I look at Atlanta to be the Eagles team of 2014. The Falcons have major leaks in their defense. Atlanta allows a lot of rushing yds and receptions by the running back along with big yardage plays by the #1 wideout. The Falcons have only seen 1 capable QB and that was week 2 with Eli.
Cousins is putting up great numbers and should be able to get the ball to Garcon. Alfred Morris is a duel threat RB and should also have success against this mediocre Atlanta D.
Love the 'Skins this week!
0
Hey Phix,
I look at Atlanta to be the Eagles team of 2014. The Falcons have major leaks in their defense. Atlanta allows a lot of rushing yds and receptions by the running back along with big yardage plays by the #1 wideout. The Falcons have only seen 1 capable QB and that was week 2 with Eli.
Cousins is putting up great numbers and should be able to get the ball to Garcon. Alfred Morris is a duel threat RB and should also have success against this mediocre Atlanta D.
Arz lost the Rams because of poor offensive plays, turnovers and lack of execution. 20% red zone efficiency, two fumbles and one INT, four QB sacks by Palmer. Resulting in 5 FG's.
Do you think that happens again in Detroit ? I'll take my chances with Zona and the Over.
0
Arz lost the Rams because of poor offensive plays, turnovers and lack of execution. 20% red zone efficiency, two fumbles and one INT, four QB sacks by Palmer. Resulting in 5 FG's.
Do you think that happens again in Detroit ? I'll take my chances with Zona and the Over.
NFL Week 4: ATL Falcons vs WASH Redskins First Half
Although the lines for the first half are yet to be released, with Atlanta -7 for the game I assume they will look Washington +4. Atlanta offense is a better pert of the Falcons team and since the line was released at -8, dropped down to -7 despite strong public support for the Falcons - we can have several different scenarios of what must have happened to drive the line in opposite direction of the majority of the bets placed:
1. Big Money was placed on the Skins offsetting the general public money.
2. The Reverse Line Movement (RLM ) was applied by the oddsmakers to drive some money in Atlanta direction.
3. The line changed in an opposite direction due to the understanding that the Falcons will lose at least one of the halves eliminating the "winning both halves" prop and somehow salvaging the chalk for the whole game.
Our first half bet answers all the criteria above.
Now, for the football buffs - we know that the Falcons aren't as strong as their record indicates since they had hardly any opposing caliber of a QB to face except Eli Manning. And we all know and saw that Eli Manning can lose when he wants and win when he wants. The game the Falcons won - the Giants were up and could easily choked the game and the Falcons - yet they did the opposite.
This season we can see few teams that the refs are favoring openly and so are the opposing QB's - STL Rams, WASH Redskins and the OAK Raiders on my radar for being those teams.
Another reason for this bet is the fact that the Falcons never had a both halves effort. It always was either losing the first half and winning the game (the Giants and the Cowboys) or losing the second half and still winning the game (The Texans and the Eagles). So, as a theoretician would go eliminating the possibilities - I'd say that the possibility where the Falcons start strong and also continue to dominate in the second half is very slim as Vegas would have to be stupid to foresee that and still lower the line from 8 to 7. So, this game alone will have few bets for me including the second half bet IN CASE this bet is not won.
This is a 10 Units Play
WASH Redskins +4 -110 First Half 1100$
0
NFL Week 4: ATL Falcons vs WASH Redskins First Half
Although the lines for the first half are yet to be released, with Atlanta -7 for the game I assume they will look Washington +4. Atlanta offense is a better pert of the Falcons team and since the line was released at -8, dropped down to -7 despite strong public support for the Falcons - we can have several different scenarios of what must have happened to drive the line in opposite direction of the majority of the bets placed:
1. Big Money was placed on the Skins offsetting the general public money.
2. The Reverse Line Movement (RLM ) was applied by the oddsmakers to drive some money in Atlanta direction.
3. The line changed in an opposite direction due to the understanding that the Falcons will lose at least one of the halves eliminating the "winning both halves" prop and somehow salvaging the chalk for the whole game.
Our first half bet answers all the criteria above.
