Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc: Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Vin Scully now too... Wonder if anyone saw that coming? Guess the Dodgers are going all the way now...right chic? I never said that. It can mean a extreme win or loss. They could lose series. Just like Raiders did miraculously make playoffs but lost in them Vin Scully dies on same day as Thurman Munson. Possible Dodgers v Yankees? Whoa, groundbreaking. Two of the three best teams in baseball, who I believe have the two highest payrolls, might meet in the World Series. I smell a book deal and whirlwind media blitz in your future. Then you're admitting I'm right when I point out at the building new stadiums/new ownership leads to winning seasons. It's the same principle. But you think it's organic. Using your logic, why don't they make series every year? You're just being childish. So, did they win organically on the field or because they spent the most money? Your proving my point Do you want me to point out all the new arena, ballparks, and football stadiums have been built without their tenant team winning a championship? Fucking dufus. I guess the Lions still play in the fucking Pontiac Silverdome. I'm still waiting on my Cowboys to win their new stadium Super Bowl. You're an idiot.
You're pointlessly cherry picking. By and large new stadiums, new owners, moving, lead to playoffs and championships. They don't have to win them. The goal is rewarding the owners with revenue and prestige.
Where did I say anything about them only winning championships? They go to one or have multiple playoff runs. You're just spinning contradictory circles.
What happened when Rams moved to st Louis? Went to two SBs. What happened when they moved to LA? 2 SBs. But yeah, just coincidence,right?
The truth is you can't find as many examples of failure ,as I can of success for moving it building new stadiuns or changing ownership. It's all about money and has nothing to do with competition.
Cowboys went to 3 SBs as soon as they changed ownership , that's what got them the new stadium. You're arguing like a child who's only capable of black,white, 2 plus 2 thinking. You just take everything literally without ability to discern multiple factors and nuance.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc: Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Vin Scully now too... Wonder if anyone saw that coming? Guess the Dodgers are going all the way now...right chic? I never said that. It can mean a extreme win or loss. They could lose series. Just like Raiders did miraculously make playoffs but lost in them Vin Scully dies on same day as Thurman Munson. Possible Dodgers v Yankees? Whoa, groundbreaking. Two of the three best teams in baseball, who I believe have the two highest payrolls, might meet in the World Series. I smell a book deal and whirlwind media blitz in your future. Then you're admitting I'm right when I point out at the building new stadiums/new ownership leads to winning seasons. It's the same principle. But you think it's organic. Using your logic, why don't they make series every year? You're just being childish. So, did they win organically on the field or because they spent the most money? Your proving my point Do you want me to point out all the new arena, ballparks, and football stadiums have been built without their tenant team winning a championship? Fucking dufus. I guess the Lions still play in the fucking Pontiac Silverdome. I'm still waiting on my Cowboys to win their new stadium Super Bowl. You're an idiot.
You're pointlessly cherry picking. By and large new stadiums, new owners, moving, lead to playoffs and championships. They don't have to win them. The goal is rewarding the owners with revenue and prestige.
Where did I say anything about them only winning championships? They go to one or have multiple playoff runs. You're just spinning contradictory circles.
What happened when Rams moved to st Louis? Went to two SBs. What happened when they moved to LA? 2 SBs. But yeah, just coincidence,right?
The truth is you can't find as many examples of failure ,as I can of success for moving it building new stadiuns or changing ownership. It's all about money and has nothing to do with competition.
Cowboys went to 3 SBs as soon as they changed ownership , that's what got them the new stadium. You're arguing like a child who's only capable of black,white, 2 plus 2 thinking. You just take everything literally without ability to discern multiple factors and nuance.
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc: Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Vin Scully now too... Wonder if anyone saw that coming? Guess the Dodgers are going all the way now...right chic? I never said that. It can mean a extreme win or loss. They could lose series. Just like Raiders did miraculously make playoffs but lost in them Vin Scully dies on same day as Thurman Munson. Possible Dodgers v Yankees? Whoa, groundbreaking. Two of the three best teams in baseball, who I believe have the two highest payrolls, might meet in the World Series. I smell a book deal and whirlwind media blitz in your future. Then you're admitting I'm right when I point out at the building new stadiums/new ownership leads to winning seasons. It's the same principle. But you think it's organic. Using your logic, why don't they make series every year? You're just being childish. So, did they win organically on the field or because they spent the most money? Your proving my point Do you want me to point out all the new arena, ballparks, and football stadiums have been built without their tenant team winning a championship? Fucking dufus. I guess the Lions still play in the fucking Pontiac Silverdome. I'm still waiting on my Cowboys to win their new stadium Super Bowl. You're an idiot.
