Falcons games have posted 10 straight unders but I guess we will get a break here. Brees AND Payton said they want to be back with the Saints in 2016 so I would guess we can find a motivational spot here. Their draft pick is in the middle of the pack and they don't have the LT & QB needs of teams above. In the first game they showed they can beat the Falcons' defense and they have nothing to lose. We are likely going to see a few fourth down conversions early in the game. On the other side, who is going to cover Julio Jones? No one. Both teams have the potential to put up 30+ points in this game.
0
Lean: Falcons game over 53
Falcons games have posted 10 straight unders but I guess we will get a break here. Brees AND Payton said they want to be back with the Saints in 2016 so I would guess we can find a motivational spot here. Their draft pick is in the middle of the pack and they don't have the LT & QB needs of teams above. In the first game they showed they can beat the Falcons' defense and they have nothing to lose. We are likely going to see a few fourth down conversions early in the game. On the other side, who is going to cover Julio Jones? No one. Both teams have the potential to put up 30+ points in this game.
I agree if you disagree on the pic then agree to disagree..if we were in a room discussing this game I'm sure you who disagree wouldn't talk garbage like that face to face internet tough guys.
are you serious? You think this is tough man talk? Hilarious. Your a joke and anytime you want me to tell you to your face you just tell me where.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:
I agree if you disagree on the pic then agree to disagree..if we were in a room discussing this game I'm sure you who disagree wouldn't talk garbage like that face to face internet tough guys.
are you serious? You think this is tough man talk? Hilarious. Your a joke and anytime you want me to tell you to your face you just tell me where.
Buffalo had no shot against NE, Jets were even in the first game and dominated the second.
Both teams have blown out the lousy Dolphins.
Buffalo got dominated by NYG while the Jets pulled off a OT thriller. If you watched the game you have noticed that the Jets have earned that win and Giants got some lucky breaks during the game.
Bills struggled to beat the Titans by 1 in a game in which they were outgained and just gained 209 total yards. Jets almost shut the Titans out, manhandling them 30-8 in a rout.
Both teams struggled against the Cowboys.
So even in the games against common opponents, the Jets looked clearly like the better team.
When the Bills played Ten they were without Mccoy and Karlos Williams. Booby Dixon is as talentless as it gets for a running back. Offense relies heavily on their runningbacks Take them away and you get an offense that struggles against at what at that time was the 2nd ranked passed def in the nfl.
NYG was a tough spot coming off b2b games against the pats and then mia. At that time a 41-14 victory at Miami was huge.
Why do you say Buf had no shot against ne? Pats lit them up in the first matchup but the score 32-37 with 4 min to go in the 4th. Thats after throwing 3 picks and being down 37-13 at the end of 3. And sure you can point out a pats fumble in the 4th but the bills had to drive 50 yds for a td. Don't get me wrong the pats gashed them but it's not like David vs Goliath and Goliath decides to lay down.
Last week was set up perfectly for the jets.
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Buffalo had no shot against NE, Jets were even in the first game and dominated the second.
Both teams have blown out the lousy Dolphins.
Buffalo got dominated by NYG while the Jets pulled off a OT thriller. If you watched the game you have noticed that the Jets have earned that win and Giants got some lucky breaks during the game.
Bills struggled to beat the Titans by 1 in a game in which they were outgained and just gained 209 total yards. Jets almost shut the Titans out, manhandling them 30-8 in a rout.
Both teams struggled against the Cowboys.
So even in the games against common opponents, the Jets looked clearly like the better team.
When the Bills played Ten they were without Mccoy and Karlos Williams. Booby Dixon is as talentless as it gets for a running back. Offense relies heavily on their runningbacks Take them away and you get an offense that struggles against at what at that time was the 2nd ranked passed def in the nfl.
NYG was a tough spot coming off b2b games against the pats and then mia. At that time a 41-14 victory at Miami was huge.
Why do you say Buf had no shot against ne? Pats lit them up in the first matchup but the score 32-37 with 4 min to go in the 4th. Thats after throwing 3 picks and being down 37-13 at the end of 3. And sure you can point out a pats fumble in the 4th but the bills had to drive 50 yds for a td. Don't get me wrong the pats gashed them but it's not like David vs Goliath and Goliath decides to lay down.
Summa. Much respect. However, I have to agree with AFN here. Jets are not a very good road team this year and have been very unimpressive on the road all year except ( Miami london) They give up close to 27 pure points per game on defense during their last 4 road series and their offense is average at 17 pppg. Buffalo counters that with a 22 pppg home offense in their last 4 game home series and carry the better home defense by by 8 pppg (19)
Buffalo wins this one wins it big and knocks Jets out of the playoffs Lets forget the Rex Ryan angle in this game. The players on the field for Buffalo are the better team @ home than the Jets are on the road in this game.
bol..
