Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:Great Info thanks a lot. I was liking balty (even tho they have been off for 2-3 weeks) but now I will consider passing on it all together. Since 2000Playoff teams on 10+ game SU win streak ... 2-12 ATS1st game of playoffs ... 4-3 SU ... 1-6 ATSHome team ... 3-3 SU ... 0-6 ATSRavens riding 12 straight (last loss: Week 4 vs CLE
Interesting, I dug a little deeper and since 2003 a team on a winstreak of 9 or more in the playoffs is 3-16 ATS and 9-10 SU (including conf/SB)
The 2003 team, really? Who cares? Its ridiculous handicapping- The players in this game were in kindergarten in 2003 This game stands alone...The Titians are not sleeping giants, they aren't much better or worse than any other teams in the playoffs- The only question is..Will Derrick Henry be able to run on that D-line- If so, we probably cover the number
You aren't comprehending my sentence properly. Reread what I wrote: "Since 2003 a team on a winstreak of 9 or more in the playoffs is 3-16 ATS and 9-10 SU (including conf/SB)". This goes for ALL teams since 2003 that were on a 9+ game win streak going into the playoffs. Situational capping can be ridiculous when random parameters are thrown in, but there are many logical situational plays that work well and have consistently won for years. This one for example makes perfect sense as there are many reasons why a streaking team will struggle to cover usually-large spreads in the NFL playoffs.
That's a lot of wins in a row, they have to expect to win at this point, if they get a punch in the mouth early on by a team with nothing to lose, this trend could continue.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TKWSNx93:
Quote Originally Posted by BlackCannons:
Quote Originally Posted by TKWSNx93:
Quote Originally Posted by Egoodie:
Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:Great Info thanks a lot. I was liking balty (even tho they have been off for 2-3 weeks) but now I will consider passing on it all together. Since 2000Playoff teams on 10+ game SU win streak ... 2-12 ATS1st game of playoffs ... 4-3 SU ... 1-6 ATSHome team ... 3-3 SU ... 0-6 ATSRavens riding 12 straight (last loss: Week 4 vs CLE
Interesting, I dug a little deeper and since 2003 a team on a winstreak of 9 or more in the playoffs is 3-16 ATS and 9-10 SU (including conf/SB)
The 2003 team, really? Who cares? Its ridiculous handicapping- The players in this game were in kindergarten in 2003 This game stands alone...The Titians are not sleeping giants, they aren't much better or worse than any other teams in the playoffs- The only question is..Will Derrick Henry be able to run on that D-line- If so, we probably cover the number
You aren't comprehending my sentence properly. Reread what I wrote: "Since 2003 a team on a winstreak of 9 or more in the playoffs is 3-16 ATS and 9-10 SU (including conf/SB)". This goes for ALL teams since 2003 that were on a 9+ game win streak going into the playoffs. Situational capping can be ridiculous when random parameters are thrown in, but there are many logical situational plays that work well and have consistently won for years. This one for example makes perfect sense as there are many reasons why a streaking team will struggle to cover usually-large spreads in the NFL playoffs.
That's a lot of wins in a row, they have to expect to win at this point, if they get a punch in the mouth early on by a team with nothing to lose, this trend could continue.
week Titans got bagled by the might Denver Broncos 16-0 season over babyNO team who's strarting QB that got shut out in season ever won a super bowl two got there and lost The Bills 4th and final bowl the Titans lost to rams Titans what a joke
Marcus Mariota was the QB in that game
zebra makes no sense with these stats. Tannehill is now the starter going forward. Pats got shut out by buffalo with brisset and he said they couldn't win because they were shut out, then they won, now he is changing it.
1
Quote Originally Posted by BlackCannons:
Quote Originally Posted by zebrakiller:
week Titans got bagled by the might Denver Broncos 16-0 season over babyNO team who's strarting QB that got shut out in season ever won a super bowl two got there and lost The Bills 4th and final bowl the Titans lost to rams Titans what a joke
Marcus Mariota was the QB in that game
zebra makes no sense with these stats. Tannehill is now the starter going forward. Pats got shut out by buffalo with brisset and he said they couldn't win because they were shut out, then they won, now he is changing it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.