just to get more clarity on your analysis train,in wat manner does a cheap hooker who got punched in the stomach fall to the ground??
ive led a rather sheltered life and dont believe ive had the pleasure of witnessing such an act.
great write-up anyhow
It happens real fast and isnt a pretty site. Its almost like they know its gonna happen so they start flinching early and often just drop without being touched
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
just to get more clarity on your analysis train,in wat manner does a cheap hooker who got punched in the stomach fall to the ground??
ive led a rather sheltered life and dont believe ive had the pleasure of witnessing such an act.
great write-up anyhow
It happens real fast and isnt a pretty site. Its almost like they know its gonna happen so they start flinching early and often just drop without being touched
dont see hags scoring that much...away from hone they are consistently a mediocre scoring offense WITHOUT superbowl pressure...perhaps they get a pick 6 to steal this one...have my doubts
Dont doubt me bro. Its never a good idea.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ROVIN56:
dont see hags scoring that much...away from hone they are consistently a mediocre scoring offense WITHOUT superbowl pressure...perhaps they get a pick 6 to steal this one...have my doubts
Nice writeup. Worries me bc i have a big future bet on Denver to win SB.
Still trying to decide if I will put $ on Seattle ML or ATS and try to middle.
One question related to Denver's TO ratio. I don't know the stats, but wasn't Denver leading enough in most games... which forced teams to take risks down the field (where I would expect Denver to get more TOs)? Or in those spots did Denver's D play conservative and give up a lot of easy/short passes (where I would expect Denver to get less TOs)?
I agree with all your comments...just wondering if you think their defensive stats could be misleading...or even more important.. given the situation most teams found themselves in vs. Denver....trying to play catchup.
Those stats are more important for turnovers, but less in total yardage. Teams were having to take risks downfield and Denver didnt make many plays on the ball.
0
Quote Originally Posted by th23787:
Nice writeup. Worries me bc i have a big future bet on Denver to win SB.
Still trying to decide if I will put $ on Seattle ML or ATS and try to middle.
One question related to Denver's TO ratio. I don't know the stats, but wasn't Denver leading enough in most games... which forced teams to take risks down the field (where I would expect Denver to get more TOs)? Or in those spots did Denver's D play conservative and give up a lot of easy/short passes (where I would expect Denver to get less TOs)?
I agree with all your comments...just wondering if you think their defensive stats could be misleading...or even more important.. given the situation most teams found themselves in vs. Denver....trying to play catchup.
Those stats are more important for turnovers, but less in total yardage. Teams were having to take risks downfield and Denver didnt make many plays on the ball.
train ur write up is like reading the comics..all them offense and defensive stats.how about this, how to teams do in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quater? wait let's throw in, in the first and 4th Denver has a 25 mile an hour wind in their face, while hawks have it in 2nd and third.thats puts us at a 2 degree wind chill. how does all ur stats stack up against that..wait while Seattle has the wind at their back in the forth it's starts snowing hard...seasonal stats mean nothing here
0
train ur write up is like reading the comics..all them offense and defensive stats.how about this, how to teams do in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quater? wait let's throw in, in the first and 4th Denver has a 25 mile an hour wind in their face, while hawks have it in 2nd and third.thats puts us at a 2 degree wind chill. how does all ur stats stack up against that..wait while Seattle has the wind at their back in the forth it's starts snowing hard...seasonal stats mean nothing here
No film on him except for half game vs NO.. but Denver still has to prepare for him.. Plus he is a pretty good player.
But he can be a double-edged sword.
He can take away from the team's regular season chemistry. Tate and Baldwin will definitely get less looks... I've watched Tate play very hesitant vs Saints in the div game, dropping several balls in the middle. (But that can be due to the hard hitting saints MLBs... Lol)
Anyways, enjoy the game Train !
0
Quote Originally Posted by CC12:
percy is definitely an x-factor
No film on him except for half game vs NO.. but Denver still has to prepare for him.. Plus he is a pretty good player.
But he can be a double-edged sword.
He can take away from the team's regular season chemistry. Tate and Baldwin will definitely get less looks... I've watched Tate play very hesitant vs Saints in the div game, dropping several balls in the middle. (But that can be due to the hard hitting saints MLBs... Lol)
Train, with all due respect, I think the game is almost a toss up, but your final score indicates 60 + points will be scored at Metlife in what figures to be windy conditions or worse? Are you really going over the 47 total?
Under is currenlty 46.5 -105
Should keep droppin
0
Quote Originally Posted by howzuck:
Train, with all due respect, I think the game is almost a toss up, but your final score indicates 60 + points will be scored at Metlife in what figures to be windy conditions or worse? Are you really going over the 47 total?
train ur write up is like reading the comics..all them offense and defensive stats.how about this, how to teams do in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quater? wait let's throw in, in the first and 4th Denver has a 25 mile an hour wind in their face, while hawks have it in 2nd and third.thats puts us at a 2 degree wind chill. how does all ur stats stack up against that..wait while Seattle has the wind at their back in the forth it's starts snowing hard...seasonal stats mean nothing here
Well, you were close kid. My statements were facts. The drivel you spewed was "what if scenarios" are indeed comical. Snow and 25 mph winds is all guess work right now. How often are the weather men right? Even so, all that does is make it much harder for Denvers offense. Thanks for proving my point.
