix" = Morons. All of them.
You're right.. If people had shopping choices and knew how to read lines.. You can tell a sharp from a fish..
The most HILARIOUS thing to me is how guys like Celtics have figured it out. They know what's going on: "The line tells the story."
But they never can parlay that knowledge into winning consistently.
You can just "hear" it in his posts. He is so completely flummoxed....so completely confused....so completely turned upside down by his paranoia......that this is what he comes up with.
He's not the first and yes, corruption exists in sports. But seriously, line this guy up with the folks who said a plane never crashed into the pentagon.
It can be done.. You just have to be that sharp.. Personally i never pay over 105 vig.. And i never parlay.. I go SU on teams, and have occasional Hi/Lo plays
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
The most HILARIOUS thing to me is how guys like Celtics have figured it out. They know what's going on: "The line tells the story."
But they never can parlay that knowledge into winning consistently.
You can just "hear" it in his posts. He is so completely flummoxed....so completely confused....so completely turned upside down by his paranoia......that this is what he comes up with.
He's not the first and yes, corruption exists in sports. But seriously, line this guy up with the folks who said a plane never crashed into the pentagon.
It can be done.. You just have to be that sharp.. Personally i never pay over 105 vig.. And i never parlay.. I go SU on teams, and have occasional Hi/Lo plays
If that was so obvious, there are things called "in-game" bets, 2nd half, 3Q and 4Q bets for you to choose from.
No disrespect, it's much easier to come up with reasons to fit your argument AFTER the game was over. For instance, there are numerous "fixed" threads AFTER tonight's game. For some reasons, people KNOW FOR A FACT that Den backers were taking -16 or above and Oak backers were taking +16 or less and that's absolute no possible way the other way around or at least somewhere in between.
.
If you can randomly make plays with your own money and you're not rich.. That is the dumbest thing in itself... Playing with money having no data to support it makes a bettor a degenerate... You would be suprised how much statistics mean when interpreted in a sharp way...
0
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:
Just a few questions:
If that was so obvious, there are things called "in-game" bets, 2nd half, 3Q and 4Q bets for you to choose from.
No disrespect, it's much easier to come up with reasons to fit your argument AFTER the game was over. For instance, there are numerous "fixed" threads AFTER tonight's game. For some reasons, people KNOW FOR A FACT that Den backers were taking -16 or above and Oak backers were taking +16 or less and that's absolute no possible way the other way around or at least somewhere in between.
.
If you can randomly make plays with your own money and you're not rich.. That is the dumbest thing in itself... Playing with money having no data to support it makes a bettor a degenerate... You would be suprised how much statistics mean when interpreted in a sharp way...
This was posted at the half of the FIRST GROUP OF GAMES.. NOT AT THE END OF THE GAMES.. EVEN IF YOU DISCOUNTED THE FIRST GROUP OF GAMES I HIT 75% Of the 4 3pm GAMES.. GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL POST AND READ IT..
0
Quote Originally Posted by bluecob4lt:
Fraud alert. Posted picks late into the 2nd half.
This was posted at the half of the FIRST GROUP OF GAMES.. NOT AT THE END OF THE GAMES.. EVEN IF YOU DISCOUNTED THE FIRST GROUP OF GAMES I HIT 75% Of the 4 3pm GAMES.. GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL POST AND READ IT..
Because how would i know? Do you think i know exactly what is going on? I can come up with arguments why NFL wants this or that team to win like it was obv. Reid wanna gonna beat his old team after being squished by them, that is a pretty obvious thing.
But i knew NOTHING about Chicago - Pittsburgh that could give me an edge, and therefore i didnt place a bet. But when i watched the game it was clearly evident to me what was going on. Chicago get their lead, now at this point, EVERYONE go: "Roethlisberger worst QB ever. Steelers in totally disarray" and since Pittsburgh are at home, they just let the Steelers come back a little bit in the game to give something for the home crowd and the fans before they let the game slide completely away again. This fact has not been useful in a capping situation anyways, unless u took the bears when the lead was down to 4 @ 27-23.
Honestly i was off on that game.. Chicago sucks at home and good away.. But its still a toss up... They can't all look that bad like the 1pm Games LOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by BostonCelticFTW:
Because how would i know? Do you think i know exactly what is going on? I can come up with arguments why NFL wants this or that team to win like it was obv. Reid wanna gonna beat his old team after being squished by them, that is a pretty obvious thing.