Wizer buddy
How impressive were the Bills' home performances? They are 4-3 with wins over the poor Colts, Dolphins, Cowboys and a Texans team with Brian Hoyer at QB who wouldn't have won 8 games in any other division. They got manhandled by playoff teams at home. The Jets weren't a good road team by any means but they still managed to go 4-3 on the road with a loss at NE where they were in front in the 4th.
Bills beat Luck, Tannehill, Moore & Hoyer at home. All bottom-10 passing offenses.
They got shredded by Manning, Brady & Dalton, because the Bills have a bad defense.
Ryan Fitzpatrick and a top-10 passing offense is next up
0
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:
Summa. Much respect. However, I have to agree with AFN here. Jets are not a very good road team this year and have been very unimpressive on the road all year except ( Miami london) They give up close to 27 pure points per game on defense during their last 4 road series and their offense is average at 17 pppg. Buffalo counters that with a 22 pppg home offense in their last 4 game home series and carry the better home defense by by 8 pppg (19)
Buffalo wins this one wins it big and knocks Jets out of the playoffs Lets forget the Rex Ryan angle in this game. The players on the field for Buffalo are the better team @ home than the Jets are on the road in this game.
bol..
Wizer buddy
How impressive were the Bills' home performances? They are 4-3 with wins over the poor Colts, Dolphins, Cowboys and a Texans team with Brian Hoyer at QB who wouldn't have won 8 games in any other division. They got manhandled by playoff teams at home. The Jets weren't a good road team by any means but they still managed to go 4-3 on the road with a loss at NE where they were in front in the 4th.
Bills beat Luck, Tannehill, Moore & Hoyer at home. All bottom-10 passing offenses.
They got shredded by Manning, Brady & Dalton, because the Bills have a bad defense.
Ryan Fitzpatrick and a top-10 passing offense is next up
When the Bills played Ten they were without Mccoy and Karlos Williams. Booby Dixon is as talentless as it gets for a running back. Offense relies heavily on their runningbacks Take them away and you get an offense that struggles against at what at that time was the 2nd ranked passed def in the nfl.
NYG was a tough spot coming off b2b games against the pats and then mia. At that time a 41-14 victory at Miami was huge.
Why do you say Buf had no shot against ne? Pats lit them up in the first matchup but the score 32-37 with 4 min to go in the 4th. Thats after throwing 3 picks and being down 37-13 at the end of 3. And sure you can point out a pats fumble in the 4th but the bills had to drive 50 yds for a td. Don't get me wrong the pats gashed them but it's not like David vs Goliath and Goliath decides to lay down.
Last week was set up perfectly for the jets.
The Bills are without many more players this time. And they are without many more players when they beat the Jets when the Jets were in a BAD spot. Just tell me how they are going to beat the Jets matchup-wise with all their injuries?
0
Quote Originally Posted by JerryWrasse:
When the Bills played Ten they were without Mccoy and Karlos Williams. Booby Dixon is as talentless as it gets for a running back. Offense relies heavily on their runningbacks Take them away and you get an offense that struggles against at what at that time was the 2nd ranked passed def in the nfl.
NYG was a tough spot coming off b2b games against the pats and then mia. At that time a 41-14 victory at Miami was huge.
Why do you say Buf had no shot against ne? Pats lit them up in the first matchup but the score 32-37 with 4 min to go in the 4th. Thats after throwing 3 picks and being down 37-13 at the end of 3. And sure you can point out a pats fumble in the 4th but the bills had to drive 50 yds for a td. Don't get me wrong the pats gashed them but it's not like David vs Goliath and Goliath decides to lay down.
Last week was set up perfectly for the jets.
The Bills are without many more players this time. And they are without many more players when they beat the Jets when the Jets were in a BAD spot. Just tell me how they are going to beat the Jets matchup-wise with all their injuries?
"troll"??...wat the fu.kk is a troll??is that the word du jour at the moment so you just feel the need to parrot it at every available opportunity like sum brainless feckin programmed robot??...i gave my opinion on wat that other idiot had to say,which wasnt useful or constructive in the way he phrased it with personal attacks..so replied in kind in the only way a piece of shiit like him understands...now,again wat the fu.kk is a "troll"??
1)the fact that you think you can be seen as "cool" by typing things on the internet to other strangers says a whole lot more about your mindset than anything that you imagine it says about me...wasnt making fun of him,just stating my opinion on his conduct..so dont project that crap onto me.
2)i have no idea whether or not i like suuma,never met him...from wat i read he seems like a perfectly reasonable,likable guy but who knows?...again,another scenario that youve dreamed up there....wasnt defending him in the slightest,simply calling out the kno.b-end spewing negative,pointless trash..too much of it goes on around here.