You're being far too simplistic.
Lions? Pay attention.
They built their new stadium between 1999 and 2002.
6 of 9 years before that, they made the playoffs ,while also having Barry Sanders. They milked all the money they could from the fans and then built the new stadium. They didn't need to win after that.
They suckered the fans enough.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc: Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Vin Scully now too... Wonder if anyone saw that coming? Guess the Dodgers are going all the way now...right chic? I never said that. It can mean a extreme win or loss. They could lose series. Just like Raiders did miraculously make playoffs but lost in them Vin Scully dies on same day as Thurman Munson. Possible Dodgers v Yankees? Whoa, groundbreaking. Two of the three best teams in baseball, who I believe have the two highest payrolls, might meet in the World Series. I smell a book deal and whirlwind media blitz in your future. Then you're admitting I'm right when I point out at the building new stadiums/new ownership leads to winning seasons. It's the same principle. But you think it's organic. Using your logic, why don't they make series every year? You're just being childish. So, did they win organically on the field or because they spent the most money? Your proving my point Do you want me to point out all the new arena, ballparks, and football stadiums have been built without their tenant team winning a championship? Fucking dufus. I guess the Lions still play in the fucking Pontiac Silverdome. I'm still waiting on my Cowboys to win their new stadium Super Bowl. You're an idiot.
You're being far too simplistic.
Lions? Pay attention.
They built their new stadium between 1999 and 2002.
6 of 9 years before that, they made the playoffs ,while also having Barry Sanders. They milked all the money they could from the fans and then built the new stadium. They didn't need to win after that.
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc: Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Vin Scully now too... Wonder if anyone saw that coming? Guess the Dodgers are going all the way now...right chic? I never said that. It can mean a extreme win or loss. They could lose series. Just like Raiders did miraculously make playoffs but lost in them Vin Scully dies on same day as Thurman Munson. Possible Dodgers v Yankees? Whoa, groundbreaking. Two of the three best teams in baseball, who I believe have the two highest payrolls, might meet in the World Series. I smell a book deal and whirlwind media blitz in your future. Then you're admitting I'm right when I point out at the building new stadiums/new ownership leads to winning seasons. It's the same principle. But you think it's organic. Using your logic, why don't they make series every year? You're just being childish. So, did they win organically on the field or because they spent the most money? Your proving my point Do you want me to point out all the new arena, ballparks, and football stadiums have been built without their tenant team winning a championship? Fucking dufus. I guess the Lions still play in the fucking Pontiac Silverdome. I'm still waiting on my Cowboys to win their new stadium Super Bowl. You're an idiot. You're being far too simplistic. Lions? Pay attention. They built their new stadium between 1999 and 2002. 6 of 9 years before that, they made the playoffs ,while also having Barry Sanders. They milked all the money they could from the fans and then built the new stadium. They didn't need to win after that. They suckered the fans enough.
