bengals +3
panthers -3
broncos -3
pitts -3.5
ravens -7.5
So 4-1
This week:
chargers-7
rams -12.5
texans pk
pats -1
kc +4
Hope its ok if I post on your thread
bengals +3
panthers -3
broncos -3
pitts -3.5
ravens -7.5
So 4-1
This week:
chargers-7
rams -12.5
texans pk
pats -1
kc +4
Hope its ok if I post on your thread
bengals +3
panthers -3
broncos -3
pitts -3.5
ravens -7.5
So 4-1
This week:
chargers-7
rams -12.5
texans pk
pats -1
kc +4
bengals +3
panthers -3
broncos -3
pitts -3.5
ravens -7.5
So 4-1
This week:
chargers-7
rams -12.5
texans pk
pats -1
kc +4
Holy sh*t covers has the worst technology.
@Sudshead - glad you are posting. That is the purpose of this thread.
GL this season.
Holy sh*t covers has the worst technology.
@Sudshead - glad you are posting. That is the purpose of this thread.
GL this season.
I opted to stay away from that Packers/Vikings game myself. Hoping everyone plays GB and they somehow get blown out!
My week 2 plays are...
Texans PK
Steelers -4
Saints -8.5
Raiders +6
Giants +3
Let's go! Best of luck this week fellas. Trust me, it was tough selecting Oakland this week...too many points IMO for this divisional battle. I also don't think Oakland is as bad as their first loss indicated. Not to mention the Broncos are NOT the Rams. But we shall see.
I opted to stay away from that Packers/Vikings game myself. Hoping everyone plays GB and they somehow get blown out!
My week 2 plays are...
Texans PK
Steelers -4
Saints -8.5
Raiders +6
Giants +3
Let's go! Best of luck this week fellas. Trust me, it was tough selecting Oakland this week...too many points IMO for this divisional battle. I also don't think Oakland is as bad as their first loss indicated. Not to mention the Broncos are NOT the Rams. But we shall see.
Van,
I like your card as well, excluding Jacksonville. I just think Brady gets it done in a low scoring, ugly dogfight especially IF Fournette does not play or is limited. I was very close to having New England on my card but outside of Gronk and Hogan (who was invisible in week 1), they simply have no one. I also think Bortles is one of the worst quarterbacks in the league. But part of me felt like if the game flows a particular way, it could get a little ugly for New England and Jacksonville could win a 17-13 type game...I think that particular possibility is what scared me off New England.
Obviously I left it off my card but BOL either way! I see we share a liking for Houston and Pittsburgh.
Let's roll! I'll be in and out of these threads each week. Having a blast with my first Supercontest thus far for sure. 100% glad I decided to play this year.
Van,
I like your card as well, excluding Jacksonville. I just think Brady gets it done in a low scoring, ugly dogfight especially IF Fournette does not play or is limited. I was very close to having New England on my card but outside of Gronk and Hogan (who was invisible in week 1), they simply have no one. I also think Bortles is one of the worst quarterbacks in the league. But part of me felt like if the game flows a particular way, it could get a little ugly for New England and Jacksonville could win a 17-13 type game...I think that particular possibility is what scared me off New England.
Obviously I left it off my card but BOL either way! I see we share a liking for Houston and Pittsburgh.
Let's roll! I'll be in and out of these threads each week. Having a blast with my first Supercontest thus far for sure. 100% glad I decided to play this year.
Were you guys as terrified as I was when selecting the Raiders?!?!
roastedpeanuts---nice start with the Bengals.
1pumpchump----VERY nice start brother!
Were you guys as terrified as I was when selecting the Raiders?!?!
roastedpeanuts---nice start with the Bengals.
1pumpchump----VERY nice start brother!
3-1-1 last week
hou pk
den -6
nyg +3
nyj -2.5
gb +7
hou is a no brainer. If it misses it misses. NYJ feels square but my partner had it and Denver as his top 2. Denver I like just feels a bit high. But Oakland on an epically short week and in mile high and already turmoil there from chucky...Just hope they can cover 6. getting Rodgers +7. I don’t care if it misses - to pass on that game ever imo is criminal. Dallas feels like shouldn’t be laying 3 to anyone let alone division Game like this.
God the “new technology” is no joke effing horrible I’ve spent literally 20 mins TRYING to post in this thread before realizing I can switch back to the old. I’m an idiot.
3-1-1 last week
hou pk
den -6
nyg +3
nyj -2.5
gb +7
hou is a no brainer. If it misses it misses. NYJ feels square but my partner had it and Denver as his top 2. Denver I like just feels a bit high. But Oakland on an epically short week and in mile high and already turmoil there from chucky...Just hope they can cover 6. getting Rodgers +7. I don’t care if it misses - to pass on that game ever imo is criminal. Dallas feels like shouldn’t be laying 3 to anyone let alone division Game like this.
God the “new technology” is no joke effing horrible I’ve spent literally 20 mins TRYING to post in this thread before realizing I can switch back to the old. I’m an idiot.
You should of paid attention to tampa last year to reallyunderstand what there capable of same with dolphins theres light at the end of the tunnel
You should of paid attention to tampa last year to reallyunderstand what there capable of same with dolphins theres light at the end of the tunnel
getting Rodgers +7. I don’t care if it misses - to pass on that game ever imo is criminal.
getting Rodgers +7. I don’t care if it misses - to pass on that game ever imo is criminal.
JC it's impossible to quite on a mobile device and can't even see what intyping when replying. There wasn't won't with the format 2 or 3 years and really the biggest reason my posting is so intermittent.
@Vanzack like Ind and Pit. Have both on my card. Didn't really look at the others. Bol this week and the rest of the season.
JC it's impossible to quite on a mobile device and can't even see what intyping when replying. There wasn't won't with the format 2 or 3 years and really the biggest reason my posting is so intermittent.
@Vanzack like Ind and Pit. Have both on my card. Didn't really look at the others. Bol this week and the rest of the season.
Ugh....
I have the TOP 3 consensus picks as well as the number 8. Only contrarian play I have is Oakland at number 23...
Could be great or a curse! We shall see come tomorrow
Ugh....
I have the TOP 3 consensus picks as well as the number 8. Only contrarian play I have is Oakland at number 23...
Could be great or a curse! We shall see come tomorrow
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.