Unfortunately, Covers has disabled the DM feature. Looking for your email, but haven't been able to locate it. Where should I be looking? Tried to direct msg on Twitter but realized I need to sign up for its premium or basic subscription.
I just need to follow you on twitter. What is your username?
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by peter0105:
Unfortunately, Covers has disabled the DM feature. Looking for your email, but haven't been able to locate it. Where should I be looking? Tried to direct msg on Twitter but realized I need to sign up for its premium or basic subscription.
I just need to follow you on twitter. What is your username?
Quote Originally Posted by peter0105: Unfortunately, Covers has disabled the DM feature. Looking for your email, but haven't been able to locate it. Where should I be looking? Tried to direct msg on Twitter but realized I need to sign up for its premium or basic subscription. I just need to follow you on twitter. What is your username?
Try DM now on twitter. I opened it up to anyone. Didnt realize you could do that.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
1
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Quote Originally Posted by peter0105: Unfortunately, Covers has disabled the DM feature. Looking for your email, but haven't been able to locate it. Where should I be looking? Tried to direct msg on Twitter but realized I need to sign up for its premium or basic subscription. I just need to follow you on twitter. What is your username?
Try DM now on twitter. I opened it up to anyone. Didnt realize you could do that.
Van what are your thoughts on Cards covering, which I don't disagree at all. No McBride definitely hurts, but Mike Wilson can fill the void and MHJ may go nuclear against that defense. Conner is healthy and Ekeler has been ruled out. Commies have no run game so far this year and they are on a short week after winning game on road as a sizable underdog (I don't have the ATS stats handy on the numbers).
0
Van what are your thoughts on Cards covering, which I don't disagree at all. No McBride definitely hurts, but Mike Wilson can fill the void and MHJ may go nuclear against that defense. Conner is healthy and Ekeler has been ruled out. Commies have no run game so far this year and they are on a short week after winning game on road as a sizable underdog (I don't have the ATS stats handy on the numbers).
Van what are your thoughts on Cards covering, which I don't disagree at all. No McBride definitely hurts, but Mike Wilson can fill the void and MHJ may go nuclear against that defense. Conner is healthy and Ekeler has been ruled out. Commies have no run game so far this year and they are on a short week after winning game on road as a sizable underdog (I don't have the ATS stats handy on the numbers).
Commanders have arguably the worst defense in the league, in both rush and pass - if not the worst very close. AZ on offense.... opposite story. So wouldnt be surprised if the Cards lay a big number up. Maybe 30+.
So then you have to analyze whether the Commanders offense is for real - and how much variance we will see on a short week with a rookie qb on the road 2 weeks in a row.
I will take my chances that the Cards will hold them down to a reasonable number. My number is AZ -6.
GL
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mchriste619:
Van what are your thoughts on Cards covering, which I don't disagree at all. No McBride definitely hurts, but Mike Wilson can fill the void and MHJ may go nuclear against that defense. Conner is healthy and Ekeler has been ruled out. Commies have no run game so far this year and they are on a short week after winning game on road as a sizable underdog (I don't have the ATS stats handy on the numbers).
Commanders have arguably the worst defense in the league, in both rush and pass - if not the worst very close. AZ on offense.... opposite story. So wouldnt be surprised if the Cards lay a big number up. Maybe 30+.
So then you have to analyze whether the Commanders offense is for real - and how much variance we will see on a short week with a rookie qb on the road 2 weeks in a row.
I will take my chances that the Cards will hold them down to a reasonable number. My number is AZ -6.
