not sure i'm going to see any matchups i really like in these playoffs, other than buffalo +3 last week, but i missed that number. i'll probably throw out a few team totals just to keep things interesting. already have tenn over 19. i see them hitting 40. by halftime.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
not sure i'm going to see any matchups i really like in these playoffs, other than buffalo +3 last week, but i missed that number. i'll probably throw out a few team totals just to keep things interesting. already have tenn over 19. i see them hitting 40. by halftime.
They might get 4....Last time we saw them they had 0 points and
150 total yards....14 months ago.......Dirt Dog....,.....
Jimmy Crack Cornnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
The ravens had Suggs and Zadarius Smith on the d line for that game. Derrick Henry had only 7 carries...Matt LaFluer was the OC with the great Marcus Marriota at the helm.
Think things will go the same?
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigred84:
They might get 4....Last time we saw them they had 0 points and
150 total yards....14 months ago.......Dirt Dog....,.....
Jimmy Crack Cornnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
The ravens had Suggs and Zadarius Smith on the d line for that game. Derrick Henry had only 7 carries...Matt LaFluer was the OC with the great Marcus Marriota at the helm.
Interesting that Matt Rhule would take on the headache that is Cam Newton but not even answer the phone for Baker's boys. From Temple to the NFL in 3 years, wow
I thought I was the only one who missed out on the "44 year old Matt Rhule is the next Bill Belichick" memo. Head coaching gigs at Temple and Baylor should suddenly be in vogue these days.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Interesting that Matt Rhule would take on the headache that is Cam Newton but not even answer the phone for Baker's boys. From Temple to the NFL in 3 years, wow
I thought I was the only one who missed out on the "44 year old Matt Rhule is the next Bill Belichick" memo. Head coaching gigs at Temple and Baylor should suddenly be in vogue these days.
Meanwhile the Giants made an even bigger splash by hiring Judge Judy as head football coach and chief of litigation. Good for them.
I wonder if the Titans will employ the same strategy as the Chargers last year which held Lamar to a 48% pass percentage, an interception, 7 sacks, 3 fumbles, and 54 rushing yards on 9 carries? Vrabel learned under Belichick, he's no dummy to taking out the opponent's best option. Or is Lamar just too good now that he's matchup proof? Opinions are welcome, Mr. Shrimp.
0
Meanwhile the Giants made an even bigger splash by hiring Judge Judy as head football coach and chief of litigation. Good for them.
I wonder if the Titans will employ the same strategy as the Chargers last year which held Lamar to a 48% pass percentage, an interception, 7 sacks, 3 fumbles, and 54 rushing yards on 9 carries? Vrabel learned under Belichick, he's no dummy to taking out the opponent's best option. Or is Lamar just too good now that he's matchup proof? Opinions are welcome, Mr. Shrimp.
Meanwhile the Giants made an even bigger splash by hiring Judge Judy as head football coach and chief of litigation. Good for them.
I wonder if the Titans will employ the same strategy as the Chargers last year which held Lamar to a 48% pass percentage, an interception, 7 sacks, 3 fumbles, and 54 rushing yards on 9 carries? Vrabel learned under Belichick, he's no dummy to taking out the opponent's best option. Or is Lamar just too good now that he's matchup proof? Opinions are welcome, Mr. Shrimp.
That's a decent angle on Lamar. Although he corrected his fumblitis this year, and has become a tremendously better passer. He couldn't hit the broad side of a barn last year. I also think that the addition of Mark Ingram and Gus Edwards has given them a battery that no one wants to tackle for 60 minutes. That makes their PA effective.
On the other side of the ball, I got the feeling Derrick Henry might run out of steam. 66 carries for 393 yards last 2 games...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
Meanwhile the Giants made an even bigger splash by hiring Judge Judy as head football coach and chief of litigation. Good for them.
I wonder if the Titans will employ the same strategy as the Chargers last year which held Lamar to a 48% pass percentage, an interception, 7 sacks, 3 fumbles, and 54 rushing yards on 9 carries? Vrabel learned under Belichick, he's no dummy to taking out the opponent's best option. Or is Lamar just too good now that he's matchup proof? Opinions are welcome, Mr. Shrimp.
