based off your spreadsheets, what do you think about this play?
Select #1 : NFL Football St. Louis Rams 10/21/2012 10:00 AM - (PST) Money Line +200 for Game Select #2 : NFL Football Tampa Bay Buccaneers 10/21/2012 10:00 AM - (PST) Money Line +110 for Game
Definitely like it. I would think you might get more value on those moneylines closer to kickoff though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pcz:
based off your spreadsheets, what do you think about this play?
Select #1 : NFL Football St. Louis Rams 10/21/2012 10:00 AM - (PST) Money Line +200 for Game Select #2 : NFL Football Tampa Bay Buccaneers 10/21/2012 10:00 AM - (PST) Money Line +110 for Game
Definitely like it. I would think you might get more value on those moneylines closer to kickoff though.
Your question sort of answers itself. These aren't robots out there so there's no way to quantify exactly how much a player is worth to his team. ESPECIALLY the first week of their absence. Sometimes a team will respond really well in the first week, following the 'next man up' practice. It can give them a temporary moral boost as much as it can hurt their overall skill level. If you're asking about a specifically player we can look at their value on a case-by-case basis, but it's just not possible to say if a team is missing their starting corner that it's worth 2.5 points on the spread.
Thanks for that response. Well said. I've been looking at average points per game for offence and defence for each team and subtracting the two to get a net for each team. Compare each team's net and I come up with a spread. However this doesn't take into account the past teams they have played which is why I'm really interested in the relative performance index numbers. Thanks to your earlier post I understand how they are calculated however do you do these calculations yourself or is there an easier source on the internet to get them? You gave an example with the SF/SEA game and I'm wondering if the Adv section at the bottom of the RPI section represents that calculation you did on an earlier post. You mentioned that the final score would be about 17-10 or something like that which is something you did just after you came up with the adv SF +7.5 to make it more realistic? Thanks for all your time answering these questions btw it really helps the learning process cuz this shit aint easy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:
Your question sort of answers itself. These aren't robots out there so there's no way to quantify exactly how much a player is worth to his team. ESPECIALLY the first week of their absence. Sometimes a team will respond really well in the first week, following the 'next man up' practice. It can give them a temporary moral boost as much as it can hurt their overall skill level. If you're asking about a specifically player we can look at their value on a case-by-case basis, but it's just not possible to say if a team is missing their starting corner that it's worth 2.5 points on the spread.
Thanks for that response. Well said. I've been looking at average points per game for offence and defence for each team and subtracting the two to get a net for each team. Compare each team's net and I come up with a spread. However this doesn't take into account the past teams they have played which is why I'm really interested in the relative performance index numbers. Thanks to your earlier post I understand how they are calculated however do you do these calculations yourself or is there an easier source on the internet to get them? You gave an example with the SF/SEA game and I'm wondering if the Adv section at the bottom of the RPI section represents that calculation you did on an earlier post. You mentioned that the final score would be about 17-10 or something like that which is something you did just after you came up with the adv SF +7.5 to make it more realistic? Thanks for all your time answering these questions btw it really helps the learning process cuz this shit aint easy.
Thanks for that response. Well said. I've been looking at average points per game for offence and defence for each team and subtracting the two to get a net for each team. Compare each team's net and I come up with a spread. However this doesn't take into account the past teams they have played which is why I'm really interested in the relative performance index numbers. Thanks to your earlier post I understand how they are calculated however do you do these calculations yourself or is there an easier source on the internet to get them? You gave an example with the SF/SEA game and I'm wondering if the Adv section at the bottom of the RPI section represents that calculation you did on an earlier post. You mentioned that the final score would be about 17-10 or something like that which is something you did just after you came up with the adv SF +7.5 to make it more realistic? Thanks for all your time answering these questions btw it really helps the learning process cuz this shit aint easy.
Unfortunately there's nowhere else where you can find the RPI numbers online so I have to do them myself. There's not even an easy way to automate the process in my databases. I have to manually add the new opponent into each data set each week (so every Monday and Tuesday I hand-edit over 300 individual cells). As automated as I've been able to get the handicapping process, I still have a lot of work to do each week to maintain the databases. Still, the result of having each game handicapped every week with everything I need organized onto a single page is well worth the time I put in.
The ADV calculation at the end does not represent that calculation on this weeks sheets.. but I've already reprogrammed them to output that number when I publish the sheets next week. Currently it's simply the differential of the +/-.