Now, for the football buffs - we know that the Falcons aren't as strong as their record indicates since they had hardly any opposing caliber of a QB to face except Eli Manning. And we all know and saw that Eli Manning can lose when he wants and win when he wants. The game the Falcons won - the Giants were up and could easily choked the game and the Falcons - yet they did the opposite.
This season we can see few teams that the refs are favoring openly and so are the opposing QB's - STL Rams, WASH Redskins and the OAK Raiders on my radar for being those teams.
Another reason for this bet is the fact that the Falcons never had a both halves effort. It always was either losing the first half and winning the game (the Giants and the Cowboys) or losing the second half and still winning the game (The Texans and the Eagles). So, as a theoretician would go eliminating the possibilities - I'd say that the possibility where the Falcons start strong and also continue to dominate in the second half is very slim as Vegas would have to be stupid to foresee that and still lower the line from 8 to 7. So, this game alone will have few bets for me including the second half bet IN CASE this bet is not won.
No one expects the Cardinals to lose again. Right? After seeing the impotency of the Lion's coaching staff who didn't even attempt to protest the referees' ignoring the batting the ball out of the inn zone penalty on Seattle and after realizing that the Lions couldn't win a game against practice dolls - after all that who in the right mind would even think betting on Detroit? Who? Anyone with the set of pair big enough to risk money on such weak and boneless team as the Lions? One look at their head coach and you feel like donating the game to them as they do not have to seem the juice to do it. And they don't. That is why they are a straight up 0-4. They could be 2-2, but they are 0-4.
Fitzgerald is not so great against the Lions traditionally. The Lions are forcing the turn overs. If the Cards can force themselves to lose at home against the Rams - they can very well do that away in Detroit. The Lions have a good defense and a very bad offense. Defense will stay the same while offense will improve.
This is a 5 Units Play
DET Lions +3 -120 (bought a half a point but in few days there will be no need to buy as it will go to 3 easily) 600$
0
NFL Week 5: DET Lions vs ARI Cardinals
No one expects the Cardinals to lose again. Right? After seeing the impotency of the Lion's coaching staff who didn't even attempt to protest the referees' ignoring the batting the ball out of the inn zone penalty on Seattle and after realizing that the Lions couldn't win a game against practice dolls - after all that who in the right mind would even think betting on Detroit? Who? Anyone with the set of pair big enough to risk money on such weak and boneless team as the Lions? One look at their head coach and you feel like donating the game to them as they do not have to seem the juice to do it. And they don't. That is why they are a straight up 0-4. They could be 2-2, but they are 0-4.
Fitzgerald is not so great against the Lions traditionally. The Lions are forcing the turn overs. If the Cards can force themselves to lose at home against the Rams - they can very well do that away in Detroit. The Lions have a good defense and a very bad offense. Defense will stay the same while offense will improve.
This is a 5 Units Play
DET Lions +3 -120 (bought a half a point but in few days there will be no need to buy as it will go to 3 easily) 600$
1. detroit was just robbed back in last plays of the game detroit was robbing from the beginning.
2. arizona allowed the broad day light robbery by the rams in arizona.
we know both of those teams can not be suspected as a straight shooting teams after last week. arizona for sure and detroit in the full knowledge.
3. arizona is only 2.5 favorites over the clueless offense of the lions after allowing another clueless offense of the rams to score a bunch.
4. but what about the arizona offense. will fitzgerald be let to play the way he knows with those side catches we saw for a fragment in phoenix last week? or will the lions "dominate" at both ends of the field and than 2.5 point spread seems like a clear invitation to take the cards.
this is what i want to see here being discussed.
Phix I think it comes down to coaching adjustment by AZ from last week. which should allow AZ passing game to open up as long as the can run, I would also assume that Joe Public would be on the Lions as for they think they were robbed last week and Lions looking for their first win. As you say it (We don't get fooled Again)
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
let us begin with detroit hosting arizona.
1. detroit was just robbed back in last plays of the game detroit was robbing from the beginning.
2. arizona allowed the broad day light robbery by the rams in arizona.
we know both of those teams can not be suspected as a straight shooting teams after last week. arizona for sure and detroit in the full knowledge.