That's a decent angle on Lamar. Although he corrected his fumblitis this year, and has become a tremendously better passer. He couldn't hit the broad side of a barn last year. I also think that the addition of Mark Ingram and Gus Edwards has given them a battery that no one wants to tackle for 60 minutes. That makes their PA effective.
On the other side of the ball, I got the feeling Derrick Henry might run out of steam. 66 carries for 393 yards last 2 games...
Meanwhile the Giants made an even bigger splash by hiring Judge Judy as head football coach and chief of litigation. Good for them.
I wonder if the Titans will employ the same strategy as the Chargers last year which held Lamar to a 48% pass percentage, an interception, 7 sacks, 3 fumbles, and 54 rushing yards on 9 carries? Vrabel learned under Belichick, he's no dummy to taking out the opponent's best option. Or is Lamar just too good now that he's matchup proof? Opinions are welcome, Mr. Shrimp.
if they do he will kill them throwing to our tight ends, which he likes to do anyway. He learned from that game i'm sure.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
Meanwhile the Giants made an even bigger splash by hiring Judge Judy as head football coach and chief of litigation. Good for them.
I wonder if the Titans will employ the same strategy as the Chargers last year which held Lamar to a 48% pass percentage, an interception, 7 sacks, 3 fumbles, and 54 rushing yards on 9 carries? Vrabel learned under Belichick, he's no dummy to taking out the opponent's best option. Or is Lamar just too good now that he's matchup proof? Opinions are welcome, Mr. Shrimp.
if they do he will kill them throwing to our tight ends, which he likes to do anyway. He learned from that game i'm sure.
Awfully inflated spreads for the divisional round Leaning Minny +7 Tenn +10 if GB gets to 3.5 then bought to -3... and if not - ML Parlay GB, Chiefs -125 Nothing locked in and will probably continue my research until Friday night even if I lose some line value
I like San Fran's make up a lot but I have a very difficult time believing the Vikings are going down quietly. Forget the Cousins narrative, they're just a very well built team.
Green Bay is the team that everyone is forgetting about. Seattle has been on a whirlwind of a schedule and a lot of people thought it would catch up to them last week. It didn't so now we think they're bulletproof. Always a huge mistake to think more of a team today than you did a week ago.
Houston may or may not cover but they're the only team who I give zero chance of winning the Super Bowl.
Tennessee has a punchers chance and early money at +10 agreed. The line dipped quickly to 8 before moving up again after the public got invited.
I do like that KC/GB ML parlay.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Titusblink:
Awfully inflated spreads for the divisional round Leaning Minny +7 Tenn +10 if GB gets to 3.5 then bought to -3... and if not - ML Parlay GB, Chiefs -125 Nothing locked in and will probably continue my research until Friday night even if I lose some line value
I like San Fran's make up a lot but I have a very difficult time believing the Vikings are going down quietly. Forget the Cousins narrative, they're just a very well built team.
Green Bay is the team that everyone is forgetting about. Seattle has been on a whirlwind of a schedule and a lot of people thought it would catch up to them last week. It didn't so now we think they're bulletproof. Always a huge mistake to think more of a team today than you did a week ago.
Houston may or may not cover but they're the only team who I give zero chance of winning the Super Bowl.
Tennessee has a punchers chance and early money at +10 agreed. The line dipped quickly to 8 before moving up again after the public got invited.
The way Green Bay unimpressively limped into the #2 seed reminds of how New England stumbled in although they did get the bye. That Detroit game took them 3 quarters to wake up and it almost wasn't enough. Seattle won't let let them off the hook as easily as the David Blough led Lions did
0
The way Green Bay unimpressively limped into the #2 seed reminds of how New England stumbled in although they did get the bye. That Detroit game took them 3 quarters to wake up and it almost wasn't enough. Seattle won't let let them off the hook as easily as the David Blough led Lions did
The way Green Bay unimpressively limped into the #2 seed reminds of how New England stumbled in although they did get the bye. That Detroit game took them 3 quarters to wake up and it almost wasn't enough. Seattle won't let let them off the hook as easily as the David Blough led Lions did
Speak your peace, but GB finished the season with 3 straight divisional wins and 5 in a row overall. They don't jump off the page, but there's something going on there and it's called winning.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
The way Green Bay unimpressively limped into the #2 seed reminds of how New England stumbled in although they did get the bye. That Detroit game took them 3 quarters to wake up and it almost wasn't enough. Seattle won't let let them off the hook as easily as the David Blough led Lions did
Speak your peace, but GB finished the season with 3 straight divisional wins and 5 in a row overall. They don't jump off the page, but there's something going on there and it's called winning.
