All Forums | NFL Betting

Packers -3 against Baltimore

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4074
Posts: 79
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5702
Posted: #51

MoneyMan214 - you hit the nail on the head. BOL brotha......

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1024
Posted: #52
gbay lost a starting lineback i believe kampmann and a DB are both out for the year...I was leaning towards the pack but I think flacco might have a field day
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 50021
Posted: #53
Webb replaced Washington(injured) has made the secondary better...But Foxworthless is still on the other corner and unable 2 hide....If Rodgers gets time it might B  a long night  chasing Driver and Jennings...Flacco's ankle has been bothering him sense the Vikings game ( spained )....The extra day of rest will help them after their slugfest with the Steelers last Sunday night.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 225
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by choiOi:

MoneyMan214 - you hit the nail on the head. BOL brotha......


choiOi  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 44
Posted: #55

Quote Originally Posted by Marky_Mark13:

gbay lost a starting lineback i believe kampmann and a DB are both out for the year...I was leaning towards the pack but I think flacco might have a field day

A 'field day'?  the guy's thrown one touchdown in 5 games!!! F-I-V-E!!! Flacco is Whack.. Only saving grace is Ray Rutgers prodigy Rice and an aging D...  Look at what Rodgers has done with a decimated O line and average offense.. 22 tds/5 int(in 3 games), two in his last 5 games!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 226
Posted: #56
Baltimore has struggled all season against good QB's. They have pounded the poor ones. Rodgers is a very good QB, but does take a lot of hits. Im not a fan of Baltimores defense anymore, they have gotten old and a step slow. Still good, but no longer have that shutdown ability.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 83
Posted: #57

It amazes me how many people make comments about how will the Packers handle the  Ravens blitz package, I can't imagine those making such statements have watched even one freakin game of the Ravens this year.  WHAT BLITZ PACKAGE? We have possibly the lamest pass rush and secondary in the NFL!

 

This is NOT the Ravens D everyone is used to seeing, they have an idiot D coordinator, a complete Bum CB in Foxworth, a rookie CB who is pretty small and has yet to start against a top tier WR in Webb, and the most non existent LB'ers not named Ray Lewis and Jarrett Johnson, if you like Money, take the Packers and the points and cash in!

Gentlemen, the Ravens D struggled at home against a third string QB for crying out loud, I don't know how this is even a debate!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 225
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by BmoreBiz:

It amazes me how many people make comments about how will the Packers handle the  Ravens blitz package, I can't imagine those making such statements have watched even one freakin game of the Ravens this year.  WHAT BLITZ PACKAGE? We have possibly the lamest pass rush and secondary in the NFL!

 

This is NOT the Ravens D everyone is used to seeing, they have an idiot D coordinator, a complete Bum CB in Foxworth, a rookie CB who is pretty small and has yet to start against a top tier WR in Webb, and the most non existent LB'ers not named Ray Lewis and Jarrett Johnson, if you like Money, take the Packers and the points and cash in!

Gentlemen, the Ravens D struggled at home against a third string QB for crying out loud, I don't know how this is even a debate!


i agree that this Ravens D is no longer the ball-hawking D that was from a few years ago. on paper, it looks like a bad match-up for their secondary going up against GB's passing game. but then again, this game is played on the field not on paper. 

after their bye week, no opponents have been able to put up more than 17 points against them (Denver, Cincy, Browns, Indy and Steelers). even though they have given up some huge yardage to QBs, they haven't let these big plays turn into touchdowns. if this INCONSISTENT defense can hold Peyton Manning to 17 pts, i think the Ravens are more than capable of doing so against the Packers. 

this is Rodgers first real playoff atmosphere type of game. i am interested to see how he responds with this pressure but I don't bank on it.

anyone knows the status on LB Suggs? how long is he expected to be out? 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 9112
Posted: #59
anyone notice when a top Defensive player leaves baltimore,,they are never heard from again?? remember darren sharper? adalieus thomas? bart scott?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 135
Posted: #60

if i were you i will pick the RAVEN all the way trust me  ........

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 83
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by tryme:

if i were you i will pick the RAVEN all the way trust me  ........

 

Care to explain why?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 7407
Posted: #62

Quote Originally Posted by midnight_toker:

Rodgers is no bum and the guy can read and pick apart the blitz. 