Quote Originally Posted by BET2WIN4: Packers -2.75 (3 units) -3 +106 / -2.5 -117 Eagles -1.5 (3 units) -1.5 -107 / -2 +100 Cardinals -3.25 (3 units) -3.5 -103 / -3 -127 Ravens -2.5 (2.5 units) -2.5 -109 / -3 +109 Saints +2.5 (2 units) +2.5 -112 / +2 -106 Rams +3 (2 units) +3 -108 / +2.5 +111 No Juice !!! If you want to say im always taking .5 less or giving .5 more at even or plus juice, I buy it, but at the time of your post and where the line is at !!! Don't keep a W/L and keep a Unit count without juice is amazing !!! At the so call amount you are wagering, you can really find that many deadbeats on the exchange to take these sucker lines? Other side of all your wagers are -105 lines to +104, these dumb Fs can basically go on or into any book and catch a better line and juice! Feel free to add juice in to my record if you want to, I already stated that doesn't bother me at all. Last season I was up 60+ units, and if you had 15% juice, I think I was up like 50 units. Whatever floats your boat. To answer your questions directly.... I am actually going to take some time and address you seriously - and I am only going to do this once - because you seem to have a serious jealousy hard on as to why I don't put juice in my record. It is pretty simple - everyone buys toilet paper at different stores for different prices. I happen to buy my toilet paper at the cheapest store, with coupons stacked. Not everyone does this, so that is why I say keep your own juice and apply it to my record. No issues. Available line right at this moment have: Packers -2.75 (3 units) -3 +111 (4C), -2.5 -110 (Lowvig) = +100.5Eagles -1.5 (3 units) -1.5 -104 (MB)Cardinals -3.25 (3 units) -3.5 +105 (4C), -3 -120 (4C) = -107.5Ravens -2.5 (2.5 units) -2.5 -103 (Pinnacle)Saints +2.5 (2 units) +2.5 -110 (Widely available, Caesars etc) (LINE CHANGE AFTER POST)Rams +3 (2 units) +3 -102 (4C) So that averages to around -104.4. Which is the range I target when I post. TAKE THE PACKERS LINE, which has -2.5 -110 widely available at Lowvig. Why aren't you up in arms that I posted it at -2.75? Do you think anyone else at covers in this case will post -2.75?? What exactly do you suggest I do with a line like Cardinals? Everyone else posts -3 if they take the Cards, and +3.5 if they take the Commanders. How can I post that more fairly? Keep in mind - I AM THE ONLY ONE DOING THE .25 and .75 line splits. Look - I get you have a hard on for me. Is it because I have won 7 years in a row doing what nobody thinks is possible? Posting NFL sides at fair lines? Would it make you happier if I only won 50 units a year instead of 65? I just find your behavior so strange. I sit here and take time to help whoever asks, post picks for free, and give quality content for anyone to read for free. What is your problem with that? Lets discuss so you can move on with your life.
Covers has it all... Keep the Faith Van
1
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Quote Originally Posted by BET2WIN4: Packers -2.75 (3 units) -3 +106 / -2.5 -117 Eagles -1.5 (3 units) -1.5 -107 / -2 +100 Cardinals -3.25 (3 units) -3.5 -103 / -3 -127 Ravens -2.5 (2.5 units) -2.5 -109 / -3 +109 Saints +2.5 (2 units) +2.5 -112 / +2 -106 Rams +3 (2 units) +3 -108 / +2.5 +111 No Juice !!! If you want to say im always taking .5 less or giving .5 more at even or plus juice, I buy it, but at the time of your post and where the line is at !!! Don't keep a W/L and keep a Unit count without juice is amazing !!! At the so call amount you are wagering, you can really find that many deadbeats on the exchange to take these sucker lines? Other side of all your wagers are -105 lines to +104, these dumb Fs can basically go on or into any book and catch a better line and juice! Feel free to add juice in to my record if you want to, I already stated that doesn't bother me at all. Last season I was up 60+ units, and if you had 15% juice, I think I was up like 50 units. Whatever floats your boat. To answer your questions directly.... I am actually going to take some time and address you seriously - and I am only going to do this once - because you seem to have a serious jealousy hard on as to why I don't put juice in my record. It is pretty simple - everyone buys toilet paper at different stores for different prices. I happen to buy my toilet paper at the cheapest store, with coupons stacked. Not everyone does this, so that is why I say keep your own juice and apply it to my record. No issues. Available line right at this moment have: Packers -2.75 (3 units) -3 +111 (4C), -2.5 -110 (Lowvig) = +100.5Eagles -1.5 (3 units) -1.5 -104 (MB)Cardinals -3.25 (3 units) -3.5 +105 (4C), -3 -120 (4C) = -107.5Ravens -2.5 (2.5 units) -2.5 -103 (Pinnacle)Saints +2.5 (2 units) +2.5 -110 (Widely available, Caesars etc) (LINE CHANGE AFTER POST)Rams +3 (2 units) +3 -102 (4C) So that averages to around -104.4. Which is the range I target when I post. TAKE THE PACKERS LINE, which has -2.5 -110 widely available at Lowvig. Why aren't you up in arms that I posted it at -2.75? Do you think anyone else at covers in this case will post -2.75?? What exactly do you suggest I do with a line like Cardinals? Everyone else posts -3 if they take the Cards, and +3.5 if they take the Commanders. How can I post that more fairly? Keep in mind - I AM THE ONLY ONE DOING THE .25 and .75 line splits. Look - I get you have a hard on for me. Is it because I have won 7 years in a row doing what nobody thinks is possible? Posting NFL sides at fair lines? Would it make you happier if I only won 50 units a year instead of 65? I just find your behavior so strange. I sit here and take time to help whoever asks, post picks for free, and give quality content for anyone to read for free. What is your problem with that? Lets discuss so you can move on with your life.
