Father Debunks Critical Race Theory In Incredible Speech: ‘How Am I Oppressed With Two Degrees?’

This guys argument is to compare the public school system indoctrinating kids to q anon indoctrinating people. 

And he thinks he made a good point. 

the problem is that it exposes the rumplicker racists

that would b the vast majority of the 75m repos who voted against democracy in last presidential election

Look at Kelly and Fubah comments. 

These are grown men around my fathers age.

They think they’re on to something.  

u make great points

crt seems to only offends RACISTS

detox is offended by crt

You have strong opinions for someone who has no idea how CRT is taught. 

You should probably STFU and go do some reading. 

Democrats in 2021 

Good winning points,  Deezy!  You win yet another debate   

even though detox mom is shouting at him to get to bed, so soon he will sign off after declaring HIMSELF the victor.

Just watch.

Deezy is talking about something he knows nothing about. 

Kelly and Fubah sound like two people with mild cognitive impairment at best or lifelong retards at worst. 

This is the majority of the Democratic Party in 2021. 

racists oppose crt being taught

The cognitive impairment twins 

This is empirically true.

You should take your own advice. 

The funny thing is that you actually know nothing about CRT, other than blanket statements you hear  on Tucker Carlson.

Post a course curriculum from a school that teaches CRT, since you claim to be well read on it. From any high school or public university in America. I'll wait. Guarantee you can't and won't produce one. 

Show me that the main purpose of the course is to show that "any policy that creates inequitable outcomes between people of different skin colors is racism.

I know you can't because you just make $hit up or pull $hit you hear from Tucker and pass it as fact to fit your racist narrative. 

The real purpose of CRT is to show that racism is embedded in political, social, and economic institutions historically. Not whatever BS you tried to make up above. 

Sounds like you are the one that is not well read. 

Not whatever BS I tried to make up above? 

Let me educate you. 

This is “How To Be Anti Racist” by Ibram Kendi 

This is a book used to teach CRT. 

Look at the 2nd paragraph under synopsis. 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Be_an_Antiracist

It always amazes me how stupid Democrats are. 

Educate yourself before speaking next time 

Everything I say can always be backed up by a source. I’m not like you idiots. 

Do you even realize how dumb you are? So you pull up one book by a single author on the topic of Critical Race Theory and think you got me???

So that is how one author that contributes to CRT defines racism, so what?

There aren't any other books or authors on CRT out there that will be taught or debated in schools?

Every school and class will be using this author's book and single definition of racism for CRT?

Geezus you are dumb, and probably the most shallow person in this forum. 

You think every class is taught the same way? Uses a single book as the course text across the country? Thank goodness I didn't grow up in your school system if so. 

You realize that CRT has been around for decades right? Long-before the book you linked, which was written in 2019.

Here let me help you,

"In 1995, Gloria Ladson-Billings and William F. Tate began applying the critical race theory framework in the field of education, moving it beyond the field of legal scholarship. They sought to better understand inequities in the context of schooling."

Here is another book on CRT written 1995 by Crenshaw

https://www.amazon.com/Critical-Race-Theory-Writings-Movement/dp/1565842715

This author's definition of CRT is as follows,

"It's an approach to grappling with a history of white supremacy that rejects the belief that what's in the past is in the past, and that the laws and systems that grow from that past are detached from it."

There is no single or universal framework for examining or describing CRT nitwit.

Many different authors and scholars have and continue to contribute the discipline and theory. 

This guy finds a single author he doesn't like and assumes that is the only book and definition of CRT. 

It's unreal how dumb you are. 

You showed me a book by a single author.

I asked you to show me a high school or college course or class that is based upon this single definition of CRT, which of course, you could not do because all you do is talk out of your A$$ and make assumptions. 

You do not think social media indoctrinates kids in today's world, and you claim you are a critical thinker?? 

Yeah only public schools, most that do not even teach CRT, are the only socializing force in today's society. Kids aren't on social media.

Your ignorance is shining bright today. 

First you said I made up the quote or heard it from Tucker Carlson. 

I provided the author who is also regarded as a CRT expert. 

Then you say “who cares what he says”. 

First you compared the indoctrination of our kids in public schools to q anon. Now it’s not a anon, it’s all of social media. 

Looks like your two brain cells are fighting. 

              Yes,  that is typical

Continue proving you lack the critical thinking skills required to break down the comparison. 

The fact you think one author or "expert" on CRT somehow controls how CRT will be taught in every school across the nation shows what a moron you are. 

The author I noted Crenshaw also an "expert on CRT" and a pioneer in the field. There are many. 

Again, develop a broader world view and critical thinking skills before you respond to me further. 

I didn't discredit his definition. I simply said his definition is not universally accepted as the ONLY definition of CRT. There is a difference. 

I understand it is very difficult for you to develop advanced thinking skills. I cannot help you if you are too blind to see how conspiracy groups like Q and other far right indoctrinating our kids and teens is problematic. It's rather sad that between the two you think CRT is worse. 

Pretty much sums up you though. 

This idiot keeps comparing stuff found online to stuff taught in public schools. 

I honestly don’t think I know one intelligent democrat anymore. 

Yeah you are just a model of intelligence (Sarcasm). 

Christ you are shallow. Q is not just followed online you moron, your GOP party has a few them sitting in Congress dumbfU$k, spreading that BS. 

Keep trying to downplay it, a week ago you were claiming there was nothing wrong with conspiracy theories, and that conspiracies aren't a big deal and we should embrace them, but yes it's CRT we should all fear.

Who cares if it's taught in public schools versus online? Kids saturate more BS online and social media today, than schools. You think learning online is less influential to young impressionable kids and teens? With no filters?

Every post you create further shows your ignorance. 

Please stop responding to me