So a -105 team is $1312 to win $1250 and a +105 team is $1190 to win $1250. I thought it was pretty black and white haha. Every wager I make throughout the year is to win 2.5% of the starting bankroll (my January 1st bankroll).
Sports gambling is a hard way to make an easy living.
0
So a -105 team is $1312 to win $1250 and a +105 team is $1190 to win $1250. I thought it was pretty black and white haha. Every wager I make throughout the year is to win 2.5% of the starting bankroll (my January 1st bankroll).
Sports gambling is a hard way to make an easy living.
" Every wager I make throughout the year is to win 2.5% of the starting bankroll (my January 1st bankroll)."
Ok, I understand your methodology in betting 2.5% of your starting BR on January 01. However as the seasom progresses your original BR will fluctuate either + or -. So in a dynamic sense there will be times when you are betting more than 2.5% of your current BR and vice versa.IE:, your BR decreases to 40 K and yet you still choose to make a wager to win 1250 which is now 3.13% of your current BR.Can you see the confusion from my point of view?
0
" Every wager I make throughout the year is to win 2.5% of the starting bankroll (my January 1st bankroll)."
Ok, I understand your methodology in betting 2.5% of your starting BR on January 01. However as the seasom progresses your original BR will fluctuate either + or -. So in a dynamic sense there will be times when you are betting more than 2.5% of your current BR and vice versa.IE:, your BR decreases to 40 K and yet you still choose to make a wager to win 1250 which is now 3.13% of your current BR.Can you see the confusion from my point of view?
" Every wager I make throughout the year is to win 2.5% of the starting bankroll (my January 1st bankroll)."
Ok, I understand your methodology in betting 2.5% of your starting BR on January 01. However as the seasom progresses your original BR will fluctuate either + or -. So in a dynamic sense there will be times when you are betting more than 2.5% of your current BR and vice versa.IE:, your BR decreases to 40 K and yet you still choose to make a wager to win 1250 which is now 3.13% of your current BR.Can you see the confusion from my point of view?
Not that hard to understand. Every wager is to win 2.5% of my STARTING bankroll, so yes as the year goes on my bankroll goes up but I didn't state that I wager to win 2.5% of my current bankroll haha. You get it now?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Allison_Road:
" Every wager I make throughout the year is to win 2.5% of the starting bankroll (my January 1st bankroll)."
Ok, I understand your methodology in betting 2.5% of your starting BR on January 01. However as the seasom progresses your original BR will fluctuate either + or -. So in a dynamic sense there will be times when you are betting more than 2.5% of your current BR and vice versa.IE:, your BR decreases to 40 K and yet you still choose to make a wager to win 1250 which is now 3.13% of your current BR.Can you see the confusion from my point of view?
Not that hard to understand. Every wager is to win 2.5% of my STARTING bankroll, so yes as the year goes on my bankroll goes up but I didn't state that I wager to win 2.5% of my current bankroll haha. You get it now?
why are you on the giants -3, have you seen eli mannings stats against the bears in his career? just wondering why this would be your play of the day
Large reason is to do with Chicago's weak secondary this season and I feel that Eli will exploit this, especially with Manningham back from injury tomorrow. The public will be all over Chicago thanks to the 3-0 start and the MNF win last week versus Green Bay, but coming off a short weak to play a NY Giants team that was favored to win their division. NYG are off to a 1-2 start and I expect a big game from Manning and this Giants football team, at home on National TV. I'd imagine 75% of the public is on Chicago and the line is Chicago +3 +115??? Goodluck on Sunday/Monday guys.
0
Quote Originally Posted by willneverstop:
why are you on the giants -3, have you seen eli mannings stats against the bears in his career? just wondering why this would be your play of the day
Large reason is to do with Chicago's weak secondary this season and I feel that Eli will exploit this, especially with Manningham back from injury tomorrow. The public will be all over Chicago thanks to the 3-0 start and the MNF win last week versus Green Bay, but coming off a short weak to play a NY Giants team that was favored to win their division. NYG are off to a 1-2 start and I expect a big game from Manning and this Giants football team, at home on National TV. I'd imagine 75% of the public is on Chicago and the line is Chicago +3 +115??? Goodluck on Sunday/Monday guys.
I like your tact, class and style - I am adding myself to your band of merry men who like to win. I had already put a play in on CHI earlier in the week when I swore I would not bet the NYG again this season, but I have got to admit, your reasoning plays out on this and I will cancel out my CHI play and get on the NYG.