But i knew NOTHING about Chicago - Pittsburgh that could give me an edge, and therefore i didnt place a bet. But when i watched the game it was clearly evident to me what was going on. Chicago get their lead, now at this point, EVERYONE go: "Roethlisberger worst QB ever. Steelers in totally disarray" and since Pittsburgh are at home, they just let the Steelers come back a little bit in the game to give something for the home crowd and the fans before they let the game slide completely away again. This fact has not been useful in a capping situation anyways, unless u took the bears when the lead was down to 4 @ 27-23.
Honestly i was off on that game.. Chicago sucks at home and good away.. But its still a toss up... They can't all look that bad like the 1pm Games LOL
If you can randomly make plays with your own money and you're not rich.. That is the dumbest thing in itself... Playing with money having no data to support it makes a bettor a degenerate... You would be suprised how much statistics mean when interpreted in a sharp way...
The only thing I am surprised is you can't even interpret what I say to the other person....
0
Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:
.
If you can randomly make plays with your own money and you're not rich.. That is the dumbest thing in itself... Playing with money having no data to support it makes a bettor a degenerate... You would be suprised how much statistics mean when interpreted in a sharp way...
The only thing I am surprised is you can't even interpret what I say to the other person....
I personally wouldnt put my money anywhere it were strickly random... Now if i get the feeling its predetermined i would go pretty full force.. If i wanted random i would play table games at the casino instead for entertainment
Here's another scenario for you.. If you knew a coach gambled on his games or in general.. Wouldnt you follow his plays? Yeah its bullshit to say they know more than us SINCE IT IS UTTERLY OBVIOUS THAT THEY DO KNOW MORE THAN US... IF ANYTHING YOU ARE EITHER ON THE WINNING OR THE LOSING SIDE..
Thirdly,, IM SURE THERE ARE PEOPLE HERE THAT EITHER KNOWS AND PRETENDS HE OR SHE DOESNT KNOW OR IS SOMEWHERE INBETWEEN... FOR THERE ARE FAKES, REALS ,HALF REALS, OR THE NINJAS, AS WELL...
Saying it is stupid that someone makes plays on something that's rigged is also stupid.. There are ones that thrive off of this and there are ones that fail..It is merely a two way street... Since you still have two main choices... I find it being more stupid to consistantly lose without making adjustments to what's important to know and learn from...
I started off losing a ton and lost some more the following years after... I finally got it all back because it really got to me knowing what i know and the time i put into it that i could consistently lose.. So i paid for my education and i never stopped and i don't believe i ever will.. When things don't go the way they should on that many occasions,,, you really have to open up your eyes and dig deeper.. As hard headed as i am,, i turn a full circle because numbers don't lie.. But it took years to figure out and many countless nights.. Took, Alot of number crunching,, Alot analysis, Alot of reading, and knowledge of current events.. I go as far as which team would play whom the following week and what happend last week and last 3-5 years of teams reputation currently and on average in conjunction with my own system.. It is more like knowing the numbers the current situations and being able to use all of that knowledge and data into into one unit of measure to being on the right side... YES IT ITS THE SIDE NOT THE TEAM... Before i just went with my feeling or fav teams or fav players.. After spending years and years,, i lost alot of love for the game.. I can honestly say i don't know who is my favorite team.. It depends on the week or more specifically favorite team for which event... THERES A NEW SLOGAN AMONG US,, INCASE YOU NEVER HEARD.. THE GAMES DON"T EVEN START UNTIL THE LAST 5 MINUTES... LOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:
Edit my missed word!!
I personally wouldnt put my money anywhere it were strickly random... Now if i get the feeling its predetermined i would go pretty full force.. If i wanted random i would play table games at the casino instead for entertainment
Here's another scenario for you.. If you knew a coach gambled on his games or in general.. Wouldnt you follow his plays? Yeah its bullshit to say they know more than us SINCE IT IS UTTERLY OBVIOUS THAT THEY DO KNOW MORE THAN US... IF ANYTHING YOU ARE EITHER ON THE WINNING OR THE LOSING SIDE..
Thirdly,, IM SURE THERE ARE PEOPLE HERE THAT EITHER KNOWS AND PRETENDS HE OR SHE DOESNT KNOW OR IS SOMEWHERE INBETWEEN... FOR THERE ARE FAKES, REALS ,HALF REALS, OR THE NINJAS, AS WELL...
Saying it is stupid that someone makes plays on something that's rigged is also stupid.. There are ones that thrive off of this and there are ones that fail..It is merely a two way street... Since you still have two main choices... I find it being more stupid to consistantly lose without making adjustments to what's important to know and learn from...