I agree with all your plays except I was leaning pretty hard towards the Vikings.
I’ve been riding them all year….maybe it is time to hop off, but I was thinking the last 2 weeks the Pack had to adapt and play a completely different game of smash mouth football to win.
Now Love returns. He was a C Hair from real damage to his knee, and I’m sure he’s still banged up to some degree. Vikings have a furious rush, so he might be a little gun-shy. Maybe a step too fast overcompensating avoiding contact.
Plus the team itself. 66% of the season, they have been game planning behind Willis. Now they gotta do a 180 and get the offense back to Loves offense. Might just be a tick off.
I think we will know by early 2Q how this one is going. Will Minnesota stop the run?? If it’s no, then all I wrote above is moot as Love eases into the game behind a wicked run game that stretches the field. If Minny owns the LOS, it’s probably a long game for love and company.
GL either way.
0
Nice Card VZ.
I agree with all your plays except I was leaning pretty hard towards the Vikings.
I’ve been riding them all year….maybe it is time to hop off, but I was thinking the last 2 weeks the Pack had to adapt and play a completely different game of smash mouth football to win.
Now Love returns. He was a C Hair from real damage to his knee, and I’m sure he’s still banged up to some degree. Vikings have a furious rush, so he might be a little gun-shy. Maybe a step too fast overcompensating avoiding contact.
Plus the team itself. 66% of the season, they have been game planning behind Willis. Now they gotta do a 180 and get the offense back to Loves offense. Might just be a tick off.
I think we will know by early 2Q how this one is going. Will Minnesota stop the run?? If it’s no, then all I wrote above is moot as Love eases into the game behind a wicked run game that stretches the field. If Minny owns the LOS, it’s probably a long game for love and company.
Hey Van good stuff. Im on few sides this week, just Chargers at 8.5, Lions at 3.5, and I was waiting to add Cards hoping it goes to 3, but I'm guessing its not likely to if youve gone ahead and bet it at 3.5. I have this game at 5.5-6.
That Vince McMahon documentary was great. I kinda just randomly turned it on for background and ended up glued for the entire series in one sitting.
0
Hey Van good stuff. Im on few sides this week, just Chargers at 8.5, Lions at 3.5, and I was waiting to add Cards hoping it goes to 3, but I'm guessing its not likely to if youve gone ahead and bet it at 3.5. I have this game at 5.5-6.
That Vince McMahon documentary was great. I kinda just randomly turned it on for background and ended up glued for the entire series in one sitting.
Lots of good info here but I realized something. If you trust the faith, there is no need to read. Just find some good plays and bet it because even if you read it and it still doesn't make sense to you then just stop reading.
I'm going to tail some of these plays while I'm still in Reno like right now.
X_____________________________
2
Lots of good info here but I realized something. If you trust the faith, there is no need to read. Just find some good plays and bet it because even if you read it and it still doesn't make sense to you then just stop reading.
I'm going to tail some of these plays while I'm still in Reno like right now.
Interested in your thoughts on the Eagles. It's a short line, but it looks like Devonta Smith and AJ Brown are both out, while Tampa is getting a few key defensive players back. I realize that's all reflected in the line, but that decimated Philly offense doesnt worry you at all?
