I Honestly don't think the spread will matter in this one. If you think SF wins, you're better off taking the first half +3, because for them to win, it will be imperative they get off to a good start. If they don't, the game could get away from them.
I think a bet with minimal risk would be SF 1H +3, Seattle -4 (full game). I don't think both of those bets lose.
The 2 most important factors from a SF standpoint in this game are:
1. How will the SF offensive line handle the crowd noise this time? Have they made adjustments since the last 2 trips? If not they are in trouble.
2. When Kaepernick is forced to make throws beyond 10 yards on 2nd and 3rd downs, can he beat the Seattle secondary?
I Honestly don't think the spread will matter in this one. If you think SF wins, you're better off taking the first half +3, because for them to win, it will be imperative they get off to a good start. If they don't, the game could get away from them.
I think a bet with minimal risk would be SF 1H +3, Seattle -4 (full game). I don't think both of those bets lose.
The 2 most important factors from a SF standpoint in this game are:
1. How will the SF offensive line handle the crowd noise this time? Have they made adjustments since the last 2 trips? If not they are in trouble.
2. When Kaepernick is forced to make throws beyond 10 yards on 2nd and 3rd downs, can he beat the Seattle secondary?
From a Seattle perspective, I think the 2 most important elements are:
1. Can Seattle's offensive line stymie San Fran's pass rush, which has been playing at a high level over the past couple of months.
2. Can Russell Wilson make big throws today when SF is stacking the box? His play has been underwhelming for well over a month now. If that continues, Seattle is in trouble. I can guarantee, Fangio's game plan is going to be to stack the box and make Wilson win it.
From a Seattle perspective, I think the 2 most important elements are:
1. Can Seattle's offensive line stymie San Fran's pass rush, which has been playing at a high level over the past couple of months.
2. Can Russell Wilson make big throws today when SF is stacking the box? His play has been underwhelming for well over a month now. If that continues, Seattle is in trouble. I can guarantee, Fangio's game plan is going to be to stack the box and make Wilson win it.
From a Seattle perspective, I think the 2 most important elements are:
1. Can Seattle's offensive line stymie San Fran's pass rush, which has been playing at a high level over the past couple of months.
2. Can Russell Wilson make big throws today when SF is stacking the box? His play has been underwhelming for well over a month now. If that continues, Seattle is in trouble. I can guarantee, Fangio's game plan is going to be to stack the box and make Wilson win it.
From a Seattle perspective, I think the 2 most important elements are:
1. Can Seattle's offensive line stymie San Fran's pass rush, which has been playing at a high level over the past couple of months.
2. Can Russell Wilson make big throws today when SF is stacking the box? His play has been underwhelming for well over a month now. If that continues, Seattle is in trouble. I can guarantee, Fangio's game plan is going to be to stack the box and make Wilson win it.
Christ almighty...are you a complete invalid? Those are averages.
Do you know what an average is?
I didn't think so.
Christ almighty...are you a complete invalid? Those are averages.
Do you know what an average is?
I didn't think so.
Always.
Always.
I can tell you unequivocally right now, that if Seattle wins the game I will tip my hat to them and say they earned it.
Personally, as a SF fan, the Super Bowl wouldn't feel validated unless the team won in Seattle to do it. Not much anyone can say; most notably Seahawk fans if that happens.
I can tell you unequivocally right now, that if Seattle wins the game I will tip my hat to them and say they earned it.
Personally, as a SF fan, the Super Bowl wouldn't feel validated unless the team won in Seattle to do it. Not much anyone can say; most notably Seahawk fans if that happens.
I think a bet with minimal risk would be SF 1H +3, Seattle -4 (full game). I don't think both of those bets lose.
Man, these were good bets
I think a bet with minimal risk would be SF 1H +3, Seattle -4 (full game). I don't think both of those bets lose.
Man, these were good bets
FADEMEWIN,, https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101809423 NOW READ WHAT HOLDINGXYZ POSTED,, WINNERS.... https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101802806 https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101689771&page=57 |
FADEMEWIN,, https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101809423 NOW READ WHAT HOLDINGXYZ POSTED,, WINNERS.... https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101802806 https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101689771&page=57 |
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.