I prefer not to publish an exact score prediction on the sheet as I find it can be misleading. I project a total and a spread, and I guess you can extrapolate likely scores using that information, but they read much better as two separate numbers. Otherwise it would be too easy to get sucked into a single score prediction.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CanadianFooty11:
Thanks for that response. Well said. I've been looking at average points per game for offence and defence for each team and subtracting the two to get a net for each team. Compare each team's net and I come up with a spread. However this doesn't take into account the past teams they have played which is why I'm really interested in the relative performance index numbers. Thanks to your earlier post I understand how they are calculated however do you do these calculations yourself or is there an easier source on the internet to get them? You gave an example with the SF/SEA game and I'm wondering if the Adv section at the bottom of the RPI section represents that calculation you did on an earlier post. You mentioned that the final score would be about 17-10 or something like that which is something you did just after you came up with the adv SF +7.5 to make it more realistic? Thanks for all your time answering these questions btw it really helps the learning process cuz this shit aint easy.
Unfortunately there's nowhere else where you can find the RPI numbers online so I have to do them myself. There's not even an easy way to automate the process in my databases. I have to manually add the new opponent into each data set each week (so every Monday and Tuesday I hand-edit over 300 individual cells). As automated as I've been able to get the handicapping process, I still have a lot of work to do each week to maintain the databases. Still, the result of having each game handicapped every week with everything I need organized onto a single page is well worth the time I put in.
The ADV calculation at the end does not represent that calculation on this weeks sheets.. but I've already reprogrammed them to output that number when I publish the sheets next week. Currently it's simply the differential of the +/-.
I prefer not to publish an exact score prediction on the sheet as I find it can be misleading. I project a total and a spread, and I guess you can extrapolate likely scores using that information, but they read much better as two separate numbers. Otherwise it would be too easy to get sucked into a single score prediction.
Unfortunately there's nowhere else where you can find the RPI numbers online so I have to do them myself. There's not even an easy way to automate the process in my databases. I have to manually add the new opponent into each data set each week (so every Monday and Tuesday I hand-edit over 300 individual cells). As automated as I've been able to get the handicapping process, I still have a lot of work to do each week to maintain the databases. Still, the result of having each game handicapped every week with everything I need organized onto a single page is well worth the time I put in.
The ADV calculation at the end does not represent that calculation on this weeks sheets.. but I've already reprogrammed them to output that number when I publish the sheets next week. Currently it's simply the differential of the +/-.
I prefer not to publish an exact score prediction on the sheet as I find it can be misleading. I project a total and a spread, and I guess you can extrapolate likely scores using that information, but they read much better as two separate numbers. Otherwise it would be too easy to get sucked into a single score prediction.
Gotcha well in that case good on ya for all the hard work. I'd like to share some other insights I have with ya and get your opinion on them but I'll post another time. Early work tomorrow.
0
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:
Unfortunately there's nowhere else where you can find the RPI numbers online so I have to do them myself. There's not even an easy way to automate the process in my databases. I have to manually add the new opponent into each data set each week (so every Monday and Tuesday I hand-edit over 300 individual cells). As automated as I've been able to get the handicapping process, I still have a lot of work to do each week to maintain the databases. Still, the result of having each game handicapped every week with everything I need organized onto a single page is well worth the time I put in.
The ADV calculation at the end does not represent that calculation on this weeks sheets.. but I've already reprogrammed them to output that number when I publish the sheets next week. Currently it's simply the differential of the +/-.
I prefer not to publish an exact score prediction on the sheet as I find it can be misleading. I project a total and a spread, and I guess you can extrapolate likely scores using that information, but they read much better as two separate numbers. Otherwise it would be too easy to get sucked into a single score prediction.
Gotcha well in that case good on ya for all the hard work. I'd like to share some other insights I have with ya and get your opinion on them but I'll post another time. Early work tomorrow.
Thanks Si1ly...you put an incredible amount of time in....I really enjoy your posts. Also thanks to Mrs. Si1ly, she must be very understanding. If you and GG go into business, I'll work for you...I will retire! GL
0
Thanks Si1ly...you put an incredible amount of time in....I really enjoy your posts. Also thanks to Mrs. Si1ly, she must be very understanding. If you and GG go into business, I'll work for you...I will retire! GL
What are your sunday plays? Appreciate the help. How do u feel about colts vs browns this weekend. Its hard to believe my rams will cover without our best receiver
0
What are your sunday plays? Appreciate the help. How do u feel about colts vs browns this weekend. Its hard to believe my rams will cover without our best receiver
Good luck with your plays Si1ly. Unfortunately the lines are all moving against what you have. Tampa concerns me the most because it moved off a key number. They are +2 now. Would you still take them getting less than a field goal?