Good Luck Robin Hood
0
I like your tact, class and style - I am adding myself to your band of merry men who like to win. I had already put a play in on CHI earlier in the week when I swore I would not bet the NYG again this season, but I have got to admit, your reasoning plays out on this and I will cancel out my CHI play and get on the NYG.
HOOD...Great Capping on Mich st ...Looked like a trap at first glance...But you showed us the way,,,,Thanks for the Work.
BOL TODAY ROBIN AND ALL TAILERS.....
Some people thought it was a trap .. when you have a team as underdog at home, it is never a trap. Learn that. The trap was Michigan at Indiana (with Indiana covering and almost winning), not Michigan State at home versus a ranked opponent. Michigan was on the road looking ahead to Michigan State, Michigan State was at home looking to beat ranked Wisconsin.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PLAYAAAA1969:
HOOD...Great Capping on Mich st ...Looked like a trap at first glance...But you showed us the way,,,,Thanks for the Work.
BOL TODAY ROBIN AND ALL TAILERS.....
Some people thought it was a trap .. when you have a team as underdog at home, it is never a trap. Learn that. The trap was Michigan at Indiana (with Indiana covering and almost winning), not Michigan State at home versus a ranked opponent. Michigan was on the road looking ahead to Michigan State, Michigan State was at home looking to beat ranked Wisconsin.
Thanks guys goodluck tonight hope you had a great day, my buddy wen't 2-0 today with Houston and St. Louis. I'll keep trying to pressure him into posting as well for you guys. Goodluck.
0
Thanks guys goodluck tonight hope you had a great day, my buddy wen't 2-0 today with Houston and St. Louis. I'll keep trying to pressure him into posting as well for you guys. Goodluck.
I have an interesting MLB Playoff System that I have tracked for years, which i'll post tomorrow. It revolves around betting the O/U. I don't follow the system to a tee, but it does help me to make a few selections during the playoffs.
0
I have an interesting MLB Playoff System that I have tracked for years, which i'll post tomorrow. It revolves around betting the O/U. I don't follow the system to a tee, but it does help me to make a few selections during the playoffs.
The below is quoting myself from what I posted in another thread I just started titled Robin Hoods: MLB PLAYOFF SYSTEM. I'll keep track of all of the results in that thread, not this one.
I will not be betting all of these wagers, but i'll use this thread to track the results of the system this. I will wager on a few of the system plays but only the ones I like, you should NEVER use a system to make your predictions because no system can stand the test of time. Use the information I post to suplement your own ideas and predictions.
The System
Bet the UNDER in Game 1 and Game 7 of every MLB Playoff Series. It is as simple as that!
Past Results
(Betting the under to win 1 unit on each wager)
Past four years: 20-9 (69%) +10.1 units
2010: 5-2 +2.8 units
2009: 6-2 +3.8 units
2008: 4-4 -0.4 units
2007: 5-1 +3.9 units
'Taking from the Rich and Giving to the Poor'
Robin Hood
0
The below is quoting myself from what I posted in another thread I just started titled Robin Hoods: MLB PLAYOFF SYSTEM. I'll keep track of all of the results in that thread, not this one.
I will not be betting all of these wagers, but i'll use this thread to track the results of the system this. I will wager on a few of the system plays but only the ones I like, you should NEVER use a system to make your predictions because no system can stand the test of time. Use the information I post to suplement your own ideas and predictions.
The System
Bet the UNDER in Game 1 and Game 7 of every MLB Playoff Series. It is as simple as that!
Thanks again Robin for another great pick with the G-Men! Have you ever tried a martingale chase system? seeing as how you win 60% of your games... you could probably pull off a pretty solid 5 game martingale system. Just curious thats all. thanks bro.
0
Thanks again Robin for another great pick with the G-Men! Have you ever tried a martingale chase system? seeing as how you win 60% of your games... you could probably pull off a pretty solid 5 game martingale system. Just curious thats all. thanks bro.
Thanks again Robin for another great pick with the G-Men! Have you ever tried a martingale chase system? seeing as how you win 60% of your games... you could probably pull off a pretty solid 5 game martingale system. Just curious thats all. thanks bro.
The martingale system is for suckers. I learned my lesson that this is not the way to increase your bankroll years ago.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GoTribe1986:
Thanks again Robin for another great pick with the G-Men! Have you ever tried a martingale chase system? seeing as how you win 60% of your games... you could probably pull off a pretty solid 5 game martingale system. Just curious thats all. thanks bro.
The martingale system is for suckers. I learned my lesson that this is not the way to increase your bankroll years ago.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.