Awfully inflated spreads for the divisional round Leaning Minny +7 Tenn +10 if GB gets to 3.5 then bought to -3... and if not - ML Parlay GB, Chiefs -125 Nothing locked in and will probably continue my research until Friday night even if I lose some line value
I like San Fran's make up a lot but I have a very difficult time believing the Vikings are going down quietly. Forget the Cousins narrative, they're just a very well built team. Green Bay is the team that everyone is forgetting about. Seattle has been on a whirlwind of a schedule and a lot of people thought it would catch up to them last week. It didn't so now we think they're bulletproof. Always a huge mistake to think more of a team today than you did a week ago. Houston may or may not cover but they're the only team who I give zero chance of winning the Super Bowl. Tennessee has a punchers chance and early money at +10 agreed. The line dipped quickly to 8 before moving up again after the public got invited. I do like that KC/GB ML parlay.
Sounds like we generally have consensus, you and I, G3.. has anyone pulled a G3 before or am I taking the copyright?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
Quote Originally Posted by Titusblink:
Awfully inflated spreads for the divisional round Leaning Minny +7 Tenn +10 if GB gets to 3.5 then bought to -3... and if not - ML Parlay GB, Chiefs -125 Nothing locked in and will probably continue my research until Friday night even if I lose some line value
I like San Fran's make up a lot but I have a very difficult time believing the Vikings are going down quietly. Forget the Cousins narrative, they're just a very well built team. Green Bay is the team that everyone is forgetting about. Seattle has been on a whirlwind of a schedule and a lot of people thought it would catch up to them last week. It didn't so now we think they're bulletproof. Always a huge mistake to think more of a team today than you did a week ago. Houston may or may not cover but they're the only team who I give zero chance of winning the Super Bowl. Tennessee has a punchers chance and early money at +10 agreed. The line dipped quickly to 8 before moving up again after the public got invited. I do like that KC/GB ML parlay.
Sounds like we generally have consensus, you and I, G3.. has anyone pulled a G3 before or am I taking the copyright?
Wasn't there a song about me a few years ago? Feelin' so fly like a G3 ?
Hah, I'm getting Tom Cruise as Lex something or the other flashbacks... If you havent watched Tropic Thunder in your life, put it on your agenda and soon.. You're welcome!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
Wasn't there a song about me a few years ago? Feelin' so fly like a G3 ?
Hah, I'm getting Tom Cruise as Lex something or the other flashbacks... If you havent watched Tropic Thunder in your life, put it on your agenda and soon.. You're welcome!
Wasn't there a song about me a few years ago? Feelin' so fly like a G3 ?
Hah, I'm getting Tom Cruise as Lex something or the other flashbacks... If you havent watched Tropic Thunder in your life, put it on your agenda and soon.. You're welcome!
Most underrated movie he ever did was American Made just a few years ago. Sounds boring enough, but it's based on a true story of a commercial pilot who who worked for the CIA and then became a drug runner for the Colombian cocaine cartels in the 80's. Very well done. I normally hate action/adventure flicks (other than Bond) but this rates a 4 out of 5 stars.
By the way the song I was thinking of was actually G6 not G3. Life is good if you look towards the light instead of the dark.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Titusblink:
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
Wasn't there a song about me a few years ago? Feelin' so fly like a G3 ?
Hah, I'm getting Tom Cruise as Lex something or the other flashbacks... If you havent watched Tropic Thunder in your life, put it on your agenda and soon.. You're welcome!
Most underrated movie he ever did was American Made just a few years ago. Sounds boring enough, but it's based on a true story of a commercial pilot who who worked for the CIA and then became a drug runner for the Colombian cocaine cartels in the 80's. Very well done. I normally hate action/adventure flicks (other than Bond) but this rates a 4 out of 5 stars.
By the way the song I was thinking of was actually G6 not G3. Life is good if you look towards the light instead of the dark.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
