Hustle I'm a Kobe fan/supporter and laker fan as you know and totally disagree w/you on SOME(not all) of your points and we've agreed to disagree, but gotta give credit where credit is due. You said fade my Lakers and you were right. I haven't went 10-2, but I did get some of that PHX today.
The formula for the non cover is simple. As the shots go up, the chances of the opponent keeping the game close increases which is why a spread other than (pk) is damn near impossible for the Lakers to cover. (But all of this was said above). It's not a surprise when the shots are distributed equally the team blows people out (i.e. Sacramento) but when one player takes almost half the shots, the team loses. (I.E. Houston, Charlotte, Memphis, etc.) Simple basketball mathematics.
Glad to see you cashed in with Phoenix.
0
Quote Originally Posted by charles4297:
Hustle I'm a Kobe fan/supporter and laker fan as you know and totally disagree w/you on SOME(not all) of your points and we've agreed to disagree, but gotta give credit where credit is due. You said fade my Lakers and you were right. I haven't went 10-2, but I did get some of that PHX today.
The formula for the non cover is simple. As the shots go up, the chances of the opponent keeping the game close increases which is why a spread other than (pk) is damn near impossible for the Lakers to cover. (But all of this was said above). It's not a surprise when the shots are distributed equally the team blows people out (i.e. Sacramento) but when one player takes almost half the shots, the team loses. (I.E. Houston, Charlotte, Memphis, etc.) Simple basketball mathematics.
I didnt even plan on conducting the FADE train tonight because of the fact that people who hopped on when I told them to in the beginning have guaranteed themselves profit for the rest of the regular season. But its a lot of stupidity out there and guys still thinking the Lakers are worth betting so it looks like its going to start up again.
I'm actually rooting for the Lakers to cover tonight because going 11-2 (85%) ATS in the past 13 just seems impossible. But then again, nothing is impossible when you have one player going for shots and shooting the team into tight games down the stretch.
Let's watch and see which way the team goes tonight because it would be a shame for the FADE train to have the same amount of wins as Bill Russell (winning 11 championships out of 13 years)
0
Tonight's matchup -
LA Lakers @ Denver -6.5 Total 216
I didnt even plan on conducting the FADE train tonight because of the fact that people who hopped on when I told them to in the beginning have guaranteed themselves profit for the rest of the regular season. But its a lot of stupidity out there and guys still thinking the Lakers are worth betting so it looks like its going to start up again.
I'm actually rooting for the Lakers to cover tonight because going 11-2 (85%) ATS in the past 13 just seems impossible. But then again, nothing is impossible when you have one player going for shots and shooting the team into tight games down the stretch.
Let's watch and see which way the team goes tonight because it would be a shame for the FADE train to have the same amount of wins as Bill Russell (winning 11 championships out of 13 years)
Let's watch and see which way the team goes tonight because it would be a shame for the FADE train to have the same amount of wins as Bill Russell (winning 11 championships out of 13 years)
11-3 ATS in the last 14 (78%)
Luke Walton, Lamar Odom, and Brian Cook (picking up the team's slack as usual) decided to sabatoge the FADE train tonight and there was a delay. The quest for tying Bill Russell was denied.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hustle_man:
Tonight's matchup -
Let's watch and see which way the team goes tonight because it would be a shame for the FADE train to have the same amount of wins as Bill Russell (winning 11 championships out of 13 years)
11-3 ATS in the last 14 (78%)
Luke Walton, Lamar Odom, and Brian Cook (picking up the team's slack as usual) decided to sabatoge the FADE train tonight and there was a delay. The quest for tying Bill Russell was denied.
Well its hard to get to the FT line when guys are jacking shots from the perimeter and not going to the basket. Not to mention the team was still in the game.
LOL @ you not mentioning a guy going 9-31 from the field and having a game high 5 turnovers as the problem.
When was the last time Michael Jordan stunk it up 3 games in a row when his team needed wins to clinch? Oh thats right, he played so well that his teams clinched back in March.
0
Quote Originally Posted by throwback420:
Lakers FT's 28
Nugz - 49 ft's
Well its hard to get to the FT line when guys are jacking shots from the perimeter and not going to the basket. Not to mention the team was still in the game.
LOL @ you not mentioning a guy going 9-31 from the field and having a game high 5 turnovers as the problem.
When was the last time Michael Jordan stunk it up 3 games in a row when his team needed wins to clinch? Oh thats right, he played so well that his teams clinched back in March.
