Pretty sure that was simultaneous possession.....

I have not heard ONE professional say it was simutaneous possession

Professional what?  Announcers?  Stuart Scott is a professional?

Come on.  I will admit I am wrong if a new angle, or a clarification to the rule comes out.  But not because Stuart Scott says so.

Once again. For the third time. Im going to assume all of the self proclaimed smart people of this thread cant answer this...

Please tell me if there was ever a time that Jennings had the ball when Tate didnt.

No one will not answer your question honestly... cause... TATE HAD HIS HAND ON THE FUCKIN BALL THE WHOLE FUCKIN TIME JENNINGS DID AND BY RULE THE OFFENSE GET THE FUCKIN BALL!!! Why in THEE HELL NOBODY UNDERSTAND THIS??? By rule, by rule, BY RULE is the key word dammit!!!!

Van, Jennings was higher than Tate, he caught the ball from the very start. Can't you see that? Jennings caught/touched, the ball first, and made a full catch. Now, going down is when Tate put his hands on the ball.

Thats not what I see.  I see what appears to be 3 hands on the ball at the same time.  You can have possession with one hand - one handed catches are an every week occurrance.

Going down is when Tate got his SECOND hand on the ball.  But that doesnt make a difference IMO - I THINK the refs ruled and will rule that there was simultaneous possesssion BEFORE the second hand of tate went on the ball.

Wait a day or two boys...

Maybe I am wrong and it will come out - and maybe Im not and it will come out.

Right now I think if you are listening to Stuart Scott and his colleagues - you should probably wait.

"it's a tough call by the nfl. if i had a bunch of shitty employees who asked me for a raise, i wouldn't be quick to say yes just becuase their replcemewnts might be worse."

Clubdirt: this is 100% why they need to say yes.  It is the replacement cost. 

You can have possession with one hand - one handed catches are an every week occurrance.