3)"high school" as you call it was so long ago for me i cant even remember it
4)the fact you got a got a picture of a thieving rap.ist says all we need to know about you.
hopefully ya dont think im "making fun" of you in any way cos that wud make me feel soooooo "cool".....okay,back to "trolling" for me now...wat the hell are you,13 years old??and having a crack about sumone else being in high school.
Can't take you serious when you can't spell. What is sum and wat ? sum is the total of two numbers, you should have said SOME!!! wat??? Not sure if you meant what? Also use ' when spelling dont / don't, im / i'm etc etc, also soooooo has 5 extra o's in it. Either way Suuma is a good guy and I'm glad that you will learn grammar next year when you enter 1st grade. Happy New Year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
"troll"??...wat the fu.kk is a troll??is that the word du jour at the moment so you just feel the need to parrot it at every available opportunity like sum brainless feckin programmed robot??...i gave my opinion on wat that other idiot had to say,which wasnt useful or constructive in the way he phrased it with personal attacks..so replied in kind in the only way a piece of shiit like him understands...now,again wat the fu.kk is a "troll"??
1)the fact that you think you can be seen as "cool" by typing things on the internet to other strangers says a whole lot more about your mindset than anything that you imagine it says about me...wasnt making fun of him,just stating my opinion on his conduct..so dont project that crap onto me.
2)i have no idea whether or not i like suuma,never met him...from wat i read he seems like a perfectly reasonable,likable guy but who knows?...again,another scenario that youve dreamed up there....wasnt defending him in the slightest,simply calling out the kno.b-end spewing negative,pointless trash..too much of it goes on around here.
3)"high school" as you call it was so long ago for me i cant even remember it
4)the fact you got a got a picture of a thieving rap.ist says all we need to know about you.
hopefully ya dont think im "making fun" of you in any way cos that wud make me feel soooooo "cool".....okay,back to "trolling" for me now...wat the hell are you,13 years old??and having a crack about sumone else being in high school.
Can't take you serious when you can't spell. What is sum and wat ? sum is the total of two numbers, you should have said SOME!!! wat??? Not sure if you meant what? Also use ' when spelling dont / don't, im / i'm etc etc, also soooooo has 5 extra o's in it. Either way Suuma is a good guy and I'm glad that you will learn grammar next year when you enter 1st grade. Happy New Year.
Can't take you serious when you can't spell. What is sum and wat ? sum is the total of two numbers, you should have said SOME!!! wat??? Not sure if you meant what? Also use ' when spelling dont / don't, im / i'm etc etc, also soooooo has 5 extra o's in it. Either way Suuma is a good guy and I'm glad that you will learn grammar next year when you enter 1st grade. Happy New Year.
not that i cud give 2 shiits whether a douche-bag takes me seriously or not,but clearly by your post you understood perfectly....so congratulations on wasting your time posting about pretending how you didnt understand sumthing that you clearly did.im gonna keep omitting letters here and there to save a little time in the long run and also gonna keep not giving a shiit whether you like it or not.
whilst you are tryna come off as superior and intelligent,do you realise that you demonstrate how utterly fu.kking thick you are by not understanding that the human brain can decipher words even when they are spelled phonetically and without gaps in between them??...well,a fully developed human brain that is..perhaps not the pile of monkey shiit sitting inside your skull.
now kindly fu.kk off,small-minded grammar nazi
0
Quote Originally Posted by rudy22:
Can't take you serious when you can't spell. What is sum and wat ? sum is the total of two numbers, you should have said SOME!!! wat??? Not sure if you meant what? Also use ' when spelling dont / don't, im / i'm etc etc, also soooooo has 5 extra o's in it. Either way Suuma is a good guy and I'm glad that you will learn grammar next year when you enter 1st grade. Happy New Year.
not that i cud give 2 shiits whether a douche-bag takes me seriously or not,but clearly by your post you understood perfectly....so congratulations on wasting your time posting about pretending how you didnt understand sumthing that you clearly did.im gonna keep omitting letters here and there to save a little time in the long run and also gonna keep not giving a shiit whether you like it or not.
whilst you are tryna come off as superior and intelligent,do you realise that you demonstrate how utterly fu.kking thick you are by not understanding that the human brain can decipher words even when they are spelled phonetically and without gaps in between them??...well,a fully developed human brain that is..perhaps not the pile of monkey shiit sitting inside your skull.
How impressive were the Bills' home performances? They are 4-3 with wins over the poor Colts, Dolphins, Cowboys and a Texans team with Brian Hoyer at QB who wouldn't have won 8 games in any other division. They got manhandled by playoff teams at home. The Jets weren't a good road team by any means but they still managed to go 4-3 on the road with a loss at NE where they were in front in the 4th.