Big Ballin' since '02
0
@vanzack
Interested in your thoughts on the Eagles. It's a short line, but it looks like Devonta Smith and AJ Brown are both out, while Tampa is getting a few key defensive players back. I realize that's all reflected in the line, but that decimated Philly offense doesnt worry you at all?
Packers -2.75 (3 units) -3 +106 / -2.5 -117 Eagles -1.5 (3 units) -1.5 -107 / -2 +100 Cardinals -3.25 (3 units) -3.5 -103 / -3 -127 Ravens -2.5 (2.5 units) -2.5 -109 / -3 +109 Saints +2.5 (2 units) +2.5 -112 / +2 -106 Rams +3 (2 units) +3 -108 / +2.5 +111 No Juice !!! If you want to say im always taking .5 less or giving .5 more at even or plus juice, I buy it, but at the time of your post and where the line is at !!! Don't keep a W/L and keep a Unit count without juice is amazing !!! At the so call amount you are wagering, you can really find that many deadbeats on the exchange to take these sucker lines? Other side of all your wagers are -105 lines to +104, these dumb Fs can basically go on or into any book and catch a better line and juice!
I 100% agree with this. Van always puts people down for giving themselves the better line but when he does it it’s ok?? For the cardinals game, the line is -3.5 at EVEN juice, what would be fair would be -3.5 for that play and NOT -3.25. So in reality, you’re just like others giving yourself the better line but what makes you even more disingenuous is the fact that you don’t include juice.
If you actually count the average juice -110 that people could actually get, then your actual record would be +1.35 units instead of the fake +3.25 units. Honestly, your play style is fine except for your no vig nonsense. Just keep the no vig to yourself because what’s the point if majority can’t get no vig? Use actual real books that people can actually get like Caesars, DK, bovada.
It just seems like you want to inflate your record to be better than you actually are. There’s a reason why people kept asking why you have -3.25 or -2.75 lines because they want to see if you’re actually an honest capper.
1
Quote Originally Posted by BET2WIN4:
Packers -2.75 (3 units) -3 +106 / -2.5 -117 Eagles -1.5 (3 units) -1.5 -107 / -2 +100 Cardinals -3.25 (3 units) -3.5 -103 / -3 -127 Ravens -2.5 (2.5 units) -2.5 -109 / -3 +109 Saints +2.5 (2 units) +2.5 -112 / +2 -106 Rams +3 (2 units) +3 -108 / +2.5 +111 No Juice !!! If you want to say im always taking .5 less or giving .5 more at even or plus juice, I buy it, but at the time of your post and where the line is at !!! Don't keep a W/L and keep a Unit count without juice is amazing !!! At the so call amount you are wagering, you can really find that many deadbeats on the exchange to take these sucker lines? Other side of all your wagers are -105 lines to +104, these dumb Fs can basically go on or into any book and catch a better line and juice!
I 100% agree with this. Van always puts people down for giving themselves the better line but when he does it it’s ok?? For the cardinals game, the line is -3.5 at EVEN juice, what would be fair would be -3.5 for that play and NOT -3.25. So in reality, you’re just like others giving yourself the better line but what makes you even more disingenuous is the fact that you don’t include juice.
If you actually count the average juice -110 that people could actually get, then your actual record would be +1.35 units instead of the fake +3.25 units. Honestly, your play style is fine except for your no vig nonsense. Just keep the no vig to yourself because what’s the point if majority can’t get no vig? Use actual real books that people can actually get like Caesars, DK, bovada.
It just seems like you want to inflate your record to be better than you actually are. There’s a reason why people kept asking why you have -3.25 or -2.75 lines because they want to see if you’re actually an honest capper.