Good point.  Each time I've seen the Ravens, they have blitzed like crazy.  Rodgers is excellent reading the blitz and assuming Baltimore brings the heat as much as I have seen them, Rodgers should have a field day.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 20
Posted: #63

Ravens win this outright.  Packs only one quality win (Dallas).

Ravens have 3 quality wins(Chargers, Steelers and Broncos (not sure about Broncos though).  There D is still better than most.  Ed Reed should have a pick 6.   Veterns who now how to win, simply do win.     Close battle Ravens 24-20.  BOL

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 83
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by theflexer:

Ravens win this outright.  Packs only one quality win (Dallas).

Ravens have 3 quality wins(Chargers, Steelers and Broncos (not sure about Broncos though).  There D is still better than most.  Ed Reed should have a pick 6.   Veterns who now how to win, simply do win.     Close battle Ravens 24-20.  BOL

 

The Ravens should've beat the steelers by 3 touchdowns, in fact, that game should convince you that the packers will win easily. They had to go to overtime due to them being outplayed by a Third String QB who had only 1 snap in his NFL career.

What do you think Aaron Rodgers and those two 1000 yard WR's of his are going to do against the Ravens then?

Against the Chargers, they had the game won, the chargers that is, they fell victim to another of Norv Turners incredibly stupid play calls that made no sense whatsoever. Denver is just not that good at all, and I already mentioned the Steelers who were without two QB's and their best Defensive player in Polamalu without those players the steelers lost to the lowly Chiefs for crying out loud.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 169
Posted: #65
GB 0-1 ATS this season on MNF. Baltimore 1-0 ATS this season on MNF. Rodgers bruised ribs. Baltimore (+3).
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3165
Posted: #66
Ravens suck on the road and can't score more than 17 on the road.packers in a mini rout..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 288
Posted: #67
Unless you have an inside on the Ravens, its extremely hard to figure out if they are going to come to play.  If they do they win, if they dont they lose. I have almost given up on trying to figure this puzzle out.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 648
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by BmoreBiz:

 

The Ravens should've beat the steelers by 3 touchdowns, in fact, that game should convince you that the packers will win easily. They had to go to overtime due to them being outplayed by a Third String QB who had only 1 snap in his NFL career.

 

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 3331
Posted: #69
Ray Rice is the only reason the Ravens are not 2-9
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 3331
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by BmoreBiz:

It amazes me how many people make comments about how will the Packers handle the  Ravens blitz package, I can't imagine those making such statements have watched even one freakin game of the Ravens this year.  WHAT BLITZ PACKAGE? We have possibly the lamest pass rush and secondary in the NFL!

 

This is NOT the Ravens D everyone is used to seeing, they have an idiot D coordinator, a complete Bum CB in Foxworth, a rookie CB who is pretty small and has yet to start against a top tier WR in Webb, and the most non existent LB'ers not named Ray Lewis and Jarrett Johnson, if you like Money, take the Packers and the points and cash in!

Gentlemen, the Ravens D struggled at home against a third string QB for crying out loud, I don't know how this is even a debate!

This is just about dead accurate

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1075
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:

The packers are much better than a mediocre team.


Not!!! Packers are not very good + AR is weak, Ravens will win this one!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 225
Posted: #72
i read an injury report from SI.com stating Ed Reed is doubtful for this game. does anyone have any other sources confirming his status?

this would be a huge blow and i would have to jump ship onto the Packs.

https://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/fantasy/12/05/last.minute.injuries/index.html
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 321
Posted: #73

Ravens win.

Rogers will get rushed out the pocket or sacked all day. If he gets Rushed out the pocket I see some forced fumbles or bad throws down the field for INT's

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 83
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by MoneyMan214:

i read an injury report from SI.com stating Ed Reed is doubtful for this game. does anyone have any other sources confirming his status?

this would be a huge blow and i would have to jump ship onto the Packs.

https://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/fantasy/12/05/last.minute.injuries/index.html

 

Ed Reed DEFINTELY playing, but hurting, Suggs will NOT play.

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 83
Posted: #75

ANY QUESTIONS!

I know my team people, if you listened when I gave extreme detail for the Colts game, you shoulda put big bucks on the Packers this game! Maybe dumbass Ozzie will get some big physical Corners and a REAL WR in free agency! I hope we lose every freaking game the rest of the season!

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.