What’s up with these hair do's that Morant and Dillon have?

Are these guys gay? Jordan Clarkson has to have the worst do! I could never imagine Michael Jordan having a do like that back in the day. If they are gay I understand. 

dillon looks like a 2k npc

@buffer

Ehhhhh, back then they have Rodman so can’t judge today. Can’t say Jordan could’ve done it without the worm

I think the 3 users that liked first post should be excluded from voting and having children, either through conception or adoption.

Morant will change his hairdo at halftime sometimes watch out for that 

@buffer

 You're gay.

Dillion brooks is dumpster juice.. and I’m here for it 

Why do you care about a basketball players haircut ?? 

They think they are Crips Gang  assholes

The real problem is ice trays nasty hair

That dude Dillon looks pathetic. I’m embarrassed for him. His hairdo is one of the more significant reasons I can’t see Memphis advancing in this series.

agree

Why is a straight man worried about another mans sexuality ???

@royboymiami

 Cause it ain't the norm.

This is a ignorant racist comment ...

What the fuck does a hairstyle have to do with gang bangers you should be banned instantly 

I'd bet my life savings he's gotten 100× more vag than you would in 10 life times 

These threads show what piece of shit ignorant morons are among us here on covers ..

You're an expert on young black men's hairstyles ???

Dillon Brooks hair guy looks like he is tring fit in.Cant believe his wife let him go out on the court like that.

What is with people wanting to ban free speech because they don't like what someone wrote about a haircut.

Free speech ??? 

Calling young black men clips, gang bangers,  and a holes bc of their haircuts IS Hate speech. 

You might want to learn how the first amendment works Brother 

@DoubleUp4Life

 I do not agree with crip etc comments made but i do stand for free speech. 
Hate speech in the United States cannot be directly regulated due to the fundamental right to freedom of speech protected by the Constitution.While “hate speech” is not a legal term in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that most of what would qualify as hate speech in other western countries is legally protected free speech under the First Amendment. In a Supreme Court case on the issue, Matal v. Tam (2017), the justices unanimously reaffirmed that there is effectively no "hate speech" exception to the free speech rights protected by the First Amendment and that the U.S. government may not discriminate against speech on the basis of the speaker’s viewpoint