The only thing seasonal stats mean is everything, because the team resumes and tendancies are clear.Thanks for the comic relief junior.
What is a volcano erupts and Bane blows up the field at opening kickoff?
0
Quote Originally Posted by hitman99:
train ur write up is like reading the comics..all them offense and defensive stats.how about this, how to teams do in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quater? wait let's throw in, in the first and 4th Denver has a 25 mile an hour wind in their face, while hawks have it in 2nd and third.thats puts us at a 2 degree wind chill. how does all ur stats stack up against that..wait while Seattle has the wind at their back in the forth it's starts snowing hard...seasonal stats mean nothing here
Well, you were close kid. My statements were facts. The drivel you spewed was "what if scenarios" are indeed comical. Snow and 25 mph winds is all guess work right now. How often are the weather men right? Even so, all that does is make it much harder for Denvers offense. Thanks for proving my point.
The only thing seasonal stats mean is everything, because the team resumes and tendancies are clear.Thanks for the comic relief junior.
What is a volcano erupts and Bane blows up the field at opening kickoff?
Seriously,TRAIN, what if Hawks "D" doesn't get to Peyton? 5 Time MVP, 13 Pro Bowls, one of the greatest QB's to ever play the game and you want to blow your wad on a 3rd year quality up and coming QB
Given the time AND.... time to ADJUST (in game) experience should always win in a contest of this ...magnitude...... Manning is a surgeon and I could easily envision him dissecting the "thugs" eventually Meanwhile, Russell is asking TB for SB advice on podium after game WILSON is gonna win SB's..... just not yet
Good luck with many of your wagers, but, I have to agree like pointed out above "your argument is trying to convince yourself" Either Hawks get to Manning or don't A simple question on how this SB goes......
I'll take the team that historically, a 2 time SB winner and 6 time participant, that enters this game CONFIDENT about how they will attack this "vaunted" D that clamped down on the visiting Saints and 49ers with an extremely strong HFA........Lastly, you best hope Hawks can slow down BRoncos no huddle, because if, if it gets cranked up, points will be flying and you just might hit a few of your props.....
Go ORANGE CRUSH
PS I assure you I know BRONCOS like you know your TIGERS
0
Quote Originally Posted by Crusher13:
Seriously,TRAIN, what if Hawks "D" doesn't get to Peyton? 5 Time MVP, 13 Pro Bowls, one of the greatest QB's to ever play the game and you want to blow your wad on a 3rd year quality up and coming QB
Given the time AND.... time to ADJUST (in game) experience should always win in a contest of this ...magnitude...... Manning is a surgeon and I could easily envision him dissecting the "thugs" eventually Meanwhile, Russell is asking TB for SB advice on podium after game WILSON is gonna win SB's..... just not yet
Good luck with many of your wagers, but, I have to agree like pointed out above "your argument is trying to convince yourself" Either Hawks get to Manning or don't A simple question on how this SB goes......
I'll take the team that historically, a 2 time SB winner and 6 time participant, that enters this game CONFIDENT about how they will attack this "vaunted" D that clamped down on the visiting Saints and 49ers with an extremely strong HFA........Lastly, you best hope Hawks can slow down BRoncos no huddle, because if, if it gets cranked up, points will be flying and you just might hit a few of your props.....
Go ORANGE CRUSH
PS I assure you I know BRONCOS like you know your TIGERS
It is @48.5 now, I have been thinking that under is the play.. Last three Super Bowls have been over, the last under had Peyton manning losing to the saints, and the Super Bowl that Peyton won it went under the total in miami.. I think under is coming in, just not so ready to pull the trigger on the Seahawks
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Under is currenlty 46.5 -105
Should keep droppin
It is @48.5 now, I have been thinking that under is the play.. Last three Super Bowls have been over, the last under had Peyton manning losing to the saints, and the Super Bowl that Peyton won it went under the total in miami.. I think under is coming in, just not so ready to pull the trigger on the Seahawks
Train....Been a long time follower....Just don't post at all....but I hope the Seahawks are not gonna be Florida State and not show up..That one hurt....Cuz I believe you are right...that Russell Wilson will lead the Hawks to the promised land.....You have any doubts??
0
Train....Been a long time follower....Just don't post at all....but I hope the Seahawks are not gonna be Florida State and not show up..That one hurt....Cuz I believe you are right...that Russell Wilson will lead the Hawks to the promised land.....You have any doubts??
Shocker....another 'sharp' on Seattle. And all your props, ridiculous lol...really calling your shots. Might as well bet the exact final score while you're at it....wouldnt be surprised at all if you lose almost all of your wagers on Sunday.
Cmon train, you're better than this lol
0
Shocker....another 'sharp' on Seattle. And all your props, ridiculous lol...really calling your shots. Might as well bet the exact final score while you're at it....wouldnt be surprised at all if you lose almost all of your wagers on Sunday.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.