Bills beat Luck, Tannehill, Moore & Hoyer at home. All bottom-10 passing offenses.
They got shredded by Manning, Brady & Dalton, because the Bills have a bad defense.
Ryan Fitzpatrick and a top-10 passing offense is next up
I base my pick on recent form status. Buffs last 4 home series vs NYJets last 4 road series. Those games vs Manning /Brady/Dalton were early game home series. Its the last 4 Home(Buff) vs Last 4 road ( Jets) ie "Recent" form
bol either way my friend
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Wizer buddy
How impressive were the Bills' home performances? They are 4-3 with wins over the poor Colts, Dolphins, Cowboys and a Texans team with Brian Hoyer at QB who wouldn't have won 8 games in any other division. They got manhandled by playoff teams at home. The Jets weren't a good road team by any means but they still managed to go 4-3 on the road with a loss at NE where they were in front in the 4th.
Bills beat Luck, Tannehill, Moore & Hoyer at home. All bottom-10 passing offenses.
They got shredded by Manning, Brady & Dalton, because the Bills have a bad defense.
Ryan Fitzpatrick and a top-10 passing offense is next up
I base my pick on recent form status. Buffs last 4 home series vs NYJets last 4 road series. Those games vs Manning /Brady/Dalton were early game home series. Its the last 4 Home(Buff) vs Last 4 road ( Jets) ie "Recent" form
not that i cud give 2 shiits whether a douche-bag takes me seriously or not,but clearly by your post you understood perfectly....so congratulations on wasting your time posting about pretending how you didnt understand sumthing that you clearly did.im gonna keep omitting letters here and there to save a little time in the long run and also gonna keep not giving a shiit whether you like it or not.
whilst you are tryna come off as superior and intelligent,do you realise that you demonstrate how utterly fu.kking thick you are by not understanding that the human brain can decipher words even when they are spelled phonetically and without gaps in between them??...well,a fully developed human brain that is..perhaps not the pile of monkey shiit sitting inside your skull.
now kindly fu.kk off,small-minded grammar nazi
Wow. You wasted a lot more time writing all that gibberish. You're a joke.
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
not that i cud give 2 shiits whether a douche-bag takes me seriously or not,but clearly by your post you understood perfectly....so congratulations on wasting your time posting about pretending how you didnt understand sumthing that you clearly did.im gonna keep omitting letters here and there to save a little time in the long run and also gonna keep not giving a shiit whether you like it or not.
whilst you are tryna come off as superior and intelligent,do you realise that you demonstrate how utterly fu.kking thick you are by not understanding that the human brain can decipher words even when they are spelled phonetically and without gaps in between them??...well,a fully developed human brain that is..perhaps not the pile of monkey shiit sitting inside your skull.
now kindly fu.kk off,small-minded grammar nazi
Wow. You wasted a lot more time writing all that gibberish. You're a joke.
The Bills are without many more players this time. And they are without many more players when they beat the Jets when the Jets were in a BAD spot. Just tell me how they are going to beat the Jets matchup-wise with all their injuries?
Not sure why so many posters responding here are ignoring the Bills disabled list...its been said many times by Suuma, myself and others the same players are no longer on the field for this one!
Add to this Rex came out and said directly he doesn't want Taylor scrambling as much!
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
The Bills are without many more players this time. And they are without many more players when they beat the Jets when the Jets were in a BAD spot. Just tell me how they are going to beat the Jets matchup-wise with all their injuries?
Not sure why so many posters responding here are ignoring the Bills disabled list...its been said many times by Suuma, myself and others the same players are no longer on the field for this one!
Add to this Rex came out and said directly he doesn't want Taylor scrambling as much!
nice comeback,ya little bitc.h....you made sum very salient points
little B? Not exactly, I'm 6 foot 2 and 220. But I can spell. I feel for you though so send me your resume to be so I can spell check it. I'm convinced 100% if I spell check your resume you can leave your job at Mc Donalds and get gainful employment ,which will result in you not having to live in your mothers basement. Your the b$$$&#& otch baby!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
nice comeback,ya little bitc.h....you made sum very salient points
little B? Not exactly, I'm 6 foot 2 and 220. But I can spell. I feel for you though so send me your resume to be so I can spell check it. I'm convinced 100% if I spell check your resume you can leave your job at Mc Donalds and get gainful employment ,which will result in you not having to live in your mothers basement. Your the b$$$&#& otch baby!!!!!