3. arizona is only 2.5 favorites over the clueless offense of the lions after allowing another clueless offense of the rams to score a bunch.
4. but what about the arizona offense. will fitzgerald be let to play the way he knows with those side catches we saw for a fragment in phoenix last week? or will the lions "dominate" at both ends of the field and than 2.5 point spread seems like a clear invitation to take the cards.
this is what i want to see here being discussed.
Phix I think it comes down to coaching adjustment by AZ from last week. which should allow AZ passing game to open up as long as the can run, I would also assume that Joe Public would be on the Lions as for they think they were robbed last week and Lions looking for their first win. As you say it (We don't get fooled Again)
Phix I think it comes down to coaching adjustment by AZ from last week. which should allow AZ passing game to open up as long as the can run, I would also assume that Joe Public would be on the Lions as for they think they were robbed last week and Lions looking for their first win. As you say it (We don't get fooled Again)
joe public is all over the arizona. all over. the line is too fishy and the lions are due.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kroep76:
Phix I think it comes down to coaching adjustment by AZ from last week. which should allow AZ passing game to open up as long as the can run, I would also assume that Joe Public would be on the Lions as for they think they were robbed last week and Lions looking for their first win. As you say it (We don't get fooled Again)
joe public is all over the arizona. all over. the line is too fishy and the lions are due.
I would have to disagree on the lions pick but bol. It seems that the lions want to find every way possible to lose games. And when they should have win a game, they don't want it. It should against the seahawks. They should contest on that last play against the seahawks but they didn't. The lions lost hope on winning games. I believe they throw away this season. Their head coach will be fired soon.
0
I would have to disagree on the lions pick but bol. It seems that the lions want to find every way possible to lose games. And when they should have win a game, they don't want it. It should against the seahawks. They should contest on that last play against the seahawks but they didn't. The lions lost hope on winning games. I believe they throw away this season. Their head coach will be fired soon.
NFL Week 4: ATL Falcons vs WASH Redskins First Half
Although the lines for the first half are yet to be released, with Atlanta -7 for the game I assume they will look Washington +4. Atlanta offense is a better pert of the Falcons team and since the line was released at -8, dropped down to -7 despite strong public support for the Falcons - we can have several different scenarios of what must have happened to drive the line in opposite direction of the majority of the bets placed:
1. Big Money was placed on the Skins offsetting the general public money.
2. The Reverse Line Movement (RLM ) was applied by the oddsmakers to drive some money in Atlanta direction.
3. The line changed in an opposite direction due to the understanding that the Falcons will lose at least one of the halves eliminating the "winning both halves" prop and somehow salvaging the chalk for the whole game.
Our first half bet answers all the criteria above.
Now, for the football buffs - we know that the Falcons aren't as strong as their record indicates since they had hardly any opposing caliber of a QB to face except Eli Manning. And we all know and saw that Eli Manning can lose when he wants and win when he wants. The game the Falcons won - the Giants were up and could easily choked the game and the Falcons - yet they did the opposite.
This season we can see few teams that the refs are favoring openly and so are the opposing QB's - STL Rams, WASH Redskins and the OAK Raiders on my radar for being those teams.
Another reason for this bet is the fact that the Falcons never had a both halves effort. It always was either losing the first half and winning the game (the Giants and the Cowboys) or losing the second half and still winning the game (The Texans and the Eagles). So, as a theoretician would go eliminating the possibilities - I'd say that the possibility where the Falcons start strong and also continue to dominate in the second half is very slim as Vegas would have to be stupid to foresee that and still lower the line from 8 to 7. So, this game alone will have few bets for me including the second half bet IN CASE this bet is not won.
This is a 10 Units Play
WASH Redskins +4 -110 First Half 1100$
Thanks Phix. 10 unit is solid. Keep it rolling. Missed you NCAA last week. BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
NFL Week 4: ATL Falcons vs WASH Redskins First Half
Although the lines for the first half are yet to be released, with Atlanta -7 for the game I assume they will look Washington +4. Atlanta offense is a better pert of the Falcons team and since the line was released at -8, dropped down to -7 despite strong public support for the Falcons - we can have several different scenarios of what must have happened to drive the line in opposite direction of the majority of the bets placed:
1. Big Money was placed on the Skins offsetting the general public money.
2. The Reverse Line Movement (RLM ) was applied by the oddsmakers to drive some money in Atlanta direction.
3. The line changed in an opposite direction due to the understanding that the Falcons will lose at least one of the halves eliminating the "winning both halves" prop and somehow salvaging the chalk for the whole game.
