BEST UC FOR FREE.. (true pitt struggles against great q.bs. but who doesn't??? secondly when it comes superbowl you don't think Dick Lebow is gona shut him down HERE IS A STAT 6-1 in superbowls. EAT A BOWL OF DICKS ARON ROGERS IS A BIG NOSE person
Pitt doesnt play well against teams that can pass cuz their secondary is swiss cheese.... GB will spread them out like AZ did with warner and "the big nose person" will light them up just like warner did..... only difference is GB has a D to go with that passing attack.... btw, 6-1 means nothing considering 4 of the 6 wins were in the '70s you vagina burp
0
Quote Originally Posted by gamereaper:
BEST UC FOR FREE.. (true pitt struggles against great q.bs. but who doesn't??? secondly when it comes superbowl you don't think Dick Lebow is gona shut him down HERE IS A STAT 6-1 in superbowls. EAT A BOWL OF DICKS ARON ROGERS IS A BIG NOSE person
Pitt doesnt play well against teams that can pass cuz their secondary is swiss cheese.... GB will spread them out like AZ did with warner and "the big nose person" will light them up just like warner did..... only difference is GB has a D to go with that passing attack.... btw, 6-1 means nothing considering 4 of the 6 wins were in the '70s you vagina burp
Pitt doesnt play well against teams that can pass cuz their secondary is swiss cheese.... GB will spread them out like AZ did with warner and "the big nose person" will light them up just like warner did..... only difference is GB has a D to go with that passing attack.... btw, 6-1 means nothing considering 4 of the 6 wins were in the '70s you vagina burp
@ vagina burp................
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bestuc4free:
Pitt doesnt play well against teams that can pass cuz their secondary is swiss cheese.... GB will spread them out like AZ did with warner and "the big nose person" will light them up just like warner did..... only difference is GB has a D to go with that passing attack.... btw, 6-1 means nothing considering 4 of the 6 wins were in the '70s you vagina burp
Yes they played yesterday in the early game.. PIT played the late game.. late game is fresh in our heads thats what I'm saying..
same day seperated by 3 hrs...foolish to think one is fresh and the other expired...silliness...ppl still talk about last years game when laying money...i know i look pretty damn far back and admit it so do you...so one/two weeks back is really a joke....plus when ppl look back they check on dates not time that the teams played...
0
Quote Originally Posted by doleman88:
Yes they played yesterday in the early game.. PIT played the late game.. late game is fresh in our heads thats what I'm saying..
same day seperated by 3 hrs...foolish to think one is fresh and the other expired...silliness...ppl still talk about last years game when laying money...i know i look pretty damn far back and admit it so do you...so one/two weeks back is really a joke....plus when ppl look back they check on dates not time that the teams played...
It's gonna be a very close game. Could go either way. Pittsburgh will have to jump on the Pack early and hold on to win. Big Ben is too drivin to catch Brady in rings. He will be the deciding factor
0
It's gonna be a very close game. Could go either way. Pittsburgh will have to jump on the Pack early and hold on to win. Big Ben is too drivin to catch Brady in rings. He will be the deciding factor
hey LIL primetime god i c a bunch of people on here think your a joke. thats funny... i dont tail you one bit. i just like going into threads to read whats going on, its kinda of amusing to me reading all this shit. i just dont c how you would put up that kinda of money right after the afc/nfc championship games. i mean did you really think gb was that impressive during that game? there 1st drive maybe but other than that they kept trying to give the bears the game. dont get me wrong i there a great team but i just dont c how u bet that that fast...pac d looked good but ur talking about cutler and a bunch of no names on offense..im not saying steelers offense is great cuz they r not but i feel they get it done on sunday. and then you got steelers defense to deal with. dick lebeau is a genius and he will have a qb spy on rodgers all game.. i use to like you but i think ur a fuckin liar and nothing worse than a liar, thief and a childmolester. i will make you a bet. if steelers lose u can no longer open threads and if they lose i will never come in your thread and post again..is it a deal????
