Not really. Jacksonville will win because the Bengals have thrown in the towel. But even with Browning, Cinci has too many ways to hit a backdoor cover at this number with all their skill guys playing. FWIW the sharp play was under 42. I did not play it.
Not really. Jacksonville will win because the Bengals have thrown in the towel. But even with Browning, Cinci has too many ways to hit a backdoor cover at this number with all their skill guys playing. FWIW the sharp play was under 42. I did not play it.
already have cinny tonite,,,,adding cinncy ml +405,,,,,,lightning -110,,,,,lightning -1.5 goals +210,,,,,,waiting for huge organ to come in here and laugh at me for taking tampa 2 days after losing to the exact team they are playing tonite by 7 goals,,,,,,
already have cinny tonite,,,,adding cinncy ml +405,,,,,,lightning -110,,,,,lightning -1.5 goals +210,,,,,,waiting for huge organ to come in here and laugh at me for taking tampa 2 days after losing to the exact team they are playing tonite by 7 goals,,,,,,
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Leans for now; Ari +6.5 Den +3 Car +3.5 Rams -3.5 SF -3 GL fella's Nice day, my friend. Coming out of retirement you haven't missed a beat.
Couldnt agree more....Id love to retire on his face
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Leans for now; Ari +6.5 Den +3 Car +3.5 Rams -3.5 SF -3 GL fella's Nice day, my friend. Coming out of retirement you haven't missed a beat.
Couldnt agree more....Id love to retire on his face
Not a good Sunday for me. Asking bad teams to win in a good spot is not optimal strategy at this time of the year. But I've got some killer props for tonite. They will all win unless they don't. Etienne UNDER 15.5 carries. He's a bit banged up with bruised ribs and although he'll start, the long term plan is to manage his reps down the stretch. Which segues into: Dernest Johnson OVER 27.5 rush yards. He's surpassed hyped up rookie Tank Bigsby in the pecking order at RB and has looked violent when given the opportunity this year. Shrimp knows him. Local kid. Engram OVER 49.5 receiving yards. Bengals are #31 of 32 at defending the TE position which segues into: Engram anytime TD +200. Guy has the most receptions (64) in the league without a TD. That changes tonite. Good Luck fine people.
This is why I enjoy your posts. Your “if, then” thought process opens up my own thinking.
Not a good Sunday for me. Asking bad teams to win in a good spot is not optimal strategy at this time of the year. But I've got some killer props for tonite. They will all win unless they don't. Etienne UNDER 15.5 carries. He's a bit banged up with bruised ribs and although he'll start, the long term plan is to manage his reps down the stretch. Which segues into: Dernest Johnson OVER 27.5 rush yards. He's surpassed hyped up rookie Tank Bigsby in the pecking order at RB and has looked violent when given the opportunity this year. Shrimp knows him. Local kid. Engram OVER 49.5 receiving yards. Bengals are #31 of 32 at defending the TE position which segues into: Engram anytime TD +200. Guy has the most receptions (64) in the league without a TD. That changes tonite. Good Luck fine people.
This is why I enjoy your posts. Your “if, then” thought process opens up my own thinking.
Lost in the Zach Wilson/Tim Boyle/Mac Jones/Bailey Zappe narratives is how utterly incompetent OCs Nate Hackett and Bill O Brien have been able to stay under the radar of scrutiny. Proper coaching is earned not a privilege. Those two guys would have killed Brock Purdy's career in less than 1 season.
Lost in the Zach Wilson/Tim Boyle/Mac Jones/Bailey Zappe narratives is how utterly incompetent OCs Nate Hackett and Bill O Brien have been able to stay under the radar of scrutiny. Proper coaching is earned not a privilege. Those two guys would have killed Brock Purdy's career in less than 1 season.
Was at the sports book collecting today, saw the Bears +3.5(-120). I hate juice so passed for now.