I started off losing a ton and lost some more the following years after... I finally got it all back because it really got to me knowing what i know and the time i put into it that i could consistently lose.. So i paid for my education and i never stopped and i don't believe i ever will.. When things don't go the way they should on that many occasions,,, you really have to open up your eyes and dig deeper.. As hard headed as i am,, i turn a full circle because numbers don't lie.. But it took years to figure out and many countless nights.. Took, Alot of number crunching,, Alot analysis, Alot of reading, and knowledge of current events.. I go as far as which team would play whom the following week and what happend last week and last 3-5 years of teams reputation currently and on average in conjunction with my own system.. It is more like knowing the numbers the current situations and being able to use all of that knowledge and data into into one unit of measure to being on the right side... YES IT ITS THE SIDE NOT THE TEAM... Before i just went with my feeling or fav teams or fav players.. After spending years and years,, i lost alot of love for the game.. I can honestly say i don't know who is my favorite team.. It depends on the week or more specifically favorite team for which event... THERES A NEW SLOGAN AMONG US,, INCASE YOU NEVER HEARD.. THE GAMES DON"T EVEN START UNTIL THE LAST 5 MINUTES... LOL
FOR THE NON BELIEVERS.. ASK SOMEONE OR YOURSELF THESE TWO QUESTIONS..
IF YOU KNOW ANY COACH FOR ANY SPORT,, ASK THEM WHETHER THEY CAN INFLUENCE A GAME... OR I GUESS YOU CAN USE YOUR IMAGINATION...
SECONDLY ,, ASK YOURSELF IF YOU PUT TOGETHER ALL THE COACHES REFS BLAH BLAH BLAH THAT CAN HAVE THE POWER TO INFLUENCE THE GAME ,, ADD IT ALL UP.. COME UP WITH A NUMBER...
THEN TAKE THIS NUMBER AND SAY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR EVEN ONE OF THEM TO INFLUENCE SOMETHING FOR THEIR OWN AGENDA OR SIMPLY FOR MONEY.. IS THIS SO FAR FETCHED?
REMEMBER EVEN IF YOU DIDNT GAMBLE.. YOU STILL PAY INTO THE SYSTEM,, ONE WAY OR ANOTHER... YEAH MOST PEOPLE HERE ARE THE LITTLE GUYS... AND THERE ARE ALWAYS MORE LITTLE GUYS PAYING INTO IT THAN THE ONES TAKING... ALWAYS..
0
FOR THE NON BELIEVERS.. ASK SOMEONE OR YOURSELF THESE TWO QUESTIONS..
IF YOU KNOW ANY COACH FOR ANY SPORT,, ASK THEM WHETHER THEY CAN INFLUENCE A GAME... OR I GUESS YOU CAN USE YOUR IMAGINATION...
SECONDLY ,, ASK YOURSELF IF YOU PUT TOGETHER ALL THE COACHES REFS BLAH BLAH BLAH THAT CAN HAVE THE POWER TO INFLUENCE THE GAME ,, ADD IT ALL UP.. COME UP WITH A NUMBER...
THEN TAKE THIS NUMBER AND SAY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR EVEN ONE OF THEM TO INFLUENCE SOMETHING FOR THEIR OWN AGENDA OR SIMPLY FOR MONEY.. IS THIS SO FAR FETCHED?
REMEMBER EVEN IF YOU DIDNT GAMBLE.. YOU STILL PAY INTO THE SYSTEM,, ONE WAY OR ANOTHER... YEAH MOST PEOPLE HERE ARE THE LITTLE GUYS... AND THERE ARE ALWAYS MORE LITTLE GUYS PAYING INTO IT THAN THE ONES TAKING... ALWAYS..
THE QUESTION IS ARE YOU STILL ON THE BOTTOM? MOVING UP OR DOWN? STAGNANT? ASK YOURSELF.. ITS USELESS TO RANT ON OTHERS... WORRY ABOUT YOURSELF.. BLAME YOURSELF FIRST... AND IT WILL CLEAR ALOT OF THINGS FOR MANY...
MY QUESTION ON A SIDE NOTE IS.. WHETHER OR NOT COLLEGE LEVEL ATHLETES KNOW THE ODDS OF BECOMING PRO.. I MEAN LIKE REALLY SEE FOR THEMSELVES WHETHER THEY MEASURE UP... BECAUSE PERSONALLY I THINK SOME COLLEGE PLAYERS DESERVE TO GET SOME FOR OF COMPENSATION.. I DON"T SEE JOBS GROWING IN THE PUBLIC SECTORS LIKE PRO... BUT ATHLETES ARE GROWING LIKE A CANCER AND I MEAN GLOBALLY...