Yea McCoy is doubtful to play. Bradham, Dareus, Easley, Darby, and Rambo are all banged up. Gilmore got ir'd. Maybe my memory is off but the only notable thurs night inactives were Antonio Cromartie and Kyle Wiliams. Brandon Marshall was hobbled and had a terrible night anyways. Ivory was playing like a bum 55 carries for 84 yards over weeks 8-10.
This time around things appear to be different. Bills have surrendered over 100 yards rushing the last 5 weeks. Ivory looks decent, but hasn't run well in 2 weeks. Powell is expected to sit.
Look what happened to Pittsburgh last week. If match ups decide game then they win that one easy. Not to mention playoffs on the line. Of course it's anecdotal to assume the same happens here. Either way bol this week and going forward.
0
Yea McCoy is doubtful to play. Bradham, Dareus, Easley, Darby, and Rambo are all banged up. Gilmore got ir'd. Maybe my memory is off but the only notable thurs night inactives were Antonio Cromartie and Kyle Wiliams. Brandon Marshall was hobbled and had a terrible night anyways. Ivory was playing like a bum 55 carries for 84 yards over weeks 8-10.
This time around things appear to be different. Bills have surrendered over 100 yards rushing the last 5 weeks. Ivory looks decent, but hasn't run well in 2 weeks. Powell is expected to sit.
Look what happened to Pittsburgh last week. If match ups decide game then they win that one easy. Not to mention playoffs on the line. Of course it's anecdotal to assume the same happens here. Either way bol this week and going forward.
Yea McCoy is doubtful to play. Bradham, Dareus, Darby, and Rambo are all banged up. Gilmore got ir'd. Clay got ir'd.
Maybe my memory is off but the only notable thurs night inactives were Antonio Cromartie and Kyle Wiliams. Brandon Marshall was hobbled and had a terrible night anyways. Ivory was playing like a bum 55 carries for 84 yards over weeks 8-10.
This time around things appear to be different. Bills have surrendered over 100 yards rushing the last 5 weeks. Ivory looks decent, but hasn't run well in 2 weeks. Powell is expected to sit.
We can talk about the advantage the jets have on the ground but i would be more than surprised if they don't show a lot of 4 wr sets and try and spread the bills defense wide.
0
Yea McCoy is doubtful to play. Bradham, Dareus, Darby, and Rambo are all banged up. Gilmore got ir'd. Clay got ir'd.
Maybe my memory is off but the only notable thurs night inactives were Antonio Cromartie and Kyle Wiliams. Brandon Marshall was hobbled and had a terrible night anyways. Ivory was playing like a bum 55 carries for 84 yards over weeks 8-10.
This time around things appear to be different. Bills have surrendered over 100 yards rushing the last 5 weeks. Ivory looks decent, but hasn't run well in 2 weeks. Powell is expected to sit.
We can talk about the advantage the jets have on the ground but i would be more than surprised if they don't show a lot of 4 wr sets and try and spread the bills defense wide.
little B? Not exactly, I'm 6 foot 2 and 220. But I can spell. I feel for you though so send me your resume to be so I can spell check it. I'm convinced 100% if I spell check your resume you can leave your job at Mc Donalds and get gainful employment ,which will result in you not having to live in your mothers basement. Your the b$$$&#& otch baby!!!!!
oh,i wasnt referring to your physical dimensions...more your I.Q./grey-matter....but hey,way to give your measurements out on the internet..looking for a hot date,fa.g.got??
and good grief,thats sum awesome,awesome original stuff with the "mcdonalds" and the "moms basement".....brilliant,brilliant work!!!!...i have to be honest with you,i've never actually heard that before.its soooo cutting and witty.
i think i'll cease and desist now cos in a battle of wits you are bringing a plastic salad spoon to a sword-fight...its all ya got when youre so mentally limited.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rudy22:
little B? Not exactly, I'm 6 foot 2 and 220. But I can spell. I feel for you though so send me your resume to be so I can spell check it. I'm convinced 100% if I spell check your resume you can leave your job at Mc Donalds and get gainful employment ,which will result in you not having to live in your mothers basement. Your the b$$$&#& otch baby!!!!!
oh,i wasnt referring to your physical dimensions...more your I.Q./grey-matter....but hey,way to give your measurements out on the internet..looking for a hot date,fa.g.got??
and good grief,thats sum awesome,awesome original stuff with the "mcdonalds" and the "moms basement".....brilliant,brilliant work!!!!...i have to be honest with you,i've never actually heard that before.its soooo cutting and witty.
i think i'll cease and desist now cos in a battle of wits you are bringing a plastic salad spoon to a sword-fight...its all ya got when youre so mentally limited.
You can tell how far he's gone in life by reading his posts. I'd say he's about 12 years old, or an uneducated 40 year old dropout who's angry with the world for abandoning him.
