Biden crime family exposed...

So the FBI, facing contempt of Congress charges, finally caves and brings the FD-1023 form. 

NBC News says Republicans attack Biden and his family. They also say democrats who saw the form have no comment. And NBC did not report what was said on the form. 

So what does the form say? President Joe Biden was allegedly paid $5 million by an executive of the Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings, where his son Hunter Biden sat on the board, a confidential human source told the FBI during a June 2020 interview.

The FD-1023 form, dated June 30, 2020, is the FBI's interview with a "highly credible" confidential source who detailed multiple meetings and conversations he or she had with a top Burisma executive over the course of several years, starting in 2015.

The Burisma executive sought the advice of the confidential source, a business professional, on gaining U.S. oil rights and getting involved with a U.S. oil company, the sources familiar with the document said. The Burisma executive was speaking with the confidential source to "get advice on the best way to go forward" in 2015 and 2016.

The Burisma executive explained to the confidential source that Burisma had to "pay the Bidens" because Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin was investigating Burisma, and explained how difficult it would be to enter the U.S. market in the midst of that investigation.

$5 million for one Biden, $5 million for the other Biden," the Burisma executive told the confidential human source, according to a source familiar with the document.

The confidential source said the Burisma executive told him he "paid" the Bidens in such a manner "through so many different bank accounts" that investigators would not be able to "unravel this for at least 10 years."

The Burisma executive told the confidential source that he "didn’t pay the Big Guy directly."

Biden has acknowledged that when he was vice president, he successfully pressured Ukraine to fire prosecutor Viktor Shokin. At the time, Shokin was investigating Burisma Holdings, and at the time, Hunter had a highly-lucrative role on the board receiving thousands of dollars per month. The then-vice president threatened to withhold $1 billion of critical U.S. aid if Shokin was not fired.

So like Hunter's laptop it appears the FBI just sat on this info. 

The president's financial filings reveal that he declared almost $7million more income on his tax returns than he did on his government transparency reports. Some of that difference can be accounted for with salaries earned by First Lady Jill Biden and other sums not required on his reports – but still leaves $5.2million earned by Joe's company and not listed on his transparency reports. 

Seems rather obvious that the FBI stalled with releasing the form so the Trump indictment could take center stage and deflect for Biden.

The timing couldn't be choregraphed any better.

Democrat Raskin of oversight committee said the bribery allegations are based on secondhand hearsay and have been debunked during a 2020 review by justice department under Trump administration.  FBI and justice department determined no further investigation was necessary.

@UNIMAN

 Yeah, kind of like the timing of an IRS agent showing up at a Matt Taibbi's home while he was testifying before Congress about the Twitter files.

Yeah, kind of like the timing of the FBI raiding Texas Dem Henry Cuellar's home right before his election primary. Cuellar was publicly critical of the handling of the border. Even their own kind not immune from nazi tactics if they step out of line. A great warning shot to others who don't tow the line. 

NOT TRUE according to Bill Barr.

Barr said Raskin was "confused" in his description of the "process" and "nature of the exercise

We also wanted to protect the integrity of the investigations that were going on," Barr said. "So this was a screening, a clearinghouse function to check evidence out before sending it to the ongoing investigations."

It was through the Pittsburgh process that the information from the FBI-1023 document came about, Barr said, however disagreeing with Raskin's suggestion that Giuliani played any part in that.

It was stuff that was developed within the department and the FBI from a confidential human source. And that information was checked out and it was determined that it was not likely to have been disinformation," he said.

Barr said that investigation, being led by Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney David Weiss – whom Biden retained to purportedly avoid conflict of interest questions – is doing a lot of damage to the nation and the DOJ because of Weiss' "silence" and failure to reach a prosecutorial decision.

"I think it's time to fish or cut bait and find out what actually happened in that investigation," he said.

They sit on the crackhead s  laptop , for years... kilary computer hammered, biden has documents from his time in congress which is illegal , nothing ... yet trump gets this right before the next election.   A bs political stunt.  Only proves more that pedophile joe and his party of perverts, pronouns and liars know they can't steal another election. So. they weaponize agencies to silent opposition.   

No hammer, she BLEACHBIT the server. 

Politico 2016; She and her lawyers had those emails deleted. And they didn’t just push the delete button; they had them deleted where even God can’t read them,” Gowdy said Thursday morning during an interview on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom.” “They were using something called BleachBit. You don’t use BleachBit for yoga emails or bridemaids emails. When you’re using BleachBit, it is something you really do not want the world to see.” 

@UNIMAN

 Bill Barr also said about Trump “ This particular episode of trying to retrieve those documents, the government acted responsibly,” he said. “And it was Donald J. Trump who acted irresponsibly I have been at his side defending against them when he is a victim. But this is much different. He is not a victim here. He was totally wrong that he had the right to have those documents. Those documents are among the most sensitive secrets the country has.”….I would guess this Barr opinion hogwash ?

@scooby-doos

 If you have top secret documents in your garage and in your library you know you have them. Not like oops where did those come from. And retained them for years. Took them as Senator and took them as vice-president. And what are the topics of these Biden files?? Ukraine? Burisma maybe?? 

Amazing what this country has become.

Has Barr read the documents? How would he know they are "most sensitive secrets"? 

Yes, I guess his opinion is based on hearsay. 

Now the left is freaking out that the judge is not one of their own Trump haters. Famous phrase "experts say" being invoked. 