0
THE QUESTION IS ARE YOU STILL ON THE BOTTOM? MOVING UP OR DOWN? STAGNANT? ASK YOURSELF.. ITS USELESS TO RANT ON OTHERS... WORRY ABOUT YOURSELF.. BLAME YOURSELF FIRST... AND IT WILL CLEAR ALOT OF THINGS FOR MANY...
MY QUESTION ON A SIDE NOTE IS.. WHETHER OR NOT COLLEGE LEVEL ATHLETES KNOW THE ODDS OF BECOMING PRO.. I MEAN LIKE REALLY SEE FOR THEMSELVES WHETHER THEY MEASURE UP... BECAUSE PERSONALLY I THINK SOME COLLEGE PLAYERS DESERVE TO GET SOME FOR OF COMPENSATION.. I DON"T SEE JOBS GROWING IN THE PUBLIC SECTORS LIKE PRO... BUT ATHLETES ARE GROWING LIKE A CANCER AND I MEAN GLOBALLY...
To those watching a game like Oak - Den tonight or Miami - Atlanta, do you think its just a coincedence that Miami end up winning by the EXACT 4 points? Do you think its skillfully by either Miami or Vegas that they end up winning with those EXACT 4 points?
0
To those watching a game like Oak - Den tonight or Miami - Atlanta, do you think its just a coincedence that Miami end up winning by the EXACT 4 points? Do you think its skillfully by either Miami or Vegas that they end up winning with those EXACT 4 points?
What you gotta have to keep an eye on this weekend is Chiefs - Giants. I think Vegas will allow Giants to win here. They may not do so, but they will be allowed to if they play good enough. Public were ALL OVER Giants thinking they couldnt go 0-3, ALL OVER, so Vegas wants to shut these betters up so they dont get screwed over in another scenario where Giants got 80% of the money. Not only did Giants lose this sunday, they got COMPLETELY demolished to remove all faith people might have had in the giants. So therefore people will not pound money on Giants like it happened this Sunday. Especially because they are facing the chiefs who are 3-0 so people backing Giants will still not be as comfortable.
0
What you gotta have to keep an eye on this weekend is Chiefs - Giants. I think Vegas will allow Giants to win here. They may not do so, but they will be allowed to if they play good enough. Public were ALL OVER Giants thinking they couldnt go 0-3, ALL OVER, so Vegas wants to shut these betters up so they dont get screwed over in another scenario where Giants got 80% of the money. Not only did Giants lose this sunday, they got COMPLETELY demolished to remove all faith people might have had in the giants. So therefore people will not pound money on Giants like it happened this Sunday. Especially because they are facing the chiefs who are 3-0 so people backing Giants will still not be as comfortable.
This is exactly spot on. You see, Denver lead by halftime, then up 30-7 and should have been 37-7. But what would happen if the score was 37-7... People would leave the field, betters would call it a game. So they just give Oakland betters a bit more faith in this pick before it will eventually get killed.
It's important when theres only 1 game on the night that the spread is somewhat close atleast at some point in the game otherwise the betters will lose interest. It ok on Sunday that some slight totally away, but the night games must have a close period. That was the case with Chicago - Steelers, where Bears were up 27-23 and Steelers had the chance to get ahead. At a 27-23 its still pretty open whos gonna win atleast if u like score wise...
You are either a troll, or one of the dumbest humans on the planet.
Which is it??
0
Quote Originally Posted by BostonCelticFTW:
This is exactly spot on. You see, Denver lead by halftime, then up 30-7 and should have been 37-7. But what would happen if the score was 37-7... People would leave the field, betters would call it a game. So they just give Oakland betters a bit more faith in this pick before it will eventually get killed.
It's important when theres only 1 game on the night that the spread is somewhat close atleast at some point in the game otherwise the betters will lose interest. It ok on Sunday that some slight totally away, but the night games must have a close period. That was the case with Chicago - Steelers, where Bears were up 27-23 and Steelers had the chance to get ahead. At a 27-23 its still pretty open whos gonna win atleast if u like score wise...
You are either a troll, or one of the dumbest humans on the planet.
What you gotta have to keep an eye on this weekend is Chiefs - Giants. I think Vegas will allow Giants to win here. They may not do so, but they will be allowed to if they play good enough. Public were ALL OVER Giants thinking they couldnt go 0-3, ALL OVER, so Vegas wants to shut these betters up so they dont get screwed over in another scenario where Giants got 80% of the money. Not only did Giants lose this sunday, they got COMPLETELY demolished to remove all faith people might have had in the giants. So therefore people will not pound money on Giants like it happened this Sunday. Especially because they are facing the chiefs who are 3-0 so people backing Giants will still not be as comfortable.