It takes time and effort to write a 500 word post with 450 spelling and punctuation errors. He's not typing like this intentionally. He honestly believes words like "what" is spelt "wut" and "some" as "sum".
0
Just ignore melossinglet.
You can tell how far he's gone in life by reading his posts. I'd say he's about 12 years old, or an uneducated 40 year old dropout who's angry with the world for abandoning him.
It takes time and effort to write a 500 word post with 450 spelling and punctuation errors. He's not typing like this intentionally. He honestly believes words like "what" is spelt "wut" and "some" as "sum".
You can tell how far he's gone in life by reading his posts. I'd say he's about 12 years old, or an uneducated 40 year old dropout who's angry with the world for abandoning him.
It takes time and effort to write a 500 word post with 450 spelling and punctuation errors. He's not typing like this intentionally. He honestly believes words like "what" is spelt "wut" and "some" as "sum".
oh no,im being called out be easily the most hated,ridiculed dude at covers...words cant express how hurtful that is.
try and find one single person who has ever given a single shiit about anything youve ever said here....
even big,bad 6 foot 2 inch rudy wud probably reject your support.
funny how a grammar nazi mis-spells the word "spelled"...youre american aint ya??..thats the normally accepted method of spelling in past tense is it not?
you fu.k.king anal little weasels can read the words perfectly fine yet you are so small-minded and pathetic ya go out of your way to try and nit-pick.....and then go on to call sumone else a loser with no life....ironic much??
you do realise you cud spend 24 feckin hours each day finding spelling mistakes and poor grammar/punctuation on this site,right??...so wat gives you stalking freaks such a hard-on about trawling thru my post in particular??......creepy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:
Just ignore melossinglet.
You can tell how far he's gone in life by reading his posts. I'd say he's about 12 years old, or an uneducated 40 year old dropout who's angry with the world for abandoning him.
It takes time and effort to write a 500 word post with 450 spelling and punctuation errors. He's not typing like this intentionally. He honestly believes words like "what" is spelt "wut" and "some" as "sum".
oh no,im being called out be easily the most hated,ridiculed dude at covers...words cant express how hurtful that is.
try and find one single person who has ever given a single shiit about anything youve ever said here....
even big,bad 6 foot 2 inch rudy wud probably reject your support.
funny how a grammar nazi mis-spells the word "spelled"...youre american aint ya??..thats the normally accepted method of spelling in past tense is it not?
you fu.k.king anal little weasels can read the words perfectly fine yet you are so small-minded and pathetic ya go out of your way to try and nit-pick.....and then go on to call sumone else a loser with no life....ironic much??
you do realise you cud spend 24 feckin hours each day finding spelling mistakes and poor grammar/punctuation on this site,right??...so wat gives you stalking freaks such a hard-on about trawling thru my post in particular??......creepy.
I have read every post in this thread and this is a very intriguing game indeed. I want to point out a few things though: you mean to tell me off a win against NE AND A CHANCE TO CLINCH A PLAYOFF SPOT, the jets are only a 2.5 favorite? You take home field away from buffalo and the jets are only about a 5 or 6 favorite on a neutral field? Hmmmm. Also, the bills are banged up, big time yet that is definitely not factored into this line. I can't think that the "Rex Ryan factor" makes this game a 2.5 game in favor of the jets. In my eyes, after beating new england last week, it should be at least 5 or 6 in favor of the jets. The line hasn't even moved all week. The whole world is on the jets, rightfully so but why no line movement? Im no genius but that is weird in such a big game.
Lastly, last week the jets got theirs against New England. We can pretend that New England got beat up but they aren't healthy and with Miami on deck, they didn't go all in. The jets won, I give it to them. Pittsburgh, last week, after coming back to beat Denver the week before lays an egg against Baltimore, a team that beat them In Pittsburgh already. Youd think Pitt would have remembered that, right? To the amateur bettor though, they feel Pitt just got outplayed, right? Yeah ok. They got beat by Ryan Mallett.......Baltimore.....maybe the worst secondary in the league; they hold Pitt under 20?! What I'm getting at is this: I feel this could be a HUUUUUUUGE trap for jets backers becuase they just aren't supposed to get in, Pittsburgh is. Pittsburgh is due for a gift this week after obeying the lopsided bloodbath they and black and yellow backers took. I get it guys, what I just said is a minority type angle especially to suuma who plays games straight up ( I respect that and his capping and he is one of the best). I am on the other side in that I feel there is a bigger picture when it comes to this chess game, the NFL. If this line sticks at -2.5, with McCoy not playing and Rex already beating the jets, is this a gift? Well....as we all know nothing gets handed to anyone in this league and usually when it's too good to be true, it is. I'm gonna watch this line movement- right now all signs point to the jets but it's too good to be true. I thought I would mention this too; I thought this was interesting: there is an NFL commercial that shows the steelers three times in it along with other teams who have all clinched playoff spots. What is the commercial about? The NFL PLAYOFFS. It plays no bearing on my picks but it is very interesting....... GL TO ALL
0
I have read every post in this thread and this is a very intriguing game indeed. I want to point out a few things though: you mean to tell me off a win against NE AND A CHANCE TO CLINCH A PLAYOFF SPOT, the jets are only a 2.5 favorite? You take home field away from buffalo and the jets are only about a 5 or 6 favorite on a neutral field? Hmmmm. Also, the bills are banged up, big time yet that is definitely not factored into this line. I can't think that the "Rex Ryan factor" makes this game a 2.5 game in favor of the jets. In my eyes, after beating new england last week, it should be at least 5 or 6 in favor of the jets. The line hasn't even moved all week. The whole world is on the jets, rightfully so but why no line movement? Im no genius but that is weird in such a big game.