0
Good luck with your plays Si1ly. Unfortunately the lines are all moving against what you have. Tampa concerns me the most because it moved off a key number. They are +2 now. Would you still take them getting less than a field goal?
What are your sunday plays? Appreciate the help. How do u feel about colts vs browns this weekend. Its hard to believe my rams will cover without our best receiver
The Rams have solid line value created by the discrepancy between public perception and the actual skill of their defense. That said, they're in a tough spot playing a Green Bay team that looked like it clicked offensively last week.
The Colts are getting a little more love than they deserve. My models have the Browns power ranked higher than the Colts which means they shouldn't be more than +2.5 underdogs at the highest.. in fact I think this line should be close to PK. I like the Browns, but in match-ups like this I try and avoid backing the road team. Probably a pass for me as I think the Browns are the right side, but in a tough spot to back them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by juniorafe13:
What are your sunday plays? Appreciate the help. How do u feel about colts vs browns this weekend. Its hard to believe my rams will cover without our best receiver
The Rams have solid line value created by the discrepancy between public perception and the actual skill of their defense. That said, they're in a tough spot playing a Green Bay team that looked like it clicked offensively last week.
The Colts are getting a little more love than they deserve. My models have the Browns power ranked higher than the Colts which means they shouldn't be more than +2.5 underdogs at the highest.. in fact I think this line should be close to PK. I like the Browns, but in match-ups like this I try and avoid backing the road team. Probably a pass for me as I think the Browns are the right side, but in a tough spot to back them.
Good luck with your plays Si1ly. Unfortunately the lines are all moving against what you have. Tampa concerns me the most because it moved off a key number. They are +2 now. Would you still take them getting less than a field goal?
I haven't locked in either Tampa or Cincinnati. The reverse line movement is comforting if anything. It tells me sharp investors are seeing the same things I'm seeing in the line. Noway in hell should the Saints be road favorites! My models pump out Tampa from -4 all the way up to -8.5. They're the better team and they're playing at home in a divisional rivalry. The only thing the Saints have that Tampa doesn't is a bye week last week. But playing the Chiefs after a bye week last week and the Bucs might as well of had two weeks off. Besides, we might see the line climb back towards +3 (-120) as public money continues to pound the Saints at less than a field goal odds.
0
Quote Originally Posted by walbanger:
Good luck with your plays Si1ly. Unfortunately the lines are all moving against what you have. Tampa concerns me the most because it moved off a key number. They are +2 now. Would you still take them getting less than a field goal?
I haven't locked in either Tampa or Cincinnati. The reverse line movement is comforting if anything. It tells me sharp investors are seeing the same things I'm seeing in the line. Noway in hell should the Saints be road favorites! My models pump out Tampa from -4 all the way up to -8.5. They're the better team and they're playing at home in a divisional rivalry. The only thing the Saints have that Tampa doesn't is a bye week last week. But playing the Chiefs after a bye week last week and the Bucs might as well of had two weeks off. Besides, we might see the line climb back towards +3 (-120) as public money continues to pound the Saints at less than a field goal odds.
After week three, I got to thinking about RPI for the NFL, and the lack of one. We use RPI for every other sport, so I started running my own spread sheets to come up with one. You are right, it is a lot of work and time entering the data. I have a meeting this weekend with an accountant to get some help programming a spread sheet to cut down on the needed entries. Will let you know if I find some useful information.
Thanks for the work & time put in, continued success
0
After week three, I got to thinking about RPI for the NFL, and the lack of one. We use RPI for every other sport, so I started running my own spread sheets to come up with one. You are right, it is a lot of work and time entering the data. I have a meeting this weekend with an accountant to get some help programming a spread sheet to cut down on the needed entries. Will let you know if I find some useful information.
Thanks for the work & time put in, continued success
Hey si1ly, have taken your standardised concept on board and am currently using it to for ball park totals, and pass and rsh yard prediction to play QB over/unders, going quite well at the moment. What are you using for your database? I have mine quite automated on excel and there should be a way you can automate, happy to chat to you and help if I can, added you as a friend
0
Hey si1ly, have taken your standardised concept on board and am currently using it to for ball park totals, and pass and rsh yard prediction to play QB over/unders, going quite well at the moment. What are you using for your database? I have mine quite automated on excel and there should be a way you can automate, happy to chat to you and help if I can, added you as a friend
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.