All Forums | NFL Betting

Thursday

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10109
Posts: 85
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 351
Posted: #26
Thanks amd I agree!  I'm hoping to see +8.5
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 793
Posted: #27
I have high respect for you AMD but KC not going to lose or win by a field goal.... I got this at +7, its going to be a push or a 9-13 point win. KC defense is the real deal. Oakland wont score much bud but good luck.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1049
Posted: #28
Raiders 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 36019
Posted: #29
Good luck buddy 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2014
Posts: 1621
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by amd:


Jesus Christ. Get a new hobby.

clowns galore around here, gotta love America.  I swear this site is more entertaining than informative.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2014
Posts: 1621
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by Andrew1976:

GB lost at Seahawks couple years ago, was it fixed? If you think nfl is not rigged, stop gamble

Or you can stop gambling.  You are clearly bitter and unable to accept the fact that you cannot make it.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 4326
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by Milkmoney67:

These raiders covered last week for my last leg of a seven on seven parlay sheet, and I played 5 of the same sheets... $35 won me $2000


I hope these weren't all spreads at -110 or better.  If so, you got robbed. 7 teamer should pay about 90-1 with standard juice. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 3646
Posted: #33
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 632
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by FreeThinker_MD:

+9 now 

You've got my attention!

Where is it +9 ?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 121
Posted: #35
It is an 80/20 bet correct?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 38
Posted: #36
If it gets to +7.5 or higher in my book, I am jumping all over it. Like the two possession side of it. Also really like the under. GL AMD
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 2892
Posted: #37
Thanks amd.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 13323
Posted: #38
Should be interesting to see Latavius Murray tonight get at least half the carries, if not more. He can't possibly be any worse than MJD and McFadden... he should give that offense a little boost. BOL with the play
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2852
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by NNYHILLBILLY:

Like it AMD....short term memory for everyone, Titans suck, no way Pitt doesn't cover! Best of luck thanks for the pick, I will ride with you! I learned long ago that your picks are well thought out, not just fade the public! Any O/U opinions?

BOL!!

 

 

I understand what your saying here but not the greatest example. Pitt tossed a pick in the end zone. Vary rare and fortunate for Tenn backers. But whatever. Pitt out played them for the most part. In the end I see KC winning but thats it. Road gm. play smart and just get the win. No risky plays. just get the win. The hook make me feel a little more comfortable with Oak, just in case. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 120
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by amd:


Why does it have to be rigged? They covered against Seattle, New England and San Diego. The winless Raiders have been in every game this season except for the Dolphins and Broncos games. Who the fukk are the Chiefs to be laying a td or more on the road in a divisional, nationally televised, game??? We understand the Raiders deficiencies so should we begin to talk about KC'S weaknesses? It seems as if we need to.


Not too mention the Chiefs spanked the Raiders last year in Oakland and I'm sure they remember that beat down.  Chiefs on a short week to prepare traveling to the west coast possibly looking ahead to the Broncos.  KC will keep it simple with lots of ground and pound with Charles and Davis sprinkled in with short play action passes to Bowe and Kelce.  Surely the Raiders can figure that out and keep it close or the unthinkable upset??
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 217
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by amd:



Oakland  +7.5  -115  

amd, been following you for a while and appreciate your picks and write ups.  When I saw your pick I knew there would be hecklers out there bustin your chops.  I have to agree with you on this one for two reasons. 
1. Divisional primetime home dog
2. KC looking ahead to the biggest game of the year for them next week against Denver.  

Just my opinion but I think the Faiders can cover with these points.  Best of luck on the play, Ill be rootin it in with you. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 5340
Posted: #42
Raiders were actually in the game against Denver, it was the pick 6 with under min left that helped Denver covered.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14932
Posted: #43
Alright, I'm on board for a unit but I'm doing it my chicken-s h i t way :

Pending 2 Team Teaser (ties push) T tp 6nfl 6½fb & 5bk
Win 11/19/14 9:05pm  NBA Basketball  520 Denver Nuggets -2 * vs Oklahoma City Thunder 
11/20/14 1:50pm Pending 11/20/14 8:25pm  NFL Football  110 Oakland Raiders +15 * vs Kansas City Chiefs 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14932
Posted: #44
The travel to Oakland on a short week, after playing Seattle, against a desperate, moribund franchise fighting for an ounce of dignity (and looking for its 1st win, against a division rival and possible playoff team, a team that embarrassed them at home last year), on national tv, I mean, if the Raiders can't do it here, they may go winless. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 1370
Posted: #45
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 3563
Posted: #46

TO ME IT SEEMS..OAKLAND..1 GOOD 1 BAD

It seems the raiders have more success on the road.so I say KC OR NOTHING

Thanks for your posts..great yr you are having

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 4651
Posted: #47
GL bro 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3173
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by TheCounselor:


You've got my attention!

Where is it +9 ?

NOWHERE...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 1310
Posted: #49
I like the under....
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2674
Posted: #50
BOL   
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.