And I also won $ on the play.
That play was a joke all the way around. Can't believe they f'ed it up even with replay.
Look - the ref situation is funny.
Its funny that eveyone all of a sudden thinks the old refs are great, its funny that the announcers of any game immediately blame the refs, and its funny just how crazy tonights game was.
What are the real refs asking for anyway? It must include something crazy. I dont think this is over a 2 dollar an hour raise.
Look - the ref situation is funny.
Its funny that eveyone all of a sudden thinks the old refs are great, its funny that the announcers of any game immediately blame the refs, and its funny just how crazy tonights game was.
What are the real refs asking for anyway? It must include something crazy. I dont think this is over a 2 dollar an hour raise.
Now come on Vanzack, you are smarter than this. You know it was not simultaneous possession. You know the defense caught the ball and put it to his CHEST, then the offensive dude just was touching the ball. Van, you are better than this.
Huh? Just shooting the shit over a very close play.
The "offensive dude" had a hand on the ball when possession was gained - and then the other hand got on the ball. I think - by rule - that is simultaneous possession.
If that hurts my reputation in the esteemed covers community, so be it.
Now come on Vanzack, you are smarter than this. You know it was not simultaneous possession. You know the defense caught the ball and put it to his CHEST, then the offensive dude just was touching the ball. Van, you are better than this.
Huh? Just shooting the shit over a very close play.
The "offensive dude" had a hand on the ball when possession was gained - and then the other hand got on the ball. I think - by rule - that is simultaneous possession.
If that hurts my reputation in the esteemed covers community, so be it.
I think by rule the refs actually got that right.
But so ridiculous. Just silly ending.
I think by rule the refs actually got that right.
But so ridiculous. Just silly ending.
Vanzack, was there OFFESIVE PASS INTERFERENCE on that play??/
Of course. Posted earlier in the thread how funny it was.
Vanzack, was there OFFESIVE PASS INTERFERENCE on that play??/
Of course. Posted earlier in the thread how funny it was.
Vanzack - either your bored and just trying to irritate people with your comments or your stupid, or you may be both.
Either way I hope the reason you have not backtracked is because in Guinea they have banned the ability to watch NFL game replays.
If you watch it you can see clearly how horrible that call was. Horrible. Please wake up.
Vanzack - either your bored and just trying to irritate people with your comments or your stupid, or you may be both.
Either way I hope the reason you have not backtracked is because in Guinea they have banned the ability to watch NFL game replays.
If you watch it you can see clearly how horrible that call was. Horrible. Please wake up.
Once again. For the third time. Im going to assume all of the self proclaimed smart people of this thread cant answer this...
Please tell me if there was ever a time that Jennings had the ball when Tate didnt.
Once again. For the third time. Im going to assume all of the self proclaimed smart people of this thread cant answer this...
Please tell me if there was ever a time that Jennings had the ball when Tate didnt.
Van, how come the ref on TV said that the Def player had the ball and cradled it to his chest?
Well - he is a former ref who might have an interest in making the situation better for his buddies.
He is also about 100 years old.
I dont fucking know. It is a judgement call. Like a ball or a strike. I think you will hear a lot of different viewpoints on it this week. We are taking stabs at something 15 minutes old here - give it a few hours - pretty sure you will hear intelligent debates on both sides of this one.
Van, how come the ref on TV said that the Def player had the ball and cradled it to his chest?
Well - he is a former ref who might have an interest in making the situation better for his buddies.
He is also about 100 years old.
I dont fucking know. It is a judgement call. Like a ball or a strike. I think you will hear a lot of different viewpoints on it this week. We are taking stabs at something 15 minutes old here - give it a few hours - pretty sure you will hear intelligent debates on both sides of this one.
Once again. For the third time. Im going to assume all of the self proclaimed smart people of this thread cant answer this...
Please tell me if there was ever a time that Jennings had the ball when Tate didnt.
Once again. For the third time. Im going to assume all of the self proclaimed smart people of this thread cant answer this...
Please tell me if there was ever a time that Jennings had the ball when Tate didnt.
Van, Jennings was higher than Tate, he caught the ball from the very start. Can't you see that? Jennings caught/touched, the ball first, and made a full catch. Now, going down is when Tate put his hands on the ball.
Van, Jennings was higher than Tate, he caught the ball from the very start. Can't you see that? Jennings caught/touched, the ball first, and made a full catch. Now, going down is when Tate put his hands on the ball.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.