Packers -3 against Baltimore

Question

I think the Packers are a mediocre team but they have the offense built to destroy the Ravens, especially after a hard fought win against the Ravens biggest rival the steelers.

I say Packers by at least 9. Thoughts?

BmoreBiz · Answer

I think the Packers are a mediocre team but they have the offense built to destroy the Ravens, especially after a hard fought win against the Ravens biggest rival the steelers.

I say Packers by at least 9. Thoughts?

andarmac99 · Answer

The packers are much better than a mediocre team.

BmoreBiz · Answer

&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Not according to their record or actual games played that I saw.

choiOi · Answer

Leaning Ravens &#x2B;3 right now. Packers OL are avg., Ravens DL should have a field day against Rodgers IMO. &#xD;&#xA;Ravens ML for me probably.

Bucks10 · Answer

I agree... the Packers are mediocre

Europa · Answer

Packers just pounded Lions and couple with three winning streak, yet it&#x27;s opened at -2.5. I am taking Ravens here.

gopherdawin · Answer

i like ravens. just not sold on rogers. there are times when i watch him and he just looks lost and/or disinterested. actually he looks like hes one of those guys that just doesnt do well when times gets rough if you know what i mean.either way ill take ravens

choiOi · Answer

Rodgers is a great fantasy QB and they win against teams without a winning record, against the Ravens, I am not so certain he would have all day in the pocket. Not sure they can run on Ravens either.

Why GB is a -3 is beyond me,,,,,should be Ravens -3 IMO.

bkg1010 · Answer

I like the Packers here as well brother, Rogers is coming on and the D has been playing much better.  &#xD;&#xA;Packers 27  -   Ravens 17&#xD;&#xA;  BOL

choiOi · Answer

Packers D have been playing better against WHO?

dennishopson · Answer

No doubt. Nonetheless, -3 is absurd. They win by ten.

jesron1269 · Answer

BAL ML for me.  But to be honest with you the over is probably the best bet in MNF.

dennishopson · Answer

Rogers has a canon for an arm (anyone recall his Oregon days...just 'cause he rode the nench for 4 yrs doesn't mean he sucks now.

He and Driver will score enough to get it done.

My .02.....Nothing more. I'm as wrong as anyone...

jesron1269 · Answer

Forgot to add... that GB&#x27;s current 3 game winning streak is the longest streak GB has had since early 2007.  Think about that for a second.  GB is an average team at best with no o-line, no defensive pressure and very suspect running game.  They are destined to be about 8-8 every season until they address those issues.  Compare that to BAL who came off a win against PIT and frankly has destroyed the NFC Central this year (other than MIN).  BAL wins but I really like the over.  Whatever you play BOL!

jesron1269 · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;Aaron Rodgers play for CAL.  Hopefully you are not comparing Aaron Rodgers to Joey Harrington who did play for Oregon.  BOL!

choiOi · Answer

&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;The first 8wks,,,,,,your kinda late to the game. It&#x27;s been an UNDER fest.

pickinvet · Answer

I think Minn is the only team Balt has played in the NFC north thus far

choiOi · Answer

Ravens ML&#xD;&#xA;UNDER (what ever number)

jesron1269 · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by choiOi] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;The first 8wks,,,,,,your kinda late to the game. It&#x27;s been an UNDER fest. &#xD;&#xA;[/Quote]&#xD;&#xA;STRONGLY DISAGREE!  If this game goes under BAL wins no doubt about it.  They not only cover the spread but win outright.  Here is why.  BAL&#x27;s defense is weakest at the deep pass.  They will stop the run and can stop the dink and dunk passes with their linebackers.  It is the deep pass with their nickle and dime packages that give them fits.  Therefore, if GB is going to keep it close they are going to have to score on long hits and that means score quickly.&#xD;&#xA;THEREFORE, FOR MNF THIS WEEK THE OVER IS PROBABLY THE BEST BET.  I am not talking about for the whole season of MNF.  I am talking about this upcoming MNF.  By the way, I have nearly 4,000 posts I think it is safe to say I know what the current MNF trends are and what they are not.

jesron1269 · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;No such thing as the NFC North anymore.  I know I make that same mistake too.  I believe they played DET too.  But I could be wrong.  This is going off of recollection.  Nevertheless, BAL is a better team than GB.

pickinvet · Answer

I don&#x27;t know what your talking about man its the NFC North and Balt hasn&#x27;t played anybody from that division except for Minn in which they lost they still have to play the other 3 teams in the division starting with GB this week

Wildcats08 · Answer

&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;They shut out the Cowboys for 59 minutes.

James_Dean · Answer

I&#x27;m making the Green Bay Packers my best bet this weekend, no doubt!  No way is this Baltimore Ravens squad even close to what they once were.  On offense, they are extremely shaky, and being in Lambeau with that weather won&#x27;t help one bit.  This isn&#x27;t 2008 anymore, stop considering the Ravens a contender. Packers $3300/$3000

James_Dean · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by jesron1269]  &#xD;&#xA;No such thing as the NFC North anymore.  I know I make that same mistake too.  I believe they played DET too.  But I could be wrong.  This is going off of recollection.  Nevertheless, BAL is a better team than GB.  [/Quote]Wait, what?

James_Dean · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by choiOi]  Rodgers is a great fantasy QB and they win against teams without a winning record, against the Ravens, I am not so certain he would have all day in the pocket. Not sure they can run on Ravens either. &#xD;&#xA;Why GB is a -3 is beyond me,,,,,should be Ravens -3 IMO.  [/Quote]Watch closely as the Ravens just have a complete free fall at end the season with a losing record.  The Ravens are the ones that are mediocre at best, and they will fall again to .500 both SU and ATS.  Look to fade this team for the rest of the year.

Packers -3 against Baltimore

Hot Forum Topics