Vegas and the NFL DON'T NEED TO FIX GAMES YOU MINDLESS MORON!! Vegas has an edge, it's called juice or vig. They have it on LITERALLY EVERY GAME OFFERED IN THE CASINO. They could give two flying f**********ks who wins the games so long as people still gamble. They only lose when no one plays. Yes, the might lose money on a particular game, but in the long run, they win, and they win big.
Face it, the linemakers know WAY MORE ABOUT FOOTBALL THAN YOU DO.
Nevermind, I am just beating my head against the wall talking to you. I hope someday when you grow up, you'll look back at this and laugh at how ridiculously silly your theory is.
Have a nice life.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BostonCelticFTW:
What you gotta have to keep an eye on this weekend is Chiefs - Giants. I think Vegas will allow Giants to win here. They may not do so, but they will be allowed to if they play good enough. Public were ALL OVER Giants thinking they couldnt go 0-3, ALL OVER, so Vegas wants to shut these betters up so they dont get screwed over in another scenario where Giants got 80% of the money. Not only did Giants lose this sunday, they got COMPLETELY demolished to remove all faith people might have had in the giants. So therefore people will not pound money on Giants like it happened this Sunday. Especially because they are facing the chiefs who are 3-0 so people backing Giants will still not be as comfortable.
Vegas and the NFL DON'T NEED TO FIX GAMES YOU MINDLESS MORON!! Vegas has an edge, it's called juice or vig. They have it on LITERALLY EVERY GAME OFFERED IN THE CASINO. They could give two flying f**********ks who wins the games so long as people still gamble. They only lose when no one plays. Yes, the might lose money on a particular game, but in the long run, they win, and they win big.
Face it, the linemakers know WAY MORE ABOUT FOOTBALL THAN YOU DO.
Nevermind, I am just beating my head against the wall talking to you. I hope someday when you grow up, you'll look back at this and laugh at how ridiculously silly your theory is.
Vegas and the NFL DON'T NEED TO FIX GAMES YOU MINDLESS MORON!! Vegas has an edge, it's called juice or vig. They have it on LITERALLY EVERY GAME OFFERED IN THE CASINO. They could give two flying f**********ks who wins the games so long as people still gamble. They only lose when no one plays. Yes, the might lose money on a particular game, but in the long run, they win, and they win big.
Face it, the linemakers know WAY MORE ABOUT FOOTBALL THAN YOU DO.
Nevermind, I am just beating my head against the wall talking to you. I hope someday when you grow up, you'll look back at this and laugh at how ridiculously silly your theory is.
Have a nice life.
Ok. do you even know what juice is? If you do, how relevant do you think 10% juice is if theres 80% on the public on one of the sides and that particular side hits?
If 80% is on the winners side all the time then vegas would go broke. Therefore they couldnt allow Giants to win here. Vegas would lose millions if that happened. They can allow the 50/50 games to be random and be fine with the juice but not the 80/20 games. I know they would still make plenty of profits even if Giants lost and even if GB lost, but i dont think u have any clue how greedy these business people are. Its all about money. Vegas wouldnt give 100$ to charity even if their life counted on it. They would rather die.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:
Vegas and the NFL DON'T NEED TO FIX GAMES YOU MINDLESS MORON!! Vegas has an edge, it's called juice or vig. They have it on LITERALLY EVERY GAME OFFERED IN THE CASINO. They could give two flying f**********ks who wins the games so long as people still gamble. They only lose when no one plays. Yes, the might lose money on a particular game, but in the long run, they win, and they win big.
Face it, the linemakers know WAY MORE ABOUT FOOTBALL THAN YOU DO.
Nevermind, I am just beating my head against the wall talking to you. I hope someday when you grow up, you'll look back at this and laugh at how ridiculously silly your theory is.
Have a nice life.
Ok. do you even know what juice is? If you do, how relevant do you think 10% juice is if theres 80% on the public on one of the sides and that particular side hits?
If 80% is on the winners side all the time then vegas would go broke. Therefore they couldnt allow Giants to win here. Vegas would lose millions if that happened. They can allow the 50/50 games to be random and be fine with the juice but not the 80/20 games. I know they would still make plenty of profits even if Giants lost and even if GB lost, but i dont think u have any clue how greedy these business people are. Its all about money. Vegas wouldnt give 100$ to charity even if their life counted on it. They would rather die.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
so what are we looking at this wk boys ?
Hot Forum Topics