Quote Originally Posted by BET2WIN4: Packers -2.75 (3 units) -3 +106 / -2.5 -117 Eagles -1.5 (3 units) -1.5 -107 / -2 +100 Cardinals -3.25 (3 units) -3.5 -103 / -3 -127 Ravens -2.5 (2.5 units) -2.5 -109 / -3 +109 Saints +2.5 (2 units) +2.5 -112 / +2 -106 Rams +3 (2 units) +3 -108 / +2.5 +111 No Juice !!! If you want to say im always taking .5 less or giving .5 more at even or plus juice, I buy it, but at the time of your post and where the line is at !!! Don't keep a W/L and keep a Unit count without juice is amazing !!! At the so call amount you are wagering, you can really find that many deadbeats on the exchange to take these sucker lines? Other side of all your wagers are -105 lines to +104, these dumb Fs can basically go on or into any book and catch a better line and juice! I 100% agree with this. Van always puts people down for giving themselves the better line but when he does it it’s ok?? For the cardinals game, the line is -3.5 at EVEN juice, what would be fair would be -3.5 for that play and NOT -3.25. So in reality, you’re just like others giving yourself the better line but what makes you even more disingenuous is the fact that you don’t include juice. If you actually count the average juice -110 that people could actually get, then your actual record would be +1.35 units instead of the fake +3.25 units. Honestly, your play style is fine except for your no vig nonsense. Just keep the no vig to yourself because what’s the point if majority can’t get no vig? Use actual real books that people can actually get like Caesars, DK, bovada. It just seems like you want to inflate your record to be better than you actually are. There’s a reason why people kept asking why you have -3.25 or -2.75 lines because they want to see if you’re actually an honest capper.
Stalker #2 arrives. This is pretty simple: I am +1.35 units according to the vig you would pay. No issues.
Now do the Saints.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry:
Quote Originally Posted by BET2WIN4: Packers -2.75 (3 units) -3 +106 / -2.5 -117 Eagles -1.5 (3 units) -1.5 -107 / -2 +100 Cardinals -3.25 (3 units) -3.5 -103 / -3 -127 Ravens -2.5 (2.5 units) -2.5 -109 / -3 +109 Saints +2.5 (2 units) +2.5 -112 / +2 -106 Rams +3 (2 units) +3 -108 / +2.5 +111 No Juice !!! If you want to say im always taking .5 less or giving .5 more at even or plus juice, I buy it, but at the time of your post and where the line is at !!! Don't keep a W/L and keep a Unit count without juice is amazing !!! At the so call amount you are wagering, you can really find that many deadbeats on the exchange to take these sucker lines? Other side of all your wagers are -105 lines to +104, these dumb Fs can basically go on or into any book and catch a better line and juice! I 100% agree with this. Van always puts people down for giving themselves the better line but when he does it it’s ok?? For the cardinals game, the line is -3.5 at EVEN juice, what would be fair would be -3.5 for that play and NOT -3.25. So in reality, you’re just like others giving yourself the better line but what makes you even more disingenuous is the fact that you don’t include juice. If you actually count the average juice -110 that people could actually get, then your actual record would be +1.35 units instead of the fake +3.25 units. Honestly, your play style is fine except for your no vig nonsense. Just keep the no vig to yourself because what’s the point if majority can’t get no vig? Use actual real books that people can actually get like Caesars, DK, bovada. It just seems like you want to inflate your record to be better than you actually are. There’s a reason why people kept asking why you have -3.25 or -2.75 lines because they want to see if you’re actually an honest capper.
Stalker #2 arrives. This is pretty simple: I am +1.35 units according to the vig you would pay. No issues.
Look at the time of your posting and then look at what the saints line was then. At the time of your posting the saints was at +2 and a few +2.5, so you still gave yourself the better line with no vig as expected.
And then now you’re just saying that because it went to +3 after the Kamara and Olave injury report came out? Nice try, you really are disingenuous!
3
@vanzack
Look at the time of your posting and then look at what the saints line was then. At the time of your posting the saints was at +2 and a few +2.5, so you still gave yourself the better line with no vig as expected.
And then now you’re just saying that because it went to +3 after the Kamara and Olave injury report came out? Nice try, you really are disingenuous!
@vanzack Look at the time of your posting and then look at what the saints line was then. At the time of your posting the saints was at +2 and a few +2.5, so you still gave yourself the better line with no vig as expected. And then now you’re just saying that because it went to +3 after the Kamara and Olave injury report came out? Nice try, you really are disingenuous!
So let me state your hypothesis:
I have posted for 25 years here. I have never taken a penny from anyone, and have turned down countless opportunities to tout. I promote giving to charity rather than giving to me. I have won 7 years straight, no matter what vig you assign I give out .25 lines to be even more precise and fair I promote good sports gambling habits for beginners and vets
But I am disingenuous. What is my angle exactly? I would love to know.