Our first half bet answers all the criteria above.
Now, for the football buffs - we know that the Falcons aren't as strong as their record indicates since they had hardly any opposing caliber of a QB to face except Eli Manning. And we all know and saw that Eli Manning can lose when he wants and win when he wants. The game the Falcons won - the Giants were up and could easily choked the game and the Falcons - yet they did the opposite.
This season we can see few teams that the refs are favoring openly and so are the opposing QB's - STL Rams, WASH Redskins and the OAK Raiders on my radar for being those teams.
Another reason for this bet is the fact that the Falcons never had a both halves effort. It always was either losing the first half and winning the game (the Giants and the Cowboys) or losing the second half and still winning the game (The Texans and the Eagles). So, as a theoretician would go eliminating the possibilities - I'd say that the possibility where the Falcons start strong and also continue to dominate in the second half is very slim as Vegas would have to be stupid to foresee that and still lower the line from 8 to 7. So, this game alone will have few bets for me including the second half bet IN CASE this bet is not won.
This is a 10 Units Play
WASH Redskins +4 -110 First Half 1100$
Thanks Phix. 10 unit is solid. Keep it rolling. Missed you NCAA last week. BOL
Lions just have too many issues as an organization in my opinion. Good reason the public should be on Zona. It's the self-destructing Lions.. And for folks who think that just because they were robbed last game is idiotic thinking, if any case they would get blown out to prove the case even more in showing the lions season is over and winning that game wouldn't of changed much. Good luck to people backing lions..?? *shake my head * it's the self-inflicted lions.
0
Lions just have too many issues as an organization in my opinion. Good reason the public should be on Zona. It's the self-destructing Lions.. And for folks who think that just because they were robbed last game is idiotic thinking, if any case they would get blown out to prove the case even more in showing the lions season is over and winning that game wouldn't of changed much. Good luck to people backing lions..?? *shake my head * it's the self-inflicted lions.
Why hasn't the Lions defense changed? Walker out for the season, Ngata injured and didn't practice, Ansah, Mathis & Ihedigbo were limited.
They have a young OL that is playing very poorly and lost Ebron. Their play-calling is garbage and they cannot run to put Stafford into better passing situations. Last season the Cardinals held them to 6 points.
Why do you believe they will improve on a short week against the Cardinals?
0
BOL phixer.
Why hasn't the Lions defense changed? Walker out for the season, Ngata injured and didn't practice, Ansah, Mathis & Ihedigbo were limited.
They have a young OL that is playing very poorly and lost Ebron. Their play-calling is garbage and they cannot run to put Stafford into better passing situations. Last season the Cardinals held them to 6 points.
Why do you believe they will improve on a short week against the Cardinals?
Why hasn't the Lions defense changed? Walker out for the season, Ngata injured and didn't practice, Ansah, Mathis & Ihedigbo were limited.
They have a young OL that is playing very poorly and lost Ebron. Their play-calling is garbage and they cannot run to put Stafford into better passing situations. Last season the Cardinals held them to 6 points.
Why do you believe they will improve on a short week against the Cardinals?
0
BOL phixer.
Why hasn't the Lions defense changed? Walker out for the season, Ngata injured and didn't practice, Ansah, Mathis & Ihedigbo were limited.
They have a young OL that is playing very poorly and lost Ebron. Their play-calling is garbage and they cannot run to put Stafford into better passing situations. Last season the Cardinals held them to 6 points.
Why do you believe they will improve on a short week against the Cardinals?
precisely. all those questions you raise guys are legit. and yet - the line we get is ari -2.5. doesn't that strike you? are the books handing easy money out on such short line?
0
precisely. all those questions you raise guys are legit. and yet - the line we get is ari -2.5. doesn't that strike you? are the books handing easy money out on such short line?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.