You'll just keep moving the goal post. Changing the narrative, everytime I prove you wrong. First you say "building a stadium leads to winning a Super Bowl". Then you say "leads to winning seasons". Then you say, "Well, they were winning before they got a new stadium." You cherry pick cases that you claim support your narrative. Then when faced with a mountain of cases that refute your narrative, you change the narrative." You come up with ridiculous time scales. It's insanity. You're full of shit. It's clear.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
1
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc: Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Vin Scully now too... Wonder if anyone saw that coming? Guess the Dodgers are going all the way now...right chic? I never said that. It can mean a extreme win or loss. They could lose series. Just like Raiders did miraculously make playoffs but lost in them Vin Scully dies on same day as Thurman Munson. Possible Dodgers v Yankees? Whoa, groundbreaking. Two of the three best teams in baseball, who I believe have the two highest payrolls, might meet in the World Series. I smell a book deal and whirlwind media blitz in your future. Then you're admitting I'm right when I point out at the building new stadiums/new ownership leads to winning seasons. It's the same principle. But you think it's organic. Using your logic, why don't they make series every year? You're just being childish. So, did they win organically on the field or because they spent the most money? Your proving my point Do you want me to point out all the new arena, ballparks, and football stadiums have been built without their tenant team winning a championship? Fucking dufus. I guess the Lions still play in the fucking Pontiac Silverdome. I'm still waiting on my Cowboys to win their new stadium Super Bowl. You're an idiot. You're being far too simplistic. Lions? Pay attention. They built their new stadium between 1999 and 2002. 6 of 9 years before that, they made the playoffs ,while also having Barry Sanders. They milked all the money they could from the fans and then built the new stadium. They didn't need to win after that. They suckered the fans enough.
You'll just keep moving the goal post. Changing the narrative, everytime I prove you wrong. First you say "building a stadium leads to winning a Super Bowl". Then you say "leads to winning seasons". Then you say, "Well, they were winning before they got a new stadium." You cherry pick cases that you claim support your narrative. Then when faced with a mountain of cases that refute your narrative, you change the narrative." You come up with ridiculous time scales. It's insanity. You're full of shit. It's clear.
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc: Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Vin Scully now too... Wonder if anyone saw that coming? Guess the Dodgers are going all the way now...right chic? I never said that. It can mean a extreme win or loss. They could lose series. Just like Raiders did miraculously make playoffs but lost in them Vin Scully dies on same day as Thurman Munson. Possible Dodgers v Yankees? Whoa, groundbreaking. Two of the three best teams in baseball, who I believe have the two highest payrolls, might meet in the World Series. I smell a book deal and whirlwind media blitz in your future. Then you're admitting I'm right when I point out at the building new stadiums/new ownership leads to winning seasons. It's the same principle. But you think it's organic. Using your logic, why don't they make series every year? You're just being childish. So, did they win organically on the field or because they spent the most money? Your proving my point Do you want me to point out all the new arena, ballparks, and football stadiums have been built without their tenant team winning a championship? Fucking dufus. I guess the Lions still play in the fucking Pontiac Silverdome. I'm still waiting on my Cowboys to win their new stadium Super Bowl. You're an idiot. You're being far too simplistic. Lions? Pay attention. They built their new stadium between 1999 and 2002. 6 of 9 years before that, they made the playoffs ,while also having Barry Sanders. They milked all the money they could from the fans and then built the new stadium. They didn't need to win after that. They suckered the fans enough. You'll just keep moving the goal post. Changing the narrative, everytime I prove you wrong. First you say "building a stadium leads to winning a Super Bowl". Then you say "leads to winning seasons". Then you say, "Well, they were winning before they got a new stadium." You cherry pick cases that you claim support your narrative. Then when faced with a mountain of cases that refute your narrative, you change the narrative." You come up with ridiculous time scales. It's insanity. You're full of shit. It's clear.
Lol your illiterate.
I didn't move any goalpost. You're just being a simpleton. No, you don't have any mountain of cases. Ive been showing time and again these last 7 years how it's been going on for 55 yrs and longer.
