All Forums | NFL Betting

Thursday

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10109
Posts: 85
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #1


Oakland  +7.5  -115  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #2
because....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 55
Posted: #3
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 214
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by amd:



Oakland  +7.5  -115  

i like it, gl bro!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by Andrew1976:

Rigged or fixed

Why does it have to be rigged? They covered against Seattle, New England and San Diego. The winless Raiders have been in every game this season except for the Dolphins and Broncos games. Who the fukk are the Chiefs to be laying a td or more on the road in a divisional, nationally televised, game??? We understand the Raiders deficiencies so should we begin to talk about KC'S weaknesses? It seems as if we need to.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 26899
Posted: #6
Its Oakland or stay away
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by amd:


Why does it have to be rigged? They covered against Seattle, New England and San Diego. The winless Raiders have been in every game this season except for the Dolphins and Broncos games. Who the fukk are the Chiefs to be laying a td or more on the road in a divisional, nationally televised, game??? We understand the Raiders deficiencies so should we begin to talk about KC'S weaknesses? It seems as if we need to.

LOL, love it.  Everytime you got a post like this I think of Joe Pesci, not Lethal Weapon Joe, Goodfellas/Casino Joe.... "How the FUKK do I entertain you?  Am I a clown?  What makes me so fukkin funny?"

Glad you are on the same side as me.  3 point KC win.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8153
Posted: #8
Why throw good money at a bad team? Oakland?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 17423
Posted: #9
With you, amd   
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 8
Posted: #10
You guys must not watch very many Chiefs games. This game is going to be ugly...like Chiefs vs. Patriots Ugly.

Chiefs will win by 14.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by best_bets:

Why throw good money at a bad team? Oakland?

This would be the typical perspective of Joe Pub and the books know it. You don't think the oddsmakers have adjusted the line accordingly? Again, a divisional game that's nationally televised and you have a home dog catching at least 7. The bargain with this wager most certainly sits in the hands of the Oakland wagers. 100% chance of heavy showers in 40 degree weather on a sliw, messy track. Not a chance in hell that KC covers this spread. I'll talk X/O's  in a bit
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by kcchiefsfan1982:

You guys must not watch very many Chiefs games. This game is going to be ugly...like Chiefs vs. Patriots Ugly.

Chiefs will win by 14.

Jesus Christ. Get a new hobby.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 214
Posted: #13
i love how people still think the nfl can be rigged...haha
granted, people can be paid off to make certain plays, take for example the first snap of the superbowl last year. There's a chance the broncos center was paid off to do that, who knows.

but rigged games? haha what a joke
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 5358
Posted: #14
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 583
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by best_bets:

Why throw good money at a bad team? Oakland?

These raiders covered last week for my last leg of a seven on seven parlay sheet, and I played 5 of the same sheets... $35 won me $2000

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14932
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by amd:


Why does it have to be rigged? They covered against Seattle, New England and San Diego. The winless Raiders have been in every game this season except for the Dolphins and Broncos games. Who the fukk are the Chiefs to be laying a td or more on the road in a divisional, nationally televised, game??? We understand the Raiders deficiencies so should we begin to talk about KC'S weaknesses? It seems as if we need to.


Exactly, AMD. They got blown out by the Dolphins and Broncos because their games against the Patriots and Seattle were like their SB. They went all in, expended a lot of energy, and huge emotional let downs the following week. Guess who just played Seattle? Although the Raiders are the correct side, I'm staying away AMD. These sharp bets often backfire in my face, for whatever reason.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:


Exactly, AMD. They got blown out by the Dolphins and Broncos because their games against the Patriots and Seattle were like their SB. They went all in, expended a lot of energy, and huge emotional let downs the following week. Guess who just played Seattle? Although the Raiders are the correct side, I'm staying away AMD. These sharp bets often backfire in my face, for whatever reason.

Thing is, I'm not even trying to be sharp. I'm just trying to pick a fukking winner. The Raiders haven't thrown in the towel. They want to win. You have guys like Maclin comparing the Eagles effort last  Sunday to that of the Raiders in the postgame. You don't think that shitt pisses off these guys? Sure, it does. The Raiders want to make a statement against their most hated rival on national television and they will.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by Milkmoney67:

These raiders covered last week for my last leg of a seven on seven parlay sheet, and I played 5 of the same sheets... $35 won me $2000


Nice cover. I'll make half of that with one play tonight.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14932
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by amd:


Thing is, I'm not even trying to be sharp. I'm just trying to pick a fukking winner. The Raiders haven't thrown in the towel. They want to win. You have guys like Maclin comparing the Eagles effort last  Sunday to that of the Raiders in the postgame. You don't think that shitt pisses off these guys? Sure, it does. The Raiders want to make a statement against their most hated rival on national television and they will.

So you have them winning. For some reason I always thought their win would come against Buffalo. But you're right, this is a much stronger spot. The Raiders are the laughingstock of the Bay Area and getting trashed on the radio and TV daily. In fact, one of the talk show hosts at the Raiders flagship station won't even talk about the Raiders, unless it is to make fun of them. So yeah, they'll be plenty motivated.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 23104
Posted: #20
Like Da Raiders too, but like the under better. Probably play both. GL bro 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 83
Posted: #21

(nine straight covers!) and Andy Reid 12-1 vs. line on the reg.-season road with the Chiefs. K.C. also now abreast with Denver in AFC West, and want to be when facing them next week

Got to go the other was but as always GL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 1255
Posted: #22

Like it AMD....short term memory for everyone, Titans suck, no way Pitt doesn't cover! Best of luck thanks for the pick, I will ride with you! I learned long ago that your picks are well thought out, not just fade the public! Any O/U opinions?

BOL!!

 

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 652
Posted: #23
+9 now 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 4525
Posted: #24
well...nationally televised for people with NFL network lol....i will be listening on radio to ehat i expect to be a dash and gash performance by Smith and Charles and David Carr (if he's playing) running for his life...Oakland can hang its hat on a good defensive game vs. Chargers last week (radio for me again) but the Chiefs are far more dangeroys than that team....this will be a close cover IMO
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 51182
Posted: #25
GL tonight Bud 
R.I.P. Legend
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.