Just ask yourself a simple question.... If I wasn't betting this stuff myself, and making enough money doing it - wouldn't I do what every other "handicapper" does out there and take money? I am unbuyable. Why do you think that is?
You cant please everyone. I suggest you just dont click on my threads if you dont like my recordkeeping. Go to the other threads, where you can get locks of the day by people who are here one day and gone the next, or when they have a good year they start charging 29.99 a pick because they would rather have 10 subscribers because they dont actually make money.
I just think you and the other guy are never going to be happy knowing there is an honest person, who cant be bought, who wins, who gives it for free - and that it is your job to be the white knight of the online gambling community and bring me down.
GL with that.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
11
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry:
@vanzack Look at the time of your posting and then look at what the saints line was then. At the time of your posting the saints was at +2 and a few +2.5, so you still gave yourself the better line with no vig as expected. And then now you’re just saying that because it went to +3 after the Kamara and Olave injury report came out? Nice try, you really are disingenuous!
So let me state your hypothesis:
I have posted for 25 years here. I have never taken a penny from anyone, and have turned down countless opportunities to tout. I promote giving to charity rather than giving to me. I have won 7 years straight, no matter what vig you assign I give out .25 lines to be even more precise and fair I promote good sports gambling habits for beginners and vets
But I am disingenuous. What is my angle exactly? I would love to know.
Just ask yourself a simple question.... If I wasn't betting this stuff myself, and making enough money doing it - wouldn't I do what every other "handicapper" does out there and take money? I am unbuyable. Why do you think that is?
You cant please everyone. I suggest you just dont click on my threads if you dont like my recordkeeping. Go to the other threads, where you can get locks of the day by people who are here one day and gone the next, or when they have a good year they start charging 29.99 a pick because they would rather have 10 subscribers because they dont actually make money.
I just think you and the other guy are never going to be happy knowing there is an honest person, who cant be bought, who wins, who gives it for free - and that it is your job to be the white knight of the online gambling community and bring me down.
Why the rams getting 3 against the bears? Makes me want to take rams blind after beating the niners
The Niners game is really an anomaly. The last 5 minutes were just weird. Crazy stuff happened.
But the Bears haven't shown anything other than potential. They havent had a single game, or section of any game - that said this team is good on offense. Might come. Might not. But I dont bet potential.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
1
Quote Originally Posted by SPark1:
Why the rams getting 3 against the bears? Makes me want to take rams blind after beating the niners
The Niners game is really an anomaly. The last 5 minutes were just weird. Crazy stuff happened.
But the Bears haven't shown anything other than potential. They havent had a single game, or section of any game - that said this team is good on offense. Might come. Might not. But I dont bet potential.
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry: @vanzack Look at the time of your posting and then look at what the saints line was then. At the time of your posting the saints was at +2 and a few +2.5, so you still gave yourself the better line with no vig as expected. And then now you’re just saying that because it went to +3 after the Kamara and Olave injury report came out? Nice try, you really are disingenuous! So let me state your hypothesis: I have posted for 25 years here. I have never taken a penny from anyone, and have turned down countless opportunities to tout. I promote giving to charity rather than giving to me.I have won 7 years straight, no matter what vig you assignI give out .25 lines to be even more precise and fairI promote good sports gambling habits for beginners and vets But I am disingenuous. What is my angle exactly? I would love to know. Just ask yourself a simple question.... If I wasn't betting this stuff myself, and making enough money doing it - wouldn't I do what every other "handicapper" does out there and take money? I am unbuyable. Why do you think that is? You cant please everyone. I suggest you just dont click on my threads if you dont like my recordkeeping. Go to the other threads, where you can get locks of the day by people who are here one day and gone the next, or when they have a good year they start charging 29.99 a pick because they would rather have 10 subscribers because they dont actually make money. I just think you and the other guy are never going to be happy knowing there is an honest person, who cant be bought, who wins, who gives it for free - and that it is your job to be the white knight of the online gambling community and bring me down. GL with that.