With both teams needing a victory to get a playoff spot, which team will be victorious? The one hit wonders? Or the worst team in the history of Phil Jackson's career?
0
Tonight's matchup -
LA Clippers "@" LA Lakers -2.5 Total 197
With both teams needing a victory to get a playoff spot, which team will be victorious? The one hit wonders? Or the worst team in the history of Phil Jackson's career?
your hate on Kobe and The Lakers is a Joke Hustleman
When did pointing out the fact that the Lakers would start to lose after Phil Jackson said they were going to Bryant earlier in games equate to "hate"? The only people that hate it are people like you that lost ATS and SU playing on them.
Sorry to break it to you but when Bryant goes for the shots, the team is worse. LOL... And by the looks of your post, it looks like your bank account is in worse shape as well. Cant say I didnt warn you to stop betting on them though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by throwback420:
your hate on Kobe and The Lakers is a Joke Hustleman
When did pointing out the fact that the Lakers would start to lose after Phil Jackson said they were going to Bryant earlier in games equate to "hate"? The only people that hate it are people like you that lost ATS and SU playing on them.
Sorry to break it to you but when Bryant goes for the shots, the team is worse. LOL... And by the looks of your post, it looks like your bank account is in worse shape as well. Cant say I didnt warn you to stop betting on them though.
With both teams needing a victory to get a playoff spot, which team will be victorious? The one hit wonders? Or the worst team in the history of Phil Jackson's career?
nice write up
0
Quote Originally Posted by hustle_man:
Tonight's matchup -
LA Clippers "@" LA Lakers -2.5 Total 197
With both teams needing a victory to get a playoff spot, which team will be victorious? The one hit wonders? Or the worst team in the history of Phil Jackson's career?
One team was a win away from the Western conference finals last year and this year cant even make the playoffs. On the other side, you have a team that even if they go 4-0 in their last 4, will finish with the worst record of any Phil Jackson coached team... Even the 1993-1994 Powerhouse Chicago Bulls team that boasted an star studded lineup of Bill Wennington, Pete Myers, BJ Armstrong, Stacey King, and Bill Cartwright
0
Quote Originally Posted by throwback420:
nice write up
Thanks.
One team was a win away from the Western conference finals last year and this year cant even make the playoffs. On the other side, you have a team that even if they go 4-0 in their last 4, will finish with the worst record of any Phil Jackson coached team... Even the 1993-1994 Powerhouse Chicago Bulls team that boasted an star studded lineup of Bill Wennington, Pete Myers, BJ Armstrong, Stacey King, and Bill Cartwright
With both teams needing a victory to get a playoff spot, which team will be victorious? The one hit wonders? Or the worst team in the history of Phil Jackson's career?
As predicted, the one hit wonders pull out the win. The FADE train still rolling along nicely.
LOL... The Lakers havent beaten a team with a winning record in almost 2 months.
And people are still betting on them.
12-3 ATS since the FADE train took off but it wouldnt be possible without our favorite player shooting the team out of the game again.
Kobe Bryant
0
Quote Originally Posted by hustle_man:
With both teams needing a victory to get a playoff spot, which team will be victorious? The one hit wonders? Or the worst team in the history of Phil Jackson's career?
As predicted, the one hit wonders pull out the win. The FADE train still rolling along nicely.
LOL... The Lakers havent beaten a team with a winning record in almost 2 months.
And people are still betting on them.
12-3 ATS since the FADE train took off but it wouldnt be possible without our favorite player shooting the team out of the game again.
This thread should be a sticky in the basketball forum. It would've MADE and SAVED guys a lot of money. As evidence proved tonight, guys are STILL betting on the most fraudulent team in all of basketball.
0
This thread should be a sticky in the basketball forum. It would've MADE and SAVED guys a lot of money. As evidence proved tonight, guys are STILL betting on the most fraudulent team in all of basketball.
Three more games to fade the Lakers. Season total was set at 41.5 by Vegas. They should lose to the Suns and Queens. And they should beat the Sonics. So they will finish with 41 wins to screw the over season bettors. Then they should miss the playoffs
0
Three more games to fade the Lakers. Season total was set at 41.5 by Vegas. They should lose to the Suns and Queens. And they should beat the Sonics. So they will finish with 41 wins to screw the over season bettors. Then they should miss the playoffs
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.