The dude that works there was surprised at the line, thought it should of been closer to 7...and said it was their biggest move and he didn't know why.
I reminded him of the last game where the Bears beat them in every which way except the final score. The Lions starting center got hurt last game. And the Bears are off a bye.
I watched the Lions and Saints game twice now. That win and cover had a lot more to do with the Saints retardation than the Lions dominance imo.
Carr's interception was on a flukey tipped ball. His fumble was atrocious, especially at that juncture.
The Saints had 5 more first downs. 15 more yards, they went 4 for 4 in the redzone, 4 punts to Detroit's 5, and had 4 min and 10 seconds more time of possession. The Saints didn't even attempt 1 FG, going 0-1 on fourth down.
Jameis Winston missed at least 3 open receivers after Carr went down.
I'm still sour on that loss. How the fuck do you not cover +4 at home there?
Was at the sports book collecting today, saw the Bears +3.5(-120). I hate juice so passed for now.
The dude that works there was surprised at the line, thought it should of been closer to 7...and said it was their biggest move and he didn't know why.
I reminded him of the last game where the Bears beat them in every which way except the final score. The Lions starting center got hurt last game. And the Bears are off a bye.
I watched the Lions and Saints game twice now. That win and cover had a lot more to do with the Saints retardation than the Lions dominance imo.
Carr's interception was on a flukey tipped ball. His fumble was atrocious, especially at that juncture.
The Saints had 5 more first downs. 15 more yards, they went 4 for 4 in the redzone, 4 punts to Detroit's 5, and had 4 min and 10 seconds more time of possession. The Saints didn't even attempt 1 FG, going 0-1 on fourth down.
Jameis Winston missed at least 3 open receivers after Carr went down.
I'm still sour on that loss. How the fuck do you not cover +4 at home there?
@Cranky_Hank The opener of Bears +5 was gold. Was at the sports book collecting today, saw the Bears +3.5(-120). I hate juice so passed for now. The dude that works there was surprised at the line, thought it should of been closer to 7...and said it was their biggest move and he didn't know why. I reminded him of the last game where the Bears beat them in every which way except the final score. The Lions starting center got hurt last game. And the Bears are off a bye. I watched the Lions and Saints game twice now. That win and cover had a lot more to do with the Saints retardation than the Lions dominance imo. Carr's interception was on a flukey tipped ball. His fumble was atrocious, especially at that juncture. The Saints had 5 more first downs. 15 more yards, they went 4 for 4 in the redzone, 4 punts to Detroit's 5, and had 4 min and 10 seconds more time of possession. The Saints didn't even attempt 1 FG, going 0-1 on fourth down. Jameis Winston missed at least 3 open receivers after Carr went down. I'm still sour on that loss. How the fuck do you not cover +4 at home there?
Whew ...I was reading to the end ...Im glad you didnt go home with the casino guy ....I would be angry
@Cranky_Hank The opener of Bears +5 was gold. Was at the sports book collecting today, saw the Bears +3.5(-120). I hate juice so passed for now. The dude that works there was surprised at the line, thought it should of been closer to 7...and said it was their biggest move and he didn't know why. I reminded him of the last game where the Bears beat them in every which way except the final score. The Lions starting center got hurt last game. And the Bears are off a bye. I watched the Lions and Saints game twice now. That win and cover had a lot more to do with the Saints retardation than the Lions dominance imo. Carr's interception was on a flukey tipped ball. His fumble was atrocious, especially at that juncture. The Saints had 5 more first downs. 15 more yards, they went 4 for 4 in the redzone, 4 punts to Detroit's 5, and had 4 min and 10 seconds more time of possession. The Saints didn't even attempt 1 FG, going 0-1 on fourth down. Jameis Winston missed at least 3 open receivers after Carr went down. I'm still sour on that loss. How the fuck do you not cover +4 at home there?
Whew ...I was reading to the end ...Im glad you didnt go home with the casino guy ....I would be angry
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.