DubUp...thanks for the simulations...I enjoy reading them and there are a couple on youtube I glance at also. Your record is amazing using them...all the best in 2020!
DubUp...thanks for the simulations...I enjoy reading them and there are a couple on youtube I glance at also. Your record is amazing using them...all the best in 2020!
I've understood your reasoning on past comments regarding ref help but please help me understand this one?? KC was one of the top 3 preseason favorites for AFC and SB futures. SB were anywhere from +400 to +800 depending on if it was before or during the season. The Niners are gonna pay out the most on return for their SB future investors but how much of a handle do the books have from these? SF was +3500 if you bet them back in the spring, along with KC at +650/700. Like I said, no idea the handle the books have on these two but what else would make you think the NFL would rather see KC win?
I've understood your reasoning on past comments regarding ref help but please help me understand this one?? KC was one of the top 3 preseason favorites for AFC and SB futures. SB were anywhere from +400 to +800 depending on if it was before or during the season. The Niners are gonna pay out the most on return for their SB future investors but how much of a handle do the books have from these? SF was +3500 if you bet them back in the spring, along with KC at +650/700. Like I said, no idea the handle the books have on these two but what else would make you think the NFL would rather see KC win?
500.00 on Heads !!!. its 50/50 hahahaha
500.00 on Heads !!!. its 50/50 hahahaha
Where can I parlay the next 7 Madden simulations all to the over?
I never play parlays, but I would bet that one.
Double....I have said this before.....you are betting on a meaningless computer game...….you are better than this.
Where can I parlay the next 7 Madden simulations all to the over?
I never play parlays, but I would bet that one.
Double....I have said this before.....you are betting on a meaningless computer game...….you are better than this.
This is awesome! I feel like i just came across a gold mine!
Now the reaaal money maker
who do you think wins the MVP? I was thinking maybe going with Mostert... idkkk
do the simulations give you that ?
This is awesome! I feel like i just came across a gold mine!
Now the reaaal money maker
who do you think wins the MVP? I was thinking maybe going with Mostert... idkkk
do the simulations give you that ?
Ive been on such a bad tare as of late. Im willing to follow a damn simulation bc i got nothin but red lol i jus havent seen any of your posts all year. Im jealous of your findings. Keep it up Coverbrudda
Ive been on such a bad tare as of late. Im willing to follow a damn simulation bc i got nothin but red lol i jus havent seen any of your posts all year. Im jealous of your findings. Keep it up Coverbrudda
Nice plays today brother!!!!!!
I played your parlay and cashed it but I am such a donkey and parlayed Burnley with Rangers -1.5. They were supposed to be the mega chalk.
Crazy to watch them leaving the stadium with time on the clock. They are getting fed up.
I wouldn't even bother arguing with the haters about the simulations. Why change something that is working even if it is just luck? Ride the wave man.
Good look bro
Nice plays today brother!!!!!!
I played your parlay and cashed it but I am such a donkey and parlayed Burnley with Rangers -1.5. They were supposed to be the mega chalk.
Crazy to watch them leaving the stadium with time on the clock. They are getting fed up.
I wouldn't even bother arguing with the haters about the simulations. Why change something that is working even if it is just luck? Ride the wave man.
Good look bro
This is awesome! I feel like i just came across a gold mine!
Now the reaaal money maker
who do you think wins the MVP? I was thinking maybe going with Mostert... idkkk
do the simulations give you that ?
This is awesome! I feel like i just came across a gold mine!
Now the reaaal money maker
who do you think wins the MVP? I was thinking maybe going with Mostert... idkkk
do the simulations give you that ?
I think the folks who sell you (and every one else) insurance policies would beg to differ. They make billions of dollars every year simply from taking past performance (e.g. accidents or in this case tackles for loss or interceptions, etc.) to predict future occurrences. Not complicated at all. Just simple statistics. These Sims are probably just some monte carlo type assessments that choose the most likely result on each play.
It is not a sure thing by any means, but gambling is not either. You play the side that has the higher probability of covering based on your capping. How you determine that side is based largely on data from past performances. Trends and Angles for example are based largely on what teams did in the past in similar situation. Power Ratings as well are completely based on teams statistics.
I am quite sure that the oddsmakers have their own predictive models and simulations. Too much money at stake for them to not to.
That being said, I already bet the over even before reading this thread. Mahommes is too mobile for SF D Line to contain in pocket, and SF D-Baacks are average at best, so I think KC puts up low 30's. KC just gave up 24 to Tenn Offense, and 24 to Houston. I rate SF O even better overall than both those teams, and see them scoring in the high 20's.
BOL to all.
I think the folks who sell you (and every one else) insurance policies would beg to differ. They make billions of dollars every year simply from taking past performance (e.g. accidents or in this case tackles for loss or interceptions, etc.) to predict future occurrences. Not complicated at all. Just simple statistics. These Sims are probably just some monte carlo type assessments that choose the most likely result on each play.
It is not a sure thing by any means, but gambling is not either. You play the side that has the higher probability of covering based on your capping. How you determine that side is based largely on data from past performances. Trends and Angles for example are based largely on what teams did in the past in similar situation. Power Ratings as well are completely based on teams statistics.
I am quite sure that the oddsmakers have their own predictive models and simulations. Too much money at stake for them to not to.
That being said, I already bet the over even before reading this thread. Mahommes is too mobile for SF D Line to contain in pocket, and SF D-Baacks are average at best, so I think KC puts up low 30's. KC just gave up 24 to Tenn Offense, and 24 to Houston. I rate SF O even better overall than both those teams, and see them scoring in the high 20's.
BOL to all.
What are the simulations saying for today's EPL. That -150 Liverpool line looks fishy to me.
What are the simulations saying for today's EPL. That -150 Liverpool line looks fishy to me.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.