------
First you say "building a stadium leads to winning a Super Bowl
------------
Wrong. I said it leads to super bowls and playoffs, not necessarily winning the super bowl. But I did not say it's exclusively what happens. I've explained that in detail numerous times here for years. You're being more than immature. You are lying.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc: Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Vin Scully now too... Wonder if anyone saw that coming? Guess the Dodgers are going all the way now...right chic? I never said that. It can mean a extreme win or loss. They could lose series. Just like Raiders did miraculously make playoffs but lost in them Vin Scully dies on same day as Thurman Munson. Possible Dodgers v Yankees? Whoa, groundbreaking. Two of the three best teams in baseball, who I believe have the two highest payrolls, might meet in the World Series. I smell a book deal and whirlwind media blitz in your future. Then you're admitting I'm right when I point out at the building new stadiums/new ownership leads to winning seasons. It's the same principle. But you think it's organic. Using your logic, why don't they make series every year? You're just being childish. So, did they win organically on the field or because they spent the most money? Your proving my point Do you want me to point out all the new arena, ballparks, and football stadiums have been built without their tenant team winning a championship? Fucking dufus. I guess the Lions still play in the fucking Pontiac Silverdome. I'm still waiting on my Cowboys to win their new stadium Super Bowl. You're an idiot. You're being far too simplistic. Lions? Pay attention. They built their new stadium between 1999 and 2002. 6 of 9 years before that, they made the playoffs ,while also having Barry Sanders. They milked all the money they could from the fans and then built the new stadium. They didn't need to win after that. They suckered the fans enough. You'll just keep moving the goal post. Changing the narrative, everytime I prove you wrong. First you say "building a stadium leads to winning a Super Bowl". Then you say "leads to winning seasons". Then you say, "Well, they were winning before they got a new stadium." You cherry pick cases that you claim support your narrative. Then when faced with a mountain of cases that refute your narrative, you change the narrative." You come up with ridiculous time scales. It's insanity. You're full of shit. It's clear.
Lol your illiterate.
I didn't move any goalpost. You're just being a simpleton. No, you don't have any mountain of cases. Ive been showing time and again these last 7 years how it's been going on for 55 yrs and longer.
------
First you say "building a stadium leads to winning a Super Bowl
------------
Wrong. I said it leads to super bowls and playoffs, not necessarily winning the super bowl. But I did not say it's exclusively what happens. I've explained that in detail numerous times here for years. You're being more than immature. You are lying.
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Childish cherry picking. He is just one of the many safs owned by a since ceased lying tout ... It will say anything for attention
Look who's talking.
And you're wrong. I'm an adult with a different opinion. Apparently that scares you, so you insult like a child.
Why do you need to keep insulting me,? I must be on the right track then.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Childish cherry picking. He is just one of the many safs owned by a since ceased lying tout ... It will say anything for attention
Look who's talking.
And you're wrong. I'm an adult with a different opinion. Apparently that scares you, so you insult like a child.
Why do you need to keep insulting me,? I must be on the right track then.
Quote Originally Posted by Doja45: @benhogan76 Bitches gots to be put on notice from time to time. Even that limp wristed mark Goodell knows that Don’t even get me started about the blacks and the person!
J ews is censored CT is doing Gods work.
22nd
0
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Quote Originally Posted by Doja45: @benhogan76 Bitches gots to be put on notice from time to time. Even that limp wristed mark Goodell knows that Don’t even get me started about the blacks and the person!
Anyone have Olivia Newton-John in the pool? I'm guessing not, but one will say he did
Yeah it definitely wasn't the cancer she battled for decades ....Chic/mctrap/spock/ 4 other safs all controlled hy one user know it's the Vax ...They have proof from madtruther.com and epochtimes ..
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Anyone have Olivia Newton-John in the pool? I'm guessing not, but one will say he did
Yeah it definitely wasn't the cancer she battled for decades ....Chic/mctrap/spock/ 4 other safs all controlled hy one user know it's the Vax ...They have proof from madtruther.com and epochtimes ..
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Anyone have Olivia Newton-John in the pool? I'm guessing not, but one will say he did Yeah it definitely wasn't the cancer she battled for decades ....Chic/mctrap/spock/ 4 other safs all controlled hy one user know it's the Vax ...They have proof from madtruther.com and epochtimes ..
There he goes again. Making crap up that no one says or thinks. All your saf talk is projection.
All pointless black and white comments. No understanding of nuance and grey area in thinking and speaking. That lends itself to a bit of NPD.
Can't think for yourself and mock anyone who does. Projecting
1
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Anyone have Olivia Newton-John in the pool? I'm guessing not, but one will say he did Yeah it definitely wasn't the cancer she battled for decades ....Chic/mctrap/spock/ 4 other safs all controlled hy one user know it's the Vax ...They have proof from madtruther.com and epochtimes ..
There he goes again. Making crap up that no one says or thinks. All your saf talk is projection.
All pointless black and white comments. No understanding of nuance and grey area in thinking and speaking. That lends itself to a bit of NPD.
Can't think for yourself and mock anyone who does. Projecting
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.