0
hey LIL primetime god i c a bunch of people on here think your a joke. thats funny... i dont tail you one bit. i just like going into threads to read whats going on, its kinda of amusing to me reading all this shit. i just dont c how you would put up that kinda of money right after the afc/nfc championship games. i mean did you really think gb was that impressive during that game? there 1st drive maybe but other than that they kept trying to give the bears the game. dont get me wrong i there a great team but i just dont c how u bet that that fast...pac d looked good but ur talking about cutler and a bunch of no names on offense..im not saying steelers offense is great cuz they r not but i feel they get it done on sunday. and then you got steelers defense to deal with. dick lebeau is a genius and he will have a qb spy on rodgers all game.. i use to like you but i think ur a fuckin liar and nothing worse than a liar, thief and a childmolester. i will make you a bet. if steelers lose u can no longer open threads and if they lose i will never come in your thread and post again..is it a deal????
Why can't there ever be any objective handicapping on this site? Always the biased fans and the haters. How about analyzing the game for what's going to happen on the field. I'll let everybody in on a little secret. The Vegas books are not nearly as sharp as everyone makes them out to be. They make glaring mistakes in the NFL lines every week and get pounded more often than they would ever admit. Don't read too much into their opening lines for this game.
0
Why can't there ever be any objective handicapping on this site? Always the biased fans and the haters. How about analyzing the game for what's going to happen on the field. I'll let everybody in on a little secret. The Vegas books are not nearly as sharp as everyone makes them out to be. They make glaring mistakes in the NFL lines every week and get pounded more often than they would ever admit. Don't read too much into their opening lines for this game.
i owe my local 10 large, i want to do as u posted in frame 1 but i swore off gambling after the packers/eagles game n i havent bet since, its tempting though still
0
i owe my local 10 large, i want to do as u posted in frame 1 but i swore off gambling after the packers/eagles game n i havent bet since, its tempting though still
i owe my local 10 large, i want to do as u posted in frame 1 but i swore off gambling after the packers/eagles game n i havent bet since, its tempting though still
Are you saying you wanna double or nothing kind of bet because that can be scary if you dont have the money to pay it off.
I know a guy that was in you position but he was down a bit more, it was $50,000. The guy had a successful restaurant & he offered his restaurant to the bookie if he lost. What he did tho is he bet $100,000 on Dallas -6.5 over the Bills in 1993 & he won the bet & $50,000.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigBadBlove:
i owe my local 10 large, i want to do as u posted in frame 1 but i swore off gambling after the packers/eagles game n i havent bet since, its tempting though still
Are you saying you wanna double or nothing kind of bet because that can be scary if you dont have the money to pay it off.
I know a guy that was in you position but he was down a bit more, it was $50,000. The guy had a successful restaurant & he offered his restaurant to the bookie if he lost. What he did tho is he bet $100,000 on Dallas -6.5 over the Bills in 1993 & he won the bet & $50,000.
jesus christ, i wish i could bet on the cowboys over the bills. 10 is whats left of what i owed him, double that. so i've been chiping away last few weeks. if i bet the packers rodgers and starks will run into each other and be out of the game on the 3rd play from scrimmage so the fact im not betting ur already looking good
0
jesus christ, i wish i could bet on the cowboys over the bills. 10 is whats left of what i owed him, double that. so i've been chiping away last few weeks. if i bet the packers rodgers and starks will run into each other and be out of the game on the 3rd play from scrimmage so the fact im not betting ur already looking good
jesus christ, i wish i could bet on the cowboys over the bills. 10 is whats left of what i owed him, double that. so i've been chiping away last few weeks. if i bet the packers rodgers and starks will run into each other and be out of the game on the 3rd play from scrimmage so the fact im not betting ur already looking good
I thought the $10k was a fresh debt. If you've been chipping at it & you feel comfy about paying it off w/o a problem & dont want to gamble, then dont because this is what we are doing, we are gambling.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigBadBlove:
jesus christ, i wish i could bet on the cowboys over the bills. 10 is whats left of what i owed him, double that. so i've been chiping away last few weeks. if i bet the packers rodgers and starks will run into each other and be out of the game on the 3rd play from scrimmage so the fact im not betting ur already looking good
I thought the $10k was a fresh debt. If you've been chipping at it & you feel comfy about paying it off w/o a problem & dont want to gamble, then dont because this is what we are doing, we are gambling.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.