"Hillary Clinton used a hammer to destroy evidence of a private e-mail server and classified information on that server and was never indicted. The same standard should apply to everyone, including Donald Trump," Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C. tweeted Sunday. 

The claim drew a sharp response from Olbermann, who suggested that the Congresswoman was not in the proper mental state to understand reality. 

You know that didn't happen, right? Are you ok? You seem to have been hallucinating a lot lately," Olbermann told Mace. 

CNN published a video on Clinton's devices scandal: "FBI: Clinton staff destroyed devices with hammers." Business Insider covered the same story back in 2016: "FBI: Aide destroyed 2 of Clinton's phones by ‘breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer.’" And Snopes, a fact-checking website, found that "[o]ne of Hillary Clinton's aides told the FBI that on two occasions he disposed of her unwanted mobile devices by breaking or hammering them."

Maybe your weed is stale. Who’s hallucinating now?" Mace tweeted back at Olbermann. 

These people lie just like Joe. No wonder they support him!

FBI investigation found no evidence of intentional misconduct in Hillary Clinton case.  Just extreme carelessness in handling documents which isn't a crime.  For security, reasonable for aides to destroy phones.  Key difference is that Clinton, Pence and Biden cooperate with investigations while Trump repeatedly refuses.

Three of the FBI’s four investigations that were launched in early 2016 were looking into allegations that the Clinton Foundation has a hub of “criminal activity.”

Those federal probes originated from field offices in Little Rock, Arkansas, Washington, DC and New York — all of which opened audits into the charity as Hillary was in the midst of her presidential run.

The Little Rock and New York offices were investigating a claim that an outside commercial industry “likely engaged a federal public official in a flow of benefits scheme, namely, large monetary contributions were made to a non-profit, under both direct and indirect control of the federal public official, in exchange for favorable government action and/or influence,” according to the Durham report.

The DC investigation was based on allegations that the Clintons accepted millions in donations from foreign governments — as well as massive Russian corporations — in an attempt to influence US foreign policy dating back to Hillary’s days as Secretary of State, as outlined by political consultant Peter Schweizer in his book “Clinton Cash.”

The fourth investigation looked into allegations made by a “well-placed” source that Hillary continued accepting those illegal donations throughout her presidential campaign.

This was a pattern. As Durham found, even when there may have been evidence that foreign powers were trying to cultivate Clinton and possibly try to bring her under their influence, the same FBI that couldn’t open a case on Trump fast enough became paralyzed.

Durham noted that in 2014 — i.e., before Clinton even formally announced her candidacy — the bureau got information about a foreign government’s effort to have one of its operatives contribute to Clinton’s campaign.

But when agents in one of field office sought to conduct FISA counterintelligence surveillance, their request sat at FBI headquarters for months with no action taken. 

In late July 2016, the FBI’s then-director, James Comey, was briefed that U.S. spy agencies had intercepted a Russian intelligence analysis that Clinton had approved a plan by her campaign to smear Trump as an asset of the Kremlin. The FBI appeared to ignore this information. 

 trump crime family

Multiple investigations found no evidence of misconduct in Clinton foundation.  Justice department acknowledges there is no case to bring.  No evidence that donations influence Clinton job in government.  Charity watchdogs gave Clinton foundation the highest approval ratings.  In contrast, New York court order forces Trump foundation to clissolve and pay $2 million for charity fraud.

And that says it all, doesn't it? Trump foundation commits a couple of errors and out they go. Gavin Newsom's wife charity out of compliance continued without a problem. Trumps corp leader hands out perks that all corporations do and have done since I was born and New York puts him in jail.

Hilliary destroys evidence, that's called OBSTRUCTION, and the result is "no evidence" found. No kidding. 

What do the charity watchdogs say about all the charity that went the Biden family's way? 

The Clinton Foundation; https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-clinton-foundation-is-dead-but-the-case-against-hillary-isnt/

Using the Freedom of Information Act, Judicial Watch in August obtained emails (that had been hidden from investigators) showing that Clinton's top State Department aide, Huma Abedin, had given "special expedited access to the secretary of state" for those who gave $25,000 to $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. Many of those were facilitated by a former executive of the foundation, Doug Band, who headed Teneo, a shell company that managed the Clintons' affairs.

Of the 154 private interests who either officially met or had scheduled phone talks with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state, at least 85 were donors to the Clinton Foundation or one of its programs.

The foundation is a massive family enterprise disguised as a charity, an opaque and elaborate mechanism for sucking money from the rich and the tyrannous to be channeled to Clinton Inc.," he wrote. "Its purpose is to maintain the Clintons' lifestyle (offices, travel accommodations, etc.), secure profitable connections, produce favorable publicity and reliably employ a vast entourage of retainers, ready to serve today and at the coming Clinton Restoration."

There is a reason the foundation just closed up shop after she lost the election. 

A little more to chew on; https://www.politico.com/sponsor-content/2016/08/inconvenient-truths-about-clinton-foundation

And....The Obama administration DOJ rejected requests from three FBI field offices that wanted to open public corruption cases involving the Clinton Foundation and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

The two-tiered-justice system is in full effect.   As you allude to, what happened to Clinton and that destroying of evidence... i.e. destroying hard drives. 

The media will cover up what has taken place by dems.... are the people smart enough to see through this hypocrisy