Lastly, last week the jets got theirs against New England. We can pretend that New England got beat up but they aren't healthy and with Miami on deck, they didn't go all in. The jets won, I give it to them. Pittsburgh, last week, after coming back to beat Denver the week before lays an egg against Baltimore, a team that beat them In Pittsburgh already. Youd think Pitt would have remembered that, right? To the amateur bettor though, they feel Pitt just got outplayed, right? Yeah ok. They got beat by Ryan Mallett.......Baltimore.....maybe the worst secondary in the league; they hold Pitt under 20?! What I'm getting at is this: I feel this could be a HUUUUUUUGE trap for jets backers becuase they just aren't supposed to get in, Pittsburgh is. Pittsburgh is due for a gift this week after obeying the lopsided bloodbath they and black and yellow backers took. I get it guys, what I just said is a minority type angle especially to suuma who plays games straight up ( I respect that and his capping and he is one of the best). I am on the other side in that I feel there is a bigger picture when it comes to this chess game, the NFL. If this line sticks at -2.5, with McCoy not playing and Rex already beating the jets, is this a gift? Well....as we all know nothing gets handed to anyone in this league and usually when it's too good to be true, it is. I'm gonna watch this line movement- right now all signs point to the jets but it's too good to be true. I thought I would mention this too; I thought this was interesting: there is an NFL commercial that shows the steelers three times in it along with other teams who have all clinched playoff spots. What is the commercial about? The NFL PLAYOFFS. It plays no bearing on my picks but it is very interesting....... GL TO ALL
Bills were dogs at home 2 times all season In week to +1 to Colts with the Colts being a serious SB contender and off the AFC Championship game.
And +3 to the 4-0-1 ATS Bengals.
Bills fav VS Pats at home.
Jets were -2.5 at home VS Bills now they are the same -2.5 fav on the road, a normal 6 pt swing should of made the line Bills -3 - 3.5.
I see the line inflated toward the Jets.
It's very difficult to beat a team twice in a season and this is especially true when the team lost the 1st time is the better team, now your asking a team to beat the better team twice.
Jets have just as much revenge factor to beat the Bills as the Bills do to beat the Jets, but the Jets are the better team and with injuries to the other team makes the Jets that much better.
I see Jets winning the game if they do it's likely they cover the inflated line.
0
Bills were dogs at home 2 times all season In week to +1 to Colts with the Colts being a serious SB contender and off the AFC Championship game.
And +3 to the 4-0-1 ATS Bengals.
Bills fav VS Pats at home.
Jets were -2.5 at home VS Bills now they are the same -2.5 fav on the road, a normal 6 pt swing should of made the line Bills -3 - 3.5.
I see the line inflated toward the Jets.
It's very difficult to beat a team twice in a season and this is especially true when the team lost the 1st time is the better team, now your asking a team to beat the better team twice.
Jets have just as much revenge factor to beat the Bills as the Bills do to beat the Jets, but the Jets are the better team and with injuries to the other team makes the Jets that much better.
I see Jets winning the game if they do it's likely they cover the inflated line.
It's very difficult to beat a team twice in a season and this is especially true when the team lost the 1st time is the better team, now your asking a team to beat the better team twice.
Jets have just as much revenge factor to beat the Bills as the Bills do to beat the Jets, but the Jets are the better team and with injuries to the other team makes the Jets that much better.
I see Jets winning the game if they do it's likely they cover the inflated line.
Rams did it this season.. and Seattle is far superior. Talent discrepancy isnt that large in this game though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
It's very difficult to beat a team twice in a season and this is especially true when the team lost the 1st time is the better team, now your asking a team to beat the better team twice.