Your angle is clearly to inflate your stats and to make people think you’re better than you actually are. Honestly, I wouldn’t have a problem with you if you didn’t call out others for giving themselves the better lines when YOU do so yourself with no vig. It just shows how much of a HYPOCRITE you are.
Why juice is so important? +1.35 units is not impressive over three weeks of NFL but you gloat like you’re the best. So why not inflate your stats by not including juice?
2
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry: @vanzack Look at the time of your posting and then look at what the saints line was then. At the time of your posting the saints was at +2 and a few +2.5, so you still gave yourself the better line with no vig as expected. And then now you’re just saying that because it went to +3 after the Kamara and Olave injury report came out? Nice try, you really are disingenuous! So let me state your hypothesis: I have posted for 25 years here. I have never taken a penny from anyone, and have turned down countless opportunities to tout. I promote giving to charity rather than giving to me.I have won 7 years straight, no matter what vig you assignI give out .25 lines to be even more precise and fairI promote good sports gambling habits for beginners and vets But I am disingenuous. What is my angle exactly? I would love to know. Just ask yourself a simple question.... If I wasn't betting this stuff myself, and making enough money doing it - wouldn't I do what every other "handicapper" does out there and take money? I am unbuyable. Why do you think that is? You cant please everyone. I suggest you just dont click on my threads if you dont like my recordkeeping. Go to the other threads, where you can get locks of the day by people who are here one day and gone the next, or when they have a good year they start charging 29.99 a pick because they would rather have 10 subscribers because they dont actually make money. I just think you and the other guy are never going to be happy knowing there is an honest person, who cant be bought, who wins, who gives it for free - and that it is your job to be the white knight of the online gambling community and bring me down. GL with that.
Your angle is clearly to inflate your stats and to make people think you’re better than you actually are. Honestly, I wouldn’t have a problem with you if you didn’t call out others for giving themselves the better lines when YOU do so yourself with no vig. It just shows how much of a HYPOCRITE you are.
Why juice is so important? +1.35 units is not impressive over three weeks of NFL but you gloat like you’re the best. So why not inflate your stats by not including juice?
You got me. You did it. I am trying to inflate my stats. Last year I won 65 units instead of 50. I have won 7 years in a row here, because I want to gloat. I am a hypocrite.
Now I am going to warn you...
Dont post in my thread unless you have something to add to the conversation. Always welcome to do that. But you have made your point, just move on - or spicycurry at covers will be no more.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
5
@spicycurry
You got me. You did it. I am trying to inflate my stats. Last year I won 65 units instead of 50. I have won 7 years in a row here, because I want to gloat. I am a hypocrite.
Now I am going to warn you...
Dont post in my thread unless you have something to add to the conversation. Always welcome to do that. But you have made your point, just move on - or spicycurry at covers will be no more.
@spicycurry You got me. You did it. I am trying to inflate my stats. Last year I won 65 units instead of 50. I have won 7 years in a row here, because I want to gloat. I am a hypocrite. Now I am going to warn you... Dont post in my thread unless you have something to add to the conversation. Always welcome to do that. But you have made your point, just move on - or spicycurry at covers will be no more.
hahahaha the common “ban the person because you can’t handle the truth”. You’re too predictable!
Answer this question, if you’re not doing this for yourself, why don’t you just include the average juice for others or just don’t include the total units in general? What good does a record do with no juice? You’re just making it seem like you want to inflate your stats then what it actually is. And juice is a part of the sports betting world, so this is relevant to your “total units with no vig”.
2
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
@spicycurry You got me. You did it. I am trying to inflate my stats. Last year I won 65 units instead of 50. I have won 7 years in a row here, because I want to gloat. I am a hypocrite. Now I am going to warn you... Dont post in my thread unless you have something to add to the conversation. Always welcome to do that. But you have made your point, just move on - or spicycurry at covers will be no more.
hahahaha the common “ban the person because you can’t handle the truth”. You’re too predictable!
Answer this question, if you’re not doing this for yourself, why don’t you just include the average juice for others or just don’t include the total units in general? What good does a record do with no juice? You’re just making it seem like you want to inflate your stats then what it actually is. And juice is a part of the sports betting world, so this is relevant to your “total units with no vig”.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