Jets have just as much revenge factor to beat the Bills as the Bills do to beat the Jets, but the Jets are the better team and with injuries to the other team makes the Jets that much better.
I see Jets winning the game if they do it's likely they cover the inflated line.
Rams did it this season.. and Seattle is far superior. Talent discrepancy isnt that large in this game though.
ORCHARD PARK, N.Y. -- Defensive end Jerry Hughes and defensive tackle Marcell Dareus were not spotted at the start of Friday's New Years Day practice, the Buffalo Bills' final practice of their 2015 season.
However,
Hughes was on the practice field at the end of practice and Dareus was
listed on the injury report as a full participant with a neck injury.
So what happened?
"Initially
we had a little issue," coach Rex Ryan said. "We had a little issue --
I'm not going to get into it -- but we're calling one of our players the
UPS guy. He delivered the goods. We had to send him to go pick someone
[up]."
Was it Hughes who picked up Dareus?
"I don't know," a
coy Ryan said, smiling. "But we got the package here. ... I'm not going
to get into specifics. But yeah, it was ... we had to scramble a little
bit this morning."
About six inches of snow fell Friday morning
in the area around Ralph Wilson Stadium. Approached in the locker room,
Hughes said he did not pick up Dareus and bring him to practice.
Teammate Boobie Dixon, however, told a different story.
"I
think Jerry went and picked him up," Dixon said in the locker room
after practice. "I think he was outside building a snowman or something.
He got caught up in the snow. But he made it."
Dareus had
problems with being late to the team facility at the end of the 2013
season, leading to former coach Doug Marrone benching the Pro Bowl
defensive tackle for the first quarter of their Week 16 win over the Miami Dolphins that season and then again for the first half of their 2013 finale against the New England Patriots.
By Mike Rodak, ESPN
0
ORCHARD PARK, N.Y. -- Defensive end Jerry Hughes and defensive tackle Marcell Dareus were not spotted at the start of Friday's New Years Day practice, the Buffalo Bills' final practice of their 2015 season.
However,
Hughes was on the practice field at the end of practice and Dareus was
listed on the injury report as a full participant with a neck injury.
So what happened?
"Initially
we had a little issue," coach Rex Ryan said. "We had a little issue --
I'm not going to get into it -- but we're calling one of our players the
UPS guy. He delivered the goods. We had to send him to go pick someone
[up]."
Was it Hughes who picked up Dareus?
"I don't know," a
coy Ryan said, smiling. "But we got the package here. ... I'm not going
to get into specifics. But yeah, it was ... we had to scramble a little
bit this morning."
About six inches of snow fell Friday morning
in the area around Ralph Wilson Stadium. Approached in the locker room,
Hughes said he did not pick up Dareus and bring him to practice.
Teammate Boobie Dixon, however, told a different story.
"I
think Jerry went and picked him up," Dixon said in the locker room
after practice. "I think he was outside building a snowman or something.
He got caught up in the snow. But he made it."
Dareus had
problems with being late to the team facility at the end of the 2013
season, leading to former coach Doug Marrone benching the Pro Bowl
defensive tackle for the first quarter of their Week 16 win over the Miami Dolphins that season and then again for the first half of their 2013 finale against the New England Patriots.
Rams did it this season.. and Seattle is far superior. Talent discrepancy isnt that large in this game though.
This isn't true. The Seahawks are far superior vs. a lot of teams but not against the Rams. The Rams match up perfectly with the Seahawks because of their defense. You could see it in the L4 matchups now. Plus the Seahawks were already into the playoffs and were without their most important piece on defense, Kam Chancellor.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Zander47:
Rams did it this season.. and Seattle is far superior. Talent discrepancy isnt that large in this game though.
This isn't true. The Seahawks are far superior vs. a lot of teams but not against the Rams. The Rams match up perfectly with the Seahawks because of their defense. You could see it in the L4 matchups now. Plus the Seahawks were already into the playoffs and were without their most important piece on defense, Kam Chancellor.
This isn't true. The Seahawks are far superior vs. a lot of teams but not against the Rams. The Rams match up perfectly with the Seahawks because of their defense. You could see it in the L4 matchups now. Plus the Seahawks were already into the playoffs and were without their most important piece on defense, Kam Chancellor.
It is true, they are much better from a general perspective. Rams have always played them tough.
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
This isn't true. The Seahawks are far superior vs. a lot of teams but not against the Rams. The Rams match up perfectly with the Seahawks because of their defense. You could see it in the L4 matchups now. Plus the Seahawks were already into the playoffs and were without their most important piece on defense, Kam Chancellor.
It is true, they are much better from a general perspective. Rams have always played them tough.
Copyright � 1995 - 2024
CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.